Chapter One
Dollar Decline
How Did We Get Here?
Think the dollar hasnât declined?
It has lost 80 percent of its purchasing power since 1970âthe year before the great experiment of cutting the dollar loose from a fixed value in gold.
Back in 1970, if you just stashed a dollar coin under the mattress, today youâd find it buys you less than two dimes worth of goods. That doesnât even cover the price of a postage stamp or a can of Coke. Itâs practically worthless. (See Figure 1.1.)
Our currency is in a turbulent flux thatâs gotten worse and worse as the decades march on.
Todayâs dollar purchases five cents of what it purchased in the 1930s. Think thatâs too far back? Consider the 1980s. Todayâs dollar purchases only 50 cents of what it did back then.
But there will be critics who tell you that purchasing power isnât the only measure of currency strength.
Dollarâs Popularity Doesnât Protect It
The U.S. Continental Congress created the U.S. dollar by an act of its own power in 1785. They hoped it would compete with the Spanish currency, which was the popular legal tender at the time.
Sure enough, here we are in 2012, and the U.S. dollar is now a victim of its own success. Itâs Americaâs most successful export everâmore successful than Leviâs, chewing gum, or Coca-Cola. No export is more popular. Letâs look at the hard numbers.
Approximately two-thirds of U.S. dollars are held outside of the United States: 85 percent of global trade is made with the U.S. dollar. But all that stands to change.
I think the role of the U.S. dollar as the worldâs primary reserve currency will be gone in a decade. The foundation of our financial franchise, the US$ brand is trust. Thatâs trust in our determination not to debase the worldâs primary exchange mechanismâthe worldâs primary store of liquid wealth. We no longer deserve the trust, and are rapidly debasing the brand.
âRick Rule, Sprott Asset Management
The euro is the second most popular currency in the worldâs beauty pageant, although itâs taking a pretty ugly beating as we enter 2012. Still, about 26 percent of the worldâs monetary reserves holdings are denominated in this 17-nation currency.
Weâll cover the details in later chapters, but for now, letâs look at a few tremors weâve tracked that predict an earthquake ahead for the U.S. dollar.
The Old Lady of Threadneedle Street to USA: Youâre Toast
Let me introduce you to my friend Ralph Benko, of the American Principles Project. We first met at the watershed October 2011 Heritage Foundation Conference on âThe Stable Dollar: Why We Need It and How to Achieve It.â
At the end of 2011, Ralph told Forbes readers, âThe world dollar standardâs death certificate arrives in the mail this week.â
Heâs referring to a paper issued officially on December 20, 2011, by the Old Lady of Threadneedle Streetâaka the Bank of England.
The Bank of England, as you can guess from the nickname is the staid, prosaic, conservative bunch on the block of central bankers.
So itâs no surprise this working paper hides its revelation under the dull title, âReform of the International Monetary and Financial System.â But hereâs the dollar bomb: The world was better off when the worldâs currencies were tied to the dollar and the dollar was tied to goldâhowever tenuously.
To understand the dollarâs future, itâs important to understand the dollarâs past.
By now, we have a vast cornucopia of dollar-denominated debt securities. The scale of these markets is unprecedented. The bigger the market the lower spreads it can offer, making deals here the most attractive.
There are also plenty of ways to hedge dollar exchange rate risk (which will be part of the solution set youâll learn about in this book). Itâs the reason why everyone from corporations to governments and central banks consider it a great currency for doing business. Finally, itâs a safe haven that benefits from there being a lack of superliquid, high-volume alternatives. Australia, for instance, has recently made a reputation for stability, but it simply accounts for too small a slice of global financial transactions.
So, basically, the U.S. dollar just so happens to be winning the beauty contest among the ugliest world currencies.
Another friend, resource expert Rick Rule, agrees. âThe only reason,â he says, âwe still enjoy the status that we enjoy globallyâand the benefits of seigneurageâis that other societies have proven even better at debasement than we have. Basing your brand on the attribute of being the least bad has been a consistently faulty strategy.â
How do you know when your branding campaign isnât working? When consumers start buying from your competitors in increasing numbers. The same principle is at work with currencies.
Increasingly, weâll have to compete for our dollars to be used, bought, and saved.
Hereâs an early sign.
Russia and Iran Are Ditching the Dollar
The two countries will carry out their trade with each other using rubles and rials. Add that to the list. China and Russia abandoned the greenback in their bilateral trade more than a year ago.
The big rumble is that the Middle East will follow suit. Imagine if they no longer trade oil in U.S. dollars. It wonât just be Iran as some âalternativeâ bourse. Plans are at work for a Gulf States cooperation, including Saudi Arabia and Abu Dhabi.
This shouldnât be too surprising, given that the United Nations itself has called for a ânew global reserve currency.â Why? They say itâs dangerous to allow us the âprivilegeâ of building up our massive trade deficit.
âPretty soon,â says EverBankâs currency guru Chuck Butler, âhaving the reserve currency of the world isnât going to be such a big thing, if all the commodity trade isnât settled in dollars!â
Chuck is definitely in the camp that questions the safe haven currency status the dollar holds.
He doesnât blame any country for wanting to remove dollars from their reserves. After all, the dollars have lost so much value over the years.
Sure, he points out, it is the most liquid currency in the world, but if countries keep taking dollars out of the terms of their trade, how much longer can it remain the most liquid currency?
Itâs a real conundrum that any dollar earner (and investor) needs to be aware of. It doesnât mean weâll lose the worldâs preferred currency status today, tomorrow, or even next year.
Eventually, though, there will come a time when the worldâs nations will stop adding U.S. dollars to their already swollen coffers. Theyâll demand something else instead.
We would argue, like the Old Lady of Threadneedle Street, for something that looks a lot more like Bretton Woods.
Weâre betting other nations (especially the gold-hoarding ones weâll explore in later chapters) would totally agree.
Let us put a period on this by ending with the comment from Englandâs central bank researchers. The Bretton Woods era âstands out as coinciding with remarkable financial stability and sustained high growth at a global level.â
Sounds pretty nice, doesnât it?
They go on: âthe solid growth outcomes were not simply the result of post-war reconstruction efforts.â They say that in fact, GDP growth was actually stronger in the 1960s than it was in the 1950s.
Makes you wonder: What went wrong?
Chapter Two
Serial Bubble Blowers
Who Controls Our Economic Destiny?
The shrinking dollar is a modern problem. The U.S. dollar has been shrinking since the inception of the Federal Reserveâthe very crew assigned the task of maintaining its value. Of late, the decline is accelerating at an alarming rate.
For many Americans, the suggestion that the dollar is losing value is unthinkableâeven unpatriotic. The problem is not simply a lack of understanding about the nature of wealth and investment used to sustain it. Our policy makers and economists make no distinction between wealth created through savings and investment in the real economy versus âwealthâ created in the markets through asset bubbles brought about by credit policies.
When I tell people this, I feel like Iâm addressing a meeting of folks who want to lose weight at the local burger joint. We as individualsâand as a nationâare addicted to cheap, easy credit. What the government gives, weâll take. We spend at a high level, and we want to accumulate wealth on the same fast track.
Forget hard work, weâd rather our house go up in value like magic! Traditionally, economists recognized that it took time to build an estate. People and countries could build wealth slowly. Those days are far, far behind us. Now we are at the mercy of what I call serial bubble blowers.
All the U.S. economyâs so-called improvements stem from one main reason: all economic growth during the ârecoveryâ since 2001 can be traced to a seemingly endless array of asset and borrowing bubbles.
First, we saw the stock market bubble, then the bond bubble, then the housing...