The Anglo Zulu War: Isandlwana

The Revelation of a Disaster

Ron Lock

• Publisher: Pen & Sword Military
• Year: 2017
• Print ISBN:
  9781526707420
• eBook ISBN:
  9781526707444
• Topic: History
• Subtopic: 19th Century History
• Index: History

A concise history of the Battle of Isandlwana, the first encounter of the Anglo-Zulu War in 1879.

In 1878, H.M. High Commissioner for Southern Africa and the Lieut. General Commanding H.M. Forces, clandestinely conspired to invade the Zulu Kingdom. Drastically underestimating their foe, the invaders had been vanquished within days of entering the Zulu Kingdom, in one of the greatest disasters ever to befall a British army.

The author not only dramatically describes the events leading up to the Battle of Isandlwana, and the battle itself but, with new evidence, disputes many aspects of the campaign long held sacrosanct.

Praise for The Anglo Zulu War: Isandlwana

"It offers a controversial but compelling account of the battle that underlines the consequences of operational arrogance and underestimating the fighting abilities of a less technologically equipped enemy – something that should resonate with all those who serve." — Soldier

"This is a book that should be on the bookshelves of everyone who is interested in the history of South Africa." —The South African Military Society

Chapter 1

‘A little war in Zululand would lead to its consolidation within the British Empire’

Lord Kimberley, Colonial Secretary

In the autumn of 1878, Lieutenant General Lord Chelmsford, Officer Commanding Her Majesty’s Forces in Southern Africa, was contemplating the invasion of Zululand. Having arrived at Government House in Pietermaritzburg, the fledgling capital of Natal Colony, both he and Sir Bartle Frere, Her Majesty’s High Commissioner to Southern Africa, had received alarming news from a Mr Frederick Fynney, a Border Agent in the service of the Crown. He had been tasked to relay intelligence of any Zulu military activity along the serpentine wanderings of the Thukela and Buffalo Rivers that formed the boundary between the Colony and the Zulu Kingdom. A frontiersman and Zulu linguist, Fynney had information of ‘the assembly of a large number of Zulu regiments at the King’s kraal …’.1 A Zulu counter-invasion, perhaps? Lord Chelmsford thought not. Like most Imperial officers who would serve under his command, Lord Chelmsford had reservations concerning the abilities of his colonial brethren. Zulu attack or not, the rumour served as an excuse for Chelmsford to assemble additional troops for his own invasion.

Chelmsford had but a few weeks earlier inherited his father’s title. Born Frederick Augustus Thesiger, Chelmsford was of German stock, his grandfather having emigrated to England where he and his family had prospered. His edlest son, also Frederick Augustus, became in turn Attorney-General and Lord High Chancellor of England. For his services to the Crown he was ennobled, becoming the first Baron Chelmsford. His son, again named Frederick, although educated at Eton, sought a military career, being first commissioned into the Rifle Brigade and sent to cold, far off Nova Scotia. On return to England he transferred to the Grenadier Guards, his father having secured him a commission by purchase. Ten years’ home service followed during which, no doubt his German ancestry finding favour, he was received socially by the Royal Family. For sport he honed his skills as a boxer. Active service followed in some of the bloodiest campaigns of the nineteenth century, the Crimea and the Indian Mutiny. Then, in contrast, as deputy Adjutant-General, he accompanied Sir Robert Napier’s expedition against King Theodore of Abyssinia, the most bizarre yet bloodless campaign in British military history. He was decorated with the Order of the Bath, and on return home was made ADC to Queen Victoria before returning to India as Adjutant-General. There he married and raised a family of four sons.

After sixteen years of uneventful but pleasant service, he returned to England where he found, with a grown family, the social life too demanding for his limited finances. Again he requested a posting overseas. Now, as a Lieutenant General, he accepted the first vacancy on offer, that of Officer Commanding Her Majesty’s Forces in Southern Africa, where an old acquaintance from India days, and now his political boss, Sir Bartle Frere, held sway. Although Chelmsford had served in many campaigns and had exhibited tireless devotion to duty, it had so far been in an administrative capacity. Now, for the first time he would hold an independent command. He arrived at the Cape in February 1878 and although by then the outcome of the 9th and last Frontier War had become a foregone conclusion, there was still opposition to contend with. However, it was soon all over and Chelmsford had proved himself a popular general; a leader who was prepared to rough it just as rough as it came and, by and large, to eat the same plain food as his men. Perhaps the victory, the seeds having already been sown by his predecessor, came too easily and Chelmsford had found no occasion to heed the advice given to him earlier by General Sir John Michel, an old campaigner who had fought in Cape frontier wars as far back as 1851. Michel had written: ‘No plan or operation of yours can in any way circumvent the Caffer. He is your master in everything … He moves three miles while you move one … they will give you a long tedious campaign … British Cavalry are utterly useless … swords are useless … always, always carry a revolver … all bivouacs at night should be half way up imminences … the tops and bottoms are too cold’. Advice Chelmsford would find to be equally applicable in Zululand.

