Disease and the Environment in the Medieval and Early Modern Worlds
eBook - ePub

Disease and the Environment in the Medieval and Early Modern Worlds

Lori Jones, Lori Jones

Share book
  1. 212 pages
  2. English
  3. ePUB (mobile friendly)
  4. Available on iOS & Android
eBook - ePub

Disease and the Environment in the Medieval and Early Modern Worlds

Lori Jones, Lori Jones

Book details
Book preview
Table of contents
Citations

About This Book

This volume brings together environmental and human perspectives, engages with both historians and scientists, and, being mindful that environments and disease recognize no boundaries, includes studies that touch on Europe, the wider Mediterranean world, Asia, Africa, and the Americas.

Disease and the Environment in the Medieval and Early Modern Worlds explores the intertwined relationships between humans, the natural and manmade environments, and disease. Urgency gives us a sense that we need a longer view of human responses and interactions with the airs, waters, and places in which we live, and a greater understanding of the activities and attitudes that have led us to the present. Through a series of new research studies, two salient questions are explored: What are the deeper patterns in thinking about disease and the environment? What can we know about the environmental and ecological parameters of emergent human diseases over a longer period – aspects of disease that contemporary persons were not able to know or understand in the way that we do today?

The broad chronological and geographical approach makes this volume perfect for students and scholars interested in the history of disease, environment, and landscape in the medieval and early modern worlds.

Frequently asked questions

How do I cancel my subscription?
Simply head over to the account section in settings and click on “Cancel Subscription” - it’s as simple as that. After you cancel, your membership will stay active for the remainder of the time you’ve paid for. Learn more here.
Can/how do I download books?
At the moment all of our mobile-responsive ePub books are available to download via the app. Most of our PDFs are also available to download and we're working on making the final remaining ones downloadable now. Learn more here.
What is the difference between the pricing plans?
Both plans give you full access to the library and all of Perlego’s features. The only differences are the price and subscription period: With the annual plan you’ll save around 30% compared to 12 months on the monthly plan.
What is Perlego?
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1 million books across 1000+ topics, we’ve got you covered! Learn more here.
Do you support text-to-speech?
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more here.
Is Disease and the Environment in the Medieval and Early Modern Worlds an online PDF/ePUB?
Yes, you can access Disease and the Environment in the Medieval and Early Modern Worlds by Lori Jones, Lori Jones in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in History & World History. We have over one million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.

Information

Publisher
Routledge
Year
2022
ISBN
9780429619298
Edition
1
Topic
History
Index
History

