![]()
The Action
When thinking about how a play might look on stage, unfolding in three-dimensional space, itās essential that we read the text in the closest possible detail, alert to every clue about staging, character and dramatic action. And when a play is written by a dramatist with such meticulous theatrical imagination as Ibsen, itās doubly important that all our conclusions should emerge from such a study. And since Ibsen is the master dramatist of the repressed and the hidden, itās essential that we read the play not just for whatās said, but for whatās left unsaid, or only suggested obliquely.
This reading needs to be comprehensive and thorough, and we must look at the whole play, not just highlights. A common mistake is to focus on the most obviously dramatic moments ā the tarantella, for example, or Noraās final departure ā and neglect the āless importantā sections. If we do this, the production will lack context or three-dimensionality; worse still, the point of the play will be lost.
This chapter divides the three acts of the play into much shorter sections, usually marked by the arrival of a new character, but sometimes by a dramatic change of pace or atmosphere. These sections are designated merely for convenience, though they might coincide with the way the play is divided into āunitsā for the purposes of rehearsal.
Iāve provided a detailed synopsis in roman type and a commentary beneath in italics.
Act One
Act One takes place on Christmas Eve.
1.
A bell rings in the hall, and we hear the front door being opened. Nora Helmer returns home from shopping: āShe is happy, humming a tuneā and carries a number of parcels. In the doorway stands a Porter, ācarrying a Christmas tree and a basketā, which he gives to Helene, the chambermaid. Nora tells her to hide the tree so that the children donāt see it until itās ātrimmedā.16 She gives the Porter a tip and he leaves. She closes the door, laughs to herself, takes two macaroons from a little bag and eats them, then listens carefully at the door of her husbandās study.
This brief section immediately introduces us to several aspects of Noraās personality: her secretiveness, her financial generosity ā at first sight, extravagance ā and her affection for her children. It also sets up the contradiction between her happy, playful independence and the anxiety she feels about her husband.
The flat has an outer door that leads onto the shared staircase, but the room in which the action of the play takes place has a door of its own. In other words, the door into the room isnāt the front door into the apartment. Itās possible that when both are open we can see a flash of daylight beyond, in the stairwell.
2.
Having established that Torvald is at home, Nora resumes her humming and looks at her parcels. Torvald hears her and calls out through the study door, wondering when his ālittle squirrelkinā came home. She asks him to come and see what sheās bought. After a pause, he emerges, and asks if āmy little feather-brain has been spending all my money again?ā She protests that this is the first Christmas they havenāt needed to āscrimp and saveā, adding that they could borrow money to tide them over until his first pay packet. Heās appalled and lectures her on the perils of debt. When she becomes sulky, he gives her some housekeeping money, which she quickly pockets. She also shows him the childrenās Christmas presents, and hints at a surprise for him. But when she asks for some pocket money for herself, he dismisses her, saying that sheād only spend it on the housekeeping. They both agree that things will be better, now that the hard times are finally over.
In this section, we get our first glimpse of the playās central relationship. As weā re to discover, Nora has been using the housekeeping money to pay off the secret loan from Krogstad, as well as providing for all the family, and has even managed to persuade Torvald into thinking that sheās extravagant. Her pretend sulkiness and little-girl flirtatiousness are all part of an elaborate act that she puts on to wheedle more money out of him, while his affectionate but patronising replies demonstrate his blindness to whatās really going on. He finds her childishness erotic, and the more she protests the more interested he becomes. Of course, all this must be played subliminally: the surface is of an entirely ānormalā nineteenth-century bourgeois marriage. Itās the tiny hints of whatās lurking beneath ā the secrets ā which provide the dramatic tension.
3.
We hear the front doorbell ringing in the hall and the maid announces the arrival of āa lady, a strangerā. She also tells Torvald that āthe doctorā (Rank) has gone straight through to his study. As Torvald leaves Nora to join Rank, Mrs Linde enters, in ātravelling clothes . . . timid and ill-at-easeā. At first, Nora doesnāt recognise her, but suddenly realises that sheās her old school friend, Kristine Linde. When Mrs Linde points out that they havenāt seen each other for nine or ten years, Nora tells her how happy sheās been in that time. Mrs Linde has just arrived in town; Nora invites her to warm herself by the stove. She tells her that she looks paler and thinner, and suddenly remembers that Mrs Linde has lost her husband. Mrs Linde explains that he left her too little to live on and that sheās had to work since his death. Tactlessly, Nora speaks of her own good fortune ā three healthy children and a husband who has just got a well-paid job at the bank ā but tells her that, when they were first married, Torvald was very ill, so they spent a year in Italy, which saved his life. She adds that it ācost a fortuneā, but implies that her father left them the money in his will. Suddenly, realising that sheās been talking only about herself, Nora asks Mrs Linde whether itās true that she didnāt love her husband. Mrs Linde replies that she had no choice but to stay with him and that after his death his business collapsed entirely; since then sheās been making her own way (āitās been endless hard workā, she says, āthese last three yearsā). When Nora tactlessly advises her to take a holiday, she snaps: āIāve no daddy to pay the billsā.
