Cultural Practices of Victimhood
  1. 258 pages
  2. English
  3. ePUB (mobile friendly)
  4. Available on iOS & Android
eBook - ePub

About this book

Cultural Practices of Victimhood aims to set the agenda for a cultural study of victimhood. Words such as 'victim' and 'victimhood' represent shifting cultural signifiers, their meaning depending on the cultural context of their usage. Using case studies and through a practice-based approach, questions are asked about how victimhood is defined and constructed, whether in the ritual commemoration of refugees on Lampedusa, the artistic practices of an Aboriginal artist such as Richard Bell, or the media practices associated with police violence.

Consisting of contributions by cultural studies experts with an interest in victim studies, this book seeks a double readership. On the one hand, it intends to break new ground with regards to a 'cultural turn' in the field of criminology, in particular victimology. On the other hand, it also seeks to open up discussions about a 'victimological turn' in culture studies. The volume invites scholars and advanced students active in both domains to reflect on victimhood in cultural practices.

Trusted byĀ 375,005 students

Access to over 1.5 million titles for a fair monthly price.

Study more efficiently using our study tools.

Information

Publisher
Routledge
Year
2018
eBook ISBN
9781351373807

Part I

Ritual practices

Chapter 1

Srebrenica

Conflict and ritual complexities

Martin Hoondert

Introduction

The massacre of more than 8000 Bosnian Muslim men and boys by Serb forces led by Ratko Mladić in Srebrenica in 1995, is the worst act of genocide in Europe since the Second World War. For the Netherlands, the fall of Srebrenica has become a national trauma. This is because a battalion of Dutch UN peace-keepers in Srebrenica and the neighbouring village Potočari failed to protect the UN safe area and the people in their care. For many years, Srebrenica haunted Dutch politicians, struggling with the issue of responsibility, and Srebrenica survivors used lawsuits in their fight for recognition and justice (Attila Hoare, 2010; Spijkers, 2016).
In 2003, a memorial centre was opened in Potočari. This Potočari Memorial Centre (PMC) is located at the Dutchbat compound, a former battery factory. On the other side of the road, the victims of the Srebrenica genocide are buried (Pollack, 2003a). Every year, on the 11th of July, various commemoration practices take place here, attracting both Bosniaks – as the Bosnian Muslims are called – from the whole of Bosnia-Herzegovina and a large international public (sympathizers and delegates of governments, NGOs and international organizations). Although the commemoration on the 11th of July in Srebrenica gets the most attention in the international media, it is not the only ritual related to the fall of the enclave and, more broadly, the Bosnian War, which lasted from 1992 to 1995 (Burg & Shoup, 1999). In this chapter, I will explore the rituals and ritual-like practices in Srebrenica and neighbouring villages, showing how the ritual dynamics resurrect the (past) conflict, making Srebrenica a prisoner of its own history. Second, I will reflect on the necessity to design places of shared truths, which enhance the process of social reconstruction and reconciliation in post-war Bosnia-Herzegovina.

Rituals and counter-rituals

In Potočari

In 2015, I visited Srebrenica and attended the 20th anniversary of the Srebrenica genocide at the Potočari Memorial Centre (Figures 1.1 and 1.2). Srebrenica and Potočari, two small villages in the Eastern part of Bosnia Herzegovina, were crowded. The road leading to the Memorial Centre was full of cars and buses. The official commemoration on the 11th of July started at the Memorial Centre, located in the former battery factory. While most of the participants gathered on the other side of the road, at the cemetery, waiting for the burial ceremony to start, we listened to speeches by, among others, the Mayor of Srebrenica, former US President Bill Clinton and the Dutch Minister of Foreign Affairs Bert Koenders. One of the guests was the Serbian Prime Minister Aleksandar Vučić, who was welcomed by Bill Clinton and praised because of his courage and his endeavour to make a first step to reconciliation.
After the speeches by the officials, we all left the Memorial Centre and walked to the cemetery. There, 136 coffins with the remains of the victims of the Srebrenica genocide, recently identified using DNA analysis, were waiting to be buried. When Vučić entered the cemetery, a few people in the crowd started booing and whistling, while others shouted ā€˜Genocide!’. Stones and other objects were thrown at him, and Vučić was forced to leave the site. Although the Mayor of Srebrenica and representatives of survivors’ associations (the ā€˜Mothers of Srebrenica’) distanced themselves from these hostilities, the damage had already been done. Later that day, the Serbian Minister of the Interior, NebojÅ”a Stefanović, declared on Serbian Pink television: ā€˜This is a scandalous attack and I can say it can be seen as an assassination attempt. Bosnia has failed to create even the minimal conditions for the safety of the prime minister.’1
Apart from this incident, the mass burial of the 136 victims was an impressive and worthy ceremonial. Ten thousand Muslim men and women took part in the funeral prayers before the coffins were carried to the graves (Figure 1.3). In the meantime, the names of the victims were read by a woman as a litany of dead. Each coffin was accompanied by an imam, who said the required prayers at the graveside. Not being a Muslim, I felt like an intruder, watching a ritual in which I was not able to participate. While all the people surrounding me bowed and kneeled, I stood upright. While the survivors of the genocide and the next of kin were digging the grave and others were praying, weeping or taking pictures, I walked around on the cemetery and took pictures. Although the ceremony had started as a collective Muslim ritual, the ritual changed into 136 individual family rituals (see also Pollack, 2003b). While the families gathered around the graves, others left the cemetery to have lunch or to visit the exhibition in the Memorial Centre. The crowd slowly resolved, although it took hours before all the cars and buses had left the venue.
image
Figure 1.1 The cemetery in Potočari, a day before the commemoration and burial, July 10, 2015.
Source: Ā© Martin Hoondert.
image
Figure 1.2 The monument with the names of the Srebrenica genocide, Potočari, July 10, 2015.
Source: Ā© Martin Hoondert.
image
Figure 1.3 A coffin with the remains of one of the victims of the Srebrenica genocide is carried to its grave, Potočari, July 11, 2015.
Source: Ā© Martin Hoondert.

