Familial aggregation is a well-recognized phenomenon in MS, and family and twin studies have long shown evidence for a strong genetic component underlying MS. This is illustrated by the 25–30% concordance among monozygotic twins, the 5% concordance among same-sex dizygotic twins, and the 3.5% concordance among nontwin siblings (Gourraud et al. 2012). However, the inheritance of MS cannot be explained by a simple genetic model, and neither the familial recurrence rate nor twin concordance supports the presence of a Mendelian trait. Rather, susceptibility is polygenic, with each gene contributing a relatively small amount of the overall risk. More than likely, genetic heterogeneity (different susceptibilities among individuals) also exists. Additionally, epidemiological data strongly hint at a parent-of-origin effect in MS: maternal half-siblings having double the risk for MS compared to paternal half-siblings (2.35% vs. 1.31%), while the risk for MS in maternal half-siblings compared to their full siblings does not differ significantly (Gourraud et al. 2012). The mechanism of the increased risk conferred maternally remains to be elucidated, but epigenetic mechanisms such as DNA methylation or histone modification may play a role (Handel et al. 2010).
SCIENCE REVISITED
Maternal parent-of-origin effect
Mendelian traits are controlled by a single locus and involve the transmission of one allele from both mother and father to a diploid offspring. This simple rule may not be followed in MS and other complex disorders, in which not only do multiple genes appear to contribute to susceptibility, but genomic imprinting may play an important role. Imprinting is an epigenetic process through which the expression of a gene is dependent on the sex of the parent from whom it was inherited. In other words, imprinted alleles are silenced such that the genes are either expressed only from the nonimprinted allele inherited from the mother or the father. Epidemiological data hint at a maternal parent-of-origin effect in MS. The mechanism of the increased risk conferred maternally remains to be elucidated, but epigenetic mechanisms that regulate genomic function (such as DNA methylation, RNA-associated silencing, and histone modifications) have been strongly implicated. Examples of other imprinted genetic disorders include Prader–Willi/Angelman syndrome and Russell–Silver syndrome.
The first direct evidence for a relationship between genes and MS susceptibility came in 1972, when MS was shown to be associated with the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) on chromosome 6p21 (encoding proteins involved in presenting peptide antigens to T cells) (Gourraud et al. 2012). This association was later fine-mapped to a specific locus, HLA-DRB1 of the class II gene HLA-DRB1 (Gourraud et al. 2012). Although the HLA-DRB*1501 haplotype exerts the strongest genetic effect in MS (heterozygosity conferring an odds ratio (OR) of 2.7 and homozygosity of 6.7), the association is not straightforward. In fact, a number of HLA-DRB1 haplotypes are both positively and negatively associated with the disease, differ in magnitude of effect, and either act on their own or greatly alter risk in combination with another haplotype (Kallaur et al. 2011). For example, HLA-DRB1*08 only modestly increases MS risk, but in combination with HLA-DRB1*15, it more than doubles the risk associated with a single copy of the latter (Kallaur et al. 2011). On the other hand, HLA-DRB1*14 carries such a protective effect that it completely abrogates the increased risk of HLA-DRB1*15 (Kallaur et al. 2011). And whereas association of MS with HLA-DRB1*15 has long been known in Northern Europe, in other regions, such as Sardinia, HLA-DRB1*0301, HLA-DRB1*0405, and HLA-DRB1*1303 are more commonly associated with MS (Kallaur et al. 2011). In fact, the relative frequencies of susceptibility and protective HLA haplotypes, which vary between countries, may play important roles in determining the risk of the disease.
It has been estimated that the HLA locus accounts for 20–60% of the genetic susceptibility in MS, leaving a large portion of the genetic component of MS (still) to be explained. In 2007, the International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium (IMSGC) completed the first MS genome-wide association study (GWAS) using trios (an affected individual and both their parents) from the UK and the USA (Gourraud et al. 2012). In addition to the HLA-DRB1 region, two new risk loci were identified: the genes for interleukin-7 receptor alpha (IL-7RA) and interleukin-2 receptor alpha (IL-2RA), which have since been replicated. These genes code for the alpha chain of the IL-7 or IL-2 receptors, which promote lymphocyte growth and differentiation. MS-associated variants in the IL-2RA gene contribute to the production of soluble IL-2RA, a biomarker of peripheral inflammation. The IL-7/IL-7RA interaction is important for memory T-cell maintenance and development and proliferation and survival of B and T cells; the protective haplotype is associated with less soluble IL-7RA; the risk allele thus likely produces a change in function (Gregory et al. 2007).
The most recent GWAS data from the IMSGC demonstrate at least 102 SNPs exerting a modest effect (OR, 1.06–1.22) (Gourraud et al. 2012). Most of the loci harbor genes with pertinent immunological roles, including several genes associated with other autoimmune disorders, consistent with the autoimmune hypothesis of MS etiology. Most notably, the results of the GWAS implicate genes coding for cytokine pathways (CXCR5, IL-2RA, IL-7R, IL-7, IL-12RB1, IL-22RA2, IL-12A, IL-12B, IRF8, TNFRSF1A, TNFRSF14, TNFSF14) and for costimulatory (CD37, CD40, CD58, CD80, CD86, CLECL1) and signal transduction (CBLB, GPR65, MALT1, RGS1, STAT3, TAGAP, TYK2) molecules of immunological relevance (Gourraud et al. 2012). Of interest, at least two genes (KIF1B, GPC5) not involved in the immune system but instead with neuronal growth and repair mechanisms may also be associated with MS. These genes may influence the potential of remyelination of lesions, and their discovery gives a hint to a disturbance of repair mechanisms in addition to autoimmune processes in MS.
Still relatively little is known about how the identified MS risk variants exert their effects at the molecular and cellular levels. Their incomplete penetrance and moderate individual effects probably reflect interactions with other genes, posttranscriptional regulatory mechanisms, or significant environmental and epigenetic influences. Further genetic and functional studies are required to pinpoint the functionally relevant genes and pathways, to understand how these influence risk, and to determine if the genes themselves, or the downstream effects thereof, can be modified to alter MS risk.