Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
The scene takes place in the mining industry somewhere in Australia. It is in the early hours of the morning, a time for thinking and philosophising. A group of workers, mates, are talking and thinking about life at work. They are musing about the never-ending mysteries of what goes on in the workplace, and in particular how managers never seem to hit the mark of mutual understanding.
âItâs as though we speak a different language on the job, and the strange thing is that when we all go for a beer, the problem disappears.â
âThatâs not my biggest problem, what bothers me is why managers rarely seem to do what they say they will do. They just donât walk the talk.â
âYeah...and then when we ask them something, they always seem to hide something â how can they expect us to give our all when they donât share things with us?â
âNot only thatâ, comes another response, âmanagers always act as though someone â some unseen force â is pulling their strings. Reminds you of Star Trek.â
âThatâs true. I suppose theyâve got pressure on them too â and all those bloody stupid rules...â
âRules, rules, rules, sometimes you feel so boxed in that you arenât sure that you should go âyou know whereâ without checking on a rule,â sighed one of the group, an old timer.
âThe strange thing is,â says one of the newcomers to the shift team, âwe seem so near and yet so far. These guys in management are really decent people and yet they just donât get how we think and what we need.â
âAnd whatâs more,â says his mate, âI think they feel the same about us. If you ask me, we are all boxed in, and from what I can see, it can get very comfortable in these boxes. I havenât been here all that long but it all becomes so bloody boring. Youâre glad to get home and feel that youâre something more than an extra set of arms and legs. At least your kids think that your brains are worth picking. What I would really like is help on how to make my work life and my home life similar in the things that matter. I donât want an imbalance between work and home as though one were the enemy. I want one to be a part of the other.â
They stared morosely into their coffees and pondered on the double lives they seemed to live â one at work where they were boxed in, often of their own doing â and one where they could think for themselves, take a chance, make some mistakes and still come up smiling.
In another area of the factory, a group of managers are talking.
âI honestly donât understand them. Theyâre bickering and complaining about so many stupid things. Iâve tried to tell them what I know, but it seems like they just donât trust us.â
âYeah, itâs the same old thing. You try to do your best for them and they just want to keep on and on about the same old things.â
âYou know, I asked for some help the other day with a break down, but do you think anyone wanted to stay back and help?â
âTheyâre not a bad lot you know, my kids go to the same school as some of their children, so we meet sometimes outside of work. Itâs just that theyâre not enthusiastic. But how can we make it different for them?â
We could peek in on such conversations all over Australia and not only in the mining industry. Almost since the first organizational forms and formats were invented, there has been a very visible âus and themâ way of thinking. It may be a bit unkind to call it âmanagers think and workers doâ as Fredrick Taylor1, the famous scientific manager suggested, but we must admit that in deed if not in word, this is sometimes what we see.2
In this book, we are facing such problems head on. Basing ourselves in large organizations that have asked themselves the hard questions and gone on to do something about them in practice, we listen and learn as managers and workers tell us their stories. We will present them to you, the reader, to strike a chord with some of the experiences you have gained as you have gone through working life. Some of these may have kept you awake too, as you may have watched your best efforts dissolve into cynicism, resentment, or worst of all, apathy. As workers, you may have marvelled at how much of your talent and creative thinking has been untapped, seemingly unneeded. In fact you may not have even recognised that you had any particular talent if it was left to the workplace.
Following this introduction is a chapter we have called âThe Dance and the Musicâ. We identify the need to dance a new dance to the old music, working together within boundaries, however, departing from the ordinary or usual. We take a look at the nature and models of change and through this learn why identifying the nature of variables is so important in strategy, change and leadership. We present here some ideas and principles that scholors have contributed to our thinking.
When you leave this, you will meet the chapter on mechanistic management. We are fairly critical here as the lack of deep and fundamental criticism is something that this style of management has, perhaps, suffered from in the past. We maintain that some of the mechanisms we talk about such as rules, regulations, and procedures are necessary if not vital to keep organizations safe and legal. However, as you see in our âyinâ and âyangâ figures, too much âmechanisticsâ inevitably leads to too little liberation of people to exercise their wisdom, understanding and individual/collective knowledge and experience. From chapter four, we take you to the transformational edge. In fact, we do no more than mirror the world as it is for most of us anyway. Thankful though we are to have some certainty, work premises, car parks, routines and so on, the âinsideâ of organizational life is fraught with the unexpected. Sometimes this is a delight and sometimes a worry, but never is it as boring and controlled as the most avid mechanistic manager might believe. In chapter four, then, we talk about learning to lead and manage in a world that is far from certain, in which, for many things, there is far from any agreement. We owe a debt here to many writers and scholars who have helped us to translate theories of transformation in to practices such as the extraordinary leadership workshop, designed and facilitated by David (and we have all helped at times). It gives us pride to say that upward of five thousand people have attended the workshop which, in its full form, is a week-long residential. In this chapter, we introduce some terms from complexity theory and you will find them, referred to throughout the book, either as concepts or practices.
