CHAPTER 1
The Motivation toward Knowledge Management
Combining the Tactical with the Strategic
In this chapter you will:
Review examples of typical tactical knowledge management problems.
Discover how knowledge management is actually a strategic tool aiming to increase the intellectual capital essential for long-term success of an organization.
Learn that the manager should lead knowledge management efforts in an organization because of its importance as a procedural tool with both tactical and strategic relevance to success.
Most managers, when they begin this journey into knowledge management (KM), do not even know what knowledge management entails. They are only familiar with some of its problems from their day-to-day experience with the flow of knowledge in their organization. These day-to-day experiences are considered tactical, meaning they interfere with an organizationâs efficiency and performance. An example of a tactical issue might be that a manager notices a worker or colleague is not open to sharing his positionâs knowledge, so the manager needs to reinvent processes that already exist.
Later, when managers become more involved in learning about successful knowledge management, they realize the tactical problems also have strategic implications and solutions that can further the intellectual capital of their organization overall. For instance, modern high-tech organizations use KM to align their research and development (R&D) efforts. Or traditional industries realize that KM helps them use their current core competencies, or develop new ones, in order to quickly invest in new products, services, and solutions that the market needs. Simply put, effective KM will turn any organization into a fast-learning one, geared toward a sustained, competitive advantage.
Once managers realize how important knowledge management is overall, they begin looking for help but often are not sure how to implement the proper plan.
This chapter begins with an account of some of the challenges that led the authors on their personal KM journeys. The challenges described here use examples of KM problems, all of which are typical of what readers might encounter in their business. The chapter continues with responses to these challenges and ends with some universal truths about KM issues, paving the way to the more detailed discussions found throughout this book.
A Manager Struggling with Key Tactical Problems
Co-author Tuvya Ronen became aware of KM problems in the late 1990s. Tuvya is now a vice president at Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd., where he manages an R&D center of about 1,500 engineers and scientists. Rafael is a leading aerospace company in Israelâwith $1.6 billion in annual sales and about 6,000 employeesâwhose products are based on an intensive use of innovative R&D. Tuvya has spent most of his career at Rafael.
Basically, the goal of an R&D center at Rafael, as in any organization, is to create and disseminate knowledge. Unknowingly, Rafael has established a unique knowledge culture that utilizes several first-class KM methods. However, some changes over the course of Tuvyaâs time at Rafael have challenged its ability to increase efficiency and competitiveness. To his dismay, Tuvya found that this was an ongoing process: New knowledge problems were always emerging where none existed before.
The following examples describe some typical problems that Tuvya first encountered in the late 1990s, when he was managing one of the departments of the R&D center at Rafael.
Benâs Bright Idea Surprisingly Rejected
Ben is a leading member of a team of aerodynamic designers. Their work requires using several different codes for estimating aerodynamic properties, such as lift and drag. Ben made an obvious and simple suggestion: Whenever somebody uses a code, he should write comments detailing the experience. These comments would be useful for others: determining which code suits a specific family of configurations or flight velocity, bug alerts, and so on.
In the old days, this suggestion would have been hailed by workers and managers alike. Surprisingly, objections sprang up like mushrooms after the rain: Why would an employee want to spend time for the benefit of others when tight schedules and deadlines pull him back to his work? When and why would coworkers read the comments? Who would sponsor the extra work? Where would the money come from in light of tight budgets and narrow profit margins?
The main issue presented in this example is: How can employees learn from each other when they donât have the time, money, or managerial attention? Is Benâs idea the best solution? Are there other, better solutions?
Nathan, the Irreplaceable Technician
Nathan is a veteran technician but the organization decided to encourage him to seek early retirement. The situation seemed win-win: He would enjoy a generous retirement package and his department could replace a not-so-cutting-edge technician with an aspiring, young engineer.
Unexpectedly, it turned out that Nathan was irreplaceable as he was the sole source of knowledge in his position. Specifically, only he knew how to maintain an old simulator that was essential to the departmentâs work. Before the decision to ask him to retire, his coworkers had no interest in the old simulator with outdated technology so they did not hasten to acquire his knowledge before encouraging his retirement.
The main issue presented in this example is: How can an organization avoid a situation whereby a single person holds all the knowledge about a key subject?
Ronâs Knowledge Leaving the Organization
Ron is a senior veteran engineer who has held various management positions. Through the years he has become a walking encyclopedia about the design and operation of a family of products. Everybody likes to hear his view. Even younger engineers, who consider him old-fashioned, ask for his advice if only to do the opposite.
In the old days, everybody knew about Ron, and felt he would always be a part of the organization. Nowadays, his fame has declined and many people do not know about his expertise. He may even retire or move to another organization.
The main issues presented in this example are: Can Ronâs knowledge about existing products be documented? Is it possible to create an expert system, using the knowledge of Ron and others, to advise us about new projects? How do we identify important sources like Ron for other workers to use? Are there similar useful sources hidden from the other workersâ experience?
