Sociology of Mental Health

11 Key excerpts on "Sociology of Mental Health"

• 

  eBook - PDF

  Society on the Edge

  Social Science and Public Policy in the Postwar United States

  • Philippe Fontaine, Jefferson D. Pooley(Authors)
  • 2020(Publication Date)
  • Cambridge University Press

    (Publisher)

  Perhaps mercifully for those outside the guild, sociology never attracted the levels of mental health funding that transformed its sister social science, and society has been spared a horde of applied sociologists ministering to society’s mental health. It has perforce remained a comparatively small, largely academic discipline. The social dimensions of mental illness are hard to miss, however, and as we have seen, members of the Chicago School and other prewar American sociologists were interested from the discipline’s very earliest years in the sociological study of mental health issues. Nor was the NIMH shy about extending its largesse in this direction, and if it never acquired the riches showered upon psychology, sociology did manage to acquire a respectable amount of funding from federal sources, funding that largely ceased with the advent of the Reagan years. Wartime experience had altered psychiatry’s approach to mental illness, as we have seen, but it had also had profound effects on public perceptions of mental illness, as well as inducing politicians to pay greater attention to the issue. The prewar focus on psychosis had been associated with a binary perception of the differences between the mad and the sane, and 35 Mojtabai and Olfson, “National Trends in Psychotherapy” and Harris, “Talk Doesn’t Pay so Psychiatry.” Mental Illness 337 a related attitude toward the social problems presented by the mentally ill, one that emphasized the biological inferiority of those confined in the mental hospital, and the necessity of separating them from the larger society. Psychiatric breakdowns during the war among populations prescreened for alleged susceptibility to mental illness, and among soldiers who were seen as heroically performing their patriotic duty, were widely interpreted to mean that, under sufficient stress, everyone was prone to mental breakdown.

  Sign up to read

  Learn more about book
• 

  eBook - ePub

  The Sociology of Healthcare

  • Alan Clarke(Author)
  • 2013(Publication Date)
  • Routledge

    (Publisher)

  In a similar vein, Ustun (1998) comments upon operationalising the concept of mental well-being as contained in the WHO’s definition of mental health quoted above. He describes the concept of mental well-being as covering four major dimensions: ‘the capacity to live, function and enjoy’, ‘the optimum development of mental abilities’, the ‘subjective feeling of well-being’ and ‘the interaction and equilibrium between the individual and the environment’ (Ustun, 1998, p. 72). According to this comprehensive approach, the attainment of mental stability is dependent upon the individual having the psychological processes and mental ability to cope with any problems they encounter. There is also the recognition that as a result of environmental factors opportunities for personal growth might be limited, thereby preventing people from realising their full potential.

  Sociological approaches to the study of mental illness

  Not all sociological work on explanations of mental disorder is grounded in social epidemiology. Some sociologists of deviance, especially writers of a symbolic inter-actionist persuasion, … have paid particular attention to interpersonal dynamics in the development of disorder.

  (Busfield, 2001, p. 8)

  There is more than one sociological perspective on mental illness. Two major perspectives are reviewed in this section: the interactionist and the social causation or structuralist. These are founded upon different assumptions about such fundamental issues as the nature and origin of mental disorder.

  Interactionist perspective

  This perspective has its philosophical roots in a theoretical approach in sociology known as symbolic interactionism, which when applied to the study of deviance in the 1950s and 1960s gave rise to social reaction theory, also commonly referred to as the labelling perspective. Thomas Scheff (1966) is often credited with being the first theorist to produce a coherent sociological theory of mental illness based on the labelling approach. To appreciate his contribution we need to understand something about the basic thinking behind the labelling theorists’ interpretation of deviant behaviour in general.

  Sign up to read

  Learn more about book
• 

  eBook - ePub

  The Sociology of Health and Illness

  • Sarah Nettleton(Author)
  • 2020(Publication Date)
  • Polity

    (Publisher)

  (2011). Mental Illness. Cambridge: Polity. An invaluable critical introduction to sociological debates. Cockerham, W. (2017). Sociology of Mental Disorder, 10th edn. Abingdon: Routledge. A comprehensive text that includes critical analysis and illustrative data and examples to prompt discussion. Rogers, A. and Pilgrim, D. (2014). A Sociology of Mental Health and Illness, 5th edn. Maidenhead: Open University Press. An established textbook – rightly so – which is highly accessible for both sociology students and health practitioners. Scheid, T. L. and Wright, E. R. (eds) (2017). A Handbook for the Study of Mental Health: Social Contexts, Theories and Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. This is a comprehensive resource with chapters by key scholars in the field. Yang, J. (2018). Mental Health in China. Cambridge: Polity. Comprehensive, clear and a compelling read about mental health in contemporary China.

