The Way of Boys

Anthony Rao, PhD, Michelle D. Seaton

• Publisher: HarperCollins e-books
• Year: 2009
• ISBN:
  9780061933776
• Topic: Psychologie
• Subtopic: Psychologie du développement

The Way of Boys by renowned psychologist Dr. Anthony Rao is an important wake-up call to the dangers of over-medicating our male children and our current tendency to treat their active boyhood as an illness. Dr. Rao raises a much-needed alarmin thisessential volume that belongs in every parent's collection alongside Raising Cain by Michael Thompson. In thesetimes when many parents, concerned about ADHD, Asperger's Syndrome, and bipolar disorder, may be dangerously misinterpreting their young sons' healthy, normal development process, The Way of Boys is must reading.

CHAPTER 1

Your Problem Is Spelled B-O-Y

Sandy stood in my office on the verge of tears. Her four-year-old son, Tommy, had recently been kicked out of preschool after slapping a teacher and throwing a toy, which hit another child in the face. Before Sandy could even hand me the packet of information containing the results of Tommy’s testing and school materials, he had climbed aboard a swivel chair, reclined it, and stood on top of it like a surfer. He ignored her pleas to get down. Sandy apologized to me, and I could see that her days were filled with anxiety about what her son might do next and how others might perceive him. She was constantly vigilant and miserable and very worried about her son.

Sandy and I managed to engage Tommy with LEGOs, and then I listened to the details of her story. Sadly, it’s one I’ve heard over and over again in my practice. After asking Sandy to withdraw her son from preschool, the director of that school told Sandy and her husband that Tommy wasn’t developing normally. She told them that Tommy had trouble transitioning from one activity to another because he was either too engrossed or too bored. He would have tantrums and throw things or bother the other kids at craft time. The director referred them to a specialist who treats young children for developmental disorders. After a quick twenty-minute appointment in which Sandy completed one behavioral checklist, the doctor announced that Tommy had ADHD, or attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. “He’s going to struggle with this long term,” the doctor said. “This is a lifelong issue. The earlier we treat it, the better.” He handed Sandy a prescription for Ritalin.

“I don’t want to give him pills,” she said.

The doctor didn’t seem to be listening. “I’ve had good luck with this in the past,” he said. “Let’s see how he does on it before we decide.”

Sandy left that doctor’s office in tears, feeling that she had no choice but to go along with his treatment plan.

Luckily, Sandy’s next move was to reach out for some help, in this case a second opinion. Through word of mouth, she had heard that, over the past twenty years, first at Children’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School and then in my own practice, Behavioral Solutions, I’d become known as a psychologist who treats young boys who are struggling, without relying solely on medication. I looked at Tommy’s packet and was not surprised by anything I saw in it. The school reports and the specialist’s checklist could justify a diagnosis of ADHD, but that isn’t saying much. It’s an easy diagnosis to hand out. Worse, in order to give that diagnosis, a clinician would have to ignore the other glaring possibility: there was absolutely nothing wrong with this boy. It was possible, and in my view probable, that Tommy was experiencing nothing more than a developmental glitch.

First of all, the fact that Tommy is having trouble in preschool is not surprising, nor is it an indication of a fundamental problem. There is an entire subset of boys who are not ready for circle time, for rigid transitions, for following complex directions or listening to a lot of talk until well past their sixth birthdays. The problem isn’t the boys, it’s our expectations of them.

Moreover, I told Sandy that in six months or so Tommy would be a completely different little boy from the one careening around my office. I told her that it was likely that the areas of his brain that control impulses were developing more slowly in him than in his peers. But I also told her that there was no evidence in the behavioral checklist that this would be a problem for him in the long run. My aim was to convince Sandy to stop worrying, to buy Tommy some time. In six months, he would likely be more settled, more able to concentrate, more verbal. Six months after that, he would be even further along. There was no pressing need to diagnose and medicate him so young. I knew in time he would settle down a bit more and change, even if he never takes a single pill. That’s how fast a four-year-old’s brain is developing. For the Tommys of the world who are struggling in preschool or day care, there are other techniques, behavioral methods for helping them learn to settle down when they have to and to keep them from hurting others when they play excitedly or act impulsively. In most cases, though, simply waiting a bit and giving a boy’s brain a chance to catch up on its own is the best approach.

