Robots with AI - will they become like Humans?

Three worlds of different dimensions: calculat­ing, physical bodies, imagination with feelings

Maria Cura

• Publisher: Books on Demand
• Year: 2019
• Edition: 1
• eBook ISBN:
  9783739202044
• Topic: Informatica
• Subtopic: Informatica generale

We know at least three different worlds. These worlds differ in the number of dimensions they are moving in.There is the 1-dimensional world of calculating, of mathematics. It always uses and combines numbers, which all can be symbolized by a line of a certain length.Then there is our 3-dimensional physical world of bodies and energies - it exists on the timeline always only in one moment, in the moment, which we call "now".But in our mind the world is existing at least 4-dimensional. That means, we not only see and realize the "now-moment" in which our body is existing, we can remember past times and we can imagine future or fantastic times. And our feelings are connected with our remembering or with planning and hoping for a imagined future. So our feeling needs the 4-dimensional mind.A calculating robot is constructed with 3-dimensional materials, and it is steering 3-dimensional materials. Will that robot be it able to see the world like a living mind does see the world? The first spontaneous answer may be: yes. But is it really so? Or is there a fundamental difference? This is the question the book deals about.

The difference between the 1-dimensional mathematical world of numbers and the 3-dimensional physical world of bodies

Mathematics is operating with numbers. A number is 1-dimensional, every number can be expressed by the length of a line (the length between two points, which are the beginning and the end of the line).

 

And every calculation, how complex it might be, is consisting of these 1-dimensional numbers and the result is again a one-dimensional number, that can be symbolized by the length of a line. One could imagine the whole calculating operation as an operation, in which a line of a certain length gets diminished and or extended one time or many times after special rules. But all that can happen in the 1-dimensional world alone, without other dimensions.

 

And if one is calculating a figure with different angles, and this figure is therefore 2- or 3-dimensional? Then the angle can be expressed by a 1-dimensional number (and this number can say something about the length of two 1-dimensional lines in a triangle for example).

 

Everything from our physical body world needs to be reduced into 1-dimensional numbers, if it should become a part of a mathematical calculation. What cannot be 1-dimensional counted, that cannot be calculated. So emotions can only be part of a calculation, if the emotion is put into a number. That happens, when people give "likes" with a click in Internet for news or videos. Then the "likes" can be counted easily. Or another trick is, that a product in a shop can be valued by a number up to 5 points. Then the computer can count the points and calculate an average valuation.

 

Measuring for calculating means cutting down and breaking down the 3-dimensional world into 1-dimensional numbers.

 

The world can be described in mathematical terms - but only in a limited way from the outside or with the measuring or calculating of special points. But the whole inner meaning we can feel, can not be described by mathematical operations.

 

To make adding or diminishing in a calculation correctly corresponding to our world, there have been found formulas. By the way: to find formulas, something must be able to be repeated many times. But what is, if there are things, that happen only once or very seldom or not regularly? It may be, because there is a chaotic background, or we do know up to now nothing scientifically about such happenings - but does it mean, that then they are impossible - I think not. Formulas do guarantee (normally) that the result will be in the right relationship with some physical value in the 3-dimensional world. To make it identifiable, which physical sizes (measured sizes of the 3-dimensional world, expressed with a 1-dimensional number) go into a formula, the numbers get physical units like "km", "kg", "hour", "velocity" and so on. But nevertheless the numbers remain numbers, and one can calculate the same thing also without physical units, the result in numbers would be the same - one only would not know to what physical body unit this result would fit.

 

But the result is a 1-dimensional number (to which is added an physical unit to understand to where it is belonging in the 3-dimensional world). The result is never the 3-dimensional physical world itself. The result only symbolizes an analogy to the 3-dimensional world. That is also the reason, why a number can be attributed to everything. The number three for example can be attributed to apples (it then describes the number of apples), to kilometer, to ideas, to a chance to win, to minutes, to possible variations, to probability and so on. The number itself remains "untouched" by the unit that is written behind the number.

 

The 1-dimensional (symbolized in a straight line) offers possibilities in one direction only. There can be infinite lot of numbers on a line that are greater or smaller than one special number (for example there are infinite many numbers smaller than 2 and infinite many numbers bigger than 2. Even if it is a line for example limited between the numbers 0 and 3, there are infinite possible numbers, as the place behind the decimal point can be extended endlessly. But if one takes an 2-dimensional object (not a line, but an area like for example a rectangle), the possibilities are even more: infinite multiplied by infinite. This is, because besides the infinite number of points on one line, there is added an infinite number of possible lines. In the rectangle they can lay one beside the other. And because a pure line has no width, into a rectangle (or into any other area) fits an infinite number of lines. And if one takes an 3-dimensional object, there can be infinite 2-dimensional areas within the 3-dimensional object. And if time is added, the possibilities are even more, because in every moment the 3-dimensional object is no more exactly the same as a moment before, because the 3-dimensional object is aging. And perhaps the object itself or its surrounding is changing by aging.

 

Each dimension is adding more possibilities.

 

So in mathematics theoretically situations in many dimensions can be calculated with the right formula. But nevertheless the used numbers and the number-size of the result are 1-dimensional. Mathematics can calculate more dimensions, but the calculation itself remains always in the 1-dimensional world. One cannot touch or smell or hear the pure number (for example the number 5), it has no substance itself.

