THE TRUMP-UKRAINE
IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY REPORT
Report of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, Pursuant to H. Res. 660 in Consultation with the House Committee on Oversight and Reform and the House Committee on Foreign Affairs
December 2019
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PREFACE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
KEY FINDINGS OF FACT
SECTION I. THE PRESIDENTâS MISCONDUCT
1. The President Forced Out the U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine
2. The President Put Giuliani and the Three Amigos in Charge of Ukraine Issues
3. The President Froze Military Assistance to Ukraine
4. The Presidentâs Meeting with the Ukrainian President Was Conditioned on An Announcement of Investigations
5. The President Asked the Ukrainian President to Interfere in the 2020 U.S. Election by Investigating the Bidens and 2016 Election Interference
6. The President Wanted Ukraine to Announce the Investigations Publicly
7. The Presidentâs Conditioning of Military Assistance and a White House Meeting on Announcement of Investigations Raised Alarm
8. The Presidentâs Scheme Was Exposed
SECTION II. THE PRESIDENTâS OBSTRUCTION OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESâ IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY
1. Constitutional Authority for Congressional Oversight and Impeachment
2. The Presidentâs Categorical Refusal to Comply
3. The Presidentâs Refusal to Produce Any and All Subpoenaed Documents
4. The Presidentâs Refusal to Allow Top Aides to Testify
5. The Presidentâs Unsuccessful Attempts to Block Key Witnesses
6. The Presidentâs Intimidation of Witnesses
APPENDIX A: KEY PEOPLE AND ENTITIES
APPENDIX B: ABBREVIATIONS AND COMMON TERMS
PREFACE
This report reflects the evidence gathered thus far by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, in coordination with the Committee on Oversight and Reform and the Committee on Foreign Affairs, as part of the House of Representativesâ impeachment inquiry into Donald J. Trump, the 45th President of the United States.
The report is the culmination of an investigation that began in September 2019 and intensified over the past three months as new revelations and evidence of the Presidentâs misconduct towards Ukraine emerged. The Committees pursued the truth vigorously, but fairly, ensuring the full participation of both parties throughout the probe.
Sustained by the tireless work of more than three dozen dedicated staff across the three Committees, we issued dozens of subpoenas for documents and testimony and took more than 100 hours of deposition testimony from 17 witnesses. To provide the American people the opportunity to learn and evaluate the facts themselves, the Intelligence Committee held seven public hearings with 12 witnessesâincluding three requested by the Republican Minorityâthat totaled more than 30 hours.
At the outset, I want to recognize my late friend and colleague Elijah E. Cummings, whose grace and commitment to justice served as our North Star throughout this investigation. I would also like to thank my colleagues Eliot L. Engel and Carolyn B. Maloney, chairs respectively of the Foreign Affairs and Oversight and Reform Committees, as well as the Members of those Committees, many of whom provided invaluable contributions. Members of the Intelligence Committee, as well, worked selflessly and collaboratively throughout this investigation. Finally, I am grateful to Speaker Nancy Pelosi for the trust she placed in our Committees to conduct this work and for her wise counsel throughout.
I also want to thank the dedicated professional staff of the Intelligence Committee, who worked ceaselessly and with remarkable poise and ability. My deepest gratitude goes to Daniel Goldman, Rheanne Wirkkala, Maher Bitar, Timothy Bergreen, Patrick Boland, Daniel Noble, Nicolas Mitchell, Sean Misko, Patrick Fallon, Diana Pilipenko, William Evans, Ariana Rowberry, Wells Bennett, and William Wu. Additional Intelligence Committee staff members also assured that the important oversight work of the Committee continued, even as we were required to take on the additional responsibility of conducting a key part of the House impeachment inquiry. Finally, I would like to thank the devoted and outstanding staff of the Committee on Oversight and Reform, including but not limited to Dave Rapallo, Susanne Sachsman Grooms, Peter Kenny, Krista Boyd, and Janet Kim, as well as Laura Carey from the Committee on Foreign Affairs.
* * *
In his farewell address, President George Washington warned of a moment when âcunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion.â
The Framers of the Constitution well understood that an individual could one day occupy the Office of the President who would place his personal or political interests above those of the nation. Having just won hard-fought independence from a King with unbridled authority, they were attuned to the dangers of an executive who lacked fealty to the law and the Constitution.
In response, the Framers adopted a tool used by the British Parliament for several hundred years to constrain the Crownâthe power of impeachment. Unlike in Britain, where impeachment was typically reserved for inferior officers but not the King himself, impeachment in our untested democracy was specifically intended to serve as the ultimate form of accountability for a duly-elected President. Rather than a mechanism to overturn an election, impeachment was explicitly contemplated as a remedy of last resort for a president who fails to faithfully execute his oath of office âto preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.â
Accordingly, the Constitution confers the power to impeach the president on Congress, stating that the president shall be removed from office upon conviction for âTreason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.â While the Constitutional standard for removal from office is justly a high one, it is nonetheless an essential check and balance on the authority of the occupant of the Office of the President, particularly when that occupant represents a continuing threat to our fundamental democratic norms, values, and laws.
Alexander Hamilton explained that impeachment was not designed to cover only criminal violations, but also crimes against the American people. âThe subjects of its jurisdiction,â Hamilton wrote, âare those offenses which proceed from the misconduct of public men, or, in other words, from the abuse or violation of some public trust. They are of a nature which may with peculiar propriety be denominated political, as they relate chiefly to injuries done immediately to the society itself.â
Similarly, future Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court James Wilson, a delegate from Pennsylvania at the Constitutional Convention, distinguished impeachable offenses from those that reside âwithin the sphere of ordinary jurisprudence.â As he noted, âimpeachments are confined to political characters, to political crimes and misdemeanors, and to political punishments.â
* * *
As this report details, the impeachment inquiry has found that President Trump, personally and acting through agents within and outside of the U.S. government, solicited the interference of a foreign government, Ukraine,...