Lieutenant General Lord Chelmsford, Commander-in-Chief HM Forces, Southern Africa.

With victory in the Cape accomplished, he was eager to conspire with those who also contemplated the conquest of Zululand. With the excuse of Mr Fynney’s alarming news, he confided his punitive plans to Frere. ‘The number of Zulu regiments at the King’s kraal must undoubtedly be considered a menace … I consider it only prudent to take steps to meet what may possibly be a serious attack …’. He went on to describe his plans for the imminent deployment of various detachments of Imperial regiments along the river boundaries between the Colony and the Kingdom, the arrival of additional Imperial infantry from Mauritius, the deployment of the Natal Mounted Police (NMP), the conscription and training ‘… with the greatest possible despatch so that they may be available at the shortest notice …’ of 6,000 Natal natives, and the necessity to assemble, under a competent European commander, the whole available force of mounted natives along the slopes of the Biggarsberg Mountains as near as possible to Rorke’s Drift. He also advised that local European regiments of mounted volunteers must hold themselves in readiness to be called out at very short notice, and that Border Police be established to patrol the border with a superintendent whose duty it would be to ‘ride along the whole boundary from station to station so as to ensure and to obtain the fullest amount of intelligence’. In conclusion Chelmsford went on to say that he assumed that the Natal Government would take immediate steps to place their border natives under competent commanders so that they may be ‘… in a position, under their own organisation, to meet the first brunt of an enemy invasion should it be made’.2 In referring to the conscription and training of 6,000 Natal natives (shortly to be designated the Natal Native Contingent, (NNC)), Chelmsford would find Natal was short of white men to fill the role of competent commanders and that such officers and NCOs would have to be recruited in the Eastern Cape.

A war with the Zulu Kingdom was not a new idea. In 1875 Sir Garnet Wolseley, then Governor of Natal, when contemplating Natal’s neighbours, Zululand and the Transvaal Republic, mused how very useful a war between the two would be to British interests. In one stroke it would deprive the Boers of an outlet to the sea and break the Zulu Kingdom’s power forever. ‘I only have to give the King the slightest hint and he would pitch into the Transvaal there and then. I wish I could do so without compromising the Government at home … I will see what can be done. If I had my way I would force on the war at once.’3

With the appointment of Frere as High Commissioner, the invasion was no longer a matter of conjecture. Frere had a personal mission to confederate the Boer Republics of the Transvaal and the Orange Free State with the colonies of the Cape and Natal, together with whatever chiefdoms remained, into one Imperial territory. In this, Zululand as an independent kingdom would find no place. Like Chelmsford, Frere had seen long service in India. However, unlike Chelmsford, whose service in the subcontinent had been uneventful, his could be regarded as spectacular. From a mundane Welsh background, a family of fourteen and a modest schooling, at the age of nineteen he secured an appointment with the British East India Company. Eight years later he became Private Secretary to the Governor of Bombay and in 1847 was appointed British Resident at the State of Sattara. Following the death of the Rajah, he virtually ruled the country until it was formally annexed by Britain a year later. Frere was then appointed Commissioner of the newly-conquered territory of Sind. Returning from long leave in England, he arrived back in time to play an important role in the suppression of the Indian Mutiny and finally, to crown his service, he was appointed Governor of Bombay. On returning to England in 1867, amongst other laurels bestowed upon him, he was made a Privy Councillor and elected President of The Royal Geographical Society. With Britain recognizing the need to bring order to the turbulent state of affairs in southern Africa, Lord Carnarvon, the Colonial Secretary, offered him the post of Her Majesty’s High Commissioner to Southern Africa and Governor of the Cape. The conquest of Zululand was only a matter of time.

