eBook - ePub
The Witch in History
Early Modern and Twentieth-Century Representations
Diane Purkiss
This is a test
Condividi libro
- 304 pagine
- English
- ePUB (disponibile sull'app)
- Disponibile su iOS e Android
eBook - ePub
The Witch in History
Early Modern and Twentieth-Century Representations
Diane Purkiss
Dettagli del libro
Anteprima del libro
Indice dei contenuti
Citazioni
Informazioni sul libro
'Diane Purkiss... insists on taking witches seriously. Her refusal to write witch-believers off as unenlightened has produced some richly intelligent meditations on their -- and our -- world.' - The Observer 'An invigorating and challenging book... sets many hares running.' - The Times Higher Education Supplement
Domande frequenti
Come faccio ad annullare l'abbonamento?
Ă semplicissimo: basta accedere alla sezione Account nelle Impostazioni e cliccare su "Annulla abbonamento". Dopo la cancellazione, l'abbonamento rimarrĂ attivo per il periodo rimanente giĂ pagato. Per maggiori informazioni, clicca qui
Ă possibile scaricare libri? Se sĂŹ, come?
Al momento è possibile scaricare tramite l'app tutti i nostri libri ePub mobile-friendly. Anche la maggior parte dei nostri PDF è scaricabile e stiamo lavorando per rendere disponibile quanto prima il download di tutti gli altri file. Per maggiori informazioni, clicca qui
Che differenza c'è tra i piani?
Entrambi i piani ti danno accesso illimitato alla libreria e a tutte le funzionalitĂ di Perlego. Le uniche differenze sono il prezzo e il periodo di abbonamento: con il piano annuale risparmierai circa il 30% rispetto a 12 rate con quello mensile.
Cos'è Perlego?
Perlego è un servizio di abbonamento a testi accademici, che ti permette di accedere a un'intera libreria online a un prezzo inferiore rispetto a quello che pagheresti per acquistare un singolo libro al mese. Con oltre 1 milione di testi suddivisi in piÚ di 1.000 categorie, troverai sicuramente ciò che fa per te! Per maggiori informazioni, clicca qui.
Perlego supporta la sintesi vocale?
Cerca l'icona Sintesi vocale nel prossimo libro che leggerai per verificare se è possibile riprodurre l'audio. Questo strumento permette di leggere il testo a voce alta, evidenziandolo man mano che la lettura procede. Puoi aumentare o diminuire la velocità della sintesi vocale, oppure sospendere la riproduzione. Per maggiori informazioni, clicca qui.
The Witch in History è disponibile online in formato PDF/ePub?
SĂŹ, puoi accedere a The Witch in History di Diane Purkiss in formato PDF e/o ePub, cosĂŹ come ad altri libri molto apprezzati nelle sezioni relative a Literature e Literary Criticism. Scopri oltre 1 milione di libri disponibili nel nostro catalogo.
Informazioni
Part I The histories of witchcraft
1 A holocaust of one's own
The myth of the Burning Times
DOI: 10.4324/9780203359723-2
Popular history, and also the history taught in schools, is influenced by this Manichaean tendency, which shuns half-tints and complexities; it is prone to reduce the river of human occurrences to conflicts, and the conflicts to duelsâwe and they, the good guys and the bad guys respectively, because the good must prevail, else the world would be subverted.Primo Levi, The Drowned and the Saved
Here is a story. Once upon a time, there was a woman who lived on the edge of a village. She lived alone, in her own house surrounded by her garden, in which she grew all manner of herbs and other healing plants. Though she was alone, she was never lonely; she had her garden and her animals for company, she took lovers when she wished, and she was always busy. The woman was a healer and midwife; she had practical knowledge taught her by her mother, and mystical knowledge derived from her closeness to nature, or from a half-submerged pagan religion. She helped women give birth, and she had healing hands; she used her knowledge of herbs and her common sense to help the sick. However, her peaceful existence was disrupted. Even though this woman was harmless, she posed a threat to the fearful. Her medical knowledge threatened the doctor. Her simple, true spiritual values threatened the superstitious nonsense of the Catholic church, as did her affirmation of the sensuous body. Her independence and freedom threatened men. So the Inquisition descended on her, and cruelly tortured her into confessing to lies about the devil. She was burned alive by men who hated women, along with millions of others just like her.
