Forensic Psychology in Germany
eBook - ePub

Forensic Psychology in Germany

Witnessing Crime, 1880-1939

Heather Wolffram

Condividi libro
  1. English
  2. ePUB (disponibile sull'app)
  3. Disponibile su iOS e Android
eBook - ePub

Forensic Psychology in Germany

Witnessing Crime, 1880-1939

Heather Wolffram

Dettagli del libro
Anteprima del libro
Indice dei contenuti
Citazioni

Informazioni sul libro

This book examines the emergence and early development of forensic psychology in Germany from the late nineteenth century until the outbreak of the Second World War, highlighting the field's interdisciplinary beginnings and contested evolution. Initially envisaged as a psychology of all those involved in criminal proceedings, this new discipline promised to move away from an exclusive focus on the criminal to provide a holistic view of how human fallibility impacted upon criminal justice. As this book argues, however, by the inter-war period, forensic psychology had largely become a psychology of the witness; its focus narrowed by the exigencies of the courtroom. Utilising detailed studies of the 1896 Berchtold trial and the 1930 Frenzel trial, the book asks whether the tensions between psychiatry, psychology, forensic medicine, pedagogy and law over psychological expertise were present in courtroom practice and considers why a clear winner in the "battle for forensic psychology" had yet to emerge by 1939.

Domande frequenti

Come faccio ad annullare l'abbonamento?
È semplicissimo: basta accedere alla sezione Account nelle Impostazioni e cliccare su "Annulla abbonamento". Dopo la cancellazione, l'abbonamento rimarrà attivo per il periodo rimanente già pagato. Per maggiori informazioni, clicca qui
È possibile scaricare libri? Se sì, come?
Al momento è possibile scaricare tramite l'app tutti i nostri libri ePub mobile-friendly. Anche la maggior parte dei nostri PDF è scaricabile e stiamo lavorando per rendere disponibile quanto prima il download di tutti gli altri file. Per maggiori informazioni, clicca qui
Che differenza c'è tra i piani?
Entrambi i piani ti danno accesso illimitato alla libreria e a tutte le funzionalità di Perlego. Le uniche differenze sono il prezzo e il periodo di abbonamento: con il piano annuale risparmierai circa il 30% rispetto a 12 rate con quello mensile.
Cos'è Perlego?
Perlego è un servizio di abbonamento a testi accademici, che ti permette di accedere a un'intera libreria online a un prezzo inferiore rispetto a quello che pagheresti per acquistare un singolo libro al mese. Con oltre 1 milione di testi suddivisi in più di 1.000 categorie, troverai sicuramente ciò che fa per te! Per maggiori informazioni, clicca qui.
Perlego supporta la sintesi vocale?
Cerca l'icona Sintesi vocale nel prossimo libro che leggerai per verificare se è possibile riprodurre l'audio. Questo strumento permette di leggere il testo a voce alta, evidenziandolo man mano che la lettura procede. Puoi aumentare o diminuire la velocità della sintesi vocale, oppure sospendere la riproduzione. Per maggiori informazioni, clicca qui.
Forensic Psychology in Germany è disponibile online in formato PDF/ePub?
Sì, puoi accedere a Forensic Psychology in Germany di Heather Wolffram in formato PDF e/o ePub, così come ad altri libri molto apprezzati nelle sezioni relative a Psychology e Forensic Psychology. Scopri oltre 1 milione di libri disponibili nel nostro catalogo.

Informazioni

Anno
2018
ISBN
9783319735948
© The Author(s) 2018
Heather WolfframForensic Psychology in Germanyhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73594-8_1
Begin Abstract

