It is a dirty fact, but everyone on Wall Street knows the stock market could not function without Dumb Money. Dumb Moneyâand that is how Wall Street classifies outsidersâalways does what most benefits Wall Street. Dumb Money buys stocks when it should sell, and panics and sells when buying makes more sense. This is a primary reason why Wall Street makes so much money when most everyone else fails, or inches forward, in the stock market. If not for the positive effect of inflation, and corporate stock dividends, which represent more than 45 percent of historical stock gains, most investors would have sharply smaller investment portfolios.
Now, as Baby Boomers confront retirement, and younger generations worry they will not live as well as their parents, millions of people are beginning to understand that they must get much smarter, much faster, about the stock market if they ever want to retire, pay for their childrenâs college educations, or lead lives that eventually bear some semblance of financial ease.
The old ideas of coasting toward retirement by regularly investing in stocks and effortlessly doubling stock portfolio values every seven or so years as the stock market advanced are no longer valid. The Credit Crisis of 2007, and Europeâs sovereign debt crisis that sparked in 2009, have unleashed new financial realities that are likely to prove true Wall Streetâs adage that the stock market hurts the most people, most of the time.
Yet, the future need not be as difficult as the recent past.
A well trod path exists that anyone can follow to better deal with Wall Street and the stock market. This path has quietly existed for centuries. The path was carved out, and continually refined, by a small group of people who typically avoid the financial calamities that ensnare everyone else. This group of investors has historically dominated the financial market, and quietly snickered at the widespread idea, birthed in the late nineteenth century by John Stuart Mill, that people can make rational financial decisions.
Mill called his idea Homo economicus. He declared his Economic Man capable of making decisions to increase his wealth. Millâs man has persisted ever since like some financial Frankenstein even though the financial markets are so complexâespecially in the past 40 yearsâthat it is increasingly apparent that Millâs man, today known simply as John and Jane Investor, has great difficulty profitably navigating the stock market.
In sharp contrast to Millâs incarnation is a small group of people who make more money than they lose. In keeping with Millâs use of Latin, think of people in that group as Homo Indomitabilis.
The Indomitable Man is different than everyone else in the market. He leads a life of counterintuitive thought and action that is perhaps best summed up by a simple idea: Bad investors think of ways to make money. Good investors think of ways to not lose money. Those 17 words are the most important words any investor can know. Learn the meaning of those words, and you have a chance of real success in the stock market.
The difference between the idea of the good investor and bad investor is profound. One idea ensures you eventually give back profits, and likely some, or all, of your initial investment, to Wall Street. The other one lets you keep much of what you make. Though the good investor rule seems like common sense, it is not well known off Wall Street. This is one reason why so many people fail in the market, or are swept along with the crowd, because they lack a simple, proper, disciplined framework to make investing decisions. Most people are interested in getting rich, and getting rich fast. They try that approach again and again and again, often taking on more risk to make profits and recoup losses. Often, this ends poorly. Still, they continue to climb back up the stock marketâs risk ladder, chasing the higher returns of riskier investments without truly understanding the risks they are taking, or even why they failed.
The issue is not necessarily that people are too greedy for their own good, or not smart enough to understand how to navigate the stock market. The issue is that the United States very quickly morphed from a nation of savers to investors. People who once saved money in passbook savings accounts have since the mid-1970s been increasingly thrust into the stock marketâeven though they were, and often remain, effectively financially illiterate. These new investors use ideas that work on Main Streetâbut not Wall Street. The disconnect is now lethal. Rather than simply hoping the economy improves, or that another bull market erases peopleâs financial problems, it is better to focus on the facts and ideas on Wall Street that are made truer by time, and that have long kept the best investors safe when others have stumbled.
If you think people learn anything from losing money, you are wrong. The people who lose the most money, at least in the stock market, are often the most anxious to recoup their losses. The reasoning is fascinating, and it is a key to understanding why investors are stuck in a boom-and-bust cycle. âIf someone had a lot of money in the market, and then loses it, they respond by jumping back into the market because the risk of not making money is greater than the risk of losing what they have left,â says Mark Taborksy, a former portfolio strategy chief at PIMCO, one of the worldâs largest money-management firms, who now works at Blackrock, another major firm.1
Gib McEachran, a financial planner in Greensboro, North Carolina, regularly deals with investors who have fallen off the risk ladder, and are eager to get back on. In late 2009, a retired couple with a $1.6 million investment portfolio came to his office for help. At the height of the Internet bubble, the coupleâs account was worth $2.3 million. Rather than focusing on how the money could be managed to provide them with retirement income, the man, a former engineer, wanted to know how McEachran would recoup the lost $600,000. His wife eventually told him to be quiet and listen. (Women, studies show, are more risk averse than men.)2
Even though there is so much anger toward Wall Street in the wake of what is now called the Global Financial Crisis that started in 2007, and that is now enveloping Europe, there is no escaping the marketâonly learning how to deal with it. But before learning how to deal with the market, it is important to understand how Wall Street came to Main Street.