Do you believe this story? Thousands of women do. It is still being retold, in full or in part, by women who are academics, but also by poets, novelists, popular historians, theologians, dramatists.1 It is compelling, even horrifying. However, in all essentials it is not true, or only partly true, as a history of what happened to the women called witches in the early modern period. Thousands of women were executed as witches, and in some parts of Europe torture was used to extract a confession from them; certainly, their gender often had a great deal to do with it; certainly, their accusers and judges were sometimes misogynists; certainly, by our standards they were innocent, in that to a post-Enlightenment society their âcrimeâ does not exist. However, the women who died were not quite like the woman of the story, and they were not killed for quite the same reasons. There is no evidence that the majority of those accused were healers and midwives; in England and also in some parts of the Continent, midwives were more likely to be found helping witch-hunters. Most women used herbal medicines as part of their household skills, some of which were quasi-magical, without arousing any anxiety. There is little evidence that convicted witches were invariably unmarried or sexually âliberatedâ or lesbian; many (though not most) of those accused were married women with young families. Men were not responsible for all accusations: many, perhaps even most, witches were accused by women, and most cases depend at least partly on the evidence given by women witnesses. Persecution was as severe in Protestant as in Catholic areas. The Inquisition, except in a few areas where the local inquisitor was especially zealous, was more lenient about witchcraft cases than the secular courts; in Spain, for example, where the Inquisition was very strong, there were few deaths. Many inquisitors and secular courts disdained the Malleus Malificarum, still the main source for the view that witch-hunting was women-hunting; still others thought it ridiculously paranoid about male sexuality. In some countries, torture was not used at all, and in England, witches were hanged rather than burned.2
All this has been known for some time. Yet in the teeth of the evidence, some women continue to find this story believable, continue to circulate it. Some women are still so attached to the story that they resist efforts to disprove it. The myth has become important, not because of its historical truth, but because of its mythic significance. What is that significance? It is a story with clear oppositions. Everyone can tell who is innocent and who guilty, who is good and who bad, who is oppressed and who the oppressor. It offers to identify oppression, to make it noticeable. It legitimates identification of oppression with powerful institutions, and above all with Christianity. This is, above all, a narrative of the Fall, of paradise lost. It is a story about how perfect our lives would beâhow perfect we women would be, patient, kind, self-sufficientâif it were not for patriarchy and its violence. It is often linked with another lapsarian myth, the myth of an originary matriarchy, through the themes of mother-daughter learning and of matriarchal religions as sources of witchcraft. This witch-story explains the origins and nature of good and evil. It is a religious myth, and the religion it defines is radical feminism.3
How did radical feminists come to need a Holocaust of their own? In order to understand this myth fully, we need to look in more detail at its history. Around 1968, the âaction wingâ of New York Radical Women formed, and they chose a striking new name: WITCH. The name exploited the negative associations of the witch as woman of dark power, but the groupâs members also played with the signification of the term in their presentation of it as an acronym for Womenâs International Terrorist Conspiracy from Hell. The meaning discovered in the term âwitchâ by that acronymic rendering is interesting because it goes beyond any simple reclamation of the witch as a foresister in order to assign explicit meaning to the figure. âWomanâ names the witch as gendered, while âinternationalâ asserts the ubiquity of witches, and âterroristâ marks witches as violent. âConspiracyâ deliberately flirts with fears of a secret organisation of subversive women, while âfrom Hellâ draws attention to the origin of witchesâ otherness while pointing to womenâs oppression. This adds up to an image of the witch as violent and empowered woman. WITCHâs members hexed the Chase Manhattan bank, and invaded the Bride Fair at Madison Square Gardens dressed as witches. Despite the disjunction between self and role implied by such flagrant theatricality, WITCH also inaugurated many of the myths of witchcraft which have become central to many radical feminists and most modern witches. Describing witches, the collective wrote:
They bowed to no man, being the living remnant of the oldest culture of all one in which men and women were equal sharers in a truly cooperative society before the death-dealing sexual, economic, and spiritual oppression of the Imperialist Phallic Society took over and began to destroy nature and human society.4
This image owed a great deal to Engelsâs history of the pre-capitalist family: it was attractive to WITCHâs original members and enabling for radical feminism. However, it was also subject to less helpful change and reformulation.
This reformulation began with WITCH itself. âViolenceâ, âConspiracyâ and even âHellâ were eliminated, and more harmless-sounding acronyms were formed. Women Incensed at Telephone Company Harassment; Women Indentured to Travellerâs Corporate Hell (a coven who worked at an insurance company); Women Intent on Toppling Consumer Holidays; Womenâs Independent Taxpayers, Consumers and Homemakers; Women Infuriated at Taking Care of Hoodlums; Women Inspired To Commit Herstory; the acronym increasingly meant only a mild-mannered bunch of consumer-rights groups. While the final group, Women Inspired To Commit Herstory, continue to use the rhetoric of crime, committing herstory is significantly less threatening than committing terrorist acts. This also identifies academic pursuits such as writing and lecturing with magic and with witchcraft as objects of persecution. This is an obvious way to romanticise what might otherwise seem dull or bookish, but it also incises the myth deeply into radical feminist identity.