Zululand had seen many changes since the days of King Shaka who, fifty years earlier, with military genius and utter ruthlessness had forged numerous clans of the Nguni people into the Zulu nation. And from the nation Shaka had formed an army of 40,000 men, warriors as disciplined as any regiment of Guards and held by both friend and foe to be utterly fearless. Shaka had eventually been murdered by his brother, Dingane, whose tyrannical reign followed, whilst his brother, Mpande, formed a following and an army of his own. With the aid of Boer Voortrekkers from the Cape, Mpande met in battle with Dingane on 29 January 1840.4 Mpande was victorious but had a hefty price to pay. For the Boer’s contribution to his triumph, Mpande found he was in their debt to the tune of a hefty slice of Zululand, including the potential harbour of St Lucia Bay. The Boers intended to add this new acquisition to that portion of Zululand they had already acquired by conquest, calling it, during its brief existence, the Republic of Natalia. Mpande’s rule lasted for forty years and, giving due consideration to time and place, his rule can be regarded as benign. Missionaries had been allowed to promote their faith amongst his subjects (with little success, it must be said), traders did good business and white men freely hunted for both profit and sport. A sort of pally rapport existed between the Colony and the Kingdom. Mpande was also a lusty monarch with numerous wives who bore him many sons. Prince Cetshwayo kaMpande was the eldest and heir to the Zulu throne, while Prince Mbuyazi kaMpande was his father’s favourite. Rivals since childhood, by the time they were young men conflict was inevitable. Each had their own adherents, Cetshwayo’s, known as the Usuthu, considerably outnumbering the iziGqoza, the faction of Mbuyazi. Although only 24 years of age, Cetshwayo already had battle experience, having fought in the Royal uUThulwana amabutho (regiment) against the Swazis in 1852 and greatly distinguishing himself.5 He was seen as something of a warrior prince and had a popular following throughout the Kingdom. No less admired was Mbuyazi amongst his own, but less numerous, people.

Mpande at first sought to distance his sons one from the other, providing each with a territory of his own. Cetshwayo’s was located on the north bank of the Mhlathuze River, fifteen miles inland from the Indian Ocean, whilst Mbuyazi was established north of the White Mfolozi. with Mpande, acting as a buffer, taking up residence in between. Perhaps Mpande grew tired of the uncertainty and tension for he rashly gave his favourite son additional territory adjacent to Cetshwayo’s domain and, as if to set one brother against the other, remarked, ‘Two bulls cannot live together in the same kraal’.6 Despite his brother’s military reputation and the size of his following, Mbuyazi insolently plundered Cetshwayo’s herds and fed the carcasses to his army. It was a declaration of war. On 2 December 1856, Cetshwayo, at the head of his Usuthu army, descended on the iziGqoza where, under a prominent hill called Ndondakusaka, they had assembled close to the banks of the Thukela River, recklessly encumbered not only with their cattle but also their women and children.

Although Cetshwayo was only 24 and Mbuyazi even younger, between them they had marshalled the greatest gathering of fighting men yet seen in Zululand. Cetshwayo’s warriors alone numbered 20,000. Mbuyazi, at last recognizing the dire consequences of his provocation, hurried across the Thukela River to beg military assistance from retired Captain Joshua Walmsley, known to the Zulus by the name Mantshonga. He was the British Border Agent living on the Natal bank with a small staff of native Border Police. Walmsey steadfastly refused to be drawn into what was clearly to be a Zulu civil war. Not so his young assistant, 22-year-old John Dunn, a man whose knowledge and influence would, thirty years hence, be avidly sought by both future King Cetshwayo and Lord Chelmsford. His father having been killed by an elephant, Dunn, at the age of 13, ‘… determined to desert the haunts of civilization for the haunts of large game in Zululand’. Thus he lived amongst the Zulu as a Zulu, speaking only isiZulu for several years until ‘caught’ by Joshua Walmsley whom, it would seem, adopted him as a son and provided him with an education. In time ‘there emerged a remarkable combination of a man who could pass for a Zulu or be entirely at ease in a European environment such as the Durban Club’.

