1
Itâs a Womanâs World. Youâre Just Working in It.
The feminist movement has created confusion for men in the workplace.
Women now hold more US jobs than men.1 So, letâs face it, if you canât learn how to work with women, your career has no hope. This recent development reflects the future of the American workforce. The data confirms that labor market dynamics are tilting in the direction of women. Productivity and growth gains from adding women to the labor force are much larger than previously thought. A study by the International Monetary Fund finds that both genders bring very different skill sets and perspectives to the workforce, including different attitudes toward risk and collaboration, therefore boosting growth.2 Studies also show that the financial performance of firms improves with more gender-equal corporate boards.3
Women in the Workforce
If youâre not working in an inclusive environment, your company is missing out. Among other cultural issues, this is one reason the iconic Victoriaâs Secret suffered declining sales. At an investor meeting, the brandâs chief executive officer, John Mehas, said it was ready to evolve. He wants the brand perceived to be âby her, for her.â4 But hereâs a problem: Victoriaâs Secretâs leadership is predominantly male, and almost all the people at the investor meetings are men. Well, howâs that going to work out?
Everyone knows thereâs more work to be done for women to achieve so-called equality, but look how far weâve come. Slowly but surely, weâre getting there. For us women, the dark ages have passed. We are living in the Renaissance for aspiring professional women. Fortune 500 executives are still male-dominated, yet there are a record number of female CEOs.5
In 2020, Jane Fraser became the first woman to lead a major Wall Street bank, Citigroup. Fraserâs ascension to CEO is groundbreaking in the financial industry, which has a long-standing reputation as a boys club, where men dominate the upper ranks of banks.
During the pandemic, Clorox jumped 22 percent in sales when the board named a female to CEO. Marillyn Hewson led defense company Lockheed Martin; e-commerce giant eBayâs success is due to Meg Whitman; and auto manufacturer General Motors survived because of Mary Barra. These women have all made it to the top on a combination of brains, brass, and savvy that equals or exceeds any of their male peers in corporate America. These companies are better because of these women and wouldnât be what they are without them.
Marillyn Hewson steered Lockheed Martin to the forefront of security, aerospace, and technology. She developed the F-35 fighter jet program to address modern military needs and increased market value to nearly $100 billion. Time magazine identified Hewson as one of the â100 Most Influential People in the World.â6
Billionaire Meg Whitman is best known for taking eBay from $5.7 million to $8 billion in sales and joined the boards of both Procter & Gamble and Dropbox.7
And Mary Barra surpassed Rick Wagoner as the longest-serving chief executive officer of General Motors. She has the distinction of leading the US automaker out of bankruptcy.8
In another statistic, women now earn more college degrees than men. Women earn more than half of all bachelorâs, masterâs, and doctorate degrees. This is a big financial benefit for women, because holding college and advanced degrees closely correlates with higher salaries, according to the Pew Research Center.9
Women in less visible roles arenât asking men to help as often as they used to, and men are less apt to offer, as they assume an equal level of technical competence in their female colleagues. Female upward mobility is an accepted part of everyday corporate life. There are fewer âfirstsâ for women entering new leadership roles, and itâs a great time for women in the workplace.
Fear of Women in the Workplace
Given these new revelations: Are you a man who is uncomfortable meeting one-on-one with women in the workplace? Are you fearful of the coed office environment? Do you think a female coworker has it âoutâ for you? If so, youâre not alone. You need to ask yourself how many of these feelings are tied to whatâs going on in the media and if youâre doing everything you can not to be part of the problem.
According to a joint survey by SurveyMonkey and LeanIn.org, 60 percent of male managers surveyed revealed discomfort participating in normal workplace activities with women, such as mentoring and socializing.10 These attitudes, while understandable in an atmosphere of fear, are detrimental for men and women and the companies that hire them.
Sixty percent of male managers surveyed revealed discomfort participating in normal workplace activities with women, such as mentoring and socializing.
If you refuse to meet with women one-on-one, to hire women, or to participate in regular work activities with women, youâre depriving yourself and your company of talent that half of the population possesses. You are missing different ideas and opinionsâsimilar to how our government operates through a system of checks and balances by both political parties. A woman may give you that eureka winning moment of input and information that you never thought of before.
