1 Introduction
Nadia von Benzon and Catherine Wilkinson
This book is concerned with intersectionality and difference in childhood, presenting empirical research and conceptual interventions from a variety of international perspectives. Building on the now burgeoning body of discourse concerning intersectionality within feminist and broader social geography, this book seeks to explore the lived experiences of children facing âmultiple discriminationsâ (Valentine, 2007, p. 10) or stigmatised experiences in their day-to-day lives. Whilst the feminist concern at the heart of intersectionality has been gender,1 the pivotal discriminatory identity at the heart of this volume is childhood. Childrenâs geography, alongside allied social science disciplines, has sought in recent decades to demonstrate the ways in which the social constructions of childhood, alongside the material reality of a juvenile physiology and psychology, have led to the systematic and structural marginalisation of children and young people in societies (Valentine, 1996; Matthews, 2000; Collins and Kearns, 2001). The focus of this book is the lives of children and youth who face additional marginalisation, through their association with stigmatised identities or activities, or through their engagement with activities that are not widely deemed normalised or acceptable for childrenâs participation.
There is a growing area of work in the study of childhood which has been concerned with childhoods that are âdifferentâ or âotherâ (see for example, the special edition of Childrenâs Geographies in 2011 Diverse Spaces of Childhood and Youth: Gender and socio-cultural difference edited by Ruth Evans and Louise Holt; the 2017 special edition of the same journal Intersectionality in Childhood Studies edited by Kristina Konstantoni and colleagues; Kraftl, 2015). Whilst alterity does not necessarily lead to stigma and marginalisation (your childhood could be âotherâ due to participation in elite activities, access to exclusive spaces or possession of prodigious abilities), difference for any reason may render a child vulnerable. This vulnerability is due to their potential lack of inclusion in policies and practices designed to safeguard children framed within a notional construction of a ânormalâ childhood, or the fragility and alterity of their relationships with other children and adults. The vulnerability inherent in difference in childhood has been painfully illustrated in the #MeToo movement which has seen (former) child actors and athletes coming forward to expose the perpetrators who were able to assault them due to the power they held over children who were trying to succeed in an adult-dominated environment, or who felt intimately reliant on them for their coaching and ultimate success.
However, research addressing childhood difference, particularly from geographers, has typically focused on differences that may manifest in stigma and marginalisation. The exception to this in terms of a conflation of difference and marginalised experience has largely concerned education, particularly with Peter Kraftlâs recent work on alternative education (Kraftl, 2014; Kraftl, 2015), and some reflection on youth engagement with politics (e.g. Skelton, 2010). The primary geographical focus of difference in terms of stigma and marginalisation is likely to reflect a political attempt by geographers to listen to children with the quietest voices, and a desire to magnify these childrenâs voices for emancipatory ends. Thus, an imperative towards social justice, alongside the development of social theory â or academic pontification â underpins much of the childrenâs geographies research addressing lived experiences of difference (Holt, 2007; Beazley et al., 2009; Klocker, 2011; Bradbury-Jones and Taylor, 2015).
Key themes within this broad childrenâs geographies literature on marginalised childhoods have included: race, ethnicity and religion (Dwyer, 1999; Hopkins et al., 2017); disability, health, and caring responsibilities (Robson, 2000; Holt, 2010; Worth, 2013; Pyer and Tucker, 2017; von Benzon, 2017a); gender and sexuality (Skelton, 2000; de Montigny and Podmore, 2014); and poverty and class (McDowell, 2003; Pimlott-Wilson and Hall, 2017). The work of Maria RodĂł-de-ZĂĄrate (2017) demonstrates that for some children and young people, it is their non-age-related identity, particularly their sexuality, ethnicity and gender, that provokes considerably more discrimination than their youthful age. Indeed, Hopkins and Pain (2007, p. 290) argue: âsome markers may intersect with age in very powerful ways; others may make age far less significant in relationâ. Thus, geographers have demonstrated the potential of a hierarchy of identities, but stress (Valentine, 2007) that the articulations between social categories are complex and dynamic and contingent upon time and space. Many of these themes are covered in the chapters herein as they seek to address alternative experiences of childhood that contest the construction of a ânormalâ childhood which dominates within a particular community or locality.
