1
Introduction
POLITICAL CONTEXT
We live in insecure political times, where the intensification of crises has turned into the emergence of authoritarian capitalism:
2016 saw the idea of human dignity and equality, the very notion of a human family, coming under vigorous and relentless assault from powerful narratives of blame, fear and scapegoating, propagated by those who sought to take or cling on to power at almost any cost. [âŠ] Donald Trumpâs poisonous campaign rhetoric exemplifies a global trend towards angrier and more divisive politics. Across the world, leaders and politicians wagered their future power on narratives of fear and disunity, pinning blame on the âotherâ for the real or manufactured grievances of the electorate. (Amnesty International 2017, 12)
Donald Trump: âAmerica Firstâ
In the USA, Donald Trump won the 2016 presidential election with a nationalist campaign that promised to put âAmerica firstâ and to âmake America great againâ. He used stereotypes, such as the one of immigrants as âpeople coming through the border, that are from all over, and they are bad, they are really bad. [âŠ] You have people coming in, and I am not just saying Mexicans. I am talking about people that are from all over that are killers, and rapists, I mean they are coming into this countryâ (Trump 2015c). âOn the political stage, perhaps the most prominent of many seismic events was the election of Donald Trump as President of the USA. His election followed a campaign during which he frequently made deeply divisive statements marked by misogyny and xenophobia, and pledged to roll back established civil liberties and introduce policies which would be profoundly inimical to human rightsâ (Amnesty International 2017, 12).
India: Narendra Modi
In India, the Bharatiya Janata Party came to power in 2014. Hindu nationalism has proliferated under Prime Minster Narendra Modi. In 2016, âauthorities used repressive laws to curb freedom of expression and silence critics. Human rights defenders and organizations continued to face harassment and intimidation, and vigilante cow protection groups carried out several attacks. Thousands protested against discrimination and violence faced by Dalit communitiesâ (Amnesty International 2017, 183). Sedition charges, among others, were brought against student leader Kanhaiya Kumar from Jawaharlal Nehru University in 2016 for allegedly shouting anti-Indian slogans. Kumar commented:
This government has resorted to dictatorial and fascist ways. Those who speak against them and their ideology are being branded as anti-nationals. Laws like sedition are not needed in a liberal democratic state. It is being misused. It is being used as a political tool by this government. Itâs the same law drafted by the colonial power. No changes have ever been made. Itâs being used on the same pattern as the British used it. [âŠ] The government is attacking educational institutions. Itâs a continuous attack against Indiaâs intelligentsia, which talks about protection of constitution, human rights and freedom. Voice of dissent arises from there. [âŠ] The scope of freedom of expression has not shrunk but it is under continuous attack from the government. (Khalid 2016).
Turkey: Recep Tayyip ErdoÄan
Turkeyâs state has, under President Recep Tayyip ErdoÄan (Justice and Development Party), become increasingly authoritarian:
On 15 July [2016], factions within the armed forces launched a violent coup attempt [in Turkey]. It was quickly suppressed [âŠ] Freedom of expression deteriorated sharply during the year. After the declaration of a state of emergency, 118 journalists were remanded in pre-trial detention and 184 media outlets were arbitrarily and permanently closed down under executive decrees, leaving opposition media severely restricted. People expressing dissent, especially in relation to the Kurdish issue, were subjected to threats of violence and criminal prosecution. Internet censorship increased. At least 375 NGOs, including womenâs rights groups, lawyersâ associations and humanitarian organizations, were shut by executive decree in November. [âŠ] Signatories to a January petition by Academics for Peace calling for a return to peace negotiations and recognition of the demands of the Kurdish political movement were subjected to threats of violence, administrative investigation and criminal prosecution. Four signatories were detained until a court hearing in April; they were released but not acquitted. By the end of the year, 490 of the academics were under administrative investigation and 142 had been dismissed. Since the coup, more than 1,100 of the signatories were formally under criminal investigation. (Amnesty International 2017, 367, 368)
The Academics for Peace petition demanded that the Turkish government create âthe conditions for negotiations and create a road map that would lead to a lasting peace which includes the demands of the Kurdish political movementâ as well as âan immediate end to the violence perpetrated by the stateâ.1 President ErdoÄan called the signatories âso-called intellectualsâ and âa fifth columnâ (Weaver 2016). In the course of the crackdown against alleged supporters of Fethullah GĂŒlen, many of the Academics for Peace lost their jobs. They also face an occupational ban from Turkish public services, and many journalists and opposition politicians face legal charges in Turkey. Noam Chomsky (2016a), who signed the petition, has argued that ErdoÄan installed a âdeeply authoritarian regimeâ.
Philippines: Rodrigo Duterte
Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte said in 2016: âHitler massacred three million Jews. Now, thereâs three million drug addicts. Iâd be happy to slaughter themâ (Holmes 2016).
