1 âIâm getting out of here.â
October 1995. A glossy commercial for the Ford Mondeo, featuring the actor David Threlfall as a man who leaves Venice because he misses his motor-car, is being shown on British television. The Times publishes its Top 100 Cult Films: the holder of position number five is a âhypnotic chronicle of a death foretoldâ whose âhorrific, heart-stopping climax ⌠gives you an even bigger shock second time aroundâ. And Haunted, a ghost story starring Aidan Quinn and directed by Lewis Gilbert, is released in Britain. This pedestrian movie is enlivened by a seance attended by, among others, actress Hilary Mason. All three pay tribute to a film that was released in the same month twenty-two years ago: Nicolas Roegâs Donât Look Now.
The TV ad is a cunning pastiche of the movie: sun glinting on water, pigeons fluttering, thirty seductive seconds of perpetual motion. But, because cars would not sell if they were associated with corpses, the floating funeral cortège featured at the end of the film has been replaced by a wedding flotilla.
The four films that came higher in The Times list were, inevitably, Jim Sharmanâs The Rocky Horror Picture Show (1975); Performance (1970) â also directed by Roeg, with Donald Cammell; John Watersâs Pink Flamingos (1972); and Todd Browningâs Freaks (1932). The fact that Roegâs work figures twice in the top five testifies to his ability to hit a nerve â if not tap a vein â but the word âcultâ implies appreciation by a discriminating, or wilfully undiscriminating, few; and it is Roegâs uncompromising approach to his material that has occasionally caused him to be discriminated against. Donât Look Now, however, is one of his most accessible films and warrants a wider audience.
Hilary Mason plays Heather, the blind clairvoyant, in Donât Look Now. Haunted also refers to Roegâs film by way of plot, as well as echoing two other excellent British pictures of the 60s: Jack Claytonâs The Innocents (1961) and Robert Wiseâs The Haunting (1963). It is not surprising that a film made in the mid-90s should hark back to one made in the 70s: once seen, Donât Look Now is impossible to forget. If such disparate details are anything to go by, the film has made an indelible impression on the cinematic imagination, and Roeg, certainly the greatest living director in Britain, deserves wider recognition.
There was still another month to go till my eleventh birthday when Donât Look Now was given its British release on 16 October 1973. I did not get to see it until it was first shown on television six years later (by the BBC on 30 December 1979) but even then, besides scaring the hell out of me, it suddenly made me appreciate the true potential of cinema. Having been made to study the multiple intricacies of irony at school, I soon saw that even the title of the film was ironic: what it was really saying was âLook at Me!â
And Donât Look Now can be looked at in several ways: as a brilliant example of literary adaptation; as Gothic thriller; as black comedy; as an exploration of grief. As a teenager I was struck by the second; as a student I was impressed by the first; in my twenties I appreciated the third; and now, in my thirties, I have been made to realise by force of circumstances â the loss of someone close â just how sensitive and perceptive is its handling of bereavement. The flashy technique and dazzling style masks a strong undertow of genuine feeling that has often been overlooked. This is what makes Donât Look Now much more than a consummate chiller: there is genius in its treatment of genre.
Of course the movie is actually all of these things at the same time. Roeg is having his cake and eating it, sending up the conventions of ghost stories while investing them with new meaning; having it both ways is one of the hallmarks of a masterpiece. Donât Look Now is also a film about film. He uses light to illuminate life.
In the course of writing this book, I conducted interviews with Roeg and with Julie Christie. Extracts from these interviews form part of Chapter Three. An edited version of the complete interview with Roeg makes up Chapter Nine.
