Introduction
By its very definition, religion is concerned with how human beings relate to the divine, the divine usually being understood as a divine being (or beings). In the Christian religion the means by which such a relationship is formed between God and humankind has often been expressed by the doctrine commonly referred to as ājustification by faith.ā
In the historical development of Christianity the doctrine of ājustificationā came into prominence early in the sixteenth century with the advent of the religious phenomenon in Western Europe known as the Reformation. For the first time a major rift developed in the Western church that was to prove permanent. The doctrinal issue dividing the Roman Catholic Church from the emerging Protestant churches was ājustification.ā Even today, notwithstanding increasing rapprochement between the Roman Catholic and Lutheran communions, significant differences remain over this issue.
The term ājustificationā is derived from the family of words that characterize the expression of the doctrine in the New Testament. Throughout this study we will refer to this family as the Ī“-family (delta-family). The three most prominent members of this word-family are the noun Ī“Ī¹ĪŗĪ±Ī¹ĪæĻĻĪ½Ī· (dikaiosune), the verb Ī“Ī¹ĪŗĪ±Ī¹Īæįæ¦Ī½ (dikaioun), and the adjective Ī“ĪÆĪŗĪ±Ī¹ĪæĻ (dikaios).
In treatments of the doctrine of ājustification,ā the term ājustificationā is sometimes applied in a very broad sense, so that any material that touches on the concepts fundamental to the doctrine are included, even if the language characterizing ājustificationā in the New Testament (i.e., the Ī“-family) is not present. In this book the term is applied more precisely, referring only to those passages where the Ī“-family is present.
1.1 āJustificationā in Paul
Defined in the way just described, the doctrine of ājustificationā is almost exclusively a doctrine of the Apostle Paul. He expounds ājustificationā in three of his letters. In order of importance they are Romans, Galatians, and Philippians. However, in the present work these letters will be treated in what is generally regarded as their order of composition, namely, Galatians, Romans, and Philippians. In addition, there are significant echoes of ājustificationā language in the two Corinthian letters (1 Cor 6:11; 2 Cor 3:9; 5:21). We have now accounted for five of the seven letters whose Pauline authorship is widely regarded as authentic: only 1 Thessalonians and Philemon lack any use of ājustificationā language. In the case of Philemon this is hardly surprising due to its brevity and the personal nature of the issues Paul is addressing; Philemon contains theological principles rather than theological exposition. Among the six letters whose Pauline authorship is widely disputed, the Letter to Titus has a significant passage utilizing the Ī“-family.
Early in the days when the Christian faith was being shaped, the author of 2 Peter wrote:
Among the things Paul wrote that are āhard to understandā the doctrine of ājustificationā has proved, over the last two millennia, one of the most intractable. From the earliest post-apostolic writings and through the next two millennia, we find that the apostleās doctrine of ājustificationā is frequently ignored or seriously misrepresented.
1.2 Development of the Doctrine of āJustificationā in the Western Church
In the early centuries of the development of Christianity, the Roman Empire was divided (on the basis of language) into East and West, the East being predominantly Greek-speaking, the West Latin-speaking. In church life the differences went beyond language to embrace different ways of understanding and practising the Christian faith. East and West developed different models of salvation and different understandings and estimates of the doctrine of ājustification.ā
In the West, which is the focus of this monograph, the doctrine of ājustificationā did not feature prominently at all until late in the fourth century, when the North African church father, Augustine of Hippo Regius (354ā430), began to give grace (Latin gratia) a prominent place in his theology. In the opening decades of the following century he employed a grace-based theology against the claims of the monk Pelagius and his followers.
The views of Augustine were enormously influential during the Middle Ages and among the Reformers, and even today exercise a powerful influence, although their source is not always recognized.
Fundamental to the view of ājustificationā held by Augustine and his heirs in the Middle Ages was the understanding that the verb iustificare (standing for Paulās Ī“Ī¹ĪŗĪ±Ī¹Īæįæ¦Ī½ in the Greek) meant āto make righteous.ā āJustificationā was seen as the process by which a person becomesāideallyāincreasingly righteous during their lifetime. The ārighteousnessā involved is a moral righteousness. This view is often referred to as the realist view of ājustificationā: a person becomes righteous in reality. In Augustine and in the Middle Ages, a person became righteous only because God, through his grace, took the initiative and supplied the means making it possible. The necessity of grace marked off the orthodox view of ājustificationā from those views which accorded grace a lesser role. Formally it was described as āanti-Pelagian.ā This term is derived from Pelagius, a contemporary of Augustine. Augustine vehemently opposed Pelagius, claiming he had a defective view of human nature, especially in assuming that a person is capable of taking the first steps towards salvation without the aid of Godās grace.
In spite of its anti-Pelagian stance, the actual practices of the Western church at times belied the formal reliance on divine grace. The practice of selling indulgences provides just one example. Associated with the elaborate system of penance prevailing at that time, it provided the spark which ignited the sixteenth-century Reformation that was soon to affect the whole of the Western church and ultimately to make its impact felt universally.
Behind the opposition to the sale of indulgences was a profoundly spiritual movement which was impatient with artifice and called for a return to the original sources of Christianity, the Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments. With the catchcry of sola scriptura there was a repudiation of the ecclesiastical traditions which had grown up alongside the Bible and a demand that the Scriptures be the touchstone for all matters of faith and conduct.
One of the streams contributing to the new way of thinking was the Renaissance, with its veneration for the ancient world. The revival of the Greek language was a direct consequence of the Renaissance, and made the original language in which the New Testament writings were composed more readily available again to the Latin-speaking West.
It was inevitable that these developments would impact on the theology of the Reformers. Very quickly an alternative view of ājustificationā surfaced, and over the next decade or so it was elaborated to the point where certain features would become permanent in the emerging Protestant articulation of ājustification.ā
The foundation stone for the Protestant doctrine was a different understanding of the verb Ī“Ī¹ĪŗĪ±Ī¹Īæįæ¦Ī½ (Latin: iustificare) in the key Greek word-family. Instead of āmake righteous,ā the Reformers held its meaning to be ādeclare righteous.ā In time the Reformers made a separation between the divine act of ājustificationā and the process of sanctification. In ājustificationā a person was declared righteous, in sanctification a person became righteous in reality (i.e., in a moral sense).
The theological rationale for ājustificationā developed on the Protestant side can be summed up as follows: