eBook - ePub
Understanding Chuck Palahniuk
Douglas Keesey, Linda Wagner-Martin
This is a test
Share book
- 152 pages
- English
- ePUB (mobile friendly)
- Available on iOS & Android
eBook - ePub
Understanding Chuck Palahniuk
Douglas Keesey, Linda Wagner-Martin
Book details
Book preview
Table of contents
Citations
About This Book
An introduction to the fictions of the Fight Club author, who is both loved and loathed
Ever since his first novel, Fight Club, was made into a cult film by David Fincher, Chuck Palahniuk has been a consistent presence on the New York Times best-seller list. A target of critics but a fan favorite, Palahniuk has been loathed and loved in equal measure for his dark humor, edgy topics, and confrontational writing style. In close readings of Fight Club and the thirteen novels that this controversial author has published since, Douglas Keesey argues that Palahniuk is much more than a "shock jock" engaged in mere sensationalism. His visceral depictions of sex and violence have social, psychological, and religious significance. Keesey takes issue with reviewers who accuse Palahniuk of being an angry nihilist and a misanthrope, showing instead that he is really a romantic at heart and a believer in community.
In this first comprehensive introduction to Palahniuk's fiction, Keesey reveals how this writer's outrageous narratives are actually rooted in his own personal experiences, how his seemingly unprecedented works are part of the American literary tradition of protagonists in search of an identity, and how his negative energy is really social satire directed at specific ills that he diagnoses and wishes to cure. After tracing the influence of his working-class background, his journalistic education, and his training as a "minimalist" writer, Understanding Chuck Palahniuk exposes connections between the writer's novels by grouping them thematically: the struggle for identity (Fight Club, Invisible Monsters, Survivor, Choke ); the horror trilogy (Lullaby, Diary, Haunted ); teen terrors ( Rant, Pygmy ); porn bodies and romantic myths ( Snuff, Tell-All, Beautiful You ); and a decidedly unorthodox revision of Dante's Divine Comedy ( Damned, Doomed ).
Drawing on numerous author interviews and written in an engaging and accessible style, Understanding Chuck Palahniuk should appeal to scholars, students, and fans alike.
Frequently asked questions
How do I cancel my subscription?
Can/how do I download books?
At the moment all of our mobile-responsive ePub books are available to download via the app. Most of our PDFs are also available to download and we're working on making the final remaining ones downloadable now. Learn more here.
What is the difference between the pricing plans?
Both plans give you full access to the library and all of Perlego’s features. The only differences are the price and subscription period: With the annual plan you’ll save around 30% compared to 12 months on the monthly plan.
What is Perlego?
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1 million books across 1000+ topics, we’ve got you covered! Learn more here.
Do you support text-to-speech?
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more here.
Is Understanding Chuck Palahniuk an online PDF/ePUB?
Yes, you can access Understanding Chuck Palahniuk by Douglas Keesey, Linda Wagner-Martin in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in Literatur & Moderne Literaturkritik. We have over one million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.
Information
Topic
LiteraturSubtopic
Moderne LiteraturkritikCHAPTER 1
Understanding Chuck Palahniuk
Charles Michael Palahniuk was born in the small desert town of Pasco, Washington, on February 21, 1962. In Invisible Monsters, Palahniuk writes that “the future ended in 1962 at the Seattle World’s Fair.”1 This event saw the construction of the Monorail and the Space Needle, bold projections of a future that never came to pass, but that instead gave way in subsequent years to a world “fixated on pollution, disease, war and hardship,” according to Palahniuk. He used 1962 to “suggest that ‘tipping point’ in people’s lives, when they become disillusioned with their dreams.”2 Only an author attuned to the dark side of things would trace the end of the future back to the year of his birth.
As the second of four children, Palahniuk grew up with his siblings in a mobile home when the family relocated to the nearby town of Burbank, Washington. As he put it, “My own background runs to trailer houses situated on gravel roads accessed by dented pick-up trucks.”3 He described their trailer as “sandwiched between a state prison and a nuclear reactor.”4 His father worked as a railroad brakeman, and Palahniuk recalls his dad taking him and the other kids to derailed train cars in order to scavenge for food among the wreckage. Other childhood memories include playing hide-and-seek in fogs of pesticide sprayed on crops, handling paper bills from a floor safe contaminated by waste water from overflowing toilets, and eating meals while wondering whether nuclear radiation had polluted the food chain.