As the encumbered army of Mbuyazi hurried east to find a battle position to their advantage, the Usuthu came into sight advancing over a nearby ridge, their massed war shields giving the impression of a moving wall. To the surprise of all, and no doubt induced by promises of a great many cattle, the common currency of southern Africa at the time, Dunn came to join Mbuyazi, leading as many of the Border Police as wished to accompany him plus a number of native trackers whom he employed as armed hunters. It was an absurd little army, if 250 men armed with spears and shields and about 40 firearms of ‘… every queer variety’7 can be called an army. However, at the time, the horse was still regarded by the Zulus as something supernatural. As Dunn later wrote ‘… seeing a man on horseback caused a feeling of uneasiness amongst the Usuthu, a horse being at the time an object of terror …’.8 With the sudden spectre of the horse, and a ragged volley of musketry, there was a brief moment of hesitation but then Dunn, like the iziGqoza, was in flight before the wrath of the Usuthu. Finally, with their backs to the fast-flowing Thukela, Mbuyazi’s 7,000 warriors, with Dunn and his men amongst them, outnumbered three to one, stood at bay with their women and children scattered to the rear. What followed was a massacre. Women and children were killed without mercy. Only a few managed to find safety on the Natal bank. Some who did so, together with their descendants yet unborn, would, as the iziGqoza Company of the NNC, fight for the British against Cetshwayo in the war that lay over thirty years in the future. Dunn, still on horseback, although surrounded by a near-drowning mass of panicking humanity, also survived and, as strange as it may seem, within months had formed a steadfast friendship with Cetshwayo that would see him made a Zulu chief in his own right and Cetshwayo’s brother-in-law. Despite the Usuthu’s heady victory it too had suffered heavily. Making their way home they passed the Mhangeni Mission Station where Mr Samuelson, a Norwegian missionary, shuddered to see the wounded ‘… with gaping wounds, groaning as they went along’.9 Cetshwayo had won by conquest his heirdom to the Zulu throne but his father, Mpande, would live for many years to come.

The Thukela and Buffalo (mZimyathi) Rivers were now firmly established as the boundary between the Colony and the Kingdom but beyond, to the west where the Blood (Ncome) River rose 320 miles from the Indian Ocean, the boundary was less clearly defined. In fact an inverted triangle of land running a hundred miles north of Rorke’s Drift along the Buffalo, and seventy miles east along the Pongola River and back to Rorke’s Drift, was known as the Disputed Territory. It had been occupied by the Boers who had assisted Mpande in his war with Dingane. Now, due to vague agreements and ill-defined boundaries, the Boers claimed the land belonged to them. Mpande believed otherwise. Not only was the occupation of the territory in contention, so again was Cetshwayo’s succession to his father’s throne. Mpande, despite Cetshwayo’s victory over Mbuyazi – or perhaps because of it – was favouring another son, Prince Mthonga, little more than a child at the time, to succeed him. To forestall his father’s plans, Cetshwayo sought to eliminate the boy but, being forewarned, Mthonga escaped Cetshwayo’s assassins, finding dubious safety amongst the Boers of the Disputed Territory. A deal was done and Cetshwayo, at least for the moment, acceded to the Boers’ claims. The Boers, subject to Cetshwayo’s undertaking that he would not harm Mthonga, handed the boy into his care. This transaction was concluded in 1861 at a sort of formal ceremony later called the Treaty of Waaihoek during which, to add to Cetshwayo’s power and aspirations, the Boers publicly recognized him as the future king.

John Dunn, the ‘White Zulu’, a man of many parts.

This did not please the British, who determined to block any Boer ambition that would give their landlocked republics a corridor to the sea. Moreover, it is possible, even at that early stage, that there were British plans to outflank the Zulu Kingdom to the west, securing access to native sources of labour to the north and expansion of Empire beyond. Enter Theophilus Shepstone, a man wholly unlike Chelmsford and Frere in birth and background, but as ardent a planner in the conquest of Zululand as both. Shepstone’s parents, both English settlers, had landed at the Cape in 1820 ...

Table of contents

• Cover
• Dedication
• Title
• Copyright
• Contents
• List of Maps
• Foreword
• Preface
• Acknowledgements
• Author’s Note
• Chapter 1 ‘A little war in Zululand would lead to its consolidation within the British Empire’
• Chapter 2 ‘… Come and establish what is wanting amongst the Zulu People’
• Chapter 3 ‘I do not think his disposition is very warlike’
• Chapter 4 ‘… The Zulus have been very kind to us’
• Chapter 5 ‘A big fuss over a small matter’
• Chapter 6 ‘Deceit is your most valuable asset in war’
• Chapter 7 ‘… The Zulus are a match for us in generalship, and more than a match for us in cunning’
• Chapter 8 ‘Startled by a calamity so sudden. So great and so close …’
• Chapter 9 ‘What excitement this will cause in England and what indignation’
• Chapter 10 ‘I regret I have to report a very disastrous engagement …’
• Chapter 11 ‘I have no desire whatever to shift any of the responsibility …’
• Chapter 12 ‘Her Majesty places entire confidence in you and the troops, to maintain our honour and name’
• Chapter 13 ‘My dear fellow, the rear always looks after itself’
• Chapter 14 ‘God save you, Sir, from ever seeing a camp or homestead sacked by Zulus’
• Chapter 15 Fugitive’s Drift
• Chapter 16 The Aftermath
• Chapter 17 Reconciliation
• Notes
• Bibliography