The chapters in this volume might, to some extent, be considered accidental interventions in the development of intersectionality theory. Unlike Valentine (2007) and RodĂł-de-ZĂĄrate (2014), none of the chapters herein set out explicitly to explore the impact of intersectionality on individualsâ lives nor do they knowingly balance or make judgements about the relative importance of different sorts of marginalisation, whether âspoiled identityâ or less detrimental lived experiences of difference. However, the chapters all, if only unwittingly, serve to respond to Hopkinsâ (2018) call to recognise the relationality and the chronological and spatial context of marginalisation. These chapters speak to the importance of locality in the way in which identity manifests as lived social experience. Bernadine Satarianoâs contribution to this volume is particularly powerful in demonstrating the way in which a particular identity â as a child of a âbrokenâ home, may manifest as âspoiledâ in one community, whilst in the same country, a matter of miles away, the same identity is considered normal, unremarkable, or even as positive. Thus, this volume addresses the issue of socio-spatial context as a syphon for intersecting identity and experiences of difference, not only at an international scale but at a local and community scale. At once, culture is positioned as a crucial mediator in social experience of difference, whilst these lived experiences of difference are positioned as a lens through which localised cultures can be understood.
As a geographical contribution to this literature, Intersectionality and Difference in Childhood and Youth offers a critical exploration of research with children and young people who may be considered âout of placeâ within their local context. Thus, this book approaches ânormalcyâ and âdifferenceâ as relational terms with the notion of the ânormalâ child encompassing specific assumptions about agency, rights and responsibilities within different communities. Looking outside the global north, what constitutes a ânormalâ, âmainstreamâ or âacceptableâ childhood may be a broader spectrum of experience, requiring a more nuanced ethical, methodological and theoretical interpretation. Whilst âglobal expectationsâ might be a difficult concept to define or morally justify, one example illustrating such are the rights enshrined within the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, the most widely ratified of all international conventions. Considering âotherâ childhoods, both in the global north and the global south, can call into question many of the pre-conceived and socially constructed values and assertions concerning childhood that underpin national and institutional policies and dictate the ways in which children and adults interact. We hope that a broader recognition of the range of experiences of childhood, and a better understanding of the lived experience of these âotherâ childhoods, will create space for rigorous debate around core geographical issues such as mobilities, agency, risk, work, education and play.
Much of the published work in this field to date has reflected on the difficulty to engage marginalised children in research â whether the difficulty of access through gatekeepers, social and spatial challenges in communicating directly and independently with children, and overcoming unbalanced power relations to develop researcher-child relationships with integrity (Barker and Weller, 2003; Lomax et al., 2011; Skovdal and Abebe, 2012; von Benzon, 2017b). These challenges are reflected on by authors in this volume, who discuss the assumptions made by participants that the research will bring a family material benefit (Boampong, Afroze), or the difficulty of accessing childrenâs own internet-published material (von Benzon). Some chapters never made it to the final volume, due to irreducible challenges in undertaking the fieldwork, whilst others were almost curtailed due to issues over rights and permission. Thus, the empirical research and the conceptual interventions presented through this book are valuable â these narratives were hard won through engagement with fieldwork, or ideas, that were often deemed risky. In engaging with these children â through real-world interaction, documentary analysis and fiction, researchers themselves experience vulnerability; emotionally, bodily and cognitively. The risk, the precarity, and the emotional investment of research with marginalised children must become embedded within the pages of the subsequent publications. Whilst this investment will not, of course, have an automatic impact on the quality of the outputs, the cost of producing them must have an inherent impact on their ultimate value.
