We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of black seas of infinity, and it was not meant that we should voyage far. āH. P. Lovecraft
At the end of the second decade of the new millennia, we face a strange world that is no longer the stable background for human history as it has seemingly turned against us, running amok. Previously recognized climatological standards are shattered, records are set, in a most alarming way, all over the world and we scramble in order to understand how to navigate in this extraordinary new normal. Dark pedagogy is a response to how our world is changing and an effort to think the consequences and potential new practices as pedagogical and educational key issues. Dark pedagogy is an experimental effort provide a pedagogy for an age of mass extinction.
While notions of climate change have been with us for decades recent events have underlined that we no longer are in negotiation and planning mode, but unwillingly find ourselves in the midst of an environmental and climate crisis. A crisis whose causes are now being recognized on a hitherto unforeseen scale, and peopleāespecially children and adolescents whose future the future isāmobilize in order to protest against the political status quo and business-as-usual approach to decision-making and to demand a new ecologically and environmentally oriented and respectful way of politically reconfiguring modern, industrial, urbanized and consumer-driven economies and societies.
Dark Pedagogy took shape during 2018, a year that turned out to be record-breaking and climatologically extraordinary in more than one aspect. As we enjoyed a rare scorcher of a Scandinavian summer, the entailing consequences slowly dawned. Denmark and Sweden went through one of the longest and hottest summers in a hundred years causing a drought with severe negative consequences for farmers and urbanites alike. At the same time, ironically, Copenhagen airport had its busiest day in history (the 13th of July) with over 110.000 travellers arriving or departing by way of flight. In Sweden, we experienced wild forest fires during the worst drought since the 1940s. Not typical weather situations in Scandinavia from a historical perspective. Around the globe extreme weather conditions also manifested. Greece was ravaged by wild forest fires and on the other side of the Atlantic, California witnessed raging wildfires causing the official authorities to carry out mass evacuation of both locals and tourists in areas north of the city of Redding. In Namibia on the African continent, a seven-year drought persevered while deadly flash floods hit Vietnam in Asia. Considering the best available climatological research, all of these events were, however, to have been expected and events like these are, regrettably, to be expected in the future as well. And unfortunately, they are not just to be expected to recur. On the contrary, it is to be expected that the extreme weather phenomena will aggravate in the foreseeable future. As Johann Goldammer, a specialist in global fire ecology put it: āThis summer is plagued by extensive and in some places deadly forest fires. And it will happen again. Actually, this is only the beginningā (Goldammer 2018).
Examples of the dire symptoms of the planetās current climatological development are omnipresent, and it is beyond any reasonable doubt that extreme weather phenomena such as the above mentioned is to a large degree co-caused by the global impact of human industrial and consumption activity on Earth since, at the latest, the 1780s. These developments have influenced, but only peripherally, how pedagogy and education have been thought for decades. It is due time, however, to draw them into the very midst of how we think the concepts that inform our pedagogical practices that go into educating the generation of tomorrow in order to ensure that they are given the best possible points of departure to theoretically acknowledge and practically change the current status quo of human societies. We are even beginning to see students themselves demanding that university curricula be changed so that issues concerning global warming, biological mass extinction and its anthropogenic (i.e. caused by humans) roots be laid bare from the perspective of all kinds of different studies. It should not only be geology, biology, environmental studies that deal with the issues and topics related to our planetary climate crisis and sustainable solutions. Economists, political theorists, psychologists and philosophers, for instance, should also engage with the pressing agendas involved in the dangerous developments characteristic of the Anthropocene. To have a dark pedagogical outlook involves a sympathetic stance towards such demands, and, as you will see, the book Dark Pedagogy offers a variety of different ways to motivate and justify such a sympathy.
We, the three authors of Dark Pedagogy , are concerned with the current critical state of things and specifically how the challenges of the Anthropocene can be thought and said to take on a central role in pedagogy and education. Luckily we are far from alone in our interest in environmental and sustainability challenges and across (and beyond) academia an invigorating current of new thinking on these challenges are emerging. Within the tradition of continental philosophy the contemporary philosophical movement of āspeculative realismā is proving most productive and influential (Bryant 2011; Harman 2009; Meillassoux 2009). The umbrella concept of speculative realism covers thinkers that specifically work with the autonomy of reality and the objects that populate it. The longstanding tradition of putting human beings at the centre of all thought and theory is now being challenged by the new theoretical perspectives and invitations of āobject-oriented ontologyā (OOO) (Harman, Morton), ācosmic pessimismā (Thacker, Brassier) and āspeculative materialismā (Meillassoux), just to name a few. Their timeliness is seen to imply that they are currently seeping into other academic fields, and often joining forces with the prospects of ānew materialismā (Bennett), āagential realismā (Barad) and āpost-human feminismā (Haraway, Braidotti). Despite the many differences between the listed -isms a shared central premise seems to be the case: To critique and subvert the long reign of anthropocentrism in theory, and to propose new ways of thinking about human-related issues from the perspectives of nonhuman forces, objects, factors, materialities and life forms (Harman 2009). To put it briefly: The nonhuman appears to be the shared interest of many of the cutting edge thinkers of our time. Or, as Saari and Mullen puts it: āWe argue that Mortonās thoughts further the post-structuralist and new materialist critique of bounded, stable places through introducing an ontology of finitude, withdrawal, and excessā (Saari and Mullen 2018). In this book, we draw inspiration from speculative realism, and occasionally from other contemporary trends as well, in our attempt to develop new perspectives on environmental and sustainability education (ESE).
The Horror!
A central point we borrow from speculative realism is an emphasis on the constructive aspects of focusing on the darker side of central ESE concepts, such as nature, place, body, learner, climate and environment and how this approach can be a useful point of departure for trying to deal with these concepts in an educational context. By drawing on recent research on the purpose and potential of the horror genre (Haraway 2015; Harman 2012; Morton 2016; Thacker 2011; Wallin 2014) we set out to explore how the different perspectives on the notion of āthe great outdoorsā (Meillassoux 2009) can be understood and incorporated in a new and darker understanding of the role of pedagogy and ESE in engaging with the nonhuman aspects of the Anthropocene.
Both the concept behind and the narrative situating the book are inspired by the ongoing surge of interest in the classic horror and weird tales author Howard Philips Lovecraft (1880ā1937). An interest that is also most evidently shared by the speculative realists (Harman 2012). Lovecraft is considered by many to be the greatest horror fiction writer of his time and as one of the first writers to elevate the beforehand fringe genre of pulp-horror to a more central place within literature (Joshi 2013). Lovecraftās universe consists of a fragile human world constantly threatened and rearranged by uncanny nonhuman powers that lie beyond the direct control of human manipulation. Through a myriad of novellas and short stories, some of which will be directly discussed in this book, Lovecraft developed his particular and distinct universe and its specifically non-anthropocentric perspectives ...