CHAPTER 1
Fundamentals of Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy
1.1. Concept of complex impedance
The concept of electrical impedance was first introduced by Oliver Heaviside in the 1880s and was soon afterward developed in terms of vector diagrams and complex numbers representation by A. E. Kennelly and C. P. Steinmetz [1, p. 5]. Since then the technique has gained in exposure and popularity, propelled by a series of scientific advancements in the field of electrochemistry, improvements in instrumentation performance and availability, and increased exposure to an ever-widening range of practical applications.
For example, the development of the double-layer theory by Frumkin and Grahame led to the development of the equivalent circuit (EC) modeling approach to the representation of impedance data by Randles and Warburg. Extended studies of electrochemical reactions coupled with diffusion (Gerisher) and adsorption (Eppelboin) phenomena, effects of porous surfaces on electrochemical kinetics (de Levie), and nonuniform current and potential distribution dispersions (Newman) all resulted in a tremendous expansion of impedance-based investigations addressing these and other similar problems [1]. Along with the development of electrochemical impedance theory, more elaborate mathematical methods for data analysis came into existence, such as Kramers-Kronig relationships and nonlinear complex regression [1, 2]. Transformational advancements in electrochemical equipment and computer technology that have occurred over the last 30 years allowed for digital automated impedance measurements to be performed with significantly higher quality, better control, and more versatility than what was available during the early years of EIS. One can argue that these advancements completely revolutionized the field of impedance spectroscopy (and in a broader sense the field of electrochemistry), allowing the technique to be applicable to an exploding universe of practical applications. Some of these applications, such as dielectric spectroscopy analysis of electrical conduction mechanisms in bulk polymers and biological cell suspensions, have been actively practiced since the 1950s [3, 4]. Others, such as localized studies of surface corrosion kinetics and analysis of the state of biomedical implants, have come into prominence only relatively recently [5, 6, 7, 8].
In spite of the ever-expanding use of EIS in the analysis of practical and experimental systems, impedance (or complex electrical resistance, for a lack of a better term) fundamentally remains a simple concept. Electrical resistance R is related to the ability of a circuit element to resist the flow of electrical current. Ohmâs Law (Eq. 1-1) defines resistance in terms of the ratio between input voltage V and output current I:
While this is a well-known relationship, its use is limited to only one circuit elementâthe ideal resistor. An ideal resistor follows Ohmâs Law at all current, voltage, and AC frequency levels. The resistorâs characteristic resistance value R [ohm] is independent of AC frequency, and AC current and voltage signals though the ideal resistor are âin phaseâ with each other. Let us assume that the analyzed sample material is ideally homogeneous and completely fills the volume bounded by two external current conductors (âelectrodesâ) with a visible area A that are placed apart at uniform distance d, as shown in Figure 1-1. When external voltage V is applied, a uniform current I passes through the sample, and the resistance is defined as:
where Ï [ohm cm] is the characteristic electrical resistivity of a material, representing its ability to resist the passage of the current. The inverse of resistivity is conductivity Ï [1 / (ohm cm)] or [Sm/cm], reflecting the materialâs ability to conduct electrical current between two bounding electrodes.
An ideal resistor can be replaced in the circuit by another ideal element that completely rejects any flow of current. This element is referred as an âidealâ capacitor (or âinductorâ), which stores magnetic energy created by an applied electric field, formed when two bounding electrodes are separated by a non-conducting (or âdielectricâ) medium. The AC current and voltage signals though the ideal capacitor are completely âout of phaseâ with each other, with current following voltage. The value of the capacitance presented in Farads [F] depends on the area of the electrodes A, the distance between the electrodes d, and the properties of the dielectric medium reflected in a ârelative permittivityâ parameter Δ as:
where Δ0 = constant electrical permittivity of a vacuum (8.85 10â14F/cm). The relative permittivity value represents a characteristic ability of the analyzed material to store electrical energy. This parameter (often referred to as simply âpermittivityâ or âdielectric constantâ) is essentially a convenient multiplier of the vacuum permittivity constant Δ0 that is equal to a ratio of the materialâs permittivity to that of the vacuum. The permittivity values are different for various media: 80.1 (at 20°C) for water, between 2 through 8 for many polymers, and 1 for an ideal vacuum. A typical EIS experiment, where analyzed material characteristics such as conductivity, resistivity, and permittivity are determined, is presented in Figure 1-1.
Impedance is a more general concept than either pure resistance or capacitance, as it takes the phase differences between the input voltage and output current into account. Like resistance, impedance is the ratio between voltage and current, demonstrating the ability of a circuit to resist the flow of electrical current, represented by the âreal impedanceâ term, but it also reflects the ability of a circuit to store electrical energy, reflected in the âimaginary impedanceâ term. Impedance can be defined as a complex resistance encountered when current flows through a circuit composed of various resistors, capacitors, and inductors. This definition is applied to both direct current (DC) and alternating current (AC).