2 âSo many impressions to seize and hold.â
Unlike the other chapter titles in this book, the above line does not appear in the script of Donât Look Now. But it epitomises the film. It is taken from page 31 of the short story of the same name â its first three words providing the title â by Daphne du Maurier. The story was adapted for the screen by Allan Scott â who also collaborated with Roeg on Castaway (1986), The Witches (1989) and Cold Heaven (1990) â and Chris Bryant. First published in 1970, it tells the tale of John and Laura Baxter who, in an attempt to come to terms with the death of their daughter Christine, take a trip to Venice. Laura soon falls under the spell of two sisters, one of whom, a blind psychic called Heather, claims to have received a message from Christine telling her parents that they are in danger while they remain in the city. John pooh-poohs the suggestion and is subsequently murdered by a female dwarf. His final thought provides the last line: âOh God, what a bloody silly way to die ...â (p. 55). It is a superb conclusion: horror, embarrassment and comedy collide to produce a punch line with real punch. âI wanted to clap when I read that line,â Roeg told Sight and Sound in 1973. âI did think of keeping the line at one time, but at that point it would have been crazy for him to say anything.â Instead Roeg transforms the verbal flourish into an equivalent sequence of stunning visual bravura (analysed in Chapter Eight).
Even though the film is a remarkably faithful adaptation â in spirit as well as substance â some crucial changes have been made. When the story begins Christine has already died of meningitis. The opening sequence of the film â analysed shot by shot in Chapter Five â shows her drowning. Besides providing a much more dramatic start, this enables Roeg to set up the correspondence between the little girl and the dwarf straightaway, to emphasise the importance of water in the story and to ensure that the colour red is immediately associated with danger and death. In the story it is Laura who wears a âscarlet coatâ (p. 30) and Christine a âblue dressâ (p. 13). Roeg reverses the colours so that the dwarf can be a little red riding-hoodlum, and thus all the more conspicuous.
Christine is the Baxtersâ second child. Their first, Johnny, attends boarding school in England but is still the means by which his parents are separated. Du Maurier has the Baxters holidaying in Venice, which would be an odd choice if your daughter had drowned, so the film provides them with a pretext: John is overseeing the restoration of a church dedicated to Saint Nicholas. In case we miss the point, Bishop Barbarrigo (Massimo Serato) â who does not appear in the story â tells Laura that Saint Nicholas is the patron saint of scholars and children: âAn interesting combination, donât you think?â. He is, of course, also known as Santa Claus, whose garb is traditionally red. John will soon be seeking help at the police station, âthe nickâ, and will eventually be killed by the devilish dwarf, the ultimate personification of evil being Old Nick. And Nicolas is Roegâs Christian name. The film creates such an atmosphere of the paranormal and the paranoid that there seems no room for harmless coincidence.
âChristine is the Baxtersâ second childâ
After Laura tells John about the weird sisterâs message they are woken in the middle of the night by a telephone call from England. Communication â getting in touch, bridging the gap, crossing the threshold â is one of the main themes of Donât Look Now. In the story Johnny has suspected appendicitis but in the film he has been injured during a fire practice. Such drills are supposed to prevent accidents not cause them: one example of how a well-intentioned attempt to achieve something ends up precipitating the direct opposite. A source of tragedy certainly, but also the mainspring of black comedy.
Laura immediately assumes that Heatherâs portentous message refers to this accident; she has lost one child and does not want to lose another. She is wrong. Roeg, like du Maurier, is in two minds about the Scottish sisters, seeing them as both silly and sinister.
Laura meets two sisters who claim to be able to contact her dead child. âHelping people in Roegâs films is always dangerousâ
On the first page of the story Laura tells John, âTheyâre not old girls at all ... Theyâre male twins in drag.â They are portrayed with great skill on the screen by Mason (Heather), who is English, and Clelia Matania (Wendy), who is Italian. The suspicion that they may be tweedy lesbians is given a comic twist by Roeg when he has them inadvertently entering the male lavatories in the restaurant. Wendy, the sighted sister, has something in her eye and so neither of them can see where they are going. Lauraâs decision to help them prompts Heatherâs confession that she has âseenâ Christine.