 

The higher-dimensional worlds have an inner aspect, that is no more calculable for the 1-dimensional mathematics. Mathematics uses values that describe limits, the numbers describe the beginning (starting-point), that is the number zero, and the end-point, that is telling the number, at which length the line would end, or where a room ends, or a situation is ended, or something is full, or something would change, and so on. The end-point of a number (its value) is always talking about the point, where something ends, something is limited. But a number never tells something of the situation in between. It is like the length of a way described as airline-distance or linear distance. But in reality, if a car drives this distance, it is a much longer way with a lot of curves. And for an crawling insect like an ant, it would even be much more longer, because it would have to crawl upside and down over every little stone. And a molecule would have to crawl inside every very small scar on a stone and out again. So the pure straight length between two points does not tell the whole reality.

 

In the 1-dimensional world, a line (symbolizing a number) is understood as to be straight. But is it really so? In the real more-dimensional world, the line could curve, it could swell, it could go through other times (perhaps in parallel worlds). So there could happen things, we do not know about, when we only look on the 1-dimensional world of calculating and mathematics.

 

And even, if everything that we calculate, "runs straight", it is not possible to calculate everything, just because of the immense number of influences physical objects are exposed to.

 

If we would try to calculate the future movement of every water-molecule within the ocean, we soon would see, that this is impossible. A water-molecule of the ocean is influenced by neighbor-molecules, these themselves are pushed around by their neighbor-molecules. The different temperature in different regions is playing a role, the wind, the rain, earthquakes, lava coming up in the ocean, the inside heat of our earth, sunshine and clouds, animals and plants within the ocean, human activities, chemical reactions in the ocean, changing gravitation by moon, sun and galaxy…

 

I cannot imagine an intelligent computer, that is able to put all these things in the calculations of each single water-molecule. I cannot imagine, how much Artificial Intelligence it would need. And then there as well are many chaotic systems in this oceanic world. These chaotic systems are not accurate calculable. They bring numbers in the formula, whose numbers in the places behind the comma are not ending. That has the effect, that by summing up all the minimal differences behind the comma, it might come to chaotic reactions, that might have a big influence, but could not be calculated before.

 

But the ocean does exist. It is a real 3-dimensional object. It has inner qualities, that cannot get perfect and wholly calculated. It can be measured (also only approximately) from outside, but its inner situation is no more describable, if one tries to be complete. Of course, special factors can be calculated. Calculating is good in isolating phenomena or by calculating the probability of future happenings of bigger units. But calculating is not able to describe the whole of 3-dimensional physical objects in every aspect. There is an inner abundance in the 3-dimensional real world, that never can be totally calculated.

 

But nevertheless: the 3-dimensional physical body world exists. And is it imaginable, that the atoms for example, always calculate their position and all the influences, that are having an effect on them? I can imagine better, that the 3-dimensional physical world is just existing by itself, following the nature laws without calculating them, by "knowing" how to "behave", just by it being, what it is. But perhaps this question, if nature is calculating, will never be answered.

Having a place

Real 3-dimensional physical objects have a certain place in a space of unknown width (universe) and in time of unknown length (perhaps eternity). And in this realm, whose limits are unknown to us, they are in relation to all the surroundings.

Calculation only can create relation with given data, each relationship has to be programmed. Reality is just as it is, and it is in relationship to all other physical objects.

Calculated "virtual objects" have no personal space and they have no personal time in the universe, no space or time that is reaching out over the small calculated realm, they are calculated in an anonymous realm, and they can be used for different objects. For example, the static of a house, calculated by an architect with a computer-program, this static is fitting for every house of the same type. While calculating, only the given data are put into relation to one another, but the calculated virtual object can be used where ever it is fitting - or also not at all.

Real 3-dimensional objects have a real place in our world, they are individualistic, they exist only once. Objects with the same shape, function and so on may exist more often, but each of these objects has its only single place in space and time. Objects are singular in the 3-dimensional world of bodies. They can change and they do change, but the substance and the energy of them do not...

Table of contents

• Dedicated to
• Thanks
• "The Fool on the Hill" - A Songtext from Paul McCartney
• Preface
• Description of the 4 dimensions: (point), line, area, room, time
• Three different worlds - differing into how many dimensions of the four basic dimensions the worlds are stretching out themselves
• The amazing working together of the 3-dimensional physical body world with the 4-dimensional imagination
• The difference between the 1-dimensional mathematical world of numbers and the 3-dimensional physical world of bodies
• Having a place
• Probability
• What is the difference between calculating the future or calculating by using past information and the remembering and imagining of my mind?
• Is God a huge calculating computer, creating our world by calculating it?
• Imagination
• Along the time-line
• Time - are there more dimensions of time?
• The inner free world of the 3-dimensional physical bodies
• Counting and calculating need time, and physical measuring is done by 3-dimensional objects
• What change does a higher dimension make: there are more of open possibilities and the ability to overview lower dimensions
• What does a lower dimension do to a higher dimension? It can block the view. It also is isolating objects by giving them a surface.
• Measuring and calculating as isolating process - higher dimensions are unifying and including inner possibilities
• The danger of a scientific reduced view onto the world
• Robots with AI: deceiving by clever imitation
• Is energy 4-dimensional, because it needs time for making a change? Is light close to the mind?
• Feeling - connected with 4-dimensional imagination and with remembering
• Will robots with AI be able to have emotions? And where could be found an emotion-particle, perhaps in electricity?
• The togetherness of calculating and feeling
• Will robots feel emotions like humans? And what, if not so?
• Over-viewing events, embedded in great time-spaces - is this 5-dimensional - when time itself gets not only a point or a line but a volume?
• Epilogue
• Copyright