📖 eBook - ePub

# A Beginner's Guide to Mathematical Logic

## Raymond M. Smullyan

Share book

📖 eBook - ePub

# A Beginner's Guide to Mathematical Logic

## Raymond M. Smullyan

## About This Book

Combining stories of great writers and philosophers with quotations and riddles, this completely original text for first courses in mathematical logic examines problems related to proofs, propositional logic and first-order logic, undecidability, and other topics. 2013 edition.

Access to **over 1 million titles** for a fair monthly price.

Study more efficiently using our **study tools.**

## Information

Topic

MathematicsSubtopic

Logic in Mathematics**Part I**

**General Background**

**1**

**Genesis**

Just what is Mathematical Logic? More generally, what is Logic, whether mathematical or not? According to Tweedledee in Lewis Carroll’s

*Through the Looking Glass*, “If it was so, it might be, and if it were so, it would be, but since it isn’t, it ain’t. That’s logic.”*The 13 Clocks*by James Thurber, the author says, “Since it is possible to touch a clock without stopping it, it follows that one can start a clock without touching it. That is logic, as I understand it.”

*The Devil’s Dictionary*. This is really a wonderful book that I highly recommend, which contains such delightful definitions as that of an egotist: “An egotist is one who thinks more of himself than he does of me.” His definition of logic is “Logic; n. The art of thinking and reasoning in strict accordance with the limitations and incapacities of the human misunderstanding. The basis of logic is the syllogism, consisting of a major and a minor premise and a conclusion thus:

Major Premise: | Sixty men can do a piece of work sixty times as quickly as one man. |

Minor Premise: | One man can dig a post-hole in sixty seconds. Therefore, |

Conclusion: | Sixty men can dig a post hole in one second.” |

The philosopher and logician Bertrand Russell defines mathematical logic as “The subject in which nobody knows what one is talking about, nor whether what one is saying is true.”

*purpose*, there are many purposes, but again, one can understand them only after some study of the subject. However, there is one purpose that I can tell you right now, and that is to make precise the notion of a

*proof*.

is no proof !” If the student is sophisticated, he could well say to the teacher, “How do you know that this is not a proof? You have never defined just what is meant by a

I like to illustrate the need for this as follows: Suppose a geometry student has handed in to his teacher a paper in which he was asked to give a proof of, say, the Pythagorean Theorem. The teachers hands back the paper with the comment, “This *proof*! Yes, with admirable precision, you have defined geometrical notions such as triangles, congruence, perpendicularity, but never in the course did you define just what is meant by a*proof*. How would you*prove*that what I have handed you is not a proof?”*proof*? As I understand it, on the one hand it has a popular meaning, but on the other hand, it has a very precise meaning, but only relative to a so-called

*formal*mathematical system, and thus the meaning of

*proof*varies from one formal system to another. It seems to me that in the everyday popular sense, a proof is simply an argument that carries conviction. However, this notion is rather subjective, since different people are convinced by different arguments. I recall that someone once said to me, “I can

*prove*that liberalism is an incorrect political philosophy!” I replied, “I’m sure you can prove this to your satisfaction, and to the satisfaction of those who share your values, but without even hearing your proof, I can assure you that your so-called

*proof*would carry not the slightest conviction to those with a liberal philosophy!” He then gave me his “proof,” and indeed it seemed perfectly valid to him, but obviously would not make the slightest dent on a liberal.

Speaking of logic, here is a little something for you to think about: I once saw a sign in a restaurant which read, “Good food is not cheap. Cheap food is not good.”

**Problem 1.**Do those two statements say different things, or the same thing?

Note that solutions to problems are given at the end of the chapters.

*Symbolic Logic*. Indeed, one of the most prominent journals on the subject is entitled “The Journal of Symbolic Logic.” How did the subject even start? Well, it was preceded by logic of a...

## Table of contents

Citation styles for A Beginner's Guide to Mathematical LogicHow to cite A Beginner's Guide to Mathematical Logic for your reference list or bibliography: select your referencing style from the list below and hit 'copy' to generate a citation. If your style isn't in the list, you can start a free trial to access over 20 additional styles from the Perlego eReader.

APA 6 Citation

Smullyan, R. (2014).

*A Beginner’s Guide to Mathematical Logic*([edition unavailable]). Dover Publications. Retrieved from https://www.perlego.com/book/113102/a-beginners-guide-to-mathematical-logic-pdf (Original work published 2014)Chicago Citation

Smullyan, Raymond. (2014) 2014.

*A Beginner’s Guide to Mathematical Logic*. [Edition unavailable]. Dover Publications. https://www.perlego.com/book/113102/a-beginners-guide-to-mathematical-logic-pdf.Harvard Citation

Smullyan, R. (2014)

*A Beginner’s Guide to Mathematical Logic*. [edition unavailable]. Dover Publications. Available at: https://www.perlego.com/book/113102/a-beginners-guide-to-mathematical-logic-pdf (Accessed: 14 October 2022).MLA 7 Citation

Smullyan, Raymond.

*A Beginner’s Guide to Mathematical Logic*. [edition unavailable]. Dover Publications, 2014. Web. 14 Oct. 2022.