Helping people in Roegâs films is always dangerous. Turner (Mick Jagger) helps Chas (James Fox) in Performance by granting him sanctuary but ends up being shot. The Aborigine (David Gumpilil) in Walkabout (1970) saves the lives of the girl (Jenny Agutter) and boy (Roegâs son Lucien John) but ends up hanging from a tree. And Johnâs attempts to help what he thinks is a distressed little girl only succeed in getting him hacked to death. All three selfless acts turn out to be different forms of suicide â half-wished, half-feared â which, depending on your point of view, can either be seen as the utter loss of self or the ultimate act of self-possession. It would seem that the only way to survive is to keep yourself to yourself â but that way, as Jack McCann (Gene Hackman) finds to his cost in Eureka (1982), madness lies. You have to keep trying to reach out. As E. M. Forster wrote in Howardâs End: âOnly connect!â
But are the sisters helpful or harmful? Du Maurierâs sceptical âa seance in the living room, tambourines appearing out of thin airâ (p. 52) finds it equivalent (when Laura asks, âCan you ever contact people?â) in Heatherâs outburst, âThey all want a lot of mumbo-jumbo about ectoplasm and holding handsâ, which is soon unconsciously echoed by John: âIâm not going to get involved with two neurotic old women in a session of mumbo-jumbo. No way.â Holding hands is an important gesture throughout the film.
It is essential to mark out oneâs territory â the familiar haunt of such ghost writers as M. R. James, Henry James and James Herbert â so that one can begin to undermine it. Johnâs âsudden rather unkind picture of the two sisters putting on headphones in their bedroom, listening for a coded message from poor Christineâ (p. 51) transfers to the screen as the sudden cut to the scene in which the two sisters are laughing their heads off in a hotel room. It suggests that, along with the Church of St Nicholas, they may be phonies: âIâm restoring a fake,â says John. But the viewer has no idea what has caused their laughter: it may be a memory evoked by one of the photographs of the children; it may be something one of them has said. Their cackling could be the horrid laughter of Jacobean tragedy or the helpless giggling of two sweet old ladies. Either way, whether they are guilty or innocent, the startling scene is simultaneously scary and amusing. Both du Maurier and Roeg want to keep us guessing, to unsettle us, thus enhancing the creepy atmosphere. In the story the hotel manager is always helpful and the policeman always reassuring but in the film they soon cease to be so. As John becomes ever more distraught the people he turns to for help â those ordinarily expected to be of service â only increase his sense of discomfort.
Alfred Hitchcock, like du Maurier, was a master of unease and filmed three of her works: Jamaica Inn (1939), Rebecca (1940) and The Birds (1963). In each case it is not just a question of plot: her insistence on sound and vision makes her an intensely cinematic writer. In âDonât Look Nowâ her repeated use of the word âglitteringâ to describe Venice â âa bright facade put on for show, glittering by sunlightâ (p. 25) â is matched by Roegâs repeated use of shots of sunshine reflected in water, windows and mirrors. The effect is literally dazzling, often making the viewer squint or think about holding up a hand to shield the eyes: donât look now. And her attention to the noise things make â âthere was a crunch of feet on the gravelâ (p. 11); âhe heard the quick patter of feetâ (p. 20); âtheir heels made a ringing sound on the pavement and the rain splashed from the gutterings aboveâ (p. 20) â is literally echoed by Roeg on an exceptionally complex soundtrack. It is a truism that the unsighted can hear better than the sighted: Heather â who, like Tiresias, can also âseeâ better â tells John that she likes Venice for this very reason: âItâs so safe for me to walk ... the sound changes you see as you come to a canal and the echoes off the walls are so clear.â Donât Look Now reveals Roegâs admiration for Hitchcock, and, indeed, contains one direct tribute to him. The jump-cut at the end of the opening sequence in which Lauraâs short, sharp scream merges with the drill as it pierces the stone of St Nicholasâs mirrors the cut in The Thirty-Nine Steps (1935) when a womanâs terrified scream merges with that of a steam trainâs whistle.
It is Hollywood tradition for the ori...