Divine Reversal

The Transforming Ethics of Jesus

RABBI RUSSELL RESNIK

• Publisher: Messianic Jewish Communications
• Year: 2010
• ISBN:
  9781936716197
• Topic: Theologie & Religion
• Subtopic: Ethik & Religion

In the Old Testament, God often reversed the plans of man. Yeshua's ethics continue this theme. Following his ethics leads to true happiness, forgiveness, reconciliation, fidelity and love.

CONTENTS

Introduction: The Jewish Jesus and His Message

Prologue: Creation Renewed

Section 1: Hesed, the Ethic of Reversal

Chapter 1 “Follow Me”

Chapter 2 Mercy, Not Sacrifice

Section 2: Torah from the Mount

Chapter 3 Introduction (Matthew 5:1–20)

Chapter 4 Reconciliation (Matthew 5:21–26)

Chapter 5 Faithfulness (Matthew 5:27–32)

Chapter 6 True Speech (Matthew 5:33–37)

Chapter 7 Resistance (Matthew 5:38–4 2)

Chapter 8 Love (Matthew 5:43–48)

Section 3: The Great Reversal

Chapter 9 Cleansing the Leper

Chapter 10 The Messianic Secret

Chapter 11 Triumphal Entry

Chapter 12 The Last Passover

Epilogue: The Ultimate Reversal

INTRODUCTION

THE JEWISH JESUS AND HIS MESSAGE

Not long ago, I attended services at a megachurch in Texas with some friends. As we were making our way out, my friends introduced me to a nationally known motivational speaker who was a member there. When he found out that I was Jewish, he said, “Oh, some of my favorite authors are Jewish.” I thought, Sure, Matthew, Mark, John… but he said, “You know, Moses, Isaiah, David….” Apparently, for my new acquaintance, some wonderful Jews wrote the Old Testament, but the New Testament authors were not in that category. I’m sure he would have acknowledged that Matthew was Jewish and that the one of whom Matthew wrote was Jewish, too, but he didn’t seem to have really absorbed the fact that the Gospels were originally Jewish books. Among writers and academics, both Christian and Jewish, the situation is quite different. Not only do they recognize that Jesus was Jewish, but many claim that he cannot really be understood apart from his Jewishness.

Orthodox Jewish scholar Pinchas Lapide writes, “[E]verything Jesus said and accomplished, did and did not do, on earth discloses its full meaning only when seen against his profound Jewishness.”¹ Christian scholars have made a similar point:

[W]e forget what the New Testament writers and above all Jesus himself never forgot: that salvation is of the Jews, not in some trivial sense, but in the rich sense that in order to save the world the creator God chose Abraham and said “in your seed all the families of the earth will he blessed.” It is precisely because Jesus of Nazareth is the fulfillment of this promise that he is relevant in all times and places. It is precisely because he is The Jew par excellence that he is relevant to all Gentiles as well as Jews.²

The Jewishness of Jesus, however, is not just a matter of his descent from Abraham, but also of his deep connection with the Jewish people and their whole story. This connection is an essential key to understanding him. Brad Young in his popular work, Jesus the Jewish Theologian, writes, “We must not ‘kill’ Jesus by destroying his links to his people and his faith. For Jesus, Judaism was a vibrant belief in the true God…. He sought to reform and revitalize, not to destroy and replace…. The Jewish roots of Jesus’ teachings lead to a fresh hearing of the ancient text.”³

Jesus, the Jewish Teacher

This book does not need to prove the Jewishness of Jesus. Instead it asks, if we start with the premise that Jesus is a Jewish teacher—and there is plenty of evidence that we should—how does this help us understand more fully his life and teachings? We will listen to Jewish voices, from the Mishnah and Talmud to more modern works, not to demonstrate the Jewishness of Jesus, but to better grasp the authentic ethical message of Jesus. If Jesus speaks from a Jewish context, it may be that other Jewish sources, even though many are from a later era, will help us properly understand his words. This approach is relevant to both those who acknowledge Jesus as Messiah and those who do not. Indeed, the answers we discover may help some decide whether to acknowledge him as Messiah.

