Business
Kotter's Change Model
Kotter's Change Model is a framework developed by John Kotter to guide organizations through successful change management. It consists of eight steps, including creating a sense of urgency, forming a powerful coalition, and communicating the vision for change. The model emphasizes the importance of engaging employees and maintaining momentum to achieve lasting transformation within an organization.
Written by Perlego with AI-assistance
Related key terms
1 of 5
8 Key excerpts on "Kotter's Change Model"
- eBook - ePub
The 8 Steps to Strategic Success
Unleashing the Power of Engagement
- Gerben van den Berg, Paul Pietersma(Authors)
- 2014(Publication Date)
- Kogan Page(Publisher)
In his books (1990, 1996, 2002), Kotter makes a clear distinction between management and leadership in change. To him, management is a set of activities that keeps a complex system of people and technology running smoothly. Leadership, on the other hand, is what defines the future (gives a vision) and gets people lined up for that vision and inspired to pursue it. The eight phases of change model provides a systematic instrument for taking leadership in change. It enables a company to instil lasting changes in the organization, avoid (possibly) fatal mistakes and get people inspired. Execution Kotter emphasizes the importance of not skipping any of the eight phases. For lasting change, an organization has to go through all eight. The phases are: Create a sense of urgency. To address complacency, it is important that false signs of security are removed. Management must ensure that people feel a sense of urgency because of an (impending) crisis and that they are convinced that continuing as usual is no longer acceptable. Appoint a change team. A strong coalition is needed to create change in an organization. The members of this group must appreciate the value of the proposed change and realize that they need to obtain trust and commitment from the people in the organization. Furthermore, they should be credible and have the skills, connections, reputation and formal authority to demonstrate leadership in change. Have a clear vision. Vision is a key element in successfully realizing change. Vision, according to Kotter, is the bridge between existing and future conditions. When implementing a new strategy, this vision should thus already be clear: it portrays the new strategy and why the organization wants to take on that strategic direction. A clear vision is then instrumental in giving a sense of direction for the desired change and in aligning activities - eBook - ePub
Human Resource Management for Organisational Change
Theoretical Formulations
- Paritosh Mishra, Balvinder Shukla, R. Sujatha(Authors)
- 2021(Publication Date)
- Routledge(Publisher)
The reason for effectiveness in applicability of Lewin’s model is that, the model not only offers suggestions on how changes can be brought about, but also depicts how changes adopted can be maintained and continued to be pursued for further organisational development. Lewin’s was one of the first theories to recognize that change is a constant which is relational and happens through interaction. In today‘s world of uncertainty, Lewin’s theory provides a premise to perceive and cope with uncertainty as a source of change, which, at the crux of it, is what Lewin meant by the process of ‘unfreezing’ (Van Nistelrooij, 2018). John Kotter's Eight Step Model Over the past decades, companies have been trying to build their organisations by reinventing organisational structures. The underlying fundamental facet of this reinvention is to change the way business is conducted. One of the most popular models for planning, implementing, and sustaining this change is the ‘Eight-Step Change Model’ introduced by John Kotter (Kotter, 1995). The model investigates the change in organisations in eight steps. ‘ Establishing a sense of urgency’ refers to the need to examine market and competitive realities (Kotter, 1995) on an emergent basis. This helps in identifying and discussing crises and solving them to create greater opportunities. Bold actions, characteristic to a strong leadership, are normally vital for creating a strong sense of urgency (p. 43). Kotter (1995) further espouses that leaders must communicate this information “broadly and dramatically”. Kotter (1996, p. 44) recommends the use of consultants as a tactic for crafting a sense of urgency and challenge the status quo. Armenakis, Harris, and Mossholder (1993) strengthen Kotter’s statement by suggesting the recruitment of sources outside the organisation. An analytical report compiled by a consulting agency can be used as an instrument to add believability to the need for change - eBook - ePub
Handbook for Strategic HR - Section 6
Change Management
- OD Network, John Vogelsang PhD, Maya Townsend, Matt Minahan, David Jamieson, Judy Vogel, Annie Viets, Cathy Royal, Lynne Valek(Authors)
- 2015(Publication Date)
- AMACOM(Publisher)
Table 53.2 ), it can be difficult to gain perspective on over-arching themes represented in the literature. In relation to the organizational development professional’s role, while the change process may move through progressive stages, the actual action steps must be managed in groups, with subprocesses addressed simultaneously. For example, leadership skills, behaviors, and actions are important in stage 1, but equally significant in the other seven stages. An organizational development professional would recommend projects that address leadership characteristics across all stages, developing training or coaching interventions that (a) improve language choice (Brower, 2007), (b) bring awareness to employee antecedents impacting receptiveness to change (Van Dam et al., 2008), and (c) provide practical action steps for communicating expected change results and measurements from the beginning (Cowley, 2007). Essential enhancements to the Kotter framework, as drawn from the research review, will thus be discussed through the lens of stakeholder groups. The three identified stakeholders are leadership (senior, middle, and front-line managers); employees (followers); and the organization (system).Enhanced Action Steps: LeadershipAn important insight for leadership (see Figure 53.1 for summary) is the acknowledgment managers have the most impact in generating change management success. From