The maidās announcement that Dr Rank has gone into Torvaldās study (without anybody seeing him) indicates that it has two entrances: one from the living room and another from the hall. When Torvald goes to join Rank, he should leave through the door from the living room into the study.
Noraās failure to recognise Mrs Linde hints at her innate sense of superiority; but it also suggests that Mrs Linde has aged markedly. At first sight sheās the polar opposite of Nora: an independent-minded woman who has had to work hard to look after her sick mother and young brothers and who now finds herself all alone in the world. But she reveals a deeper truth when she tells Nora that she feels āemptyā, with āno one left to live forā. When later we see the nature of her relationship with Krogstad, we come to understand more clearly what this means.
Mrs Lindeās arrival is an important development in the unfolding drama. Her presence allows Nora to speak frankly about what sheās been doing. Furthermore, her underestimation of Noraās situation triggers Nora into revealing more than she might do otherwise. Itās important to note, however, that Nora doesnāt reveal everything, including who lent her the money.
4.
Nora assures Mrs Linde that Torvald will help her, but when she patronises Nora for being a ābabe in armsā, Nora says that sheās not talked of her āreal problemsā. So she leads her over to the sofa and says, āThe person who saved Torvaldās life ā it was meā, explaining that she borrowed the money (āFour thousand, eight hundred kronerā) herself, even though, as she says, āa wife canāt borrow without her husbandās permissionā. She also says that she hid from Torvald the seriousness of his condition, and persuaded him to take the break for her benefit. Mrs Linde wants to know if sheāll ever tell him the truth, and Nora replies, āwith a light smileā: āOne day. Perhaps. When Iām not quite such a pretty little thing.ā She also explains how sheās paying off the debt ā by taking money out of the housekeeping, but also by taking on copying work ā and says that she used to dream about a rich old man who would die and leave all his money to her. āNowā, she says, āIām free of it. I can play with the children . . . make the house pretty, make everything the way Torvald likes it. Itāll soon be spring, the wide blue sky.ā
Note the change in atmosphere when the two women move from the stool and the rocking chair by the stove (good for calm contemplation and memory) to the more comfortable sofa (good for more active and passionate discussion). Once moved, Nora is careful not to tell the whole sordid truth, that she borrowed the cash from a common moneylender (she doesnāt know about Mrs Lindeās involvement with Krogstad); instead she retreats into pleasure at her own cleverness. Her dream of a wealthy admirer makes Mrs Linde suspicious, but Noraās last exclamation gets to the heart of the relief she feels.
5.
The doorbell rings, and Mrs Linde decides that she should leave. Nora, however, tells her to stay. The maid announces that thereās āa gentleman here to see the masterā. When Nora asks who it is, Krogstad appears at the door, and Nora surreptitiously ushers him into Torvaldās study, through the hall door. Mrs Linde asks Nora about Krogstad and shows that she knows a surprising amount about him. But Nora doesnāt want to talk about Krogstad and is pleased when Rank enters from the study.
This brief appearance of Krogstad raises the dramatic temperature. Not only is Nora alarmed by his arrival (whatās he going to say to her husband?), but Mrs Linde, who is still in love with him, is disturbed to see him there too. Neither woman wants to share her secret with the other, and the audience is likewise in the dark. However, their reactions to his appearance should alert the audience to the fact that things are more complicated than they seem, without giving away exactly what those complications might be. Itās important for the scene that Mrs Linde is positioned in such a way that Krogstad doesnāt notice her when he comes in, but that she can see him, or at least hear his voice.
6.
Rank enters, sees Mrs Linde and feels that he shouldnāt stay. Nora introduces them to each other: he says that he noticed her on the stairs earlier. Mrs Linde explains that she finds stairs difficult, and he presumes that she must be unwell; she says, however, that sheās exhausted and has come to town to look for work: āOne has to liveā, she tells them ruefully. Rank agrees, saying that his patients all feel the same, including those who are āmorally sickā, such as Krogstad. He speaks of how āsome people go round sniffing out weaknessā and back the weak person into āa profitable cornerā. Mrs Linde is shocked by his cynicism, but Nora is excited by the prospect of Torvaldās newly found power as bank manager. She tells Rank there is one thing sheād like to say āstraight outā to her husband, but that itās ātoo terribleā. Hearing that Torvald is about to enter the room, Rank encourages her to speak, but she just hides the bag of macaroons she has been eating.
