1
Introduction
Crafting Anatomies
Katherine Townsend, Rhian Solomon, and Amanda Briggs-Goode
Introduction
Crafting Anatomies places the human body at the centre of a transdisciplinary exploration, revealing how it acts as a catalyst for craft-based collaborative research, using archives, creative dialogues, and technologically advanced fabrications. As the book demonstrates, nothing happens without collaboration in fashion and textiles, which involves intense, creative dialogues at all stages of the process (Anderson 2017). Increasingly, this applies to all contemporary artistic design practice—where the tradition of the “isolated auteur” and mastery of a specific discipline is challenged by the provocative and disruptive nature of information and technology (Mower 2017).
This collection of illustrated narratives seeks to highlight how critical making and conversation around the contemporary body is manifest through a range of material and immaterial responses. The contributors, drawn from a network of creative thinkers and practitioners based in Europe, North America, and Oceania, exploit methodologies that resonate with wider transnational philosophies, “[paying] no attention to the boundaries between fine and applied art, high and low culture, gendered and racial identity, let alone, fashion, textiles and craft”1 (Hemmings 2015: 157). So, through the shared lens of crafting anatomies, researcher/practitioners in materials (textiles) and product (fashion) design are united with artists, writers, scientists, and curators to demonstrate how their/our response to the corporeal is constantly flexing and changing.
Figure 1.1 Ana Rajcevic, “Animal: The Other Side of Evolution” (2012). Photograph by Ana Rajcevic.
Craft
While many of the contributors to this book could be described as “designers,” the term “crafting” is adopted, both literally and metaphorically; revealed through the unique relationships makers have with the fabric of, and for the body. Adamson (2007: 1) asks provocatively “Isn’t craft something mastered by the hands, not the mind? Something consisting of physical actions, rather than abstract ideas?” Skilled making, or craftsmanship, is widely understood as “expertise in technique”; the result of a learned repertoire of refined gestures informed by hand and mind, sustained through supplemental material-based practice (ibid.: 4; Sennett 2008). However, the influence and impact of craft is no longer tied to the Western constructed definition or terrain of “the crafts,” following new insights into the role, value, and “power of making”2 to the creative economy and culture.
The authors within this book demonstrate an inherent understanding of craft’s capacity for collaboration; to communicate across distinct ideologies, domains, and cultures (Niedderer and Townsend 2019; Solomon 2013). The reconceptualization of craft, in parallel with other practices3 has resulted in the melding and dissembling of different genres of making (Ravetz, Kettle, and Felcey 2013). Exchanges between individuals across disciplinary boundaries are shared and through joint endeavor leave one or both sides significantly changed; haptic and reflective dialogues leading to the generation of new and unexpected ideas (Schön 1984). In Crafting Anatomies, therefore, we define craft as a holistic “approach” to the body, realized through the actions and concepts of practitioners who utilize it as a form of “material intelligence” (Adamson 2019).
The body
In Shapeshifters, Francis (2019: 3) discusses our evolving understanding and treatment of the human body from ancient history to the present, observing that “it is in constant flux, with porous physical and psychological borders that are shaped by the environments we inhabit.” Francis also makes connections between the systems of the natural world and humankind’s biological capacity to grow, recover, and adapt based on a continual process of metamorphosis.4 As this study demonstrates, skin,5 the body’s largest organ and regenerative frontier between the inside and outside of the human form, is the source of groundbreaking textile advances. What goes on “beneath the skin,” how our internal organs appear, function, and influence the human condition (Lynch in Alderman et al. 2018) also represents an expanding territory for hybrid practitioners to intervene in.
“The singular, bounded, carbon-based body is being replaced by the proliferation and emergence of technologies and practices which enable the enhancement, alteration and invention of new bodies” (Blackman 2008: 2).
Designer/makers are adapting their existing toolkits and mindsets toward hybrid approaches to the corporeal, drawn from different domains. Consequently, the repair and transformation of the body is no longer restricted to medicine and surgery, with the crafting of its internal and external architectures increasingly located at the intersection of technology and biology (Oxman 2015). The merging of mechanized and natural systems, via hand, augmented and virtual realities are extending the engineering of “the digital body”;6 through the employment of biotechnologies and robotics to enhance its capabilities and ontology.
A plethora of temporary exhibitions and permanent gallery spaces dedicated to the body have also appeared globally (e.g., the Wellcome Collection, Science Gallery, Cité du Corps Humain, and Deutsches Hygiene Museum), stimulating new dialogues and perspectives.
Crafting the body
As Turner (2008: 1) identifies “humans both have bodies and are bodies” the exception being, as Entwistle expands, that “humans are dressed bodies” (Entwistle 2015: 31). Thus, the body, in both its natural and clothed state, has continued to intrigue artists and designers since the beginnings of classical Western culture.7 Cloth and clothing “represent the body as a fundamentally liminal phenomenon by stressing its precarious location on the threshold between the physical and the abstract, the literal and the metaphorical” (Wilson 2003: 273). It is therefore difficult to consider the concept of “crafting anatomies” without contemplating the codes, matrices, and materials of the system in which the body is fashioned (Barthes 2010).
Entwistle (2015: ix) observes “how much the field [of fashion] has massively complexified and breached discipline boundaries” since the beginning of the new millennium. Similarly, the “end of fashion” has been proclaimed and debated by theorists and practitioners alike, acknowledging that its “former paradigms have been exhausted” (Geczy and Karaminas 2019: 1). This is evidenced by changes to the conceptualization, processes, and dissemination of fashion, resulting in a more critical design environment “which has its core in the body and its way of being in the world, of its representations, its masking, its disguises, its measures, and its conflicts with stereotypes and myths” (Calefato 2019: 33). Such change has led to a more focused exploration of the somatic through “corporeal design,” involving subtle and spectacular modifications using decoration and accessories (Zellweger 2011).
One of the most critical issues relating to the crafting of the fashionable body is how fashion and textile products are resourced, designed, and made; the bodies and labor involved (von Busch et al. 2017). Resultantly, a growing number of organizations, including Fashion Revolution8 and the Union of Concerned Researchers9 are attracting international membership and affecting change in the fashion system. Sustainable design is acknowledged by the contributors to this book both implicitly and explicitly; via methodologies that utilize craft as both method and philosophy toward enhancing human expression, health, and well-being, and reducing human impact on the environment.
As the collated examples illustrate, craft-based methodologies often engender slower, co-creative, human-centered models, “aw...