PART ONE
The purpose, nature and practice of coaching and mentoring
01
In the mainstream?
When we wrote the previous edition we said you would need a very large removal van to carry all the books, journal articles, news stories and Internet references referring to coaching and mentoring. Since then the volume of publications on these topics has continued to grow, although with the increasing popularity of e-publications perhaps the physical volume is not so daunting.
Over the last decade we have all seen a tremendous amount of change in our working lives. The enormous growth of mobile and social networks has influenced our lives in many ways, not always for the better. The pace of globalization â particularly with the rapid development of the BRIC nations â has accelerated.
Against this, the economic instability of the European region and the Far East has prompted many organizations to âbatten down the hatchesâ and think more carefully about future investment. As a result, we are seeing organizations place much more focus on return on investment and measuring results of any training and development activities, including coaching and mentoring, so those who are doing them are doing them much more effectively.
In the world of work and the broader social community, a rich variety of examples of successful applications of coaching and mentoring abounds. It has become a mainstream focus of interest for many organizations, as well as professional institutes, management schools, corporate and community policy makers and anyone interested in people development. Coaching and mentoring, we believe, have become so integrated into work and community life that they can be described routinely as simply âthe way we do things round hereâ.
Despite these activities being considered as a recognized profession, it seems surprising that there is still confusion over definitions and language. Later in this chapter we will attempt to dispel some of this confusion.
Before we look at coaching and mentoring in more detail, we will first attempt to sketch the âbig pictureâ review of the trends, developments and influences of this explosion of activity.
The management and academic âinfluencersâ
Our interest in the potential for both coaching and mentoring came from our own experiences of corporate life and the management writers (who were largely from the United States) of the 1980s. It was impossible to read the new thinking on issues like âprocess re-engineeringâ, âtotal quality managementâ, âcustomer service excellenceâ, âemployee empowermentâ and âthe learning organizationâ without recognizing that the days of the traditional management science of command and control were numbered. The notion of coaching began to enter the language of people management and development literature, either implicitly or sometimes explicitly, in accordance with one of Blanchardâs situational management styles.
The âSituational Leadership Modelâ was developed by Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard in the 1970s. The model comprises four quadrants, depicting the simple concept of the four different styles of leadership that a manager may need to adopt in any given situation: see Figure 1.1. One of those quadrants is called âCoachingâ.
Figure 1.1 Blanchard and Herseyâs âSituational Leadership Modelâ
Hersey and Blanchardâs use of the term âcoachingâ did not have its current meaning, however: by coaching they meant a way of leading and persuading staff to adopt a managerâs solution to the situation.
The US writer with the greatest early impact on the emerging profession of management coaching in Britain was most likely Tim Gallwey in his book The Inner Game of Tennis (1974). His simple proposition that all great tennis players needed a coach to maintain their high levels of performance was a metaphor and message that was easy to relate to the management of peopleâs performance at work. Gallwey made this message even clearer in The Inner Game of Work (2000).
Gallweyâs philosophy that âPerformance = Potential minus Interferenceâ was accompanied by the message that a coachâs job was primarily to release the self-knowledge and potential that everyone possesses. The key to this was to develop greater self-awareness and a sense of self-responsibility in the performer. Again, these are messages that were in tune with the emerging new thinking about management and organizational performance.
Since 2000, a number of UK universities and some in Australia have pioneered programmes leading to formal academic qualifications. Oxford Brookes University was the first to offer a masterâs degree in Coaching and Mentoring Practice and the first to offer a doctorate; Middlesex University offered a masterâs degree and a doctorate with a strong psychological emphasis and Sheffield Hallam University also built on its long involvement with mentoring research. Similar academic qualifications are becoming more widely available all the time. Anthony Grant in Australia has been widely published, advocating the need for an evidence-based approach to academic research. One positive aspect of this increasing academic involvement has been a rapid advance in respectable research-based evidence and a recognized body of literature that many consider an essential requirement for the establishment of a genuine coaching and mentoring profession. Qualifications and certification processes and requirements are explained in more detail in Chapter 10 â âAn industry or a maturing profession?â.
The sport coach âinfluencersâ
Not surprisingly perhaps, it has been the famous âsports-coaches-turned-management-coaching-gurusâ who were the most visible group in shaping the early thinking and approaches to applying coaching to the workplace. Among the leading exponents were John Whitmore, former champion racing driver; David Hemery, former Olympic medallist; and David Whitaker, former Olympic hockey coach. Towards the end of the 1990s, the former tennis player Myles Downey teamed up with The Industrial Society (later renamed the Work Foundation) to form a âSchool of Coachingâ for high-flying managers. More recently, the former Olympic swimming gold medallist Adrian Moorhouse joined up with the leading sports psychologist Professor Graham Jones and created a successful coaching company. Appropriately named Lane 4, this has helped to further consolidate the connection between sports coaching and a notion of âbest practice managementâ.
The medium most commonly used by this group to convey their messages is highly stimulating and memorable training courses. Here practical examples of sports coaching are used to relate to the world of work. The analogy between high achievers in sport and work has fostered the belief that it is possible to develop âgreat coachesâ who can help produce âextraordinary resultsâ. However, John Whitmoreâs book Coaching for Performance (1997, updated 2002) remains an inspiring call for a change of management philosophy. Like many pioneers before him, he has faced a growing number of other âinfluencersâ who challenge the sports coach approach.
The basis for some of the challenges is that the skills required to be a successful sports person are far narrower than those required to manage, for instance, a busy call centre, the intensive care ward of a large hospital or a pharmaceutical processing plant. Thus it has been claimed that the approaches an...