Keeps Kids Out of Porn

The Governments Intentional Failure

Marc C. Lafond

• Publisher: Marc Lafond
• Year: 2020
• ISBN:
  9781087939018
• Edition: 1
• Topic: Law
• Subtopic: Administrative Law
• Index: Law

Every webpage in adult entertainment should be unconditionally clear of child related content, whether in words or pictures. It is illegal to photograph or video minors engaged in sex or posing nude in inappropriate positions, but why is it still legal in porn to have category names, words, and links that imply children engaging in nudity and sexual activity.Adult entertainment must also seek a better means to deter our minors from gaining access to its hazardous content. Moral citizens demand a drastic change within online pornography to eliminate all aspects of child exploitation and prohibit minors from gaining access.

The government (GOV) passed laws banning online pictures and videos of children engaged in sexual activity and provocative nudity. This was an important first step to reduce child exploitation within online adult entertainment. However, these laws failed to embrace all the areas of child exploitation that are clearly visible within pornography today. The areas unprotected comprise child related words, links, categories, and pictures within webpages containing nudity, sex, and pornography referred to as gray area child content (GACC). GACC also comprises websites that lack pictures and videos but contain children related words, links, and categories that suggest children are engaged in nudity or sexuality within subsequent webpages.

The GOV failed to unearth a better means of protecting our minors from gaining access to online adult entertainment. In today's world of technology, our minors can still gain access to pornography even though households engage in internet blocking practices. South Carolina bill H5414 states that the typical age of minor exposure to pornography is between nine and eleven. Teenagers that engage in porn can develop a misconception about the reality of sex and relationships. Porn can rewire a teenager's brain to think in a distorted manner by corrupting their perception regarding family, marriage, morality, and fidelity. Regulators have neglected to construct a better plan to keep our youth from accessing porn on the internet and the question is why?

Porn has become an uncontrollable multibillion-dollar industry lacking adequate regulation to criminalize and fine website owners for fraud, abuse, and misrepresentation. Porn website owners use GACC freely to attract viewers, optimize inadvertent redirects, label deceptively, and some steer viewers to illegal content. Website owners create categories such as incest, rape, and bestiality that use women and children in an exploitive manner. There is little to no enforcement to stop these website owners from their immoral practices. There needs to be legislative reform to eliminate GACC, block underage access to porn, keep all adult entertainment confined to a secured login portal, and criminalize website owners for abuse, misrepresentation, and deception. We need a strong solution to solve America's porn problem. This book offe

Part I: GACC Exploitation and Deception

Chapter 1: Introduction

Every webpage in adult entertainment should be unconditionally clear of child related content, whether in words or pictures. It is illegal to photograph or video minors engaged in sex or posing nude in inappropriate positions, but why is it still legal in porn to have category names, words, and links that imply children engaging in nudity and sexual activity. Adult entertainment must also seek a better means to deter our minors from gaining access to its hazardous content. Moral citizens demand a drastic change within online pornography to eliminate all aspects of child exploitation and prohibit minors from gaining access.

The government (GOV) passed laws banning online pictures and videos of children engaged in sexual activity and provocative nudity. This was an important first step to reduce child exploitation within online adult entertainment. However, these laws failed to embrace all the areas of child exploitation that are clearly visible within pornography today. The areas unprotected comprise child related words, links, categories, and pictures within webpages containing nudity, sex, and pornography referred to as gray area child content (GACC). GACC also comprises websites that lack pictures and videos but contain children related words, links, and categories that suggest children are engaged in nudity or sexuality within subsequent webpages.

The GOV failed to unearth a better means of protecting our minors from gaining access to online adult entertainment. In today’s world of technology, our minors can still gain access to pornography even though households engage in internet blocking practices. South Carolina bill H5414 states that the typical age of minor exposure to pornography is between nine and eleven. Teenagers that engage in porn can develop a misconception about the reality of sex and relationships. Porn can rewire a teenager’s brain to think in a distorted manner by corrupting their perception regarding family, marriage, morality, and fidelity. Regulators have neglected to construct a better plan to keep our youth from accessing porn on the internet and the question is why?

Porn has become an uncontrollable multibillion-dollar industry lacking adequate regulation to criminalize and fine website owners for fraud, abuse, and misrepresentation. Porn website owners use GACC freely to attract viewers, optimize inadvertent redirects, label deceptively, and some steer viewers to illegal content. Website owners create categories such as incest, rape, and bestiality that use women and children in an exploitive manner. There is little to no enforcement to stop these website owners from their immoral practices. There needs to be legislative reform to eliminate GACC, block underage access to porn, keep all adult entertainment confined to a secured login portal, and criminalize website owners for abuse, misrepresentation, and deception. We need a strong solution to solve America’s porn problem.

The out of sight, out of mind approach (OSOMA) is a method that can provide a solution. OSOMA goal is to augment the current child pornography laws by illegalizing GACC and website owner abuse and fraud while blocking underage access to porn. This approach would use Internet Search Engines (ISE) as the backbone in developing technology inclusive of artificial intelligence to monitor and control porn, while reducing taxpayer costs. In implementing OSOMA, the federal government would generate millions of dollars in annual revenue from fees and duties.

