Notes
Introduction
1. Ralph Waldo Emerson, Society and Solitude, Collected Works, vol. 7, ed. Douglas Emory Wilson and Ronald A. Bosco (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2007), 81.
2. William Uricchio, “Historicizing Media in Transition,” in Rethinking Media Change: The Aesthetics of Transition, ed. David Thorburn and Henry Jenkins (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004), 23–38, p. 24.
3. Lisa Gitelman, Always Already New: Media, History, and the Data of Culture (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006), 7. I am also indebted to Carolyn Marvin, When Old Technologies Were New: Thinking about Electric Communication in the Late 19th Century (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988); and Jonathan Sterne, The Audible Past: Cultural Origins of Sound Reproduction (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2006).
4. Uricchio, “Historicizing Media,” 26.
5. Ann L. Ardis and Patrick Collier, eds., Transatlantic Print Culture, 1880–1940: Emerging Media, Emerging Modernisms (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008).
6. Garrett Stewart, Between Film and Screen: Modernism’s Photo Synthesis (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999); Sara Danius, The Senses of Modernism: Technology, Perception, and Aesthetics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2002); David Trotter, Cinema and Modernism (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2007); Laura Marcus, The Tenth Muse: Writing about Cinema in the Modernist Period (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010); Andrew Shail, Cinema and the Origins of Literary Modernism (London: Routledge, 2012).
7. Todd Avery, Radio Modernism: Literature, Ethics, and the BBC, 1922–1938 (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006); Debra Rae Cohen, Michael Coyle, and Jane Lewty, eds., Broadcasting Modernism (Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2009).
8. Tim Armstrong, Modernism (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2005), 109–14; Melba Cuddy-Keane, “Virginia Woolf, Sound Technologies, and the New Aurality,” in Virginia Woolf in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, ed. Pamela L. Caughie (New York: Garland, 2000), 69–96; Ivan Kreilkamp, “A Voice without a Body: The Phonographic Logic of Heart of Darkness,” Victorian Studies 40, no. 2 (1997): 211–43; John M. Picker, Victorian Soundscapes (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), 110–45; Juan A. Suárez, Pop Modernism: Noise and the Reinvention of Everyday Life (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2007), 119–40.
9. John Brooks, Telephone: The First Hundred Years (New York: Harper & Row, 1976); Ithiel de Sola Pool, ed., The Social Impact of the Telephone (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1977); Claude S. Fischer, America Calling: A Social History of the Telephone to 1940 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992). For a cogent revisionist approach, see Robert MacDougall, “Long Lines: AT&T’s Long-Distance Network as an Organizational and Political Strategy,” Business History Review 80 (2006): 297–327; and Richard R. John, Network Nation: Inventing American Telecommunications (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010).
10. Donald Crafton, The Talkies: American Cinema’s Transition to Sound, 1926–1931 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997), 34. See also Paul Starr, The Creation of the Media: Political Origins of Modern Communications (New York: Basic Books, 2004), ch. 6.
11. Roland Marchand, Creating the Corporate Soul: The Rise of Public Relations and Corporate Strategy in American Big Business (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998), ch. 3.
12. Facts from “A History of the British Post Office,” http://web.online.co.uk/freshwater/bpo.htm.
13. F. G. C. Baldwin, The History of the Telephone in the United Kingdom (London: Chapman & Hall, 1925), 615–18.
14. Asa Briggs and Peter Burke, A Social History of the Media: From Gutenberg to the Internet (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2002), 152.
15. Raymond Williams, Television: Ideology and Cultural Form, 2nd ed. (London: Routledge, 1990), 26.
16. Avital Ronell, The Telephone Book: Technology—Schizophrenia—Electric Speech (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1989); Jacques Derrida, “Ulysses Gramophone: Hear say yes in Joyce,” in Acts of Literature, trans. Tina Kendall, ed. Derek Attridge (New York: Routledge, 1992), 253–309, pp. 266, 269; Laurence A. Rickels, Aberrations of Mourning: Writing on German Crypts (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1988), 279–93.
17. Eileen Bowser, “Le coup de téléphone dans le primitif du cinéma,” in Les premiers ans du cinéma français, ed. Pierre Guibbert (Perpignan: Institute Jean Vigo, 1985), 218–24; Tom Gunning, “Heard over the Phone: The Lonely Villa and the de Lorde Tradition of the Terrors of Technology,” Screen 32, no. 2 (1991): 184–96; Jan Olsson, “Framing Silent Calls: Coming to Cinematographic Terms with Telephony,” in Allegories of Communication: Intermedial Concerns from Cinema to the Digital, ed. John Fullerton and Jan Olsson (Rome: John Libbey Publishing, 2004), 157–92.
18. Richard Menke, Telegraphic Realism: Victorian Fiction and Other Information Systems (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2008), 10–11, 3. Mark Goble, starting where Menke leaves off, with Henry James, has taken this story up in compelling fashion. For Goble, American literary Modernism’s desire for communication provoked an avid interest in, precisely, photography, cinema, the telephone, and the gramophone. The writers he investigates, from James through Gertrude Stein, William Carlos Williams, F. Scott Fitzgerald, and James Weldon Johnson to George Oppen and James Agee, “manifest a sha...