1. Introduction: Witnessing Crime

Heather Wolffram1
(1)
History, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand
End Abstract
Writing in 1900 in the Wiener Zeitung (Viennese Newspaper), Hans Gross (1847–1915), an Investigating Judge, Professor of Criminal Law at Czernowitz and editor of the Leipzig-based journal Archiv für Kriminal-Anthropologie und Kriminalistik (Archive for Criminal Anthropology and Criminalistics), complained of the narrow contemporary use of the term “criminal psychology.”1 Under the auspices of criminal anthropologists, who had argued for the mental and, in some instances, physical distinctiveness of offenders, this term, Gross wrote, had come to refer exclusively to the peculiar psychology of the criminal.2 Rejecting this a priori assumption of difference, Gross argued that the criminal’s psychology was not distinct from that of the non-criminal; the problems of perception, memory and testimony affecting the offender being identical to those that impacted on the other participants in criminal proceedings.3 With this in mind, Gross told his readers that the term “criminal psychology” should be used to refer, not to the study of the offender’s psychological difference, but rather to “all those lessons from general psychology, which for criminalists can be of importance in the consideration of the mental activity of criminals, witnesses, judges, expert witnesses and jurors – that is, all lessons of psychology that in a criminal trial can in any manner be useful.”4 These lessons, derived from extensive observation of individual psychology, would, Gross claimed, “…enable us to learn how we should handle and evaluate the claims of the accused, information from witnesses, the perceptions of judges, jurors and expert witnesses.”5 While Gross pointed to the 700 pages of observations he had collected in his 1898 book Criminalpsychologie (Criminal Psychology), he stressed that these were “…vanishingly few in comparison to those that we need.”6
While Gross sought to remobilise the term “criminal psychology,” in order to describe this new field, the discipline he envisaged in the pages of the Wiener Zeitung was to become more commonly known as forensic psychology. Dedicated to the psychology of all those involved in criminal proceedings, this new science promised to move away from an exclusive focus on the criminal to provide a holistic view of how human fallibility impacted upon criminal justice . While in Germany during the following decades a number of psychiatrists, psychologists and jurists took steps to realise Gross’ vision, by the inter-war period, it was apparent that, to a large extent, concentration on the criminal had simply given way to an equally narrow focus on the witness, particularly the juvenile witness . Writing in 1927, for example, the psychologist Paul Plaut (1894–1960) noted,
…the big questions, that for twenty years have occupied psychologists, centre nearly exclusively on the problems of the psychology of testimony. They got hold of the narrowest area of forensic psychology, in that, they specialised in the psychology of the witness and, also here, only again on a quite small, if not unimportant part, namely the psychology of children’s and juvenile’s testimony.7
Similarly, in the same year, the district court judge, Albert Hellwig (1880–1950) complained,
From the wide purview of forensic psychology is covered, nearly exclusively, the area of the psychology of the testimony of the witness, only slightly the psychology of the accused and as good as nothing on the very important psychology of interrogators, particularly of police officials and judges.8
While there were attempts, mainly on the part of jurists, to conduct investigations of the psychology of the judge and the jury and to develop a reliable psychological test to detect offenders’ lies, the psychological problems that arose from German criminal trials in the Imperial and inter-war periods acted far more as a stimulus for research on the witness than on any other participant in criminal proceedings.9 Figures like Plaut and Hellwig may have resisted this tendency, but it was the question of the credibility of the witness, particularly the young witness, that created a space for psychological expertise in German courtrooms. Coveted by the representatives of a range of disciplines, including psychiatry , psychology, forensic medicine and pedagogy, the role of psychological expert within criminal proceedings was highly contested in early twentieth-century Germany; arguments about competency coalescing around children’s testimony and trials, usually sex crimes trials, in which the statements of minors played a crucial part. Subtitled, Witnessing Crime, 1880–1939, this book, which traces the development of forensic psychology in Germany from the late nineteenth century through to the Second World War, is, therefore, largely a history of the psychology of the witness and the competing disciplines that claimed expertise in this area.
Emerging in the closing decades of the nineteenth century, concern about witness reliability was the result not only of new research within the mental sciences, which revealed the fallibility of perception and memory and the power of suggestion, but of legal reform, which had swept away those criteria that excluded witnesses on the basis of age, class or gender.10 Exploiting the growing anxiety around testimony for their clients’ benefit, professionalising German defence lawyers sought experts to testify to witnesses’ lack of reliability; in the late nineteenth century relying on psychiatrists with an interest in suggestion and in the early twentieth century mobilising psychologists and pedagogues who had conducted memory and testimony experiments.11 Judges also, as the works of Gross and Hellwig demonstrate, were often intensely engaged in the psychology of testimony, in many cases claiming their own expertise, based on long professional experience, on witness credibility.12 Beyond the courtroom, the press too were important in shaping forensic psychology in the German context, acting not simply as a means of communicating the findings of the psychology of testimony to the public, but as a key pressure group that provided impetus for judicial reform and expressed strong opinions on matters of witness reliability and psychological expertise.13 These opinions impacted upon the acceptance and success of forensic psychology in the lead up to the Second World War.
Multidisciplinary in both its conception and early development, forensic psychology, contrary to the short practitioner histories that constitute much of the historiography in this field, did not simply emerge at the fin de siècle, generated in the laboratories of psychologists determined to find real-world applications for their research.14 This is part of the story, of course, but tends to ignore the role of psychiatrists , Gerichtsärzte (forensic physicians) and jurists, which preceded the interest of psychologists in forensic questions and continued throughout the Imperial and inter-war periods, often in tension with psychologists’ claims to expertise. Nonetheless, the short works produced by practitioners such as Otto Undeutsch and Siegfried Ludwig Sporer are valuable in alerting us to the way in which the psychology of testimony evolved in the hands of psychologists such as William Stern (1871–1938), Karl Marbe (1869–1953) and Otto Lipmann (1880–1933); their experiments, courtroom appearances and campaigns for judicial reform were crucial to establishing the field in the early twentieth century and solidifying psychology’s monopoly over it following the Second World War.15 But, while Undeutsch and Sporer acknowledge the contributions of jurists like Gross and Franz von Liszt (1851–1919) to this nascent field, their narrow focus disguises both the heated cross-disciplinary debates around psychological expertise that characterised the Weimar period and the legal, financial and political contingencies, which prevented a clear winner in the “battle for forensic psychology” from emerging before 1939.
Building on practitioners’ brief explorations of the history of forensic psychology, a small number of doctoral these...

Indice dei contenuti