From Nezuk to Potočari

The day before the official commemoration I witnessed the arrival of the participants of the so-called ā€˜Mars Mira’ at Potočari and had informal conversations with some of them. Since 2005, several Bosnian survivors and families of the victims organize a Peace March beginning on the 8th of July. This Mars Mira memorizes the escape of 15,000 Bosnian men from Srebrenica-Potočari to Nezuk (near Tuzla) in July 1995. Because of illness, infirmity because of the war, and due to snipers and land mines along the route, only 3,500 survived the march.2 In the Peace March, participants walk this ā€˜path of death’ in the reverse direction, from Nezuk to Potočari. Starting as a local event, the Mars Mira now attracts visitors from all over the world and thousands of people participate in this march every year. The marchers pass near mass grave sites, and at some locations they get ā€˜history lessons’ by survivors, forensic specialists and others. There are periodic stops for food and drink and three overnight camps are encompassed by the organizing committee. Nettelfield and Wagner, who described the 2010 Mars Mira, call the march a ā€˜symbolic act of movement – an inverse trek to defy the attempts of General Mladić and his army to eradicate a people from a place’ (Nettelfield & Wagner, 2015, p. 61). The arrival of the walkers is both an event of sorrow and joy: people along the road are applauding and a lot of international media pay attention to the walkers finishing. The march is framed as a ā€˜campaign of solidarity’,3 and for some of the participants it might be a healing ritual, a symbolic walk from ā€˜death’ to ā€˜life’, symbolically bringing the beloved deceased home.

From Visoko to Potočari

A few days before July 11, 2015, the 136 coffins with the remains of the victims of the Srebrenica genocide were brought from Visoko, near Sarajevo, to Potočari. I did not witness the arrival of the coffins in Potočari, but was informed about the convoy and its route by employees of the Dutch peace organization, PAX. In the months before the official commemoration, the remains of the victims had been identified in Tuzla, in the ICMP (International Commission on Missing Persons)4 Identification Coordination Facility (ICF) (Delpla, Bougarel, & Fournel, 2012) in cooperation with the Missing Persons Institute (MPI) of Bosnia-Herzegovina. In spite of efforts that were employed to hide or relocate the bodies of those killed to cover up the genocide, the ICMP was able to identify nearly 7000 victims of the genocide using DNA techniques. One thousand victims are still missing.
The convoy carrying the coffins of the newly identified victims of Srebrenica passed through Lapisnica, Sokolac, Vlasenica, Milici, Bratunac and Srebrenica.5 In several towns, for example in Bratunac in the Republika Srpska (the Serb entity of Bosnia-Herzegovina; Srebrenica and Potočari also belong to the Republika Srpska), the convoy passed by posters displaying the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, who had, less than two weeks before the commemoration, vetoed a UN Security Council resolution that called the Srebrenica massacre a ā€˜genocide’.6
These posters were more than a political statement and an expression of gratitude by the Bosnian Serbs towards Putin. From a ritual studies perspective they might be analysed as a materialization of genocide denial and as a counter-ritual against the Bosniaks’ commemoration in Potočari, which almost exclusively dominates the media. Also in former years, from the first large-scale commemoration in 2000 and the opening of the Potočari Memorial Centre in 2003, local Serbs expressed discontent with the commemorations, jeering the arriving mourners, welcoming them with the three-finger Serb nationalist salute and holding pictures of the former Bosnian-Serb General Mladić and President Karadžić. In July 2001, some Serbs roasted pigs on a spit in Kravica, apparently set up for the Muslims to see (Bougarel, Helms, & Duijzings, 2007). From a ritual studies perspective, this seemingly innocent barbecue party is a ritual to make the place impure for Muslims.