Section III Science Meets Historical Disease Environments

7 Environments of Health and Disease in Tropical Africa before the Colonial Era

GĂ©rard Chouin
DOI: 10.4324/9780429055478-11

Introduction

Marine engineer Louis Ancelin de GĂ©mozac was a decent artist and an efficient spy.1 Crisscrossing the Atlantic from West Africa to La Martinique, and then back to the port at Rochefort (in south-western France) aboard the French man-of-war Le Tourbillon in early 1671, he spent a great deal of time in his quarters, drawing and writing. A few weeks earlier, he had taken advantage of his visits to the Dutch fortified trade posts on the African Gold Coast to sketch their layouts; he was now putting the finishing touches on an impressive series of confidential plans intended for Jean-Baptiste Colbert, Louis XIV’s all-powerful Secretary of State of the Navy.2 De GĂ©mozac probably kept a private journal of his voyage in which he documented his experiences, and which he later used to produce a short travel account published anonymously in 1674 (Chouin 2011). Like many other early modern European travellers to West Africa, he recorded gruesome details of the health hazards to which sailors were exposed in this part of the world. For instance, he mentioned a mysterious illness that affected some crewmen after the ship had left SĂŁo TomĂ©, an island he described as being “the most unhealthy in the world” (Chouin 2011, 142). Some died within three weeks, he wrote, while it took others four months to recover from what he described as extreme fatigue. Because the men affected by this illness also bled profusely from the penis, he blamed the condition on an excessive “dissipation of spirit” that occurred during intercourse with the native island women, whom he considered randy and dangerous.
De GĂ©mozac’s report fits into an entrenched western perception of Africa as a diseased continent and Africans as vectors of deadly diseases. In nineteenth- and early-twentieth-century Great Britain, this notion was epitomized by the widespread use of the phrase “the White Man’s Grave,” an expression made popular by traveller F. Harrison Rankin’s 1836 book The White Man’s Grave: A Visit to Sierra Leone, in 1834 (Curtin 1961; 1992; Skotnes-Brown 2019). This metaphor for tropical West Africa, however, contradicted synchronous colonial propaganda that sought to present Africa as a new “White Man’s Opportunity.” In the twenty-first century, after many decades of advances in tropical western medicine, the old scares have evolved but remain firmly embedded in global health discourses about Africa. Even though the idea of the “White Man’s Grave” has disappeared, Africa remains perceived as a reservoir of global bio-threats to western nations. The HIV/AIDS pandemic and the more recent 2013–16 West African Ebola virus epidemic provide ample evidence that the “backward” and “diseased continent” narrative endures, alongside the stigmatization and structural violence that accompanies it (Joffe 2011, 449–51; Jones 2011; Leach 2010; Wilkinson and Leach 2015). In the same vein, Western media that loudly predicted mayhem in Africa in the wake of the Covid-19 has been much less vocal since the continent eventually proved to be less severely impacted by the virus than many parts of the Western world.
We need to critically examine this long-term narrative about the deadly entwining of Africa and diseased environments. Detailed histories of various diseases and epidemiological patterns have taken into account both environmental and global factors, but most focus on relatively recent case studies (Echenberg 2011; PĂ©pin 2021; Webel 2019). In contrast, there is limited published research on Africa’s disease landscapes before the nineteenth century, including those parts of the continent engaged in pre-modern Atlantic trade (Cagle 2018). In the face of a ghostly historiography and scattered sources, the task of writing a chapter on the history of diseased environments in pre-modern Africa is more than a challenge; it is an act of intellectual tightrope walking on a dotted line. I, therefore, address the topic by providing impressionistic, fragmented, and, sometimes, provocative answers to three primary questions.
First, was pre-modern tropical Africa as dangerous a diseased environment as is often suggested in the western scholarly literature? One way to respond to this question is to revisit European travelogues about the early modern Atlantic world. We need to probe them as historical sources and reflect critically on their contribution to the deeply rooted and enduring perception of tropical Africa as a metaphor of the world’s darkest unwholesomeness. From this emerges a second question: how did Africans themselves conceptualize their environment and its diseases before the nineteenth century? In other words, is the modern concept of diseased landscape useful in a pre-modern Africa-centred perspective? Finally, how might we historicise the intersections between human activity, diseases, and environments in Africa? To engage with these critical questions, I will investigate how pre-modern connections between the Old and New Worlds contributed both to the emergence of specific African diseased landscapes and their projection beyond the continent’s shores.

Sickening Sources? Early Modern European Travelogues and the Construction of Disease in Tropical Africa

Walking a Fine Line: Early Modern European Writings as a Source for the History of Disease in Tropical Africa