During his first three years at school, Palahniuk thought it strange that classroom clocks were hung so high on the wall that you could not read the time. It was only when he was finally able to get his first pair of glasses that the world came into clearer focus. Perhaps this also accounts for why he did not learn to read or write until age eight or nine. “I was filled with terror that I was going to be left behind” the other kids, he said,5 but after finally having some success, “I was so relieved and filled with joy that I decided I’d make my life’s career out of this hard-won skill.”6 Still, he recalls the “heartbreaking” moment when he heard that everyone in school, including kids he thought were his friends, had been spreading the rumor that he was “retarded.”7
When he was eleven or twelve, teachers decided that he needed to spend time in the gym lifting weights because he just was not “boy enough.” As a result, he was given “special coaching” on how to bulk up and be more “masculine.”8 Certainly, to hear Palahniuk describe it, his educational environment was not one where differences were tolerated or where vulnerable students were protected: “my high school was akin to a prison, rife with date rape (before it was [called] date rape) and queer bashing (before it was [called] queer bashing). Students just took their lumps and held their tongues. And if you complained the principal swatted you with a wooden paddle.”9
Home life, too, was far from easy. Palahniuk’s mother was not happy about the fact that his father was often away, including spending significant time at the local bar. When his parents were both at home, they quarreled a lot, despite their children’s often desperate attempts to keep the peace. “To interrupt a loud fight between my parents,” Palahniuk recalled, “I once jumped on a needle that was sticking out of the carpet. When I hopped, bleeding, into the kitchen, the shouting ended like magic.”10 But the fighting did not stop for long—his parents eventually divorced, when he was only thirteen. Palahniuk has since suffered from years of anxiety and insomnia, which he traces back to his time spent as a child in the midst of an acrimonious marriage. At age eighteen, he did learn a family secret that he said has helped him to understand that his father never had a model for how to be in a happy marriage: Palahniuk found out that his paternal grandfather had killed his grandmother and then himself when Palahniuk’s father was still a young boy.
Following high school, Palahniuk left home to attend the University of Oregon, where, inspired by Woodward and Bernstein’s Watergate reporting, he earned a journalism degree in the hope of making a career in that field. However, saddled with student loan debt and unable to find a reporting job that would pay him more than a pittance, he was compelled to quit journalism and seek other employment. The position he got, which he later characterized as “the worst job you could possibly imagine,”11 was as a mechanic at a diesel-truck manufacturing plant in Portland. The work was dirty and dangerous, as it involved lying on his back for eight hours every day installing drivelines on trucks as they moved down the assembly line. Fortunately, after several years of this, he was able to vary the work by also writing technical repair manuals. Palahniuk spent thirteen years, from age twenty-two to thirty-five, working at Freightliner Trucks, feeling stuck there, and getting increasingly angry, which he expressed by getting into brawls—one of which became the inspiration for Fight Club.
It is fair to say, then, that Palahniuk knows something about blue-collar work and the kind of rage that can build up in those who feel trapped in such jobs. He connects with working-class people, many of them young, who do not usually read fiction—and who may not regularly read anything at all. His writing features characters, situations, and language with which they can identify. Because it speaks to them and expresses some of the things they would say about their lives if they could, they become his avid fans, with some of them finding value in reading for the very first time. When Palahniuk attended a personal development seminar in 1988 and was asked to state “some huge impossible thing” that he would devote the rest of his life to, he said, “I want to write books that bring people back to reading.”12