The [Philippine] government [in 2016] launched a campaign to crackdown on drugs in which over 6,000 people were killed. Human rights defenders and journalists were also targeted and killed by unidentified gunmen and armed militia. In June [2016], the government launched a campaign to crackdown on drugs which led to a wave of unlawful killings across the country, many of which may have amounted to extrajudicial executions. These killings followed the election of President Duterte, who repeatedly and publicly endorsed the arrest and killing of those suspected of using or selling drugs. No police officers or private individuals were known to have faced charges for over 6,000 deaths during the year. (Amnesty International 2017, 295)
Europe: Viktor OrbĂĄn, Heinz Christian Strache, Norbert Hofer, Marine Le Pen, Geert Wilders and Nigel Farage
In 2016, Hungary continued its systematic crackdown on the rights of refugees and migrants despite growing international criticism. [âŠ] The detention of asylum-seekers in the country continued to be implemented without the necessary safeguards to ensure that it was lawful, necessary and proportional. [âŠ] The government spent over âŹ20 million on communication campaigns labelling refugees and migrants as criminals and threats to national security. In October, it held a national referendum on its opposition to the relocation of asylum-seekers to Hungary within an EU-wide scheme. The referendum was invalid due to insufficient turnout. (Amnesty International 2017, 181, 182, 183)
Hungaryâs prime minister, Viktor OrbĂĄn, spoke of migration as âpoison, we donât need it and wonât swallow itâ and said that âevery single migrant poses a public security and terror riskâ (Guardian 2016). In summer 2017, OrbĂĄnâs Fidesz movement ran a campaign that used posters showing a picture of philanthropist George Soros and the messages âDonât let Soros have the last laughâ as well as â99% reject illegal immigrationâ. The posters created the impression that Soros fostered illegal immigration to Hungary. The campaign was widely condemned as being anti-Semitic.
In Austria, the Freedom Party (FPĂ) under Heinz Christian Strache used election campaign slogans such as âHomeland instead of Islam: WE are for YOUâ,2 âVienna must not turn into Istanbulâ3 or âMore courage for our âViennese Bloodâ: Too much foreignness is not good for anyoneâ.4 In the run-off 2016 presidential election, the FPĂâs candidate, Norbert Hofer, achieved 46.2 per cent of the votes.
In France, the leader of the National Front, Marine Le Pen, calls immigration âan organized replacement of our population. This threatens our very survival. We donât have the means to integrate those who are already here. The result is endless cultural conflictâ (RT 2011). In the Netherlands, Party for Freedom (PVV) politician Geert Wilders suggested a âhead rag taxâ of âŹ1,000 that he justified by saying that he believes in the âpolluter paysâ principle (Steen 2010).5
In the 2016 UK referendum on leaving the European Union (EU), Nigel Farageâs UK Independence Party (UKIP) used posters that read: âBREAKING POINT: The EU has failed us all. We must break free of the EU and take back control of our bordersâ. The posters showed an image of thousands of refugees. Some observers pointed out parallels with Nazi propaganda films that showed images of Jews accompanied by the message, âThese are the type of Eastern Jews who flooded Europeâs cities after the last war â parasites, undermining their host countries, threatening thousand-year-old cultures and bringing with them crime, corruption and chaosâ (Bartlett 2016).
Several European countries [in 2016] saw an increase in hate crimes targeting asylum-seekers, Muslims and foreign nationals. In Germany there was a sharp increase in attacks on shelters for asylum-seekers, and in the UK hate crimes surged by 14% in the three months after the referendum on the UKâs withdrawal from the EU (Brexit) in June compared to the same period the previous year. (Amnesty International 2017, 44)
Right-Wing Authoritarianism
These are just some examples that document the prevalence of right-wing authoritarianism. We live in times of economic crises, complex wars and heavy political conflicts. Far-right demagogues make use of these insecurities and resulting fears. They distract attention from the complex societal and political-economic causes of crises, construct scapegoats and preach nationalism and law-and-order politics. The proliferation of new nationalisms and authoritarian politics reminds us of past times. The danger is that history might repeat itself. While there is a danger of regression to the past, at the same time we are experiencing the emergence of new technologies such as social media, big data analytics, the Internet of things, cloud computing, smart technologies that promise a new age. The old and the new are always linked in complex ways in the present. Right-wing authoritarianism celebrates new successes and is communicated through new formats, such as social media. Donald Trump as a president who uses the two communication tools of reality TV (The Apprentice) and social media (Twitter) is prototypical for how old ideologies are communicated through new media and how these ideologies take on new forms in the age of Internet spectacles.
This book asks: what is authoritarian capitalism? How is authoritarian capitalism communicated through social media? It formulates the foundations of a contemporary critical theory of right-wing authoritarianism and authoritarian capitalism. In doing so, it updates the Frankfurt Schoolâs critical theory of authoritarianism. It draws on and reinvigorates the works of the Frankfurt School thinkers Franz L. Neumann, Theodor W. Adorno, Erich Fromm, Herbert Marcuse, Max Horkheimer and Leo Löwenthal. It studies how right-wing authoritarianism works and is communicated on social media platforms such as Twitter and Facebook.
THE CHAPTERS IN THIS BOOK
Chapter 2 gives an introduction to the notions of ideology, nationalism and fascism from a critical theory perspective. Chapter 3 provides a theoretical framework for understanding right-wing authoritarianism and authoritarian capitalism.
If you want to go directly to the analysis of Trumpâs r...