As a Jewish teacher, Jesus doesn’t separate matters of theology from practice. His teaching is consistently practical, ethical, and applicable to real life, even two thousand years after it was originally given, since “for Jews, love of God without deeds pleasing to God is hypocrisy, empty blather. In Jesus’ words, ‘By their fruits you will know them!’ (Matt. 7:16).”⁴ In this book, therefore, we will explore Jesus’ teachings as they apply to our own deeds today, as well as how they might have applied in their original setting.

As a Jewish teacher, furthermore, Jesus personally represents and exemplifies everything he teaches. He never hides behind theory or abstraction. Hence, his life and character—who he is—help us understand his message, and conversely his message helps us understand who he really is. But be warned; Jesus’ message, like Jesus’ identity itself, will take us by surprise if we understand it correctly. “What he signified is always more challenging than we expect, more outrageous, more egregious.”⁵

In contrast, the contemporary Christian world, at least in the West, tends to prefer an abstract, idealized sense of truth and, therefore, adopts that view of Jesus as well. It wants a Jesus who is clearly defined, incorporated into its creeds, and set up as a boundary marker between the insiders and the outsiders. One Christian author recognizes this tendency and its dangers:

The desire to find, declare, and propagate a simple and univocal Jesus who “matches” an individual believer (or some group of believers) perfectly—and without remainder—is… idolatrous, since it exchanges difficult and challenging truth for a counterfeit version that is more comfortable. But by “truth” I do not mean some other single image of Jesus that is better than those being proposed. I mean instead the truth of the process of personal and intersubjective learning.⁶

It is just such a process of personal and intersubjective learning that this book will pursue. And it will pursue it by focusing on ethics—right behavior toward other people—because Jesus placed so much emphasis upon ethics in his teaching. The Sermon on the Mount is central to Jesus’ ethical teaching, but the entire gospel account—not just his specific teachings, but his whole story—conveys the ethic of Jesus. Therefore, we will spend a good amount of time with the Sermon on the Mount, but we will consider the entire Jesus story as well. Because it is a Jewish story starring a Jewish Messiah, we will generally use his Hebrew name, rather than an English translation of his Greek name, and call him from here on Yeshua.

The Key to Scripture

Once, a scribe who had become impressed with Yeshua’s teaching asked him what was the most important commandment of all.

Yeshua answered, “The first is, ‘Hear, O Israel: the Lord our God, the Lord is one; you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind, and with all your strength.’ The second is this, ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ There is no other commandment greater than these.” (Mark 12:29–31)

Matthew adds an additional comment of Yeshua’s, “On these two commandments hang all the Torah and the Prophets” (Matt. 22:40).⁷ The whole message of Scripture, which Yeshua fully upheld in his life and ministry, hangs upon love for God and love for our neighbor. This love for neighbor, of course, is not a matter of mere sentiment, but of treating our neighbor the way we would want to be treated. Or as Yeshua said elsewhere, “In everything do to others as you would have them do to you; for this is the Torah and the Prophets” (Matt. 7:12).

In contrast, some expressions of Christianity, particularly in the modern era, tend to view the ethical dimension as secondary to the theological dimension. They tend to emphasize Yeshua’s person and the nature of his atoning work over his teaching and example. I don’t want to minimize either aspect, but Yeshua himself says that the whole of Scripture—or at least the whole of Scripture that he and the rest of the Jewish people possessed in his day—depends not upon proper definitions of God and his nature but on two commandments. And these commandments focus on our relationships with God and our fellow human beings. Yeshua seems more intent on teaching a way of life than on defining theological truths. As we study this way of life, however, we will see that it is far more than adherence to a set of rules or ethical guidelines; rather Yeshua’s ethics reveal his character as God in our midst, and adopting them transforms our character from within.

In emphasizing the ethical dimension, Yeshua is accurately reflecting the Hebrew Scriptures. In the first chapter of A Code of Jewish Ethics, entitled, “What Matters Most to God,”⁸ Rabbi Joseph Telushkin argues that ethical behavior is the essence of Judaism and shows how this emphasis stems directly from the Hebrew Scriptures. For example, the foundational Ten Commandments “obligate Jews to affirm God … and to observe the Sabbath … and ban idolatry.” They also deal with strictly ethical issues because they “prohibit murder, adultery, stealing, bearing false witness, taking God’s Name in vain [which has ethical implications] and covetousness.” Telushkin concludes that the testimony of the Ten Commandments “seems overwhelming: Moral rules regulating relations between human beings are primary. Morality is the essence of Judaism.”⁹