I wish this were the only example in my practice of very young boys sidelined by some kind of quick diagnosis or kicked out of preschool because of a transient behavioral problem or their quirky developmental path. But I meet boys like Tommy all the time. It’s not just aggression or hyperactivity that is cited as a problem. I meet boys rushed into diagnoses with Asperger’s syndrome because they line up their toys or don’t make enough eye contact; other boys are tagged as antisocial loners because they haven’t graduated to cooperative play at their third birthday; some get labeled with sensory processing issues or nonverbal learning disorder because they are not mature enough to stay on task during craft time, because they don’t take turns readily or verbalize their needs, or because they move clumsily. While early intervention does help with certain diagnoses, such as speech impediments, prolonged language delay, and clear signs of autism, the truth is that the vast majority of young boys don’t have a disorder. They aren’t lagging in any permanent way. There is nothing wrong with them. They are just developing, sometimes unevenly, which is the way development takes place in many boys.

From the earliest days of my practice, I found myself getting many more referrals for boys than girls, and I soon learned that the vast majority of kids receiving psychiatric referrals are boys. But over the past ten years, I’ve noticed another trend that is alarming. Younger and younger boys are coming into my practice with what seems to me exaggerated and inappropriate diagnoses for disorders more commonly assigned to adults or teens. These very young boys are being labeled in alarming numbers as having ADHD, bipolar disorder, various learning disabilities, oppositional disorders, pathological anger, serious social skills deficits, and more. Their parents have read or been told that these disorders have a genetic basis and that they are best treated in a medical way, and that means drugs.

Yet when I work with these boys, I often find them to be in a developmental cul-de-sac that is causing them to seem different from their peers, when in reality they are just lagging a step or two behind. What is shocking to me about this quick culture of diagnosis is that no one is explaining to parents that there is no way to say with certainty that a three-, four-, or five-year old boy is going to struggle with aggression, extreme shyness, or a lack of impulse control for the rest of his life. No one is informing parents that most of these odd developmental pathways are quite normal and don’t mean anything in the long term. The data are clear on this. Accurate long-term predictions for these disorders for kids under age five or six are very, very poor. These diagnostic labels mean nothing in the long term because boys, especially young ones, grow and change so fast.

Even when a boy doesn’t have a diagnosis, even when he hasn’t been kicked out of school or removed from day care, his parents are often struggling to shield their son from relatives and strangers who tell them that something’s wrong with him because he has too many tantrums, because he doesn’t make enough eye contact, because he doesn’t share. More and more often, parents come into my office with a similar set of concerns. They have a boy with destructive, antisocial tendencies, or one who has failed to meet certain developmental milestones on time, or who seems nearly debilitated by anxiety or rage. These parents have been told by a chorus of voices—relatives, teachers, day care providers, and child health professionals—that their son needs an evaluation or some kind of medication.

I believe these fears signal a crisis in young boyhood, a bias against boys in terms of their behavior at home and in school. We know, for example, that boys receive the vast majority of special education services, in part because teachers report their behaviors as problematic. While this has been true for older boys for quite a while, what we are seeing now are IEPs, or individual education programs, for three- and four-year-olds, most of whom are boys. Boys attending preschool under an IEP may be the lucky ones. Some don’t make it that far. In 2005 researchers at Yale published a study that made headlines nationwide. The study examined preschool expulsion rates and found that children are three times as likely to be kicked out of preschool than at any other time during their academic careers. Less widely reported was the study’s finding that boys were more than four and a half times more likely to be expelled than girls.

It’s time we stop this madness.

I want to encourage parents, educators, pediatricians, psychiatrists, psychologists, and other developmental experts to reevaluate and radically alter how we deal with our youngest boys. The time between a boy’s second and eighth birthdays is crucial to his long-term health in terms of cognitive, social, and emotional development. We must stop diagnosing and medicating every boy who doesn’t quite fit in or who stumbles either at home or at school.