A Nation of Stock Market Junkies
Americaâs relationship with the stock market is actually a relatively recent phenomenon that took off in the 1990s when technology accelerated, automated, and coalesced major policy developments that had occurred over the preceding 15 years to let Wall Street invade Main Street. In isolation, none of the events seem epically important, but the sum is greater than the parts, and the succession of events, and scope of innovation, are stunning.
In 1974, the U.S. tax code was changed to create Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs). The launch of IRAs let people invest in stocks and defer paying taxes until the money was withdrawn at retirement. This provided many people with their first taste of investing and sent millions of investors climbing up the risk ladder. The launch of the IRA also marked the end of a bear market. The next year, in 1975, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) deregulated brokerage firm commissions, ending a 183-year-old practice that had protected the profits of stock exchange members and kept investing beyond the reach of many because stock trading commissions were exorbitant. Soon, discount brokerage firms, including Charles Schwab, brought Wall Street to Main Street. To attract customers, Schwab and others dramatically lowered stock-trading commissions. Suddenly, stock trading was affordable to the middle class.
âWith the sudden arrival of negotiated stock trades that were less than half the cost they had been, a major barrier to investing went away for the average American,â Charles Schwab, the brokerage firmâs founder, said.3
According to Schwab, in 1975 about $1.75 trillion of investable assets were held by individuals, and less than 45 percent was invested in securities, like stocks. Trading commissions were fixed-price and done through highly paid brokerage firms. By 2005 individuals held more than $17 trillion of investable assets, and 73 percent was invested in securities. In just 30 years, more than half of the U.S. adult population owned stocks in one form or another.
In 1975, John Bogle launched the Vanguard Group. His mutual-fund company is to Wall Street what Walmart is to retailing: low-cost. Around 1980, Ted Benna, a tax consultant, effectively created 401 (k) retirement accounts that would prove to play a major role in how people saved for retirement.
Inevitably, investors who got a taste of the market in IRAs and 401 (k) accounts, found they loved stocks. A massive bull market began in 1982, two years into President Reaganâs first term. Conditions were ideal. It was cheap to buy stocks. It was easy to do. It was tax effective. Standing on the sidelines was inadvisable, and maybe even dumb, as the Dow Jones Industrial Averageâs rally would soon demonstrate. On August 12, 1982, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was at 777. The rise of the stock market would soon be chronicled in Technicolor. In 1989, CNBC was launched, which would ultimately help change the publicâs perception of the stock market. Prior to CNBCâs launch, financial news was mostly limited to the business press, including the Wall Street Journal and Barronâs. If the stock market was mentioned on TV, it was only to briefly note that the Dow Jones Industrial Average had risen or fallen during the day. Now, stock market news often dominates evening newscasts, and the front pages of many newspapers and magazines.
On Christmas Day, 1990, the Internet was effectively launched, unleashing forces that quickly revolutionized stock investing. The stock market was suddenly accessible to anyone, anytime. Buying stocks was destined to be as easy as clicking a computer mouse. In 1993, the first exchange-traded fund, the SPDR S&P 500 Trust (SPY), was created. Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are stocks in drag. They trade like stocks, but own a portfolio of stocks like mutual funds. In 1995, as the stock market chugged higher, Dick Grasso, then chairman of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), let the first reporter in the Exchangeâs long history report live from the trading floor. Soon, reporters from all over the world joined CNBCâs Maria Bartiromo at the Big Board. In 1999, the United States Congress eliminated the historic separation of investment and commercial banks, enabling the creation of mega-banks, like Citigroup and Bank of America. The late 1990s were heady times on Wall Street.
In April, 1999, the predecessor of TD Ameritrade, an online discount brokerage firm, introduced its now classic Stuart advertising campaign, and other firms followed with similar campaigns that suggested that making money was easyâand fun. Few ads captured the zeitgeist like Stuart.
Stuart was a young dude with spiky, punk rock hair and some vague office job. One day, he was copying his face on the office mimeograph machine when he was interrupted by his boss and summoned to his office. Rather than getting disciplined, the boss asked Stuart to teach him how to buy stocks on the Internet.
âLetâs go to Ameritrade.com,â Stuart tells his boss. âItâs easier than falling in love. What do you feel like buying today, Mr. P.?â
He buys 100 shares of Kmart.
âWhat does that cost me?â
â$8, my man.â
âMy b...