Palahniuk’s books sell briskly, regularly making the New York Times bestseller list. If he is an author with a cult following, that cult is large. And yet, despite being a fan favorite, he is hardly a critical darling. Newspaper, magazine, and web reviewers often pan his fiction. The volume and vehemence of these negative reviews suggest that some readers still struggle with impediments to enjoying this writer’s works. Nevertheless, the success of the 1999 Fight Club movie sent sales of Palahniuk’s novel skyrocketing. Suddenly, the first-time author was famous—and widely influential. Impromptu fight clubs sprang up around the country, drawing participants as varied as high-school teens in Texas, Silicon Valley techies, and Mormon students at Brigham Young University. The phenomenon was parodied in the tea-party mêlée of “Jane Austen’s Fight Club,” a YouTube video that went viral. Palahniuk himself received numerous snapshots of fans proudly posing with bruised faces and was regularly asked by readers, “Can I hit you really, really hard?”13 Fight Club–inspired food pranks reportedly invaded the culinary world; Gucci and Versace had runway stars sporting black eyes and adorned with razor blades modeling the “fight club look”;14 and the rules of fight club became a pervasive cultural meme, adopted and adapted everywhere. The impact on society was hotly debated by cultural commentators, perhaps most intelligently by Henry A. Giroux—for the prosecution—in “Fight Club, Patriarchy, and the Politics of Masculine Violence,”15 followed by—speaking for the defense—Gary Crowdus in “Getting Exercised over Fight Club”16 and Susan Faludi in “It’s Thelma and Louise for Guys.”17
A writer whose first book achieves great fame will always live in the shadow of that early success. Palahniuk has never abjured or disparaged his neophyte novel. Over the years he has happily signed fan copies of it, appeared on numerous panels to discuss it, and fielded countless interview questions about its inception and impact. And, despite having resolutely maintained that he would “never write a sequel,”18 he has recently relented and done exactly that, although it should be noted that Fight Club 2 does take a somewhat different form, that of a graphic novel with chapters published serially by Dark Horse Comics. Yet the phenomenon of his first book’s fame has sometimes seemed to loom over him. Asked once whether he ever worries about being “labeled the Fight Club guy forever,” Palahniuk replied, “Too late. I’m already that ‘Fight Club guy.’ Now my mission is to be that ‘anything else’ guy.”19 Perhaps most gallingly, critics have tended to make invidious comparisons, viewing Palahniuk’s later works as inferior when measured against their famous predecessor. “As the author of Fight Club, Mr. Palahniuk legitimately and brilliantly shocked readers,” writes Janet Maslin in the New York Times, “but he also opened the floodgates for wretched excess of a less inspired kind,” which is the way she characterizes his book Haunted.20 Field Maloney of the New York Times Book Review believes that, while “Fight Club had a cold stylish gleam,” the gleam is gone from Palahniuk’s Rant and “all that’s left is shock as shtick.”21 Reviewing Doomed, Tim Martin of the British Telegraph says that Palahniuk’s “early work crackled with evil humour,” but “his later novels shuffle weakly between leitmotifs of unpleasantness.”22
Readers who come to Palahniuk’s fiction out of enthusiasm for Fight Club will find many features of that great novel carried on in his later work, but in order to appreciate all that this author has to offer, they must get beyond just expecting more of the same. Over the nearly twenty years since the appearance of that novel, Palahniuk has explored a remarkably diverse range of subjects and styles, challenging readers to grow and change with him. In addition to male narrators (Fight Club, Survivor, Choke, Lullaby, Pygmy), his books have featured female storytellers (Invisible Monsters, Diary, Tell-All, Damned, Doomed) as well as multiple points of view (Haunted, Rant, Snuff). He has ventured into—or been influenced by—a variety of genres, including the road novel (Invisible Monsters), horror (Lullaby, Diary, Haunted), science fiction (Rant), pornography (Snuff), chick lit (Beautiful You), Hollywood memoir (Tell-All), the young adult novel (Damned), and the religious journey to redemption (Doomed). Palahniuk’s fiction has taken such innovative forms as an in-flight “black box” tape recording (Survivor), a personal inventory for a twelve-step program (Choke), a diary kept for a coma victim (Diary), an undercover agent’s dispatches to the homeland (Pygmy), stories read aloud at a writers’ retreat (Haunted), a star biography (Tell-All), and a spiritual confession (Doomed). Fight Club was indeed a monumental work—it deserves and receives the most extended discussion in this book—but readers who can make themselves receptive to Palahniuk’s other novels will find much of interest and excitement there.
Some reviewers have shown an unfortunate tendency to mock a certain segment of Palahniuk’s readership, claiming that he writes “angry young man” fiction fit only for immature teens and twenty-somethings. Such critics describe Palahniuk’s work as “raw but insular, angry but self-coddling, like a teenager’s moods.”23 “Whatever emotional depth he achieves is undercut by his seemingly incurable adolescent streak.”24 Palahniuk’s books are said to “traffic in the half-baked nihilism of a stoned high school student.”25 They exhibit an “adolescent urge to shock” that is “facile,”26 and they express outrage in “bumper-stickerlike rallying cries” that are “catnip to preadults.”27 Palahniuk’s readers are subjected to condescension and mockery by critics, who describe them as an “army of disenfranchised Everymen,”28 “teenagers and the sort of young man whose disaffection springs from hazy origins,”2...