  Sign up to read

  Learn more about book
• 

  eBook - ePub

  An Introduction to Mental Health

  • Jo Augustus, Justine Bold, Briony Williams(Authors)
  • 2019(Publication Date)
  • SAGE Publications Ltd

    (Publisher)

  9 Societal Influence on Mental Health Jo Augustus

  Learning Objectives

  After studying this chapter you will be able to:

  • consider societal influences on the perception of mental health;
  • describe the historical context of societal influence;
  • understand barriers that may restrict access to recovery;
  • understand theories and models that underpin stigma and discrimination.

  Introduction

  Societal influence is a term often used to describe the influence an individual or individuals can have on one another. For example, this could be a change in our belief system or behaviour as a result of an intentional or unintentional behavioural change of another individual. Such influence can have a profound impact on individuals accessing mental health services (Kawachi et al. 1997). As a culturally diverse society, mental health service provision has to be responsive to the social and cultural needs of its local population. Here culture is referred to as shared sets of beliefs and values between social groups (Hofstede 1991). Therefore, cultural and societal influence, are closely linked. It is important to note that culture is not the only factor to consider when trying to understand the issues surrounding access to services. It is evident that misinterpretation of culturally bound symptoms can impact on access to mental health services (Webber, Huxley and Harris 2011). Therefore, organisations need to be competent in the services they provide. However, in order to provide culturally competent services, there has to be an understanding of the influence of society and culture on mental health, which this chapter will explore (Kawachi et al. 1997).

  The Culture of the Individual and the Professional

  Historical context

  At the beginning of the nineteenth century, Western medicine recognised that the social aspects of an individual had an impact on disease, which arguably led to the advent of public health. The mid-nineteenth century saw the introduction of psychoanalysis as a way to treat mental health. The twentieth century brought an understanding that social and psychological components are of importance, in addition to the bio-medical (Porter 1997). There have been extensive developments in the provision of mental health services since the 1970s. In particular, the shift towards care provision in the community rather than inpatient settings and the awareness of cultural diversity (Shorter 1997). In addition, the publication of DSM-IV in 1994 gave more detailed references to cultural variation than earlier editions, encouraging a cultural formulation approach to be taken within the assessment (APA 1994). Although the bio-psycho-social model is subject to current criticism, it remains a helpful frame of reference (Engel 1980; Pilgrim 2011). Such an integration of approaches to the assessment and treatment of mental health enables a whole-person or holistic approach and provides the platform to meet specific cultural needs. See Chapter 1

  Sign up to read

  Learn more about book
• 

  eBook - ePub

  Improving Mental Health through Social Support

  Building Positive and Empowering Relationships

  • Jonathan Leach(Author)
  • 2014(Publication Date)
  • Jessica Kingsley Publishers

    (Publisher)

  Chapter 2 Social aspects of mental health and distress Introduction

  The American sociologist C. Wright Mills suggested that one of the key roles of the sociologist is to illuminate how seemingly private troubles are actually public issues (Mills 1970). For instance, in the late 19th century, Emile Durkheim realised that something as apparently personal and individual as suicide, when looked at in terms of the levels of incidence in different countries and social groups, seems to be influenced by the type of society in which the person lives (Durkheim 1971, first published 1897). In contrast to psychological understandings of friendship, social interactions and mental distress, which focus on the characteristics of the individual, sociology looks at the wider social contexts within which that individual operates. This chapter will explore some of the theories that attempt to explain issues of mental distress, identity and relationships and the impact of social contexts on mental health.

  Understanding mental health problems

  In the previous chapter, it was suggested that mental health problems can be understood from a number of perspectives including the bio-medical, psychological and social. This chapter focuses on theories that inform social perspectives, as these are particularly relevant to the exploration of social support for mental health. A broad range of social and sociological theories suggest that what might at first seem to be individual and personal problems can also be understood within a social context.