Telushkin traces this emphasis through the rest of Torah and the Prophets, citing examples such as Micah 6:8—“And what does the Lord require of you? To do justice, love mercy, and walk humbly with God”¹⁰—and Zechariah 7:9–10—“This is what the God of Hosts said: ‘Render true justice, be kind and merciful to one another. Do not oppress the widow, the orphan, the convert or the poor; and not plot evil in your hearts against one another.’” Telushkin comments, “As the prophet makes clear, it was the Israelites’ refusal to obey these injunctions (Zechariah does not mention ritual violations) that prompted God’s great anger at them (7:11–12).”¹¹

Rabbi Telushkin, of course, doesn’t believe in Yeshua as Messiah, but his words support Yeshua’s claim that the whole of Scripture hangs on the two commandments to love God and our neighbor. The second commandment at least brings us into the realm of ethics, and it cannot at all be separated from the first because loving our neighbor arises out of and is dependent upon our love of God. The ethical and theological are intimately related. Furthermore, Yeshua does not just give ethical instruction; he offers transformative ethnics, ethics entailing a change of character that will inevitably become embodied in our behavior.

Ethics always have to do with how we live and behave—how we treat those around us in ways that can be seen and experienced; therefore, my emphasis throughout the book will be practical. Sometimes I will spend time laying a theological or interpretive foundation, but the goal is always to more accurately understand the practical implications of Yeshua’s teachings. Because of this emphasis, this book won’t explore every theological question inherent in the Jewish ethical pathway of Yeshua. But of course, “Of making many books there is no end” (Ecc. 12:12), and we will have to leave some questions for the next one.

Divine Reversal: A Jewish Theme

At the core of Yeshua’s ethical teaching is the theme of divine reversal. Indeed, we will be considering divine reversal as a dominant theme of the entire gospel story. The kingdom of God is announced as a reign that overturns and reverses the priorities of the kingdoms of man. It is a kingdom based on self-giving love and true justice between human beings rather than on the quest for power and self-aggrandizement, which characterizes the kingdoms of this world. The king of this kingdom arrives on the scene in simplicity, even in weakness, reversing the way that we would expect the Son of God to step onto the stage of history. As he lays out the standards and values of his kingdom—which is the subject matter of this book—he continues this theme of reversal. Those who are great in the kingdom are the lowest of all and the servants of all. This king models servanthood in all that he does, ultimately laying down his life for his subjects. This final act of apparent weakness is in fact the pinnacle of divine reversal, overturning the powers and values of the kingdom of man to lay the foundation of the kingdom of God.

The theme of divine reversal comes to fulfillment in the Gospels but it is not foreign to Jewish thinking. Indeed, it is deeply rooted in the Hebrew Scriptures, beginning in the Torah with the narratives of Genesis. For example, God chooses Abraham to become the father of the Chosen People and a blessing to all humankind, but Abraham is without an heir and married to a woman who apparently is barren. In accord with an ancient custom, Abraham sires a son through his wife’s slave, Hagar, but God makes it clear that Ishmael, the firstborn, will not be Abraham’s heir. Instead, God allows Abraham’s wife to finally conceive and give him a son. The son of the barren wife, the younger Isaac, will carry on Abraham’s legacy (Gen. 17:15–21). Here is a double reversal: An elderly couple produces a son after many years of barrenness, and this younger son will inherit in place of his older brother. This reversal was undoubtedly even more striking to those who first heard the story. Ancient Hebrew practice clearly gave the inheritance rights and privileges to the firstborn, as was expressed later in the Torah:

If a man has two wives, one of them loved and the other disliked, and if both the loved and the disliked have borne him sons, the firstborn being the son of the one who is disliked, then on the day when he wills his possessions to his sons, he is not permitted to treat the son of the loved as the firstborn in preference to the son of the disliked, who is the firstborn. He must acknowledge as firstborn the son of the one who is disliked, giving him a double portion of all that he has; since he is the first issue of his virility, the right of the firstborn is his. (Deut. 21:15–17)

The right of the firstborn is not explained or rationalized here. It is assumed as a foundation of the social order that is not to be overturned by mere human preference. But the line o...