If you refuse to work with the opposite sex, thereâs no question that it will be impossible to learn how to coexist in this new environment. Your companyâs talent pool will be at a disadvantage, and the quality of your work output may suffer without a womanâs point of view.
To avoid the appearance of sexual discrimination in the workplaceâif you refuse to meet with a female colleague, then you will also have to refuse to meet with a man one-on-one. Does that make sense? How can you do your job without ever having a one-on-one meeting with anyone? Why not just leave the door to your office open (Secret Rule #6) when a coworker, colleague, or someone you supervise is meeting with you one-on-one in your office? How about a transparent glass door? These are some ways you can get over your fear of workplace meetings with the opposite sex.
To avoid the appearance of sexual discrimination in the workplaceâif you refuse to meet with a female colleague, then you will also have to refuse to meet with a man one-on-one.
To avoid feeling uncomfortable at one-on-one business meals, a great idea is to invite everyone out as a group (Secret Rule #3). This not only makes the individuals in the group more accessible to you, it makes you accessible to them. In fact, itâs more equitable and allows everyone you work with access to one another, instead of playing favorites and fostering an appearance of bias and the resentment that inevitably flows from employees sniffing favoritism.
Executives in the Hot Seat
Companies have become much more active in enforcing policies around employee relationships. McDonaldâs Chief Executive Officer Stephen Easterbrook was fired for having a consensual and amicable relationship with another employee, even though Easterbrook almost doubled the equity valuation of the company in only four years.
Contractual obligations with companies can exceed the standards established by statutes and court decisions. For example, McDonaldâs personal conduct policy does not allow managers to have romantic relationships with âdirect or indirect reports.â
According to the Wall Street Journal, although the fast-food giant did not provide details about the relationship, Easterbrook said (in an email to employees) that his conduct had violated company policy. âThis was a mistake,â he wrote. âGiven the values of the company, I agree with the board that it is time for me to move on.â11
McDonaldâs decision to act may be a sign of progress on workplace issues that have come to light in the #MeToo era, said Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond.
âOther companies donât always act on that kind of information or fire their CEO for that [a consensual relationship], and so it seems like they are trying to enforce a pretty strict policy in this situation,â Tobias said.12 While Easterbrook obviously did not violate federal law, he was forced to forfeit $22 million in unvested options when he was dismissed for breach of contract over his relationship with the employee. Talk about an expensive date!
âOther companies donât always act on that kind of information or fire their CEO for that [a consensual relationship], and so it seems like they are trying to enforce a pretty strict policy in this situation,â Tobias said.
And Easterbrookâs not alone. Intelâs chief executive officer, Brian Krzanich, also resigned over a consensual relationship after an independent examination brought things to light. The company, one of the worldâs largest makers of semiconductor chips, said that the relationship violated the companyâs nonfraternization policy.
Should an employer really be the romance police? Do corporations really have any business telling you (as an employee) who to fall in love with?
Unfortunately, clearly the answer is yesâespecially with high-profile executives. Sexual harassment is no longer just about sex; itâs about power and perception. Workplace romances between individuals at opposite ends of the power spectrum are sexual harassment claims waiting to happen, and when someone is in a relationship with a senior member of the company, coworkers will scrutinize every raise, accolade, and acknowledgment, creating a hostile work environment for everyone aware of the relationship.
Due to a change of heart, a previously amicable partner may become a jilted ex depending on how the relationship unfolded. Thus, suddenly, the narrative flips, and the company can become liable for the behavior.
Hereâs another case: ride-hailing service Uber has become a prime example of a Silicon Valley start-up culture gone awry. The company was exposed for having a workplace culture that included sexual harassment and discrimination.13 That tone was set by Travis Kalanick, who aggressively turned the company into the worldâs dominant service and upended the transportation industry around the globe. The toxic culture at Uber, amid allegations of sexual harassment and troubling reports that human resources did not sufficiently intervene, sent up a glaring red flag about his leadership.14
These allegations went public and the company was slammed in the media for looking the other way. Despite Kalanickâs incredible success and growth, the board of directors eventually relented to pressure and forced him out.15 While Kalanick himself faced no specific claims of harassment, every public or private company is expected to define and articulate the culture an...