Chapter five is our âreflection and making senseâ chapter. Here, we outline the ideas and concepts first as they compare with the ones we have used in chapter three and then, in part two, the ones that are almost unnecessary in mechanistic management but come very much to the fore in extraordinary leadership. These are mostly relational and we use some of the metaphors and ideas from complexity theory to offset the trap of explaining an exciting future in the words and images of the past. As the famous philosopher, Wittgenstein, said âwe are prisoners in the cage of our languageâ. This is why you will meet terms like the strange attractor and fractals to project images of âorganizational magnetâ and âself similar but uniquely different behaviourâ that these two terms portray.
Following the reflections chapter, we introduce the âExtraordinary Leadership Programâ we talked about earlier in the introduction. Words can not convey the experience of watching people work in a non-hierarchical environment where they gradually, over the week, âfindâ resources, skills and talents that they did not know or even remotely suspect they had. The chapter describes the workshop itself, and we have persuaded David that it would not be too immodest to share just a few of the reactions and reflections of those who attended various workshops. For the mechanistic leader, the workshop might come under the heading of âdanger, whole people at workâ.
One of the syndromes of the last twenty or so years is that of political correctness. It has not been OK for some time now to be considered as a poor corporate citizen whether this is inside or outside of the organization. This has resulted in many cases in declarations, in public and in the press such as âpeople are our greatest assetâ. Nice to hear, but do organizational structures and organizing practices bear scrutiny on this score? Does it matter and how would the manager/leader know? Stirred by one of these inspirational declarations in the press, and because only a few days before, workers were on strike not because of pay and conditions, but because they were not valued, the PATOP model was built. Basically this is a âwalk the talkâ diagnostic model for leaders, teams and even individuals to check out the talk and the walk. Thanks to the devotion and encouragement of many PATOP users over the years, we bring you an extended version which also deals with strategic change.
Following PATOP we bring to you a summary of extraordinary leadership and then in Chapter 9 we provide a possible lens through which we may understand why the journey along the path of extraordinary leadership may be difficult for some people.
The remaining chapters are stories from organizations who have transformed themselves in an extraordinary way. In doing this, we hope to convince readers that however much of a âmechanistic ceilingâ is above them, it is possible to take people to (and over) the transformational edge. We hear stories about the life of uncertainty and far-from-agreement that to us is much more realistic than the âfantasyâ one of control. Interestingly, in liberating people and coping with diminished opportunity for control, the leaders, especially those who have been in the workshop, find that productivity goes up, whatever the constraints and uncontrollable variables.
More than anything, we hope that you will enjoy being with us, sharing our ideas and experiences.
Notes
Chapter 2
THE DANCE AND THE MUSIC
Many managers are aware of the needs of the present and future. Pressures and problems are not only greater than ever before, but they are experiencing different problems. Their tried and tested solutions just donât seem to work anymore. The way we like to think of it is that managers are being asked to dance a new dance to the old music. Itâs here that we liken organizations to jazz players. They are working together, but improvising in ways that depart from the ordinary or usual, to deliver something new and exciting. Their music is eclectic, yet they are playing to the same tune.
In this chapter we are going to bring you some of the views of our favourite management scholars. In his book, âStrategic Management & Organizational Dynamicsâ, Ralph D. Stacey3 provides a useful and intriguing lens through which possible options for organizations can be explored. We would also like to acknowledge scholars such as Meg Wheatley4, the late Fred Emery5, and Bob Dick6, who we have quoted elsewhere as well as Stacey for their ideas and principles. These, presented with great scholarship, have contributed to our thinking. We add to their writings our experiences and ideas, focusing on the topic of strategic change.
Strategy, change and leadership go hand in hand. We believe that the ordinary methods of the past need to become the extraordinary ones of the future. We begin by looking at the nature of change.
Nature of Change
For Peter Senge7 and his colleagues, people seeking change in organizations may use many different labels (as we ourselves often do) but essentially Senge captures the essence of change.
[Organizations are] Trying to respond quickly to external changes and think more imaginatively about the future. They want better relationships with less game playing and more trust and openness. They want to unleash employeesâ natural talents and enthusiasm. They want to move genuinely close to their customers. Through all of this, they are striving to shape their destiny, and thereby achieve long-lasting financial success.
Many change writers and managers share some central ideas about what is involved when change happens. One is that change is really a feedback loop, and one that is not linear, but more resembling a series of interacting feedback loops, never still, always dynamic and coming in different guises.
For example, Senge talks about âfear and anxietyâ feedback loops, âno helpâ feedback loops, ânot relevantâ feedback loops, ânot enough timeâ feedback loops. Remember, these are all feeding back into the organizational system at varying times and with varying intensity. As he says succinctly, (p61) âIn any complex system...