CHAPTER 1
How to Turn Time
into Money
âThat which is not worth doing at all is not worth doing well.â
âWARREN BUFFETT
What is âentrepreneurshipâ if not the conversion of your knowledge, talent, guts, etc.âthrough investment of your timeâinto money?
Starting with the very next chapter, we dive into very specific how-to strategies, but first, I think youâll find it useful to understand how I arrived at my philosophy of valuing time and how I value time.
In time-management books and in time-management seminars, authors and speakers love to show off charts and graphs depicting the dollar value of each workday hour, depending on your income or the income you want to achieve. Maybe youâve sat through one of these painful PowerPoint sessions before. You know, Mr. Lecturer up there, laptop computer wired into the overhead projector, lights dimmed, even a laser-beam pointer in hand, so he can show off his beautiful five-color bar graph. If you use his numbers, for example, based on eight-hour workdays, presuming 220 workdays, earning $200,000.00 a year requires that each hour be worth $113.64.
Unfortunately, itâs all a pile of seminar-room B.S.
Hereâs why: itâs all based on eight-hour workdays. Eight hours a day. But thereâs not a soul on the planet who gets in eight productive hours a day. Not even close. You see, the workday hour is one thing, the productive hourâor what I call the billable hourâis another. In Chapter 4, thereâs a definition of productivity you may want to use to determine which of your hours are productive. (If you canât or wonât define it, you canât own it. If you donât own it, you wonât achieve it.)
Now, if you happen to be an attorney, none of this matters. It seems lawyers bill out hours whether productive or not. Hereâs a joke: 35-year-old lawyer in perfect health suddenly drops dead. He gets to Saint Peter at The Gate and argues: âYou guys screwed up. You pulled me up here early.â Saint Peter checks his clipboard and says, âNo sir. Judging by your total billable hours, youâre 113 years old and weâre late.â Lawyers.
But the rest of us can only collect on genuinely productive hours.
Can One âNumberâ Change Your Life?
Letâs go back to the math game and assume that $200,000.00 is your base earnings target. (Weâll talk more about what that term means later.) How many of your hours will be productive, directly generating revenue? How many will be otherwise consumed: commuting, filling out government paperwork, dealing with vendors, emptying the trash cans (I hope not), whatever? Letâs say it is one-third productive, two-thirds other. Thatâs pretty generous. One study of Fortune 500 CEOs revealed they averaged 28 productive minutes a day. The business legend, Lee Iacocca, who made the Mustang happen at Ford and who rescued Chrysler from the brink of bankruptcy in the 1980s with mini-vans, cup holders, and bold warranties, personally told me he figured top CEOs might squeeze in 45 productive minutes per dayâthe rest of the day fighting off time-wasting B.S. like a frantic fellow futilely waving his arms at a swarm of angry bees on attack. And that was then; this is now, with all the intrusive communication: email, texts, expected participation in social media. All those distractions in the device in your hand. I have a lot more to say about this in the new Chapter 14. But letâs generously label 33% of your time productive. With that, only one of three hours counts as âbillable.â So youâve got to multiply the $113.64 times three, $340.92. This becomes your governing number for $200,000.00 a year. For $600,000.00, three times that: $1,022.76.
When I wrote the first edition of this book in 1996, I was charging about $3,500.00 to write an advertising campaign for a client. By the time I updated this book in 2013, that fee had multiplied five times. Today, a full campaign bills at $75,000.00 to $150,000.00 plus royalties. Since the time required is about the sameâpossibly less as my memory bank of material and proficiency have grownâthis puts more and more weight on any time wasted. I also now target a yearly income upwards from $1.5 million, so the ideas and methods I describe in this book are a lot more important to me financially today than they were in 1996 or in 2013. Of course, itâs arguably true that I can more easily afford to repel some clients and annoy some people with these methods now than then, but I contend I got here, in part, by thinking about time in this fashion and doing these things long before I could ostensibly afford them.
Anyway, letâs roll back the calendar and assume that my base earnings target number required an hourly average of only $340.92. If you travel in business, you have to think about this a lot. I once lived in Arizona, and then traveled for business constantly. I currently have homes in Ohio and in Virginia, grew to loathe travel, and now do it as little as possible, insisting that the clients, coaching groups, and even events I speak at occur in my home cities. But when I was traveling, if there were two days of travel bracketing a day of work, that put three daysâ cost to that work. Using the $340.92 hourly number, thatâs $8,182.08 of cost.
Few people ever factor cost of their time (or their staffâs time) into product, service, or deliverable cost, or the maintenance of each client of variable value or much of anything else. But you should. At just $340.92 an hour, a client who comes to you costs only for the hours he is there. A client you must drive an hour to visit and an hour to return from costs $683.84 more. If thatâs four times a year, one costs $2,735.36 more than the other. Consider two customers, each worth $3,000.00 a year, but one is needier and more demanding than the other. One consumes eight hoursâthe other three. The first may not even be worth having, particularly if there are enough of the second to be had. This, by the way, is why I book 20-minute, not 30-minute, calls with my coaching clients. I can do three per hour at 20 minutes each but only three per one-and-a-half hours at 30 minutes each. In a year, 10 minutes saved per month per client = two hours! Times 20 clients, a full week!