The book contributes to both the developing discussions concerning the precarious nature of marginalised childrenâs lives, and the ways in which this precarity might be exacerbated or managed through the childâs broader relationships with both people and non-human agents. We recognise children as independent actors capable of managing themselves in uncertain spaces, whilst also being influenced and constrained by broader social, political and economic factors over which they have no control. The chapters in this book are concerned with exploring the everydayness of precarity, revealing the reality of the emotional and embodied experience of precarity whilst also demonstrating how âotherâ children routinely develop strategies that limit the experience of uncertainty in particular spaces. The authors in this volume do not shy away from the challenge of approaching some of the most ethically complex experiences of difference, uncertainty, agency and vulnerability faced by children in contemporary society. Chapters address child soldiers (Markowska-Manista), sexual assault (McRobert), child labour (Willman) and the lives of street-connected youth (Pearson).
In so doing, the volume seeks to emphasise the importance of focusing resources in support of those children whose lives differ from the normative, or at least, normalised, view of childhood present in the internationalised discourse that underpins child-focused regulation, policies and services. However, in opening discourse on everyday alterity and contingent precarity, the volume seeks to contribute to the growing geographical discourse calling for a queering of childrenâs lives (Taylor and Blaise, 2014; Shillington and Murnaghan, 2016). That is a picking apart of the assumptions that are made, not just about childrenâs sexuality, but about ability, opportunity and desire, each underpinned by childrenâs intersectional identities of class, race, impairment, wealth, religion, and the many other axes of difference illuminated in the chapters of this book. The existence of so much difference â the vast heterogeneity of childrenâs experiences, not only internationally but also at a highly localised scale, calls into question the utility of the notion of childhood itself â and certainly of the value of international and national policies that seek to bind particular lived experiences to the construct of âthe childâ.
Through presentation of a variety of experiences of childhood that contradict the multiple and context-specific constructions of ânormal childhoodsâ, Intersectionality and Difference seeks to demonstrate the way in which precarity and agency can be concurrently experienced in the lives of out-of-place children. The lives presented in this collection should neither be considered tragic, nor heroic, but everyday lives in which children are agential actors employing what capital they can access, and drawing on complex networks of human and non-human relationships, in order to address the challenges they face. As such many of these children are at once fragile, vulnerable to (further) upheaval, abuse or stigmatisation and also coping. Their capacity to âget byâ is based on a complex interweaving of personal resiliency, interpersonal support and sometimes structural interventions available through outside agencies. Ultimately though, agency suggests choice, and for many of the protagonists of this volume, choice, and thus meaningful agency, is limited (see Barker et al., 2010). This book presents a timely intervention in a period when the idea of agency, a core concept in the development of childrenâs geographies to date, is being interrogated (Kraftl, 2013) and reframed (Holloway et al., 2018).
The book collates a series of different narratives exploring the ways in which experiences of childhood can counter the hegemonic narratives of normal childhood that are plural on a global-scale, but often singular at the local. This book moves away from a vision of a single, idealised, normalised childhood in favour of multiple childhoods, and considers the way in which children and young people experience childhood and youth in a variety of contexts. Looking from both majority and minority world perspectives, the book demonstrates children as both passive and active agents of their lived experience, illustrating the way in which agency is underpinned by social and economic capital and relationships, which vary according to geo-social contexts.
Structure of the book
Each contribution to this edited collection presents a discourse based on research addressing children who are marginalised and stigmatised due to difference, or for whom difference is the result of personal or familial choices that contradict social norms. The chapters each demonstrate the ways in which childrenâs lives are shaped by intersecting identities and notions of difference. For these out of place children, their lived experience is as much about vulnerability and precarity as it is a story of tenacity, agency and the deployment of social capital. This book includes chapters that discuss the experiences of children and childhoods that are âotherâ. Each individual chapter provides a lens on a particular context in which young people are constructed, sometimes by themselves, their families or through choice, but more often by the actions and discourse of wider society, as âdifferentâ. The chapters focus in on a particular childhood identity or a particular event or activity experienced by a child that may mark them out as different. The chapters draw on a variety of geographical contexts, from Bolivian working and lower middle-class families, to minority ethnic children living in encampments in Bangladesh, to wealthy children in suburban Australia. The chapters also draw out a variety of key themes in childrenâs geographies, including education, play, work and mobilities,...