  Friendships tend to be made when people identify themselves as similar in various significant ways (Allan 1989). So when considering the need for social support, it is useful to examine whether having a ‘mental disorder’ can be distinguished from the commonly experienced problems of distress and unhappiness in life. If there is a distinction, it could mean that people labelled as ‘disordered’ are seen as different in some important sense by those around them. In this case, there might need to be an extra dimension to the support offered to people who have a diagnosed disorder, over and above what one friend might do for another during difficult times. The idea of two continua, one for mental disorder and one for mental health, has already been proposed in Chapter 1

  Sign up to read

  Learn more about book
• 

  eBook - PDF

  The SAGE Handbook of Mental Health and Illness

  • David Pilgrim, Anne Rogers, Bernice Pescosolido, David Pilgrim, Anne Rogers, Bernice Pescosolido(Authors)
  • 2010(Publication Date)
  • SAGE Publications Ltd

    (Publisher)

  49 INTRODUCTION Mental health is a fuzzy concept. It is intertwined with social and cultural values, which are characteristically and legitimately diverse (Fulford, 2001). Hence, there is no bird’s eye view of it but a variety of different perspectives (Pilgrim, 2005: 438). Established approaches to mental health focus on psychiatric disor-der or psychological distress. That is they see mental health as the absence of symptoms of psychopathology. In this chapter, two different perspectives are described from positive psychology and the sociology of the self. Both have developed distinct theoretical concepts and delivered empirical evidence that complement the psychopathological view and are of high relevance to research-ers and practitioners in the field of mental health. The present contribution is structured as follows. First, as a background the psychiatric disorder and the psychological distress concept are briefly recapitulated. Then, I highlight the approach and contributions of positive psychology. Subsequently, I deal with the sociology of the self. For both perspectives, emergence, main theoretical assumptions, central empirical findings and merits and criticisms are described. The contribution ends with a short conclusion. 3 Mental Health, Positive Psychology and the Sociology of the Self B e n e d i k t R o g g e THE SAGE HANDBOOK OF MENTAL HEALTH AND ILLNESS 50 BACKGROUND: THE DISORDER AND THE DISTRESS APPROACH Both the psychiatric disorder and the psychological distress approach (see for example Payton, 2009) conceive mental health indirectly as the absence of symptoms. Mental health is thus defined negatively by the absence of pathology, operationalized by cognitive, emotional, behavioural and (occasional) physical symptoms, defined in psychiatric classifications, such as DSM and ICD (Rogers and Pilgrim, 2005). However, there are major differences between these deficit approaches.

  Sign up to read

  Learn more about book
• 

  eBook - ePub

  Contemporary Health Studies

  An Introduction

  • Louise Warwick-Booth, Ruth Cross, Diane Lowcock(Authors)
  • 2021(Publication Date)
  • Polity

    (Publisher)

  This chapter will introduce you to the discipline of sociology and demonstrate its relevance to studying and understanding health. A detailed discussion about the importance of sociology for health is provided later, but a key aspect of this is the way in which the discipline explores social divisions as determinants of health. The chapter will demonstrate how sociology as a discipline contributes to our understanding of health as primarily socially influenced. The chapter outlines what sociology is as a discipline and analyses how different theoretical perspectives contribute to understanding health and illness. The chapter discusses the social model of health, looking critically at the medical model of health in relation to health inequalities. The chapter uses a sociological lens through which to view aspects of health and health-related behaviour, showing that by using such a mechanism we can begin to view health, health-related interactions and behaviour both differently and more critically. Finally, the chapter uses the theory of social construction to explore disability and offers the reader a case study to discuss the medical management of sleep.

  What is sociology?

  Sociology is the study of interaction between groups and individuals in human society and involves the critical examination of everyday aspects of human life. Sociology as a discipline examines both the macro and the

  micro-level

  , examining large organizations and institutions such as the economy, education and work, as well as looking at individual behaviour such as the interactions that take place between people. Sociology also explores the relationships and interactions between the two; how does society influence individuals and conversely how do individuals influence society? So sociology is interested in social processes and how society is structured and works (Jones and Bradbury, 2018). A key lesson that can be drawn from sociological theory and research is that social structures can often exert more influence over our behaviour than we would expect, and this is certainly true in relation to health, which is significantly influenced by the social context in which we live. Our health is socially determined, and the chapters in part III of this book offer a more detailed discussion of specific determinants. Sociology explores many dimensions of health, illness and health care. Sociological research has also been crucial in drawing attention to the experiential aspects of health and illness. For example, examining doctor–patient relationships and lay perspectives about health and illness (these are discussed in depth in chapter 5 , research related to health is also discussed in depth in chapter 3