I’m not saying that medical intervention is never necessary. However, I am saying that, in most cases, we should just let boys be. We should stop robbing them of normal developmental struggles, which are necessary catalysts in the process of growing up. Children’s challenges are actually their best source of strength; hovering adults can interfere unintentionally with their natural development. It is so tempting for us to label and focus on delays, disorders, and disabilities. In reality every child faces many thousands of developmental challenges over the course of those early years. That’s what early development is: a constant battle to acquire new skills, to navigate challenging new situations, and to allow the brain opportunities to change and grow in the aftermath of failure.

Many years ago I was observing a group of twenty or so children playing at a preschool. I remember one little boy who moved between toys and play areas and engaged two or three girls in constant chatter, a real give-and-take. They moved as a group between blocks and cars and dress up. It was thirty or so minutes before I realized the boy was blind. The girls playing with him were also gently guiding him, not because they had been asked to, not because they were feeling sorry for him, but because they figured out that this was how to play with him. Their play, their movements around the room, didn’t look any different from any other group of children. I remember thinking at the time how comfortable and easy it was for these young children to navigate around something we adults would consider a serious disability. I later learned these children had developed a way to play with one another all on their own. In short, they adapted without adult intervention. How many of us would have felt it necessary to rush in, teach, model, and even try to fix the situation for them? It was a clear example to me of how challenge is part of growing up and how development is not stymied by struggle but helped along by the hurdles we need to overcome.

We may well be robbing our youngest boys of this opportunity. Let’s get back to Tommy. After a few sessions with me in which we worked on sitting skills, better eye contact, and better listening (facilitated with a sticker chart and small rewards), Sandy decided not to medicate her son. Instead, she learned about young boyhood development and learned to be the best behavioral coach she could be for her son. She worked with his teachers at preschool so that they provided him with a consistent, clear, and structured environment, which she continued at home. Within a month, he was no longer distracting the class as much, and within three months, he was thriving at school. Tommy is now a well-adjusted second grader who doesn’t show any signs of ADHD. In fact, his teachers have remarked on how focused he is.

If Tommy’s mother had never questioned his diagnosis or the prescription that came with it, she would have allowed that diagnostic label to mask a set of behaviors that may have been temporary and that may have signaled important new developments happening in his brain. Boys struggle hardest with behavior right before big breakthroughs in development. What’s worse, sometimes medications seem to confirm that the diagnosis was right in the first place. They appear to change a child’s behavior dramatically at home and school. A boy like Tommy might suddenly focus and be better behaved. Problem solved? No, it might not be the medicine at work, but rather that boy’s developmental upheavals having gone through their natural course and resolving on their own. Further, medications such as stimulants improve a boy’s ability to sit and follow directions, whether he has real ADHD or not. If you or I took these medications, they would do the same and improve our concentration and performance. That’s not evidence of having a disorder. While these medications certainly have their usefulness, they shouldn’t be the first and only option for boys like Tommy. There’s plenty of time to track him, watch and gather more information, try other less invasive strategies, before pinning a diagnosis on him and medicating him.

To be fair, nobody knows for sure what would have happened with Tommy had he taken the prescription without any behavioral therapy, but I caution parents that we don’t know in what way many of these medications affect mental and physical development in very young children in the long run. We do know that once medications stop, a child stumbles, often dramatically, as if you’ve kicked a crutch out from under him. Medications alone don’t teach skills. Many boys I know who have to go off medications because of serious side effects have to start from scratch and learn better listening and self-control on their own. Every boy who is struggling can benefit from good structure at home and at school along with techniques, such as behavioral therapy and academic help. Medications should never be used alone without some form of behavioral or academic help. Had Tommy’s problems at school continued after using behavioral techniques alone, I would consider the diagnosis of ADHD to be more accurate and refer him to an experienced physician who might add medication judiciously—but only after exhausting all other reasonable, nonmedical options.

