Busy Church
Summary
This first session will look at how loving our neighbour in the biblical sense leads to questions which may require political answers. We will celebrate the churchâs efforts that are having a huge impact all over the UK, and we will also ask if perhaps we need to be more strategic in order to see sustainable kingdom transformation. There will also be a chance to solve some of societyâs biggest problems using the power of clothes pegs!
Structure
Each week will involve Bible-based input from videos and talks, group discussion, prayer, and a practical activity. This week, we recommend you do them in this order:
- Welcome (8 minutes)
- Video (2 minutes)
- Feedback (8 minutes)
- Activity (12 minutes)
- Talk (10 minutes)
- Discussion (20 minutes)
- Prayer (10 minutes)
- Takeaway (2 minutes)
72 minutes total
To run this session, you will need:
- Access to the internet or the downloaded video (and if needed, a projector and laptop setup) to watch the âShow Up 2.0â video.
- Pens.
- Three pieces of string or similar to act as temporary âwashing linesâ stretching across the room.
- Twenty clothes pegs.
- About twenty small pieces of card or paper that you can peg to the washing lines.
- Two large sheets of paper.
Welcome (8 minutes)
Invite each person in your group to introduce themselves and answer the question, âWould you consider yourself âpoliticalâ?â Then open the session with a prayer asking God to speak to everyone present, deepening our understanding of what it means to love your neighbour.
Video: Show Up 2.0 (1:38 minutes)
Play the Christians in Politics video âShow Up 2.0.â
Here is the video script to give you an idea of its content:
All over the UK, the church is doing an incredible job. Weâre running foodbanks, mentoring at-risk teenagers, counselling those in debt, being friends to the elderly, sheltering the homeless, running parent-toddler groups, homework clubs, music/arts workshops, healing on the streets, and sports camps, working with prisoners and community choirs. This is wonderful. But there is a danger.
Martin Luther King said that as Christians we enjoy being the Good Samaritan on lifeâs roadside. It often feels good to help someone and see the change up close. But he went on to ask, âWho is going back to the Jericho road?â In other words, who is making sure that no one else gets mugged? Do we need more street lighting? More CCTV cameras? More police on the beat? The thing is that those political decisions happen in fairly dull committees poring over statistics and reports. Not as exciting as seeing that change right in your face. But if we donât show up in those places, the church may spend the next fifty years as the nationâs paramedic, treating the victims of a flawed system but failing to bring righteousness and justice to the system itself.
Itâs good to be the Good Samaritan, but itâs also good to give him the odd day off. Some of us need to be in the system. Might that be you? Donât just vote. Show up.
Itâs good to be the Good Samaritan, but itâs also good to give him the odd day off.
Feedback (8 minutes)
The aim of the discussion time is to ease the group into reflecting and engaging with the session topic, not necessarily to have all the answers.
1. What jumped out at you from the video?
2. What needs are you aware of in your local neighbourhood/s?
3. How could your church try to meet some of those needs and how is it doing so already? Note that here we are including the church gathered (for example, through church projects) and the church dispersed (for example, through individuals in their work).
4. What insights have these efforts given you into those needs?
Activity (12 minutes)
The personal and the politicalâjoining the dots
On the left-hand wall of your room, put up a sheet of paper that says PERSONAL, and on the right, one that says POLITICAL.
Ask the group to now choose just one problem that impacts the lives of people or an individual in their communityâit may be a need or issue that has just been mentioned in the discussion. It doesnât have to be the most challenging problem in your area, but it will help if it is an issue of which at least some of the group have some understanding. Some examples could be debt, not being able to speak English, isolation/loneliness, alcohol dependency, homelessness, or youth violence. Write the one you have chosen on a small piece of paper or card.
Stick or hang the âproblemâ on the far left of the room (not implying the political far left!). From that point, stretch three âwashing linesâ of string across the room to three separate points on the right-hand side. Now ask everyone, âWhat is the âproblem behind the problemâ?âand what might the steps towards solving it be? What would it look like to âgo back to the Jericho roadâ for this problem?â Scribble these steps down in short form and hang them in sequence to the right of the problem on the washing line.
There will of course be more than one âproblem behind the problemâ, but just choose three, and each gets its own washing line. It should look something like this ⌠using the example of road traffic casualties.
You might also jump straight across to the right-hand side, to a political reason for why this problem exists or to a political solution that might address it. Hang this on the far right of the âwashing line.â You can then also work backwards towards the left, perhaps meeting in the middle.
You may want to split into teams, taking a washing line each, to discuss what connects the left to the right. Your answers on these sheets will hopefully join the dots between the personal and the political.
For example, you might choose âyouth violenceâ as your problem. One person may suggest that the root causes are âboredomâ linked to âlack of adequate youth resources in the areaâ linked to âcouncil cutsâ linked to âlack of funding from central governmentâ linked to âpoor management of the economy.â
Someone else may say âlack of good role modelsâ linked to âfamily breakdownâ linked to âlack of parenting supportâ linked to âlack of national government priority around family.â
One person may say âdrugsâ linked to âlack of effective deterrentâ linked to âfailing policing strategiesâ linked to âhome office policy.â
That gives you three âlinesâ emanating from the same problem. ...