Prose Poetry in Theory and Practice vigorously engages with the Why? and the How? of prose poetry, a form that is currently enjoying a surge in popularity. With contributions by both practitioners and academics, this volume seeks to explore how its distinctive properties guide both writer and reader, and to address why this form is so well suited to the early twenty-first century. With discussion of both classic and less well- known writers, the essays both illuminate prose poetry's distinctive features and explore how this "outsider" form can offer a unique way of viewing and describing the uncertainties and instabilities which shape our identities and our relationships with our surroundings in the early twenty-first century. Combining insights on the theory and practice of prose poetry, Prose Poetry in Theory and Practice offers a timely and valuable contribution to the development of the form, and its appreciation amongst practitioners and scholars alike. Largely approached from a practitioner perspective, this collection provides vivid snapshots of contemporary debates within the prose poetry field while actively contributing to the poetics and craft of the form.
- 256 pages
- English
- ePUB (mobile friendly)
- Available on iOS & Android
eBook - ePub
Prose Poetry in Theory and Practice
About this book
Trusted by 375,005 students
Access to over 1.5 million titles for a fair monthly price.
Study more efficiently using our study tools.
Information
1Protean Manifestations and Diverse ShapesDefining and Understanding Strategies of the Contemporary Prose Poem
Cassandra Atherton and Paul Hetherington
DOI: 10.4324/9781003199533-2
Introduction
Prose poetry is one of literature’s most elusive and protean forms. It is a short form that often looks unremarkable when first encountered but ranges widely in its manifestations – and it is evolving and developing so fast that, as scholars of the prose poem, we keep finding innovative expressions of the form, even when we’re not looking for them. Many of these innovations appear in the rapidly growing number of anthologies, critical books, and special journal issues that focus on prose poetry – and an example is Lauren Russell’s sequence “Requiem for Elementary Language Acquisition,” which we discuss below.1 This remarkable hybrid piece juxtaposes prose poetry paragraphs with lineated moments while exploring the use of free-lines and colons to quiz and defer meaning and resist completion.
In the face of the great variety of prose poems and a conspicuous lack of consensus about what prose poetry is, various scholars and prose poets have suggested that it is best if the form remains mysterious and that we understand prose poetry primarily through reading individual works. For instance, Kevin Brophy writes:
It is perhaps impossible to discuss the prose poem sensibly. If you move too far towards categorising the different forms it can take, you can end by defeating its defiant formlessness; and if you move down the path of pointing out its poetic strategies you re-align it with that form of poetry it is deliberately discarding.2
John Taylor broadly concurs, although he generalises about the prose poem form by acknowledging that it “express[es] a demotic spirit and rarely avoid[s] the anecdotic, in both the etymological and evolved sense of the term.”3
It is an understandable impulse in a postmodern period to maintain the sometimes-enigmatic frisson associated with the idea of an unquantifiable literary form. Part of the appeal of prose poetry is that it may represent different things to different prose poets and may even manifest in ways that they do not expect. Thus, the form often brings with it a sense of surprise and an associated sense that every prose poem carries the possibility of newness. When we wrote the book Prose Poetry: An Introduction (2020), we were aware of these issues. Prose poetry has long been called a subversive form, and even “hypersubversive,”4 largely because it fails to conform with conventional expectations of either traditional verse or contemporary free verse. It also does not conform to the expectations associated with conventional, discursive prose – whether fiction or narrative nonfiction.
In this context, we wrote that “the main scholarship written about English-language prose poetry to date defines the form as problematic, paradoxical, ambiguous, unresolved, or contradictory.”5 We also quoted the fine prose poet and editor, Peter Johnson’s wonderfully tantalising remark, “Just as black humour straddles the fine line between comedy and tragedy, so the prose poem plants one foot in prose, the other in poetry, both heels resting precariously on banana peels”6 – a comment he made at a time when prose poems were hard to place in journals and magazines and when there was a powerful sense that the prose poem had been “othered” by mainstream literary culture. Given this, is it possible to say what constitutes a prose poem and, in any case, what should one make of its protean tendencies?
In addressing these questions, we will focus on some of the features of prose poetry we have defined in our scholarship on the form: its fragmentary nature and use of metonymy; its use of sentences rather than poetic lines; its prose-poetic cadences; its relationship to the quotidian; its appearance on the page; and its incorporation into hybrid literary forms. We examine these features primarily through the discussion and explication of particular prose poems, taking the position that, overall, prose poetry belongs to the genre of poetry but is written in the mode of prose.7 Importantly, we begin with the premise that prose poetry is a literary form with identifiable characteristics, however various actual prose poems may be.