In Belgrade

On the eve of the official commemoration and burial service in Potočari, on the 10th of July, a group of women and other citizens gathered in downtown Belgrade, the capital of Serbia. I gathered information about this group, the so-called ā€˜Women in Black’, through literature and online sources. The group Women in Black was formed in 1991, just after the former Yugoslavia began to disintegrate and the war broke out.7 Since the very first years of the July 11 commemorations, the Women in Black travelled to Potočari to attend the ceremony and to show their support (Nettelfield & Wagner, 2015, p. 51). During the war, the Women in Black were already standing in weekly vigils at the Republic Square, protesting against the war, the killing of innocent people, and against silencing of the perpetration of war crimes. In the aftermath of the war, the group continued to remind the citizens of their country of Serbia’s atrocious past. The yearly gathering on the 10th of July has become part of their commemoration calendar, but also part of a ā€˜war of memories’. While the Women in Black commemorated Srebrenica as genocide, others protested against the Women in Black, celebrating the 11th of July as the ā€˜Liberation of Srebrenica’. As Orli Fridman wrote in her article regarding alternative calendars and memory work in Serbia,
the square became a contested territory of interpretations of the past. From 2006 on, police began escorting the Women in Black on their way to and from the square. After the 2008 arrest of Radovan Karadžić, in 2009 the square literally was divided into two by police forces standing as divider between those attending the Women in Black vigil and counter demonstrators […].
(Fridman, 2015, p. 218)
The presence of the Women in Black in Belgrade is an attempt to restructure the narrative of Srebrenica in the minds of the Serbs, and to offer a counter-narrative against the genocide denial and the relativism of numbers of victims. As the counter-demonstrations showed, the Women in Black only partly succeeded in their pursuit.

In Zalužje

The day after the commemoration and burial service in Potočari, a memorial service and wreath-laying ceremony took place in the village of Zalužje (also: Zalažje), near Srebrenica. I did not visit this ritual myself, but was informed about it by one of the members of the delegation with which I visited Srebrenica. I interviewed this member, a former Dutchbat soldier, on the day of the Zalužje ritual and received the pictures he took during the ritual (for example, Figure 1.4).
image
Figure 1.4 The Bosnian-Serb memorial in Zalužje, July 12, 2015.
Source: Ā© Marco Smit.
On the 12th of July, the Serbs commemorate the massacre of Serb civilians and soldiers by Bosnian Muslim forces under the command of Naser Orić on July 12, 1992. This commemoration, and there exist a lot more of them in the villages of Republika Srpska, receives hardly any attention in the international media.
The ceremony took place at the memorial in Zalužje and was led by Orthodox Serb priests. According to Serb sources, 69 Serbs were killed and 22 were taken prisoner. All prisoners were tortured and eventually murdered in Srebrenica camps.8 The memorial consists of two mausoleums and a wall with the names and pictures of the 1992 victims. According to a speech, held by Borislav Paravac, a member of the Bosnia-Herzegovina Presidency, on July 12, 2005, one mausoleum contains ā€˜those who were executed on the Christian feast of the Holy Trinity in 1943, and another c...

Table of contents

  1. Cover
  2. Half Title
  3. Title Page
  4. Copyright page
  5. Table of Contents
  6. List of figures
  7. Introduction: cultural practices of victimhood
  8. PART I Ritual practices
  9. PART II Artistic practices
  10. PART III Media practices
  11. Epilogue: imagining cultural victimology
  12. About the authors
  13. Index

Frequently asked questions

Yes, you can cancel anytime from the Subscription tab in your account settings on the Perlego website. Your subscription will stay active until the end of your current billing period. Learn how to cancel your subscription
No, books cannot be downloaded as external files, such as PDFs, for use outside of Perlego. However, you can download books within the Perlego app for offline reading on mobile or tablet. Learn how to download books offline
Perlego offers two plans: Essential and Complete
  • Essential is ideal for learners and professionals who enjoy exploring a wide range of subjects. Access the Essential Library with 800,000+ trusted titles and best-sellers across business, personal growth, and the humanities. Includes unlimited reading time and Standard Read Aloud voice.
  • Complete: Perfect for advanced learners and researchers needing full, unrestricted access. Unlock 1.5M+ books across hundreds of subjects, including academic and specialized titles. The Complete Plan also includes advanced features like Premium Read Aloud and Research Assistant.
Both plans are available with monthly, semester, or annual billing cycles.
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1.5 million books across 990+ topics, we’ve got you covered! Learn about our mission
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more about Read Aloud
Yes! You can use the Perlego app on both iOS and Android devices to read anytime, anywhere — even offline. Perfect for commutes or when you’re on the go.
Please note we cannot support devices running on iOS 13 and Android 7 or earlier. Learn more about using the app
Yes, you can access Cultural Practices of Victimhood by Martin Hoondert, Paul Mutsaers, William Arfman, Martin Hoondert,Paul Mutsaers,William Arfman in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in Social Sciences & Criminology. We have over 1.5 million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.