Early modern travellers’ accounts of their visits to Atlantic Africa are replete with horrendous stories about the deadly or debilitating illnesses that awaited European crewmen. Authors noted three main origins of such diseases: sexual intercourse with African women, miasmas generated by abundant rains and heat, and freshwater. The latter usually only appeared in connection with the parasitic infection caused by the Guinea worm, from far the most discussed condition.
Like Louis de GĂ©mozac, Johann von LĂŒbelfing and Samuel Brun noted that spending the night with local women in SĂŁo TomĂ© and Cape Lopez, respectively, could cost men their lives (Jones 1983, 16, 72).3 A barber-surgeon, Brun explained that “the men’s sperm or genitals decayed, till blood and finally death itself followed” (Jones 1983, 72). All three men described similar signs leading to death but provided no detailed clinical descriptions and did not attempt to identify a particular disease.4 Instead, the connections they established between “the Black wenches” and the visible lesions on the men’s bodies rested primarily on Christian moral and racial/gendered prejudices, not on what we would call medical evidence today. As such, they foreshadowed eighteenth-century discourses that linked tropical women and venereal diseases (Siena 1998). Of course, the mention of casual intercourse in West African port cities suggests that the men could have already suffered from a range of sexually transmitted conditions and might have contracted new ones. None of these diseases on its own would have offered a short-term death sentence. Reading between the lines of these sources, though, we see that intercourse also meant that the men spent time ashore in local settlements, by day and night, drinking, eating, flirting, bathing, and, as a result, exposing themselves to tropical pathogens and parasites.
Notwithstanding Andrew Cunningham’s (2002) now-classic warning against interpreting past diseases in modern terms, we should examine the symptoms reported by the three traveller-writers. De GĂ©mozac’s brief description of the men’s illness suggests that they suffered from gross haematuria (blood in urine visible to the naked eye). Red-coloured urine and Brun’s mention of blood in the men’s semen – ​a condition known as haematospermia – ​are symptoms consistent with a parasitic, mostly non-lethal infection known in modern medical terms as schistosomiasis, and more specifically its urogenital variant.5 People become infected with the parasite while bathing, swimming, or wading in waters infested with larvae of trematode worms (Schistosoma haematobium or S. guineensis in the case of urogenital infection) released by freshwater snails. What we know of its evolutionary history as a human parasite suggests that it was already present in Africa in the pre-modern period and transmitted to tropical America by the slave trade (Noya et al. 2015; Webster et al. 2006).
Without engaging in further retrospective diagnoses, it is enough to note that a contextual assessment points towards a much more complex picture than that offered by a superficial reading of the socially and culturally constructed seventeenth-century travel narratives. Not only did the illness likely have nothing to do with the sexual behaviour of the victims, but the infection of their urogenital systems – ​dramatic as it might have looked – ​would not have caused their deaths.
Most certainly, those men who died after leaving the African shores suffered from several diseases, in the modern sense of this term. The suggestive location of their physical symptoms created a smokescreen behind which less visible life-threatening conditions lurked – ​malaria, yellow fever, or typhoid (again in modern medical terms) – ​that were not yet conceptually constructed in the seventeenth century. More than being the result of any single disease, the high mortality rates more likely indicated co-infection by multiple pathogens in short-term travellers who were habituated to radically different epidemiological environments. In the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, many men serving on the ships that sailed across the southern Atlantic Ocean, or who were posted to fortified European trading posts, suffered from relatively poor health: they were mal- and under-nourished, probably dehydrated, and exposed to numerous wounds and infections (Fury 2012; Watt et al. 1981). In these conditions, it is not all that surprising that their immune systems could not cope when they encountered several new pathogens in unfamiliar tropical environments.
The cases discussed above illustrate the complexity and limitations of using early modern European sources to discuss the pre-modern African epidemiological landscape and to diagnose its diseases. In most cases, the writers of these accounts used concepts they had learned in Europe, not in Africa, and they usually focused on the health of European travellers, not on Africans. Cunningham has already argued that historians should stop trying to make retrospective diagnoses and should focus instead on “how diagnosis happens” (2002, 16). Nevertheless, although our cognitive experiences and interpretations of disease might be radically different from those of past societies, the biological fundamentals that connect us to our environments evolve at a much slower, almost imperceptible pace. For instance, we can justifiably assume that the parasitic blood flukes (flatworms) of Schistosoma spp. were present in seventeenth-century western Africa and that the biological processes leading to the infection of human hosts in a variety of freshwater habitats were no different than those of today. From there, we can anticipate that they contributed to the morbidity aboard European ships plying the southern Atlantic. We likewise can expect some signs of their presence in European sources.
Can I know that the men who died on De GĂ©mozac’s ship were infected by schistosomiasis? No, I cannot; but I can establish a dialogical relationship between a seventeenth-century written source and a corpus of contemporary medical evidence, which allows me to interpret that source and reconstruct fragments of Africa’s past epidemiological state. Despite the inherent risks of over- or...

Table of contents