Fragmentation and the Prose Poem
Prose poems belong to the tradition of fragmentary literary forms that came into vogue in the Romantic period, most conspicuously in Germany and England. German poets, philosophers, and philosopher-poets, notably Friedrich Hölderlin, Novalis, and Friedrich Schlegel, made a virtue of the unfinished (and in many cases, fairly brief) work, reflecting on the uncontainable nature of existence and what they tended to see as the inherently fragmentary nature of literature. One of the famous statements about such matters is by Novalis (1772–1801):
Only what is incomplete can be comprehended—can take us further. What is complete is only enjoyed. If we want to comprehend nature we must postulate it as incomplete, to reach an unknown variable in this way. All determination is relative.8
Once poetry, and literature more generally, began to be actively conceived of as “incomplete” – and as a gesture towards incomprehensible immensities – so literature began to be understood as insufficient to the task of comprehending the whole.
The development of prose poetry was one outcome of this preoccupation with literary insufficiency. Whether one takes Charles Baudelaire’s preface to the first book of modern prose poetry, Le Spleen de Paris [Paris Spleen] (1869) at face value – and a few critics have questioned Baudelaire’s sincerity – his attitude in this preface is reasonably congruent with some of Novalis’s key ideas. He writes, “I will not hold [the reader] to the unbroken thread of some superfluous plot … Chop it into many fragments and you will see how each is able to exist apart.”9 This idea of prose poetry being composed of fragments is of profound importance in understanding how ideas of the small and the large, and of what is contained and what is liberated, may intersect in this literary form. As fragments acknowledge their insufficiency, so they simultaneously claim a kind of self-sufficiency, suggesting that their limitations are part of their point. Fragmentation implies that although there is a whole, and although it may be partly knowable, once one steps back from society’s grand and encompassing narratives – of the Biblical story, for example, or aspects of European Enlightenment narratives – fragmentation becomes a recognition of knowledge’s limitations.
Prose poems as literary fragments thus have the capacity to suggest a clear-sighted understanding of the power of appreciating the brokenness and partiality – in both senses – of human ways of seeing. Prose poems resonate especially powerfully in the liminal space that exists between the limitations of what they say and know, and the larger world and knowledge at which they gesture. Their own gestures are deliberately circumscribed and poetically suggestive in order to reach outwards and, in this reaching outwards, they resist closure. Instead, they open a dialogue with larger and not-completely knowable worlds, sometimes unfathomable states of being and the ineffable. By never trying to tell the full story, they acknowledge that no single narrative is able to be all-encompassing.
If prose poems as fragments gesture towards and invoke larger ideas and meanings, they may be understood as inherently metonymic. Certainly, any analysis of their parts indicates that they regularly employ metonymic gestures – where truncated and limited statements stand in for, or gesture at, larger statements and broader ideas beyond their own forms of representation. Furthermore, because prose-poems-as-fragments acknowledge what one may call their broken-offness, many of the most interesting of them resist the full impetus of narrative even when they employ narrative devices. Prose poems try to point to something about their language or their subject that sits outside of the narrative gestures they make (and frequently outside of the work itself), understanding that narrative gestures alone can rarely do the work of connecting the outside “whole” to the prose poem’s relatively brief, fragmentary utterance. The prose poem’s language needs to employ metaphorical, metonymic, analogical, and ambiguous figures in order to open conduits between its utterance and what is does not, or cannot, explicitly say.
Thus, prose poems exemplify the art of what we will call the suggestive-implicit – saying just enough to indicate that there is more – somewhere – that might be said but cannot currently be stated. However, in its use of prose, the prose poem’s flow of sentences and its box shape initially tend to disguise this suggestive-implicitness; indeed, at a first glance, many prose poems appear to be complete and explicit. This means that many prose poems transform powerfully under the reader’s gaze as they are revealed to be fragmentary and open.
Speaking the Unspeakable – Mariko Nagai
Mariko Nagai’s prose poems in her collection, Irradiated Cities, are a good example of these prose-poetic tendencies at work. She creates works that gesture towards an unspeakable reality, are fundamentally metonymic, and which gain much of their power through their carefully circumscribed modes of address. These works are complemented by a series of black and white photographs which Nagai took in Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Tokyo, and Fukushima. Together, both text and image explore the traumatic history of radiation in Japan. And, to a significant extent, the fully justified blocks of prose poetry and photographs mimic one another as both attempt to capture and reiterate fragmentary experiences in the aftermath of atomic catastrophe.