  Sign up to read

  Learn more about book
• 

  eBook - PDF

  The Palgrave Handbook of Sociocultural Perspectives on Global Mental Health

  • Ross G. White, Sumeet Jain, David M.R. Orr, Ursula M. Read, Ross G. White, Sumeet Jain, David M.R. Orr, Ursula M. Read(Authors)
  • 2017(Publication Date)
  • Palgrave Macmillan

    (Publisher)

  The Palgrave Handbook of Sociocultural Perspectives on Global Mental Health seeks to extend understanding about GMH by drawing on diverse disciplinary per- spectives, some of which have been under-represented to date. Specifically, the handbook includes contributions from people with a lived experience of men- tal health difficulties and academics, researchers and practitioners with back- grounds in anthropology, geography, law, history, philosophy, intercultural studies, social work, psychiatric nursing, occupational therapy, social psychol- ogy, clinical psychology and psychiatry. This brings together a broader range of epistemic frames and allows for recognition of mental health as an intrinsi- cally complex and contested field. Such divergent epistemologies inevitably lead to different priorities in approaching the treatment of mental disorders described in this volume. R.G. White et al. 5 Within academic research and clinical practice, diagnostic manuals exist that provide criteria for diagnosing ‘mental disorders’ that are proposed to occur universally across cultures. However, there is contention about the appropriateness of applying the language of ‘mental health/illness/disorders’ across diverse cultural settings where aberrant psychological, emotional and/ or behavioural states may not be conceptualized as being associated with either health or illness. The development of manuals for diagnosing mental disorders was predicated on the assumption that the criteria for these disorders could be universally applied across all individuals—an assumption that has been con- tested by those who advocate a relativist approach to understanding aberrant states that is sensitive to the beliefs and practices that particular groupings of people espouse (Summerfield 2008; Mills 2014). In recent decades, there has been a growing recognition in diagnostic manuals that certain aberrant states may be unique to particular cultural contexts.

  Sign up to read

  Learn more about book
• 

  eBook - PDF

  Social Scaffolding

  Applying the Lessons of Contemporary Social Science to Health and Healthcare

  • Richard Williams, Verity Kemp, S. Alexander Haslam, Catherine Haslam, Kamaldeep S. Bhui, Susan Bailey(Authors)
  • 2019(Publication Date)
  • RCPsych Publications

    (Publisher)

  Section 2 Scoping Chapter 6 The Social Determinants of Mental Health Kamaldeep S. Bhui, Oliver Quantick and David Ross Summary This chapter connects the everyday experience of poor mental health and mental illness with the complex social nexus in which these problems arise. Prevention and recovery might be improved if we assert that social justice, equality and equity are worthy values and essential for a functional and successful society as well as a healthy society. Inequalities, inequity and injustice are drivers of poor health. Some groups, especially those that carry stigmatised social identity or with multiple social disadvantage, are especially affected. Divisions in the social construction of wellness and illness along mind and body lines are unhelpful and serve to fragment efforts for healthy societies and better healthcare. Public health intervention is population-based, universal and engages communities; people are empowered as active citizens who have responsibility for their own and societal health. Ensuring parity of esteem and better mind–body interventions are needed; the spatial and social clustering of illness requires us to revise our models of mind and health. Introduction Public health is defined by the UK’s Faculty of Public Health as ‘The science and art of promoting and protecting health and well being, preventing ill health and prolonging life through the organised efforts of society’. This definition locates the causes of ill health and the remedies in the realms of personal and societal agency, and not only in the remit of health practitioners. Although the latter have a role as members of society to make prevention a reality for themselves, families and communities, they play a special part in preventing further ill health for people who suffer mental illness and are seeking help for it.

  Sign up to read

  Learn more about book
• 

  eBook - ePub

  The Textbook of Health and Social Care

  • Darren Edwards, Stephanie Best, Darren Edwards, Stephanie Best(Authors)
  • 2020(Publication Date)
  • SAGE Publications Ltd

    (Publisher)

  Chapter 1 Sociology of Health and Illness Ashley Frawley

  Overview

  This chapter introduces the sociology of health and illness, first by considering the meaning of the ‘sociological imagination’ and associated importance of the concept of context to understanding human social life. It then discusses three contexts of health: socio-economic, institutional/professional and cultural. Within these contexts a number of key issues in the sociology of health and illness are considered: the social determinants of health, health inequalities, challenges to medical authority, social construction and health panics, medicalisation and growing cultural preoccupations with health risks.

