[The] family is the centre of all social organisations and constitutes the dominant social institution through which persons and groups inherit their religious, class, and cultural affiliations. It also provides security and support in times of individual and societal stress ⌠[and is] the basic unit of production and economic activity.
In all analyses of families in the MENA region, researchers describe the family as the absolute centre of life (Hoodfar, 1997; Moghadam, 2003; Roudi-Fahimi and Kent, 2007; Rugh, 1984; Shafey, 1998; Sherif, 1999; Sherif-Trask, 2006). The importance of the family is reflected in the World Values Survey (2015), whereby the MENA countries placed the highest level of importance on family in comparison to any other world region. Between 93 per cent and 99 per cent of respondents from the region stated that family in life is âvery importantâ, with 97.4 per cent of respondents in Egypt confirming this. Sherif-Trask (2006) emphasises that despite regional and class differences, in contemporary Egypt the family remains the central institution. This precept is strongly and constantly reinforced both legally and socially. The Egyptian Constitution (1971), for example, identifies the family as the basic unit of society, stating that:
The family forms the basis of society, founded on religion, morality and patriotism. The State strives to preserve the authentic character of the Egyptian family and the values and traditions it embodies, while affirming and developing this character in relations within Egyptian society.
(Article 9)
Successive constitutions drafted since the 2011 revolution in 2012 and 2013 have also kept similar clauses. The core of the Egyptian family is based on marriage. As is in the entire MENA region, marriage in Egypt is considered to be at the centre of both social and religious life (Sherif-Trask, 2003). Moghadam (2004) asserts that in the region, the family is considered as the only institution in society that is both natural and essential (p.137). Marriage is also identified as the single most important event in an individualâs life (Hoodfar, 1997). Cultural norms across the region reject the possibility of living alone (Sherif, 1999; Sherif-Trask, 2003), and Hoodfar (1997) argues that the concept of living alone is almost unthinkable. As a result, individuals will move from their parental household directly into their new household formed through marriage. Marriage is regarded as a âsocial pinnacle and major turning point in the lives of both men and womenâ (Shafey, 1998, p.39). Marriage is also seen as a way of validating and strengthening oneâs social status in society (Singerman and Ibrahim, 2001) by symbolising the transition to adulthood.
Because marriage is the only culturally and religiously approved form of sexual interaction between males and females (Salem, 2016, 2015; Singerman, 2007; Singerman and Ibrahim, 2001), an extremely strict moral code is enforced by parents for their children prior to marriage, particularly for females (Sherif, 1999). Despite the fact that Egyptian women now have greater opportunities to interact with males in university and the workplace (Moghadam, 2003; Sherif, 1999), women still observe behavioural restrictions so as not to ruin their prospects for marriage (see Chapter 2 for a more detailed discussion). Sherif highlights that from a young age, girls are made aware of their honourable obligations towards their families, and their duty to enter into a âgood marriageâ (1999, p.619).
According to Hoodfar (1997), marriage in Egypt is âregulated by custom, religion and the legal system, which dictate different roles and responsibilities for men and womenâ (p.52). Egypt follows the Hanafi school of Shariâa law which specifically outlines the functions of husband and wife in marriage. This law is fundamentally based on the ideology that men and women have complementary, yet unequal roles (Cowan et al., 2001; Rugh, 1984). Both Islam and social traditions specify that it is the manâs duty to provide for his wife and children. Islamic law states that Muslim men have the right to divorce without their wivesâ consent, marry up to four wives and exercise the principle of taâa. Taâa literally means obedience and can refer to a manâs right to restrict his wifeâs physical mobility. This right is based on Islamic interpretations and is incorporated into Shariâa law differently across Muslim countries. The principle of taâa has generally been acknowledged in Egypt as encompassing the right of husbands to restrict their wivesâ employment (Hoodfar, 1997), which has increasingly become a major issue in negotiations prior to marriage. In the case of divorce, a mother is first granted custody if her children are young; ultimately however, it is the father who gains formal custody of the children, usually at the age of nine for girls and seven for boys (Moghadam, 2013, p.118).