communicating the vision, modeling new behaviors, and signaling support for change, to rewarding employees for innovation and improvisation, to building employee engagement—managers carry the keys to unlock the benefits of transformational change. Organizational development professionals should devote considerable energy to the design of corporatewide development tools and measures that proactively develop core change management competencies.These skill sets and behaviors include:1. Communicating specifics regarding expected change process results, including how performance will be measured, what resources will be committed, and projected employee changes (Cowley, 2007).2. Using “building up” and “breaking down” language (Brower et al., 2007, p. 69) to generate understanding and commitment, where establishing understanding is the first priority. Breaking down language means negating information no longer relevant or functional, then promoting disengagement from outdated commitments (Brower et al.). Building up language includes emphasizing information directly relevant to the new vision, then “affirm[ing] the [company’s] mission and inspir[ing] commitment to it” (2007, p. 69).FIGURE 53.1 Recommended Enhanced Action Steps to Kotter Model, Grouped by Stakeholder3. - eBook - ePub
- Eugene McKenna(Author)
- 2020(Publication Date)
- Routledge(Publisher)
Produce visible signs of progress in the form of short-term victories. It is recognized that achieving major change can take time. Given this reality, there is a danger that the effort put into bringing about change may subside or slow down as people lose the initial sense of urgency and their attention moves elsewhere, particularly to important operational issues. One way to guard against this is to seek short-term or early wins (where progress is visible). This is of value because people involved in making things happen receive recognition for their good work.- (7) Stick to the change process and refuse to give up when conditions get tough, and don’t declare victories or achievements too soon. Although early wins are advocated to maintain the motivational impetus and to promote continued effort directed at implementing change, we are cautioned against declaring victories or wins too soon as this could damage the momentum.
- (8) Nurture and shape a new culture to support the improvements and innovations that are taking root. Those instituting the change are keen to ensure that changes are consolidated. This will be made easy if they are able to show that the change has brought about beneficial alterations or modifications to attitudes, behaviour, and organizational processes, which in turn have resulted in improved performance. There should be constant reminders of the benefits of the changes introduced until they form part of the accepted culture of the organization.
The first four steps in Kotter’s model above could be viewed as a preoccupation with the unfreezing stage, the fifth and seventh stages represent a movement from the old to the new, and the final stage concentrates on refreezing.Kotter’s contribution has value in providing a guide to managers and change agents to assist with the successful implementation of change. Bolman and Deal (2017) have taken Kotter’s model and combined it with four ways in which they view organizations – structure, symbolic (culture), human resource, and political frames – and claim this approach provides a powerful vehicle for successfully managing change. - Available until 24 Jan |Learn more
- Shahron Williams van Rooij(Author)
- 2017(Publication Date)
- Routledge(Publisher)
Lewin’s conceptualization of change as a process and his 3-Step Model served as the basis of four well-known models that recommended a series of stages or phases for change agents to follow in implementing change. The Judson model (1991) postulated five phases of change implementation, namely: analysis and planning, communication, acceptance, changing to a desired state, and consolidation and institutionalization of the new state. The model included recommendations for overcoming resistance to change, such as alternative media, reward programs, bargaining, and persuasion. Kotter (1995) proposed an eight-step model for transformational change: (a) establish a sense of urgency by relating environmental conditions to challenges and threats to the organization; (b) form a powerful guiding coalition of individuals who firmly believe in the need for change and can inspire others to support change efforts; (c) create a vision of the desired end-state; (d) communicate the vision through multiple channels, (e) empower others to act by changing policies, procedures, systems, and structures in ways that will facilitate the implementation of change; (f) plan and create short-term wins by publicizing successes to build momentum; (g) build on the change and consolidate improvements; and (h) anchor the changes in corporate culture to sustain the new state. Unlike the Judson or Lewin models, the Kotter model focused on high-level executives seeking to lead transformational change and, as such, is not a good fit for change projects that are not transformative.A third model in the Lewin tradition is Galpin’s (1996) nine-wedge wheel model comprised of (a) establishing the need to change; (b) developing and disseminating a vision of planned change; (c) diagnosing and analyzing the current state; (d) generating recommendations; (e) detailing the recommendations; (f) pilot testing the recommendations; (g) preparing the rollout of the recommendations; (h) rolling out the recommendations; and (i) measuring, reinforcing, and refining the change. Central to Galpin’s model is an understanding of organizational culture as evident in rules and policies, norms, events, rewards, and recognition. Armenakis, Harris, and Fields (1999) focused on change messaging as a mechanism for facilitating change readiness and minimizing resistance to change, on the one hand, and facilitating adoption and institutionalization of the desired change, on the other hand. The change message should include the need for change, affirmation of the capability to change, the benefits of change, identification of those driving the change, and evidence that the change is right for the organization. - eBook - PDF
The International Manager
A Guide for Communicating, Cooperating, and Negotiating with Worldwide Colleagues