In this section we see Rankās curious combination of charm, cynicism and despair. Rank is, of course, the rich, dying man that Nora mentioned to Mrs Linde, as Mrs Linde realises. This is borne out by what happens: we see the familiarity of his relationship with Nora, which is mostly avuncular, but also flirtatious. His frankness about the proximity of death (his own included) and his almost jovial acceptance of the folly of trying to avoid it, give Nora a powerful sensation of the transience of all things ā and this encourages her recklessness. His attempts to persuade her into talking to Torvald are more provocative than serious, but his condemnation of Krogstad has real force behind it ā disturbing to both Nora and, more especially, Mrs Linde.
7.
Torvald comes out of his study, with his coat and hat, ready to go out, and Nora runs to him, keen to hear whether heās got rid of Krogstad. She introduces Mrs Linde as a āgenius at bookkeepingā, and asks him to find her a job at the bank. He says that she ācould hardly have come at a better timeā and he may well have something for her. However, he has to go to the bank, and Rank says that heāll join him. Mrs Linde says that sheās going too, to find a room. As they leave, childrenās voices can be heard coming up the stairs: Torvald says, āThisāll soon be no place to be, except for mothers.ā
Torvaldās second entrance into the play should show another side of his character: a man with business affairs to get on with. He has been unyielding with Krogstad in his study and has sacked him (as weāll soon see), but is now magnanimous with Mrs Linde ā whom he takes kindly to almost immediately. His exit with Rank and Mrs Linde should be full of businesslike bustle: picking up hats, coats and a briefcase, cracking cheerful jokes, and so on. Itās made clear that the manās world lies outside and that the home is a sacred preserve for mothers and children. Mrs Linde ā childless, hardworking, old before her time and alone ā is accepted by the men, but only as an unthreatening junior.
8.
The three children, Ivar, Emmy and Bob, come running into the apartment with their nanny, Anne-Marie, and tell their mother what they have been up to outdoors, in the snow. Thrilled to see them with their rosy cheeks, Nora picks up her youngest and dances with him. When Anne-Marie starts to take their coats off, Nora intervenes and tells her to help herself to some coffee: sheāll look after the children herself. Delighted to see their mother, the children all chatter excitedly, and she starts to play a game of hide-and-seek with them. When they insist that she should hide first, she takes refuge under the table; when they eventually discover her, they all shriek with delight.
This short scene is essential to the balance of the play. It demonstrates the depth of Noraās love for her children and the pleasure she takes in them. It also shows that she can be unconventional: taking over from the nanny, running around like a child and joining in the shrieking and giggling, playing hide-and-seek and hiding under a table herself. Of course, this is all quite natural in a modern family, but in a middle class nineteenth-century woman such behaviour would suggest a real independence of spirit; childish as it may be, this hints at the greater unconventionality that she demonstrates so conclusively later on. It also suggests a certain desperation, as if Nora foresees the possibility of losing her children.
Ibsen doesnāt actually write the childrenās lines, and in a production these should be improvised. Of course, he asks for such a hubbub of laughing, giggling and general excitement that it should be difficult to catch everything they say.
9.
In the meantime, Krogstad has knocked at the hall door and quickly appears at the half-opened door. Nora is shocked to see him again and tells him that her husband is out. But he wants to talk to her, and so Nora āgentlyā sends the children off to Anne-Marie, reassuring them that āthe man wonāt hurt Mummyā. She closes the door behind them and asks Krogstad what he wants, adding that āItās not the first of the monthā (when her payments are due). He says that heās just seen Torvald in the street with Mrs Linde ā who, he says, was once a āfriendā of his ā and wants to know if Mrs Linde has been given a job in the bank. When Nora confirms that she has (āOne isnāt without influenceā, she says), Krogstad tells her bluntly that heās been sacked and asks her to put this influence of hers to work for him, to help him keep his āposition of dependence in the bankā. He reminds her that a long time ago he āslipped upā, but heās now keen to become ārespectable againā: the job at the bank was the first step, he says, but now Torvald is kicking him down āinto the mud againā. Sheās shocked to realise that Krogstad might tell her husband the truth about what sheās been up to, and snaps at him: āDo it, do it, and see where it gets you . . . Youāll never get your job back.ā Krogstad, however, reminds her of the facts: he lent her money on the condition that her father would guarantee the repayments. He points out that it appears her father signed the contract three days after he died ā in other words, she must have forged the signature. When Krogstad speaks of the seriousness of what sheās done and says that heāll show the document to the court, sheās scornful:
Nonsense. A daughter canāt save her dying father from care and worry? A wife canāt help her sick husband? I kno...