This is a difficult thing to ask parents to do when the phone rings off the hook and a teacher is asking their son to leave the class. I work with moms and dads who come to me in real crisis over a boy’s behavior at home and at school. When boys are engaging in what I call “the storm before the calm,” that developmental moment just before we see a major leap, their behavior can really regress. Boys can fall apart. I tell these parents to stay calm, hold on, take a breath, and watch. Soon they will see progress that occurs on the behavioral front, signaling that the brain has reorganized itself. And when it does, the change they see in their son is often dramatic. A boy may have a series of terrible tantrums or outbursts just as he’s getting ready to learn to read. He can forget his potty training entirely for a week or longer just before he learns to count to twenty. He can seem leagues behind his peers, even behind other boys, in terms of his verbal and social skills, then suddenly catch up. If he does get a little coaching from me, from his teachers, or from his parents, that work can seem to produce a wholly different boy. Yet it’s not what causes a boy to improve. Coaching merely encourages and supports the brain to do what it’s likely to do on its own.

In these moments parents often turn to me and say, “But we really thought he had a disorder. We really thought he had a medical condition. The testing proved it. His pediatrician said this is a common problem and treatable. How could we have been so wrong?” I can sense their fear. They want to know how they got to that point. How can so many parents and professionals be convinced that the problems young boys are having require medical intervention and long-term therapies?

Faster Pace Equals Higher Demands

I think several cultural influences are at work here, and they are worth looking at. We’re rushing kids through their childhood, as the pace to keep up and compete with one another increases. The world is moving faster, and we all feel it. The stress of our high expectations trickles down, and our young boys often feel it the most. They are not always ready for longer days in school and the higher demands that go along with them. We’re expecting too much from them, to sit, listen, and use social skills that won’t be fully up and running until they reach the second grade. Even then, many boys have difficulties well into second and third grade. They are struggling to learn in larger classrooms. They are stuck indoors and not moving around, as they are hardwired to do. Nowadays, curriculums are geared more and more to tests and standards. Kids have more rote work, more lectures to listen to, and they are not allowed as much natural hands-on playful learning. Homework packets are arriving at home stuffed with one to two hours of work a night. The result? Greater numbers of boys aren’t keeping up, are overloaded with stress, and are acting out in frustration. That gets them noticed, labeled, and diagnosed at alarming rates. More and more boys are being labeled with psychiatric and learning problems once reserved for only a few kids in real trouble. We’ve done a better job over the years making early education work for young girls, who historically were getting left behind and discouraged from learning. Now it is time for us to turn our attention to the unique developmental and learning needs of young boys and do the same for them.

What can we do? We should be hiring more male teachers for early grades. Research shows male teachers create a more boy-friendly learning environment. They rely less on language-only techniques and use more hands-on, real-life exploration for learning. Male teachers are also less likely to see active boy behavior negatively, or pathologically, and don’t as often refer boys for evaluations. Along these lines, we need to increase physical movement and free play for all children, especially young boys, who are more sedentary than ever. We need to give boys more developmental breathing room, regardless of the pressures and forces trying to move all children ahead faster.

There is another trend we need to address. We need to stop medicalizing our problems and stop turning only to drugs to face our life struggles. The diagnostic criteria for many psychiatric disorders are getting broader and more inclusive of behaviors that a generation ago would have been considered odd or challenging but basically normal, such as social shyness, aggressive behavior, restlessness, bed-wetting, and slight delays in learning to read and write. The good news is that most boys do grow out of these problems, sometimes on their own, and sometimes with only a little help from their parents or a professional to guide their development. Yet studies show that psychiatric diagnoses related to many common childhood issues, along with the use of pills, are on the rise among younger and younger children.

The trend to seek medical causes and cures for what ails us is pervasive. The Archives of General Psychiatry reports that about half of all Americans would meet the criteria for some form of “mental disorder” at some point in their lives. With such loose criteria, is it any wonder that diagnoses of mental disorders are on the rise among children? Consider one example, bipolar disorder, which increased by more than 4,000 percent in children and adolescents over a recent eight-year period, again, mostly among boys.

While no doubt beneficial for the few children who may be in need of such help, psychiatric diagnoses and pills have become a first, only, and one-size-fits-all approach. We need to take responsibility as adults and not push problems onto our y...