1 Chapter 1
Discovering the Magic:
What Is Whole-Scale?
Introduction
Our ever-changing environment combined with the warp speed of technology has placed unparalleled demands and expectations on each of us both where we work and where we live. These demands require leaders to uncover new approaches that harness the tumult, speed, and complexity of the new environment and use them to the organizationâs advantage. These demands are also requiring employees to adapt, change, and then change again, as they respond to the same challenges facing their leaders. As consultants, we believe there is an overwhelming need to change from the old structural organizational models of the twentieth century. We need commonsense ways to tap into and unleash the wisdom present in the entire workforce. We need processes to release the energy and combine that knowledge. That is the reason we believe that the Whole-Scale methodology makes important sense today. Whole-Scale enables the organization to quickly and effectively assess todayâs environment and map and implement a strategy to deal with it successfully now and in the future.
This writing is driven by the urgency we feel in bringing about change that empowers organizations and the people in those organizations to be truly successful in the future. We want to âopen our hearts,â share some of our experiences, and pass on ideas, theories, models, and processes that are robust in creating change.
2 The Richmond Savings Storyâ1995
We were approached by the President and CEO and the human resources director of the third largest credit union in Canada. They asked if we would go to Vancouver to work with their organization, using our Whole-Scale processes. These two men had been able to observe a Whole-Scale large-group event the month before and had a vision of what they could accomplish with their own organization.
Richmond is a suburb of Vancouver, changing culturally based on the influx of immigrating Hong Kong Chinese who are settling and building houses in Richmond. The president, Kirk Lawrie, had worked out a new Vision statement for the credit union in response to these changes. After seeing the Whole-Scale event with another company, he realized that he needed to involve all of his employees in setting direction toward that Vision for the year 2000.
Two Dannemiller Tyson Associates partners met with the Leadership Group of Richmond Savings and developed a draft Mission and Strategic Goals statements that could be articulated to and enriched by the entire organization in a series of large and small events. The first event was with a group that we call the Event Planning Team (EPT), which was a true microcosm of the whole credit union, including one of the leaders, a couple of middle management directors, and front line people of all types (tellers, loan officers, secretaries, technicians, and so forth). This group of twenty met with the consultants for two days to agree on a meaningful purpose and agenda for a large group event (250 participants). Together they answered the questions:
- What will be different in our world as a result of these 250 meeting for three days (Purpose)?
- Who needs to be in the meeting in order to achieve that Purpose?
- What conversations need to take place among that group in order to achieve that Purpose?
3 The Purpose this group debated and finally consensed on was:
To ensure the continuing success of Richmond Savings by capturing and focusing the energy toward shared direction, actions, and results, where each individual and group understands, passionately commits, and contributes to that collective success.
At that point, the group agreed there were some people missing from their own microcosm Event Planning Team, whose voices needed to be part of planning with the Purpose in mind. These people were invited and joined us. We then agreed on the following plan:
Days one and two would be a diagonal slice of people (another, and larger microcosm) representing all of the levels and functions of work geography (branches, central office). That group held discussions for two days, hearing from the various stakeholders, including customers, suppliers, each other, leadership, and competitors (role played by Richmond people), and would finish the second day with input from everyone in the room on the draft Strategy. Then that microcosm would return to work, freeing the other half to come together on days three and four to repeat the processes from the first two days, ending with input regarding the Strategy. The next day (day five), the leadership team returned to the meeting room, read and discussed the input they received from the entire organization, and rewrote the Strategy based on the wisdom the group had given to them.
Day six was a Sunday and the branches were closed, enabling every person in the organization to come to the meeting place to take the next steps. The Leadership Team described the work they had engaged in and the resulting rewrite of the Strategy, a copy of which was at each personâs place when they arrived. When the leaders finished telling everyone what they had done, the President asked: âHow did we do? Did we get it?â The room erupted into excitement and applause, even ending in a sustained standing ovation. The leaders were overwhelmed with the response.
4 Let us show you how the Strategy had changed:
See Table
s
The rest of day six was spent developing systemwide action plans that would cause change in work processes and enable the group to achieve the new goal statements. After these plans had been developed and agreed upon, back-home groups developed committed action plans for their own office or branch. Follow-up continued by computer reports and by all-hands meetings to share what was happening.
Two years later, Kathie Dannemiller received a phone call from the President asking her if she would be willing to be interviewed for a Canadian news magazine that had noticed the amazing success of this group. Kathie, of course, agreed, and asked him what had been so surprising. He said, âWe thought we were writing a strategy for the next five years, and the most surprising thing is that we have been successful on every measure in just two years. And whatâs been particularly amazing is that we have achieved the original goals, the draft first created by leadership, and we have achieved the rewritten goals. We are amazed. How do you account for us having achieved both sets?â Kathie said, âThe goals, in fact, were the same.⌠The language of the rewritten goals spoke more clearly to the front-line person, and because people could viscerally understand what was needed, they made it happen!â
Although their leadership has changed, Richmond Savings thrives today, their strategy evolving appropriately because of the work they did together in 1995.
