In Defence of the Enlightenment

Tzvetan Todorov

• Publisher: Atlantic Books
• Year: 2010
• eBook ISBN:
  9780857891389
• Topic: Geschichte
• Subtopic: Europäische Geschichte

Tzvetan Todorov argues that although our liberal democracies are the offspring of the Enlightenment, they also illustrate the ways in which its ideas have been distorted and perverted. People living in contemporary democracies are often baffled by phenomena which resist easy judgement: globalisation and media omnipotence; disinformation and state-sponsored torture; moralism and the right of intervention; the dominance of economics and the triumph of technology.

In this book, Todorov shows that we cannot learn lessons from the past unless we know how to relate them to the present. He demonstrates that what remains relevant to today is the spirit expressed in the core principles and values for which the Enlightenment stood. In a period of great uncertainty, In Defence of the Enlightenment could not be more timely.

Notes

1 TN: The French term for the Enlightenment, les Lumières, literally means ‘the lights’.

2 Turgot, Tableau philosophique des progrès successifs de l’esprit humain (1750) (Paris: Calmann-Lévy, 1970), 12.

3 Rousseau, Discourse on the Origin and Foundations of Inequality Among Men (1755), The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings, ed. Victor Gourevitch (Cambridge University Press, 1997), 159, 167, 184, 138.

4 TN: Todorov is referring to the murder of Sohane Benziane, 17, in October 2002 in the Parisian suburb of Vitry by an 18-year-old boy who doused her with petrol and set her on fire because she snubbed his advances.

5 Rousseau, ‘Lettre sur la vertu, l’individu et la société’, Annales de la société Jean-Jacques Rousseau 16 (1997), 325.

6 Online source: www.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-5037 (198601%2F03)47%3A1%3C61%3AMPOH%3E2.0.CO%3B2-6

7 Montesquieu, The Spirit of Laws, trans. Thomas Nugent (New York and London: Hafner Publishing Company, 1966), 3.

8 De Bonald, Législation primitive (Paris: Adrien Le Clère, 1829), volume 1, 250.

9 Montesquieu, ‘Letter to the Marquis de Stanville’ (27 May 1750), Œuvres complètes (Paris: Nagel, 1955), volume 3; Rousseau, ‘Letter to Beaumont’ (1762), Œuvres complètes (Paris: Gallimard, 1969), volume 4, 996.

10 Condorcet, Outlines of an historical view of the progress of the human mind: being a posthumous work of the late M. de Condorcet (Philadelphia: Lang and Uftick, 1796), 253–4.

11 Leroy-Beaulieu, De la colonisation chez les peuples modernes, 1902, volume 1, xxi, vii.

12 Ferry (1885), Discours et opinions 1893–1898 (Paris: Armand Colin & Cie), volume 5, 211.

13 Bugeaud, Par l’épée et par la charrue – écrits et discours (Paris: PUF, 1948), 68.

14 Tocqueville (1846), Œuvres complètes (Paris: Gallimard, 1962), volume 1, 299.

15 Ferry, Discours et opinions 1893–1898, volume 5, 209.

16 Eliot, The Idea of a Christian Society (London: Faber and Faber, 1940), 63.

17 Solzhenitsyn, online source: http://www.columbia.edu/ cu/augustine/arch/solzhenitsyn/harvard1978.html

18 John Paul II, Memory and Identity: Conversations at the Dawn of a Millennium (New York: Rizzoli, 2005), 10, 110.

19 Solzhenitsyn, op. cit.

20 John Paul II, Memory and Identity, 48, 134–5.

21 Montesquieu, Treatise on Duties, online source: http://books.google.com/books?id=x-vDjpV0vrQC&pg= PA179&lpg=PA179&dq=montesquieu+justice+ %22human+laws%22+existence+reasonable& source=web&ots=LQ-2MUT8br& sig=78UDHKwikIGD445iSl4qwL8OdHA&hl=en& sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=3&ct=result; The Spirit of Laws,19.

22 See page 72.

23 Rousseau, Discours sur l’économie politique (1756), Œuvres complètes, volume 3, 248; Diderot, ‘Éclectisme’, Encylopédie, this translation from online source: http://books.google.com/ books?id=5Up1LRv6k3AC&pg=PA122&lpg=PA122&dq= diderot+encyclopedie+eclecticism+philosopher+tradition+ %22universal+consent%22&source=web&ots=7e35y1ayO7&sig= aK6S8k7_UVj2rw5ouDy8v3aYBEc&hl=en&sa=X&oi= book_result&resnum=4&ct=result

24 Kant, ‘An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment?’ (1784), What is the Enlightenment? Eighteenth-Century Answers and Twentieth-Century Questions, ed. James Schmidt (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996), 58; ‘What is Orientation in Thought?’, Kant: Political Writings, ed. H. S. Reiss (Cambridge University Press, 1970), 249.

25 Diderot, ‘Fait’, Encylopédie; Condorcet, Cinq mémoires sur l’instruction publique (1791) (Paris: Garnier-Flammarion, 1994), 257; Kant, The Critique of Pure Reason, trans. J.M.D. Meiklejohn (Dodo Press, 2007), preface to the first edition.

26 Montesquieu, The Spirit of Laws,154.

27 Rousseau, An inquiry into the nature of the social contract, or, Principles of political right (1762), ‘The Social Contract’ and Other Later Political Writings, ed. Victor Gourevitch (Cambridge University Press, 1997), III, I and II, 6.

28 Hume, A Treatise on Human Nature (1739), online source: http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/h/hume/david/h92t/B2.3.3.html

29 Rousseau, Dialogues (1772–6), The Collected Writings of Rousseau (Hanover and London: University Press of New England, 1990), volume 1, 118.

30 Rousseau, The Discourses,185.

31 Sade, Justine, Philosophy in the Bedroom, and Other Writings, trans. Richard Seaver and Austryn Wainhouse (New York: Grove Weidenfeld, 1965), 283–4.

32 Blanchot, Lautréamont and Sade, trans. Stuart and Michelle Kendall (Stanford University Press, 2004), 10, 37.

33 Bata...

Table of contents

• Cover
• IN DEFENCE OF THE ENLIGHTENMENT
• Copyright
• Introductory Note
• one: The Project
• two: Rejections and Distortions
• three: Autonomy
• four: Secularism
• five: Truth
• six: Humanity
• seven: Universality
• eight: The Enlightenment and Europe
• A Note of Conclusion
• Notes