In experimental situations the electrochemical impedance is normally measured using excitation AC voltage signal V with small amplitude VA (expressed in volts) applied at frequency f (expressed in Hz or 1/sec). The voltage signal V (t), expressed as a function of time t, has the form:
In this notation a âradial frequencyâ Ï of the applied voltage signal (expressed in radians / second) parameter is introduced, which is related to the applied AC frequency f as Ï = 2 Ï f.
In a linear or pseudolinear system, the current response to a sinusoidal voltage input will be a sinusoid at the same frequency but âshifted in phaseâ (either forward or backward depending on the systemâs characteristics)âthat is, determined by the ratio of capacitive and resistive components of the output current (Figure 1-2). In a linear system, the response current signal I(t) is shifted in phase (Ï) and has a different amplitude, IA:
An expression analogous to Ohmâs Law allows us to calculate the complex impedance of the system as the ratio of input voltage V(t) and output measured current I(t):
The impedance is therefore expressed in terms of a magnitude (absolute value), ZA = |Z|, and a phase shift, Ï. If we plot the applied sinusoidal voltage signal on the x-axis of a graph and the sinusoidal response signal I(t) on the y-axis, an oval known as a âLissajous figureâ will appear (Figure 1-3A). Analysis of Lissajous figures on oscilloscope screens was the accepted method of impedance measurement prior to the availability of lock-in amplifiers and frequency response analyzers. Modern equipment allows automation in applying the voltage input with variable frequencies and collecting the output impedance (and current) responses as the frequency is scanned from very high (MHz-GHz) values where timescale of the signal is in micro- and nanoseconds to very low frequencies (ÎŒHz) with timescales of the order of hours.
Using Eulerâs relationship:
it is possible to express the impedance as a complex function. The potential V(t) is described as:
and the current response as:
The impedance is then represented as a complex number that can also be expressed in complex mathematics as a combination of âreal,â or in-phase (ZREAL), and âimaginary,â or out-of-phase (ZIM), parts (Figure 1-3B):
and the phase angle Ï at a chosen radial frequency Ï is a ratio of the imaginary and real impedance components:
1.2. Complex dielectric, modulus, and impedance data representations
In addition to the AC inputs such as voltage amplitude VA and radial frequency Ï, impedance spectroscopy also actively employs DC voltage modulation (which is sometimes referred to as âoffset voltageâ or âoffset electrochemical potentialâ) as an important tool to study electrochemical processes. Alternative terms, such as âdielectric spectroscopyâ or âmodulus spectroscopy,â are often used to describe impedance analysis that is effectively conducted only with AC modulation in the absence of a DC offset voltage (Figure 1-4).
Dielectric analysis measures two fundamental characteristics of a materialâpermittivity Δ and conductivity Ï (or resistivity Ï)âas functions of time, temperature, and AC radial frequency Ï. As was discussed above, permittivity and conductivity are two parameters characteristic of respective abilities of analyzed material to store electrical energy and transfer electric charge. Both of these parameters are related to molecular activity. For example, a âdielectricâ is a material whose capacitive current (out of phase) exceeds its resistive (in phase) current. An âideal dielectricâ is an insulator with no free charges that is capable of storing electrical energy. The Debye Equation (Eq. 1-12) relates the relative permittivity Δ to a concept of material polarization density P [C/m2], or electrical dipole moment [C/m] per unit volume [m3], and the applied electric field V:
Depending on the investigated material and the frequency of the applied electric field, determined polarization can be electronic and atomic (very small translational displacement of the electronic cloud in THz frequency range), orientational or dipolar (rotational moment experienced by permanently polar molecules in kHz-MHz frequency range), and ionic (displacement of ions with respect to each other in Hz-kHz frequency region).
The dielectric analysis typically presents the permittivity and conductivity material properties as a combined âcomplex permittivityâ Δ* parameter, which is analogous to the concept of complex impedance Z* (Figure 1-4A). Just as complex impedance can be represented by its real and imaginary components, complex permittivity is a function of two parametersâârealâ permittivity (often referred to as âpermittivityâ or âdielectric constantâ) Δâ and imaginary permittivity (or âloss factorâ) Δâ as:
In dielectric material Δâ represents the alignment of dipoles, which is the energy storage component that is an inverse equivalent of ZIM. Δâ represents the ionic conduction component that is an inverse equivalent of ZREAL. Both real permittivity and loss factor can be...