OVERVIEW: When Pauline authorship was accepted in the East, it became necessary to explain why Paulâs name is not appended to the actual text of Hebrews. Theodore of Mopsuestia and Severian of Gabala represent the received interpretation that, because Paul was an âapostle to the Gentiles,â out of tact and appropriate deference to apostles called to the ministry to the historic people of Israel, Paulâs authorship is not explicitly mentioned in the Epistle to the âHebrews.â
THE REASON PAUL DID NOT APPEND HIS NAME. THEODORE OF MOPSUESTIA: Paul did not write as to unbelievers who had acquired an implacable hatred against him but to believers who have shared all things that it is necessary to share. He writes not to those who are simple in their faith but to those who are demonstrating in their works the solidity of their faith and the keenness of their virtue, as the contents of the epistle show. Consequently, the epistle must have been delivered to them as one of Paulâs epistles, for if this were not the case the things written would not benefit them.
Again, in addition to these considerations the things written at the end of the epistle prove what I am stating: âI appeal to you, brethrenâ he says, âbear with my word of exhortation, for I have written to you briefly.â1 But to whom did he write, âI appeal to youâ if those things were not the reason the letter was sent to them? Then he adds, âYou should understand that our brother Timothy has been released with whom I shall see you if he comes soon.â2 Clearly you see that Timothy was the one who has delivered the epistle Paul wrote, with whom Paul clearly promises also to see them, if Timothy returns.
What then is the reason for Paul not appending his name? It is evident and very clear. Both Barnabas and Paul divided the preaching task with the disciples of the blessed Peter. [This was] not so that the former could teach some doctrines and the latter othersâfor there is one goalâbut so that Paul and Barnabas might lead to faith some from the Gentiles while Peter and his disciples would lead some from the Jews to faith, deeming this division more expedient because at that time there was still a powerful rivalry due to the custom of the Jews (based on their law) who did not permit themselves to consort with Gentiles. Then some of the apostles had dealings with the Gentiles, while others with the circumcised. But those who had come to faith in all probability deemed the teachers and apostles to be shared by both communities. Thus, when Paul wrote to the Gentiles, he in all likelihood commands them as their apostle, but when he writes to the Hebrews, he does not. FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS.3
THE EPISTLE IS PAULâS. SEVERIAN OF GABALA: The heretics say that this epistle is not Paulâs, and they offer as their first proof of this that his name is not superscribed as in the other epistles. Second, his vocabulary is different, that is, it is foreign to Paulâs customary word choice and usage. One must know, however, that Paul was hated by the Jews on the grounds that he was teaching apostasy from the law, and having been endangered for this reason in Jerusalem and having scarcely escaped, he was sent to Rome. Therefore, writing something useful to the Hebrews, he does not append his name, so that they might not lose any advantage they could have derived from the letter because of their hatred against him.
And he writes to them in the tongue of the Hebrews, which was also translated by one of his disciplesâby Luke or more likely by Clement who also is mentioned. For this reason the vocabulary is different. And this has been investigated by previous generations, and Eusebius of Pamphilus, a historian of those things in preceding and contemporary generations, made mention of the investigation,4 and it still seemed to our fathers, the predecessors of the bishops, that the epistle was Paulâs. FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS PROLOGUE.5