Metonymically, these works stand in for the nuclear sublime’s appeal to the beauty and terror of extinction, while simultaneously acknowledging the ultimate failure of any attempt to convey the end of all forms of life. In this way, the accumulation of prose poems and photographs in Irradiated Cities is a stark admission that while each is a part of something much larger, perhaps even infinite in its implications, it must be pieced together from fragments to be effective – an acknowledgement that, in such a context, nothing we know or can name or grasp is truly whole. Furthermore, Nagai highlights the power of fragments to stand in for much more than singular moments in a traumatic past. As Nicholas Wong argues, the juxtapositions in the text haunt and beg us “to confront both the cities and ourselves in pieces.”10
Nagai’s striking use of colons between phrases and clauses in Irradiated Cities both separates and unites fragments. The colons signal conclusions that never conclude and may even be read as QEDs that prove nothing. However, this repetitive use of the colon constantly expands the reader’s sense of these prose poems because, as John Bradley identifies, “everything is connected to everything else.”11 For example, in “The Living Calls to the Dead,” Nagai uses the initial aftermath of the atomic bombing to build a picture of abject suffering and catastrophe. Broken parts of sentences are used to convey a sense of the ruptured, postatomic world. Nagai’s fragments are simultaneously joined and separated, stacking up on one another like debris and an uncontainable, immeasurable list of suffering:
: the city simmers from above & from the ground : house...
Table of contents
- Cover
- Half-Title Page
- Title Page
- Copyright Page
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- Acknowledgements
- Notes on Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 Protean Manifestations and Diverse Shapes: Defining and Understanding Strategies of the Contemporary Prose Poem
- 2 Prose Poetry and the Resistance to Narrative
- 3 “In the Eye of the Beholder”: Prose Poetry in Dialogue Between Reader and Poet
- 4 Nobody’s Storybook: Reading Russell Edson for the Wrong Reasons
- 5 “Borders on Edges, Where Skin Stops, or Begins”1: The Prose Poem’s Relationship with the Discourses of Fashion and Food, with Particular Reference to Charles Baudelaire, Gertrude Stein, and Harryette Mullen
- 6 The Contemporary Vernacular: Exploring Intersections of Architecture and Prose Poetry
- 7 “Image Machine”: Gaspar Orozco’s Book of the Peony and the Prose Poem Sequence as Perceptual Trick
- 8 Writing the Prose Poem: An Insider’s Perspective on an Outsider Artform
- 9 “A Form of Howling. A Form of Chanting. A Form of Looking Out for Each Other”: Poetics and Politics of the Contemporary Indian-English Prose Poem
- 10 Collaboration, Conversation, and Adaptation: The Prose Poetry Project and Renga Attitude
- 11 Framing Catastrophe: The Ekphrastic Prose Poem
- 12 “An Interlude Suspended”1: Historical Biography Through the Lens of Prose Poetry
- 13 Who Are the Contemporary Symbolists?: The Prose Poem and the Decorative-Subjective Approach
- 14 One Foot; Many Places: The Prose Poem’s Art of Standing Still While Travelling
- Bibliography
- Index
Frequently asked questions
Yes, you can cancel anytime from the Subscription tab in your account settings on the Perlego website. Your subscription will stay active until the end of your current billing period. Learn how to cancel your subscription
No, books cannot be downloaded as external files, such as PDFs, for use outside of Perlego. However, you can download books within the Perlego app for offline reading on mobile or tablet. Learn how to download books offline
Perlego offers two plans: Essential and Complete
- Essential is ideal for learners and professionals who enjoy exploring a wide range of subjects. Access the Essential Library with 800,000+ trusted titles and best-sellers across business, personal growth, and the humanities. Includes unlimited reading time and Standard Read Aloud voice.
- Complete: Perfect for advanced learners and researchers needing full, unrestricted access. Unlock 1.5M+ books across hundreds of subjects, including academic and specialized titles. The Complete Plan also includes advanced features like Premium Read Aloud and Research Assistant.
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1.5 million books across 990+ topics, we’ve got you covered! Learn about our mission
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more about Read Aloud
Yes! You can use the Perlego app on both iOS and Android devices to read anytime, anywhere — even offline. Perfect for commutes or when you’re on the go.
Please note we cannot support devices running on iOS 13 and Android 7 or earlier. Learn more about using the app
Please note we cannot support devices running on iOS 13 and Android 7 or earlier. Learn more about using the app
Yes, you can access Prose Poetry in Theory and Practice by Anne Caldwell, Oz Hardwick, Anne Caldwell,Oz Hardwick in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in Literature & Literary Criticism. We have over 1.5 million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.