5 The Roots of the Term Whole-Scale
Our work with systemwide consulting has undergone significant change over the years. As the challenges of our clients have changed, our work has changed to support them. Each time our understanding of what is needed has undergone dramatic change. We have chosen to call what we do by different names as the work has evolved. Based on our work with Ford Motor Company in the early 1980s, the name we used was Large-Group Interactive Processes. During that time our clients told us that they needed to bring larger and larger groups of people together, in order to move quickly in the same direction. Later, from our work with Boeing on the challenges facing them in the early 1990s, they identified the work they needed to do as getting large groups of people connected around developing a common and accurate strategy. We then began to call our approach Real Time Strategic Change. During that time we discovered that when a microcosm of the organization had a common database and could identify what needed to be different in their work, at that very moment (âReal Timeâ in the meeting), change began. Several years ago, we realized how dramatically we had expanded our work and changed the focus. Ford taught us to âgo bigâ; Boeing taught us to âget focusedâ with strategy; and now clients were asking us to continue doing those things and also find ways to go deeper by changing day-to-day behaviors and work processes in their organizations. By combining everything we knew about moving large groups fast in a focused direction, we realized that in these same types of microcosms the client could also develop new work structures and processesâlarge groups doing details in real time.
United Airlines, Indianapolis Maintenance Center, provided us our first real opportunity to combine and integrate the Socio-Technical Systems approach we had called Real Time Work Design, created by our partner Paul Tolchinsky with the Real Time Strategic Change. Both had been highlighted in Bunker and Alban, Large Group Interventions (Berrett Koehler, 1995). This new approach helped organizations meet their needs to move faster and deeper. We began to call our approach Whole-Scale because the power of the microcosm
6 allowed them to see the whole system and work the whole system (the âwholeâ in Whole-Scale) regardless of the size of the microcosm (large or smallâthe âscaleâ in Whole-Scale).
What our clients helped us see is that the same robust change processes we had developed for Ford and Boeing could be applied to process issues, organization design problems, and the daily work issues of organizations. United forced us to develop a methodology that would not only move them faster, but would also take the conversations from the strategic to the day-to-day issues of whole systems. What we learned is that with any size group, when we work with a microcosm of the whole, we can help the system think âwholeâ about their present realities and future needs. Building a common database ignites action to begin in the moment. In that fashion we bring about significant change without having the whole system in one place at one time. Whole-Scale means that we are always operating as well as thinking of the whole organization as we work with true microcosms of that organization. Whether we are working with twenty people or 2,000 people, the principles of the microcosm and seeing âwholeâ are the same.
Large-group approaches to organizational change have become increasingly popular in the last few years because many leaders have learned that the style of management often referred to as âcommand and controlâ no longer works. Leaders are learning that they need to get real buy-in on strategy from their people. They need to find new ways to align and engage large numbers of people around a common, effective strategic focus and an organization structure that can be executed quickly!
The organizations we work with are typically being challenged by a quickly changing environment and experiencing a sense of urgency about operating in that environment. It is our goal to help leaders and organizations understand and believe that the change processes we call Whole-Scale are a viable way of responding to that urgency.
7 Unleashing the Power of the Microcosm
If you want to shift the whole system at one time, you must be able to think the way the whole system thinks. Using microcosmsâreal subsets of the larger group that represent all the âvoicesâ of the organizationâin the overall change process is one of the features of the Whole-Scale approach that allows youâand the organizationâto think and see âwhole system.â The microcosm contains the essential âDNAâ of the whole organization. Working with groups that mirror the âwholeâ allows you to work with the âwhole systemâ at a different level. The best way to change a system is to engage the whole system. Microcosms are the best windows through which to view the whole system in real time. They provide access to the whole system quickly and effectively. Having a critical mass of microcosms experiencing a paradigm shift helps the whole organization shift.
The underlying assumption in the use of microcosms is that the wisdom necessary for success is in all the people of the organization. The most effective change efforts include the voices of all key stakeholders, not just the voices of the top or the bottom or the middle. All of the people in the organizationâ plus those who are counting on the organization, such as customers, owners, or suppliersâmust be able to speak and be heard. When you cannot get allâ getting the âDNAâ re-creates the whole, without having to have everyone. The decisions of any one representative microcosm should be exactly the same as those of any other âDNAâ microcosm would be.
8 Why is this so important?
The traditional consulting approach has been to pull together the âexpertsâ on a particular issueâoften people who thought alike or had the same background or had the ârightâ status in the organization. This view is necessarily limited, often focusing on data of high-ranking, influential views. Itâs necessary to include those views; and, by themselves, they are not sufficient. Using the holistic view from a microcosm (or many microcosms) will illuminate the fact that people can contribute powerfully when they have enough information and when they are invited to do so.
In Whole-Scale, using microcosms means tapping into the wisdom of every area and every level of the organizationâall the way throughout the process, not just the night before implementation. In Whole-Scale, involving people means engaging each person in a de...