- Frank Garten(Author)
- 2015(Publication Date)
- Productivity Press(Publisher)
In high-power-distance countries with the same characteristics of femininity and individualism (France and Belgium), people will be more concerned about having the right people in the team, to the extent that all relevant stakeholders in the hierarchy are involved and can be reached. Without the proper involvement of individuals who are relevant in the hierarchy, change will not be successful. After the urgency and need for change have been defined and a guid-ing coalition has been formed, a clear vision will need to be developed as part of preparing the organization for change. People not only need to understand the burning platform for change and have trust in the proj-ect team driving it, but also need to see the future and envisage how this will differ from the past. Kotter says about this: “A clear and powerful vision will do far more than an authoritarian decree of micromanage-ment can even hope to accomplish.” Again, we clearly see the American assumptions behind the Kotter model of change (Kotter 1996): after all, the United States is characterized by an individualistic and low-power-distance culture. Developing the change vision is an important aspect of preparation: to a large degree, winning the hearts and minds of people is about drawing a clear picture of what the future will look like, and making sure that this is a picture people can look forward to. They should recognize themselves Managing Change • 299 in the future vision of the company, and really identify with this vision. It should be a realistic picture in which people identify their roles, and it should be clear and sufficiently focused to later provide guidance in daily decision making. In countries where people feel part of a group and where hierarchy is important (most countries in the world), a clear and powerful vision alone will not be enough. Here people feel comfortable following the directions set by the leader(s) of the group. - eBook - ePub
- Colin Egan(Author)
- 2012(Publication Date)
- Routledge(Publisher)
5
A strategic perspective on managing change
Introduction
A striking feature of the business and management literature in recent years has been the pervasiveness of the concept of ‘change’. Despite the proliferation of change models its dimensions are essentially twofold: (i) antecedents, i.e. those factors which ‘trigger’ the need for change; (ii) change as process, i.e. a set of management actions which transform organizations from a given to a desired state over a period of time. We will discuss each in turn, but first a caveat. One of the most respected writers on change management is Kanter, whose early work (1983, 1989) essentially defined the topic or at least brought it to its broader public domain. In a more recent text she draws attention to the shallowness of much of the discussion of change and, in the light of the analysis presented in the previous chapter, she is worth quoting at length here as a preface to the challenges we will encounter in the following sections (Kanter et al ., 1992):… the danger lurking in many discussions of organizational change is that the whole thing starts to sound much simpler than it is. Too much credit is given to leaders when things go well, and too much blame when they go poorly. Yet, despite decades of very good advice to organizations about change, we are struck by how many failures there are and how much can go wrong. Even though both the reformers and the revolutionaries are, in their own way, utopians, believing in organizational perfectibility, the sad fact is that, almost universally, organizations change as little as they must, rather than as much as they should.The dimensions of change are captured on two axes of our adapted nexus model. The change antecedents, the so-called ‘triggers’ of change, are rooted in the relationship between the organization and its environmental context. The change process, meanwhile, is rooted within the organization–strategy axis and is modelled in the ‘dropped’ process box shown in Figure 5.1 - eBook - ePub
Kanban Change Leadership
Creating a Culture of Continuous Improvement
- Klaus Leopold, Siegfried Kaltenecker(Authors)
- 2015(Publication Date)
- Wiley(Publisher)
uncertainties and allow enough time to process them. Do we want to change? Keep role modeling in mind : water doesn’t flow uphill! Clarify attitudes : What is our mental collaboration model like? What does it say about the culture of our organization? What are our underlying assumptions with regard to change? Conduct personal dialogs : open and frank discussions about hopes, concerns, ideas and questions for the future, concrete impulses, and crazy visions. Focus on the benefits and opportunities : by focusing on something, we make it stronger! Professional change management is fostered by communication with all stakeholders. This raises a few questions that aren’t always easy to answer: Who are our stakeholders, actually? What drives our partners in the value chain? What interests are they pursuing? And how are these interests related to each other? All these questions are critical for Kanban, too. If they are processed seriously and not simply reduced to on-the-fly discussions, call-center questionnaires, or even e-mail surveys, then the existing interests can be identified as early as possible. In today’s world, organizations require the right kind of agility, first and foremost an accurate responsiveness to ever-changing markets and customer expectations. This responsiveness ultimately boils down to permanent strategic scanning, having your feelers everywhere, and remaining attentive. These are the factors that decide between corporate success and failure nowadays. Kanban change leadership strengthens responsiveness by having the stakeholders participate in shaping the change initiative right from the start. In Part 3 of this book, we extensively explain how to identify and get in touch with them, how to campaign for the change, and how to achieve lasting agreements. At present, we will content ourselves with a pointer to the systemic spirit of continuous improvement
Index pages curate the most relevant extracts from our library of academic textbooks. They’ve been created using an in-house natural language model (NLM), each adding context and meaning to key research topics.