Women, on the other hand, are required to care for their husbands and children (Botman, 1999, p.48). According to most interpretations of Shariâa, women are not obligated to make any household contributions. Any property or income earned by a woman is solely hers and she has the right to do with it what she sees fit. In the case of divorce, a woman is only entitled to her mahr (muâakhar1 payment), and to any possessions she may have owned prior to the marriage or acquired with her own income during the marriage (Hoodfar, 1997). She is then expected to return to her fatherâs home and is once again his financial responsibility. Men are obliged to financially care for all single women; this includes divorcees and widows. Such women would be heavily stigmatised if they chose to live alone following a divorce (especially if a woman has no children) or the death of a husband (Sherif-Trask, 2006). In all cases, the woman is expected to return to her parentsâ home, if they are still alive, or alternatively live with a sibling or a son (Sherif-Trask, 2006). Sherif-Trask asserts that this type of âcommunal responsibilityâ allows women to feel that their kinship ties and strongest source of economic support derive from their relationships with the men in their lives â if not a husband, then the father, brother or son (2006, p.57).
Marriage is regarded as the institution through which gender ideologies are strengthened, enforced and perpetuated. Marriages in the MENA region are defined by pervasive gender roles and ideologies. Traditionally, the gendered division of labour is recognised as both natural and harmonising, enforcing the modern capitalist ideology of man as the breadwinner. Women control the household domain. According to Early (1993), the Egyptian household is considered as a âwomanâs castleâ and that ârules for gender interaction establish womenâs priority over domestic space, but female society flourishes there and beyondâ (Early, 1993, p.7). A womanâs control and management of the household is of great importance, and is the source of her reputation and respect within the community (Kamphoefner, 1996). As I found through my interviews, a woman is judged on her ability to skilfully keep her household in order and raise her children well. In contrast, men are not expected to, and rarely do, partake in household duties or childrearing. In fact, it is often frowned upon, and even ridiculed, if a man undertakes household tasks. In essence, this creates a strong co-dependence in marriages, with husbands providing financial support and wives providing meals and an orderly household (Hoodfar, 1997; Rugh, 1984).
The notion of tasks and roles being assigned according to gender continues to be perpetuated, regardless of social class and across generations. Qualitative data from the SYPE (2014) strongly suggests that Egyptian adolescents of both genders accept and support highly gendered household roles, which reinforces the male breadwinner â female homemaker model (Sieverding and Hassan, 2016). A wifeâs duties typically include buying provisions, washing clothing, cooking and feeding, bathing, playing with and supervising children (Mensch et al., 2003). Married women do in fact devote several hours each day to cooking, cleaning and childcare. Hendy (2010) finds that on average married Egyptian women with children spend 51.7 hours a week on domestic chores. Despite this, the role of a housewife has always carried prestige, as it is women with better-educated husbands and good standards of living that do not need to work (Donahoe, 1999; Rugh, 1984). Hence, the use of the term sitt al-bayt â literally meaning âlady of the homeâ â to describe a woman carries significant weight, particularly in Egyptian society, and implies that a woman belongs to a household which can afford to keep her out of the labour market. Ultimately, a husbandâs socio-economic status plays an integral role in a womanâs decision to engage in cash-generating activities. A husband with a good wage is not expected to subject his wife to labour market engagement, whereas a woman whose husband earns a small income is more likely to work for cash (Donahoe, 1999). As will be examined later, in more recent years the value of womenâs paid work in Egypt has considerably deteriorated, with fewer job opportunities meeting the reservation wages2 of educated women in terms of conditions and benefits. Hence, the luxury of being sitt al-bayt is once again associated with those of more affluent classes, where husbands can afford to have their wives not engage in work.