Tuvya assumed that he was not the first person to encounter these types of knowledge issues within an organization. He wanted to find out how other organizations, both in Israel and globally, had solved them. He decided to dedicate a generous amount of time to searching for successful answers and will share many of them with you throughout this book.
A Consultant Struggling with Key Strategic Problems
During Tuvyaâs search he was introduced to co-author Edna Pasher, a management consultant. Whereas Tuvya was struggling with KM problems on the tactical level, Edna was grappling with KM issues on the strategic level.
Edna draws from her academic background in organizational communications to guide organizations in strategic renewal processes. Since the 1980s, she has adopted the approach outlined by Hammel and Prahalad,1 whose focus of strategic processes is to identify the core competencies of an organization that will lead to a sustained competitive advantage. Once these competencies are agreed upon, the question becomes how to develop them in the most effective and efficient way. In order to ensure a sustained competitive advantage, the core competenciesâor in other words the core knowledgeâshould be developed, upgraded, and improved in order to generate a higher return.
Since 1994 Edna has tackled the task of exposing executives to the emerging field of knowledge management. She realized that viewing knowledge as the heart of the competitive edge of organizations implied that knowledge management and strategic management must go hand in hand.
A good example of the power of strategy working in concert with proper KM is IBM Corporation. Its success over the years has relied on a unique combination of technological and business management innovation. IBM allocates billions of dollars of R&D investments to create unique products and adapts them to the changing needs of the market. Further, it develops core competencies in business innovation to influence those market needs. We can see this at work when we think about how IBM was first on the market in creating PC hardware, but then got out of it for more profitable activities later on.
We present a more detailed description of IBM in Chapter 3, but we mention it here as a powerful example of knowledge management and strategic management going hand in hand. In spite of such an obvious model, it is still difficult to persuade managers to take a serious look at strategic KM. The following stories further describe Ednaâs experiences.
Convincing Managers about the Importance of Strategic KM
When leading strategic processes in organizations, Edna observed that it was very difficult for managers to âthink outside the box.â It was hard for them to be creative and innovate faster than their competitors. Sometimes managers were better able to incrementally improve what theyâd already done rather than to dare to embark on a full paradigm shift.
Edna found that it was extremely difficult to convince managers that knowledge management is a worthwhile pursuit. It is a difficult business case to make because tangible results can take years to come to fruition. Managers of public companies are particularly pressed to show results on a quarterly basis, so they donât often see the results of knowledge management overhaul quickly enough to put the initial effort into perspective.
Even though thinking about strategy at the outset of major tactical changes is a difficult case to make, sometimes Edna is successful, as the following examples show.
Arkia: A Strategic KM Transformation
In the early 1990s, the Israeli domestic airline Arkia was a 40-year-old company, which always did more or less the same thing. It operated domestic flights in Israel and flew short-range international charter flights. The company seemed to be sleepwalking through its processes for many years without change. But when the company managers took a look at their business in terms of strategic KM, a transformation came about.
They used the tactical methods of knowledge-creating interactions to gain insight into the experiences of managers and employees. They then arrived at a strategic decision to better exploit existing core competencies. In this particular case, instead of selling vacation packages only on a small scale to accompany flight tickets, they decided to use that capability to make the airline a major tourism company. The result was a major increase in revenues and profits.
The main issues presented in this example are: How to achieve a strategic transformation based on knowledge and core competences (which we detail in Chapter 3)? What are the tactics to produce knowledge creating interactions (which we describe in Chapter 6)?
Danya Cebus: A Construction Company Going Public
Picture this: It is the technology boom of the late 1990s and enthusiastic investors are abandoning the old economy for the lure of high- tech profit. How do you convince potential investors to buy shares in your construction company during a recession in the construction industry?
This was the challenge faced by Danya Cebus, a leading construction company in Israel. Their strategic problem was raising the companyâs value in a difficult market in preparation for going public. They needed to convince potential investors that they had the possibility for future growth and were just a high-tech company in an old-tech industry. With this in mind, they asked themselves, how does Danya Cebus present its core competencies and demonstrate that it can ensure a sustained competitive advantage in a fast-changing industry?
Although a construction company technically belongs to the old economy, knowledge management turns out to be a relevant tool for addressing their strategic question. They faced the task of presenting their strategic advantage by tallying their knowledge assets and knowledge management practices. Their solutions to staying competitive are presented in Chapter 9. The changes led to successful results.
Holon, Israel: A City Reborn
Cities need to move to knowledge-based development, too, just as organizations do. The city of Holon in Israel had to reinvent itself as it became less attractive to future generations of Israeli citizens. In 1993, a new mayor and CEO started a well-documented renaissance process in the city and the story has become an example recognized worldwide.
The city managers started with a singular vision: Make Holon âThe Childrenâs City,â thu...