  Learning Outcomes

  By the end of this chapter you will be able to:

  • Define the ‘sociological imagination’ and its relationship to the concept of context
  • Discuss the relationship between socio-economic context and health inequalities
  • Critically examine different explanations of health inequalities
  • Discuss several developments argued to indicate the decline of medical authority
  • Explain and apply theories of social construction and medicalisation to think critically about health risks and panics

  Introduction

  Health and illness may seem solely individual matters. However, sociologists draw attention to social patterns in health and illness, seeking to situate our experiences and beliefs within broader social, historical and cultural contexts. This chapter introduces key concepts from the sociology of health and illness, beginning with an exploration of the ‘sociological imagination’ and importance of ‘context’ to understanding human social life. First, we examine socio-economic contexts of health in relation to social determinants and health inequalities. The context of health care professions is then considered with attention to changing professional relationships as well as challenges to medical authority. Introducing social constructionism, the cultural context of health is explored with reference to medicalisation, moral panics and risk.

  Sign up to read

  Learn more about book
• 

  eBook - ePub

  Applied Sociology for Social Work

  • Ewan Ingleby, Author(Authors)
  • 2017(Publication Date)
  • SAGE Publications Ltd

    (Publisher)

  The two quotations from the authors Sylvia Plath and Ken Kesey highlight concerns that have existed over mental illness in the West. Some academics (for example, Thomas Scheff) have drawn attention to the controversy that is present in this area of health and care. There is even a question as to whether or not mental illness actually exists. The argument runs that mental illnesses are forms of deviant behaviour, and the behaviour of those who are mentally ill is troubling for the social order. This requires intervention and control. This theme will be explored in this chapter. Mental health is a key area of social work. In order to develop our professional work as social workers in this area, it is important to reflect on what sociologists are interested in when they consider the nature of mental illness.

  Functionalist interest in mental illness

  We have seen that functionalists are interested in wider social factors. With mental illness, they consider the social organisation of health systems. Functionalists regard key social organisations as similar to the vital part that key organs play in the human body. The health system of a social group is visualised as being akin to the role that the heart plays in the body – as long as the heart remains healthy, so the body functions effectively. Similarly, as long as the health system of a social group is effective, so that social group can function efficiently. Functionalist sociologists are also interested in the ways in which understandings of mental illness have changed in societies over time. A number of social scientists have reflected on changing interpretations of mental illness to outline the social factors that influence our understanding of the mentally ill. Hirst and Woolley (1982) apply the work of the French philosopher Foucault in order to demonstrate how wider social structures change and, in turn, impact on our understanding of mental illness. Hirst and Woolley reveal that, in societies such as England’s, there has been a change in perceptions of what contributes to mental health and well-being. In Victorian England, religious explanations were applied in order to help understand mental illness. The mentally ill were literally removed from society and placed in asylums – institutions that were isolated from the rest of society. The mentally ill and their families were regarded as being punished by God for some kind of transgression against ‘his divine law’. Hirst and Woolley (ibid.) reveal that, over time, this social interpretation of mental illness changes in societies such as the UK’s. Through the nineteenth century, a scientific interpretation of mental illness replaces this religious explanation. There emerges a medical model of mental illness: Hirst and Woolley suggest that this medical model depends on a particular train of thought. ‘Condition A’ is expected to respond to ‘Treatment A’ and to improve. The challenge with many mental illnesses appears to be that they do not respond to this course of action. In the quotation from Plath, her treatment sounds more like something you would experience upon being tortured! The problem for the doctors and nurses treating mental illnesses is that the illness does not appear to improve following this medical model of care. Hirst and Woolley (1982) outline which social factors influence mental health and this is of interest to functionalist sociologists. Mental illness is reinterpreted, and we see the emergence of ‘care in the community’ in the UK in response to a failing set of arrangements for the mentally ill. The asylums are closed and a new form of treatment is offered that appears to be less punitive and more humane. The critical factor in these changes is not so much the ‘illness’, but the social understanding of mental illness.

  Sign up to read

  Learn more about book