So again, letâs say my number is $340.92, calendar rolled back. Hereâs how I have to use it.
First, it has to be on my mind constantly. Is what Iâm doing worth $340.92 an hour to do? I believe you need to be hyper-conscious of the disappearance of time by the minute or the hourânot in retrospect at the end of a week, month, or yearâand hyper-conscious of the dollar value of what that time is disappearing into.
Second, it puts a meter on othersâ consumption of my timeâthat unnecessary 12-minute phone conversation just cost $68.18, and the same goes with 12 minutes on Facebook or Twitter. This exercise forces you to think of time and activity in terms of investment and expense. It enables you to quantify what is going on in your life. About this, something of a discovery Iâve made in just the past 10 years: the more you think like an investor-entrepreneur than just an entrepreneur, the better you do financially. It is âinvestor-thinkâ that makes you wealthy. If some activity, project, person, series of meetings, etc. is going to consume 40 hours in total, using the $340.92 number, you have to ask yourself: would I invest $13,636.80 in this as a venture? You also have to consider lost opportunity cost, meaning: if I wasnât investing $340.92 . . . or $13,636.80 . . . of time in this, is there something else I could invest that time in more profitably?
Third, for me it sets the base cost for hours given to a speaking engagement, consulting assignment, copywriting assignment, and other things I do that are directly billable. And if you do anything but earn a fixed salary, you have to weigh this base cost against every activity to set your fee or to decide whether or not to bother.
Iâve learned to think about time cost and time cost of travel a lot. When I first started shifting from going to clients to getting clients to travel to me, I used differential pricing. At that time, a consulting day billed at $8,300.00 if I came to you but only $7,800.00 if you came to me. Why? Because itâs worth money to me to stay home, be able to write for an hour in the morning before the consulting day, finish and be at home at 4:30, be able to drive in harness races and not miss any, sleep in my own bed, and be at work in my home office promptly at 7:00 A.M. the next morning vs. losing that hour the day of, losing a half day or so to travel on either side. Gradually, I eliminated the differential pricing and simply mandated that clients travel to me. I finally converted to flying only by private jet, and that exorbitant expense to be absorbed by a client has pretty much ended any discussion of me coming to them. In a way, that expense added to fees has recreated differential pricing; the cost of even the client plus a couple staff people traveling commercial to me is a lot lower than my fee plus my private jet bill. Looked at side by side on a sheet of paper, itâs dramatic if the client fails to factor in the dollar value of his and his staffâs travel time, which most clients do not calculate. Differential pricing is useful for a variety of purposesâwithin GKIC membership, there are a lot of lawyers, accountants, dentists, and others who charge a higher fee if they do a clientâs work than they do if they only supervise the work done by subordinates.
You donât have to be flying the unfriendly skies to do travel-time cost math. Many years ago, when I was in the field, selling, I quickly figured out that you could fit in two, three, four, or five appointments per day, depending on how you routed yourself. A salesman half as good at selling as a competitor but twice as good at efficiently routing himself and clustering prospects makes the same amount of money. With this in mind, Iâve long âclusteredâ as much productive activity as possible, if traveling, or even when leaving the house. Weâll talk more about that in Chapter 6. By not âclustering,â most people allow a great deal of inefficiency to sneak into their lives.
By working at home, as a writer, consultant, and tele-coach, as opposed to going to an office, I make a lot of money each day just by not commuting. I have conditioned myself to go directly from bed to shower to work in 15 minutes. If I were leaving the house to go to an office, Iâd have those 15 minutes plus another half-hour, maybe an hour commute, then another 15 minutes getting settled in at the officeânot to mention the commute at end of day. And the stops at Starbucks.
I have nothing against Starbucks. At different times, Iâve owned the companyâs stock. If Iâm at the mall, I might stop in for a cup. But the person who stops there every morning easily surrenders at least a half-hour every day, 110 hours per work year; about 2 full work weeks to parking and standing in line. At the $340.92 per hour number, $37,501.20 has been spent plus the price of the coffee! Get a Keurig and buy Starbucks K-cups, and do something more valuable with those two weeks! Heck, even take a two-week vacation. Almost anything beats this very expensive Starbucks habit.
Seek Leverage
In whatever ways you can, in your business, you need to seek leverage. In terms of work productivity, leverage is, in essence, the difference between the base cost for your hour and the amount of money you get for it or from it. One good way to evaluate your personal effectiveness is measuring and monitoring this differential, hour by hour, for a week.
Now, letâs set up your base earning target. Since you are your own boss, you write your own paycheck and you decide how muc...