The Conversation
I. Historical Beginnings
From Jerusalem to Cambridge
HB: I would like to start with your background, trying to get a sense of the story of how you became a medievalist.
MR: I never meant to be a historian. I actually started studying chemistry at university.
HB: Oh, really?
MR: Yes. I had a brilliant chemistry teacher. I had wonderful teachers. I went to one of the best schools in, I would say, the Middle East? Maybe the world? Itâs in Jerusalemâa highly selective, really brilliant high school. And we had wonderful teachers in all subjects.
I grew up in Israel, and from the age of 12 I was in Jerusalem. I went to a brilliant high school and had fantastic teachers literally in all subjects. Iâm not exaggerating. They were incredible.
HB: But you had a particularly good chemistry teacher.
MR: I had a really charismatic chemistry teacher. And at the timeâweâre talking the seventiesâthere werenât so many girls doing science, definitely not at university. There was a special sort of cachet to it. The sentiment was: If you can do it, you ought to pursue itâlots of people can do other things, but since there were so few women in science you should consider that if you could do it well.
So I went to university and I studied chemistry in the first year.And then we had a great and devastating war, the Yom Kippur War, which started at the beginning of October, just before the academic year was about to begin.
I was going to enter my second year, but that wasnât going to happen because everyone was at the front. A lot of the people I knewâyoung people, soldiersâwere killed. So with the education not starting at university, I just went and presented myself in a hospital and worked. And I worked for about 10 months in Hadassah Hospital in Jerusalem.
HB: What sort of things did you do?
MR: I just helped out as best I could. It was in the orthopaedic ward, mostly a ward that dealt with amputees, really young men whoâd lost a leg or more.
I suppose nowadays it would be called âphysicianâs assistantâ or something, I did everything and anythingâyou just did what you could. And that experience made me rethink everything, really.
I remember a day in the hospital where one of the top professors in another ward, who was the father of a friend of mine and used to see me regularly in the corridors, said to me, âLook, Mary, thatâs enough. Things are getting back to normal (it was now winter time), youâve done your bit. Now you have to think about your future.â
A hospital can be a very captivating environment. Itâs almost like an Erving Goffman-type of total institution. You could do everything there: sleep there, eat there, shower there. You could just live there and be totally engrossed by your surroundings.
So I remember looking at the annual catalogue containing all the courses offered at Hebrew U, which is a great university. And I just fell on history, saying to myself, Actually, with wars and suffering and loss and all that makes you think about, I really want to understand. And I really want to understand what only history can give me. So I enrolled in history.
HB: So, if I can just interject for a moment: before the war broke out when you were studying chemistry, were you basically happy with your courses?
MR: They were a little bit on the dry side, and the people I met with were terrifically earnest and I was sort of young and silly. So I did find the social environment a bit boring, but it was basically fine.
HB: So you likely would have continued had it not been for these external circumstances.
MR: I probably think I would have done, yes.
Thereâs a very distinctive structure to the history course in Jerusalem, whereby in your first yearâbecause they assume that you know really very little, except for perhaps the history of Israel and some Jewish history or a very thin survey of other historiesâthey require that you take courses on ancient, medieval, early modern and modern history, a lecture and a seminar in each.
So by the end of the first year, at least you know something about a whole lot of different periods. Iâd never studied the Middle Ages before. And amongst all the excellent teachers I had that year, one simply soared. Heâs a totally amazing medievalist, still active. His name is Ron Barkai.
He was then doing his own PhD, in fact, and was earning a living by teaching. We were studying the Crusades; and in addition to his deep knowledge of the Crusades he also had the advantage of knowing Islam culture very well because his family had come from North Africa and he had excellent Arabic.
So the whole vantage point we had on the Crusades was not as had traditionally been taughtâthis sort of amazing medieval phenomenon, one of the great achievements and events of its timeâbut actually much more like what we might call today âa cultural encounterâ, or perhaps even âa clash of civilizationsââsomething much, much more textured.
And I remember that in the first class we looked at the attitude to war in Islam and Christianity. We read a bit of the Koranânowadays, itâs par for the course, but at the time, in the seventies, it certainly wasnât generally done. But he did it.
That was my introduction to medieval history; and I was absolutely hooked. And then in the second year I had another totally brilliant teacher, Benjamin Kedar, who introduced me to concepts of economic history as well as the general methodology of thinking through historical arguments of any kind. And then it just continued from there: I did my MA in Jerusalem as well and encountered many very brilliant teachers.
The interesting thing about Hebrew U, and itâs still true today, is that although weâre tucked away in the Middle East with all our problems and challenges, culturally Israel sees itself absolutely part, if not at the forefront, of what you might call the âWestern cultural sphereâ.
This is actually recognized by the EU: although Israel is clearly not a member of the EU and a lot of Europeans rightly have a lot of criticism on the state of Israel, the country is allowed to participate in all sorts of collaborative programs because it is recognized as having a lot to give.
HB: Perhaps it will replace the UK at some point.
MR: Ugh. Another painful point.
HB: Sorry.
MR: At any rate, while we recognized that we were geographically far from the centre of things, we wanted to beâand we felt that we merited beingâpart of that world, partly also because so many of the people who were living in Israel, had created the state, or were coming to it, were from European backgrounds. We have all the languages. Itâs common still in Israel for world literature to be translated very, very quickly into Hebrew and very, very high levels of translation, because you always have native bilinguals from a given country and Hebrew.
So that meant that all the people who taught me had been educated at the worldâs top universities. And there was a particular moment where the new historiography that was coming out of France, the Annales school, and its American offshoots like Princeton, was where my teachers had studied.
HB: So there was a direct influence.
MR: Absolutely. At the beginning of every academic yearâI really remember this when I was an MA studentâour teachers would have just returned from their summers of research in Europe.
And during the first gathering of the advanced seminars was all about hearing whatâs new, what new ideas are out there: What is Jacques Le Goff doing now? What is Emmanuel Le Roy Ladurie thinking? and so on.
So one can see it as a slavish following, but actually it was a real commitment to being engaged in the history that was happening. We religiously read the Times Literary Supplement to know about new books, even if they were always so expensive ...