These examples, however, stand for the extraordinary flexibility of the term âwitchâ as a signifier within all feminist discourse. Constantly cast and recast as the late twentieth centuryâs idea of a protofeminist, a sister from the past, the witch has undergone transformations as dramatic as those in any pantomime. The figure of the witch has been central to the revival of womenâs history over the past two decades. That revival has been carried out by academic historians, but not only by them; the original impetus behind the attempt to uncover womenâs past came from activists in the womenâs liberation movement, and partly from the fact that witches were among the few women given any space whatever in pre-feminist history. The witch has consequently been caught up in virtually all of feminist historyâs debates about itself and its own project. The enormous changes in the standard feminist narrative of the witch and her place in history reflect feminismâs attempt to ask and answer questions about what history is, what feminist history is, what might count as authority and authenticity, and where the intersections are between history and textuality, history and politics. The figure of the witch mirrorsâalbeit sometimes in distorted formâthe many images and self-images of feminism itself. Originally, womenâs history was inspired by the wish to uncover the truth about women, and this led to a yearning to find oneself in the past, to locate real women who share our natures and problems. The witch offers opportunities for both identification and elaborate fantasy, standing in a supportive or antagonistic relation to the contemporary feminist-activist-historian inscribing her. To remark this is not to side with those notorious critics of womenâs history who see feminist historians as unreasonably âbiasedâ; feminist histories are no more âbiasedâ than those male historians who have taken up the figure of the witch and reformulated it according to their needs and fantasies.5 It is, however, true that many radical feminist figurations of witches and narratives about witches set out to challenge or question the ârulesâ by which academic historians have operated, and these challenges can involve a refusal of the professional authority and discursive strategies which have for long defined authentic or âtrueâ history. While doing this, radical feminist historians make truth-claims of their own, some of which are very easy to refute using the methods of historical scholarship as usually conceived, and in particular the ârulesâ of evidence.6 Usually this has nothing to do with poststructuralism or even solipsism: the more flagrant a radical feminist writerâs disregard for the rules of evidence, the more dogmatic her own truth-claims are likely to be. However, I am less interested in engaging with the âtruthâ of various figurations of the witch, or even in legitimating or delegitimating various strands of feminist historical scholarship, than in examining radical feminist figurations of the witch to see what kinds of investment produced them.
Like other histories, then, though more egregiously than some, radical feminist histories of witches and witchcraft remember the past according to a variety of myths, ideas and political needs, and often they refer explicitly to the needs and desires which brought them into being. Equally often, however, radical feminist figurations of the witch, again like other histories, seek to erase the traces of their own historicity, in the interests of offering themselves as a means of access to a transparent, unmediated past. Gesturing away from its own immediate past and towards the stories it narrates, the radical feminist history of witches often appears to offer a static, finished vision of the witch. However, feminist histories of witchcraft are not finished artefacts, but stages in a complicated, conflictual series of processes within the public sphere, processes which involve both the writing of womenâs past and the rewriting of their present and future. Since all feminist histories offer to ask âand sometimes answerâthe question âWhat is a woman?â, all feminist histories of witchcraft are caught up in contemporary questions of authority, authenticity and public politics.
Where the shaping power of those questions in determining radical feminist historical narratives is acknowledged, the acknowledgement often takes the form of a refusal of historicity, an insistence that the past must be mapped in a certain way because such a map still applies in and to the present. This tension between past and present is experienced in all feminist histories, but only radical feminism resolves it by denying the difference. Radical feminism offers its narrative not as a reconstruction of the past, but an account of the way things always are. This stance is ironically close to traditional humanist scholarship, with its insistence on eternal verities. It constitutes a challenge to the traditions of academic history not because of the explicitness of its political agenda, butâmore importantlyâbecause its ahistorical stance allows the complete overthrow of the rules of reading and interpreting evidence. Yet what is significant about these histories is not only unprofessional âindisciplineâ, but the way this exposes the extent to which orthodox (male) history suppresses the emotions invested in it in favour of a discourse of objectivity. Radical feminist histories make more conventional historians uncomfortable because of their closeness to what we wish to hide.
Radical feminist history refuses the various positions of detachment which define the historian in a judging, criticising, evaluative relation to the traces of the past. It values highly emotional, involved, âpersonalâ pleasure and engagement: fear, hatred, love and solidarity are evoked. Emotion is evoked by the fact that the story told by this kind of feminist history is a story of sameness; conversely, it is produced as a story of sameness by the relentless repetition of figures of emotional identification.7 This emotion is often figured as the eruption of âfeminineâ values into the masculine terrain of history. The priority given to personal engagement with texts from the past also means a lack of interest in other ârulesâ of evidence, especially rules about comprehensiveness and balance. For instance, male historians never tire of observing that radical feminist histories of witchcraft use almost no early modern texts as a source for views about witchcraft except the Malleus Maleficarum, refusing to undertake any demonstration of the centrality of the Malleus.8 There are many reasons for this, but one reason is the Malleusâs ability to arouse strong feelings in the reader. Passages are quoted from it not for their centrality to witch-beliefs, but for their striking qualities, hence the more or less constant reiteration...