Why use ISE’s? These multibillion-dollar ISE firms employ skilled software engineer experts with knowledge in controlling queries within their database of sources that can confine all adult entertainment to a secured login portal. The adult entertainment login portal would require age verification, proof of address (e.g., Utility bill), a onetime application fee, and annual user duties. Under OSOMA, the only entrance for adult entertainment on the internet is through the secured porn portal that would block minor access. With this protection barrier in place, an internet search for topics related to nudity, sex, or pornography would result in zero findings. OSOMA would also introduce new legislation to prohibit website owner abuse and deception and eliminate immoral categories. OSOMA is the answer that would keep the internet a very safe and clean environment for all ages to enjoy the information and knowledge that it possesses. Moral citizens demand a change in how pornography is accessible online. Now is the time for change to protect America from the beast of porn!

Chapter 2: GACC

Gray area child content (GACC) may seem harmless to those that are not active within online adult entertainment. However, child related words, categories, links, and visual depictions are clearly positioned within adult entertainment where millions of aroused viewers are seeking sexual satisfaction. Even the adversaries of porn such as homemakers, devote religious folks, and anti-porn activists have failed to realize GACC destructiveness within online adult entertainment.

The GOV violated their moral and conscientious duty when they failed to seal all the gaps to protect child exploitation within porn. GACC comprise words related to children; child pictures in advertising; child modeling advertisements; pictures of children on modeling login pages; clothed children; naturalist (nude) pictures of children in open content and within advertisements; deceptive website navigation techniques using child pictures or names in baiting schemes; and webpages containing references or hints of children engaged in sexuality. The government (GOV) should have created legislation to prohibit all GACC found within webpages containing nudity, sex, and pornography. Just place nudity, porn, and a gender in any search engines query box with the filter off and the results would yield many links to GACC websites. There is no reason why the GOV has allowed millions of aroused males to encounter children sexually, whether implied or explicit, within pornography.

Porn rewires the brain and weakens one’s mental defenses, which leads a viewer into becoming more vulnerable to its content. Deceptive website owners that create GACC within porn attempt to get aroused males interested in younger models. Stimulated neuronal and hormonal activity does not instantaneously stop when viewers come across child content after looking at adult pornography for hours. The environment of porn makes it easy for a viewer to become indifferent and uninhibited about GACC.

Viewers of adult entertainment have the right to enjoy their first amendment rights without running into the temptation of GACC. Adult viewers do not need manipulation by those website owners that play games using children as lures to create sexual excitement. Children are not bait, whether in words or pictures. Yet, our GOV has been doing an extremely poor job at stopping GACC and even child porn from entering online websites for decades. It is unknown where sources of child porn originate until found, investigated, and disclosed to the public through the news media. Yet, the GOV spends our taxpaying dollars wastefully because they cannot eliminate it from the web.

Moral citizens demand regulation that prohibits child visuals and words from sitting in front of millions of porn viewers that are seeking sexual gratification. We must put a stop to this beast of destruction that seemingly has full GOV approval. Principled parents and religious people would oppose this type of content if they knew it existed. Prolonged engagement in GACC content may lead males into looking at children as sexual objects. Who are the website owners that use children as baiting mechanisms to get sexually aroused males to look at them?

Chapter 3: Porn Category Names

The lack of government (GOV) oversight in matters dealing with pornographic website control has led to lenient, ambiguous and child related categories, links, and words. Some of these questionable gray area child content (GACC) categories comprise teen, young, lolita, and barely legal that imply children within its sexually explicit material. These websites and categories are easily accessible on the internet by conducting a simple word search along with the word porn. Just place nudity, porn, and sex terms in a search engines query box and the result would yield many website links containing GACC. Website owners use GACC because the implication is that aroused adult males will find youth, virginity, and innocence within its contents, which creates a level of excitement.

However, the extensive and uninhibited use of child related categories and names within hundreds of adult websites creates an insensitivity among porn viewers. This is a sad fact. A conditioning effect triggers active porn participants to associate the words teen and young to mean universally legal nudity and sexuality. Mental barriers can easily break down with the repetitive and extensive use of child related words creating total ignorance by the adult viewer.

There are other category names buried within adult porn containing implicit and explicit references to minors. These categories include junior, nymphets, little girls, preteen, young, and youngest, daddy’s daughter, tiny, small, and jailbait among others. What are these names doing in adult entertainment in the first place? By their inaction, the GOV seems to approve children's categories in adult porn where millions of pleasure-seeking males are searching. Why has the GOV allowed this to exist?

Conditioned that there is nothing wrong with the category name teen, millions of active porn viewers choose it without a second thought when it shows up on countless sexually explicit websites, links, videos, or pictures. When a viewer clicks on the teen category, they experience models that are eighteen years of age and older. If we look at the true definition of teenager (teen category), we find that the word represents individuals between the ages of 13 to 19. Roughly, 29% of the teenager definition falls within the legal porn age limit whereas 71% of the teenager definition falls outside the legal age limit. Presumably, all models within the teen category are at least 18, but the word teen still implies all teenagers from ages 13 to 19.

Pornography has created an impression in the viewer’s mind that anything affiliated with the word teen is sexually legal. So, when the word teen shows up on any adult website, the viewer may perceive it to be perfectly safe and normal to click on. The risk is very apparent in that websi...