1
Introduction
1.1 A historical review
The task of connecting building components is as old as building itself. Throughout history, the job has been handled in different ways dependÂing on the building material, the structural sysÂtem and the particular requirements of the conÂstruction.
In wood construction traditional joinery began with timbers bound with tough natural fibres and developed into various types of interlockÂing, screwed and doweled joints, glued and finÂger joints as well as embedded steel plates and ring connectors.
Steel construction, a comparatively âyoungâ disÂcipline, employs connection techniques ranging from cast-iron fittings to rivets, bolts and weldÂing, whereby only bolting and welding are in common use today.
In concrete and masonry construction, various means of anchoring are in regular use (Fig. 1.1).
The mortar used in masonry assemblies can be regarded as the oldest type of connection mateÂrial. In fact, the hewn dovetails, cast metal joints and embedded metal studs or sleeves hisÂtorically employed in stone masonry may be considered to be the predecessors of todayâs modern fastening technology. Today, these methods have been largely replaced by plastic and/or metal elements of sophisticated design inserted into pre-drilled holes and secured via friction, mechanical interlock, chemical bond, or a combination thereof. Today there are sysÂtems available that are suitable for practically any type of masonry.
Concrete and reinforced concrete construction initially borrowed fastening techniques from other building trades, either unchanged or only slightly modified. Wood lathe placed in the formwork was anchored in the concrete via pre-driven nails and served as an attachment point for the entire range of building systems, as well as for suspended ceilings. Later, threaded sleeves, anchor channels and headed studs welded to steel plates were employed, these being secured inside the formwork and cast into the concrete
These so-called âcast-in-placeâ techniques were later rivalled by systems designed to be installed after the concrete had cured. The evoÂlution of drilling technology from chisels to rotary-percussion tools and the more recent development of diamond core drilling has opened up new opportunities for the field of post-installed anchoring technology.
For minor loads, the ubiquitous plastic anchor, successor to hemp and lead plugs, has all but replaced other techniques. To cope with higher loads, various types of metal expansion anchors have been developed that employ, in principle, the same functional principles but with varying construction details and attendant variations in installation and application conditions.
Bonded anchors, in which a steel rod is grouted into a pre-drilled hole, continue to be frequently used. Representing the latest stages in this chain of development are undercut anchors, hybrid systems employing bond, friction and/or mechanical interlock, and second-generation self-tapping screws.
Parallel with the development of anchors for pre-drilled holes, the technology of high-strength steel nails or studs driven into steel and concrete by an explosive or pneumatic energy source (so-called power-actuated fastening) has seen growing use over the past four decades. These systems serve to simplify the attachment of piping systems, lightweight suspended ceilÂings, etc., and are also widely employed for the attachment of metal deck to steel framing.
Clearly, post-installed fastening in concrete and masonry is a relatively young discipline, meanÂing that the state of the art is generally in a state of flux. Consequently, these systems typically cannot be regulated via prescriptive standards, as is done, say, with high-strength structural bolts. Consequently, in the member states of the European Community, the U.S. and other counÂtries the design and installation of post-installed fastenings is usually carried out in accordance with product-specific approvals.
1.2 Requirements for fastenings
Fastenings must be designed in such a way that they do the job for which they are intended, are durable and robust, and exhibit sufficient load-carrying and deformation capacity. Fastenings for less critical applications, e.g. securing lightÂweight duct, lighting, and wiring, can be selected on the basis of the userâs experience and do not usually require analysis or structural review (outside areas of seismic hazard). On the other hand, fastenings that are relevant to life safety, i.e. whose failure could pose a hazard to life or result in significant economic loss, must generally be selected on the basis of structural considerations and are typically designed and detailed by a structural engineer. The design establishes whether the requirements of the serÂviceability and ultimate limit states are met. The serviceability limit state includes requirements for limiting deformation, and requirements on durability (corrosion, chemical resistance). At the ultimate limit state it must be proven that the design value of the actions does not exceed the design value of the fastening resistance. AnalyÂses of the serviceability and ultimate limit states generally make a distinction between the type and direction of the load. Section 1.3 deals with loads acting on connections and section 3.7 with the distribution of these loads to the fasÂteners. The capacities of the fastenings are explained in relation to the type of fastener and type of base material as well as failure mode in sections 4 to 9. The behaviour of fasteners under seismic excitations and under fire is dealt with in sections 10 and 11 respectively. CorroÂsion and corrosion protection is discussed in section 12 and the influence of fastenings on the capacity of concrete members in which they are installed is explained in section 13. RequireÂments on the suitability of fasteners for the application in question and the design of fastenÂings are discussed in section 14.
1.3 Nature and direction of actions
Actions (loads) can be classified according to the frequency of their occurrence and their duration. In addition, we can make a distinction as to whether or not inertial forces are involved. Table 1.1 provides an overview of various actions. Dynamic forces arise in cases of impact, earthquake, explosion or machines that generate large inertial loads. If the load is perÂmanent or occurs only a few times and does not include inertial forces, then the action is considÂered to be static. If the number of load cycles is large but, again, inertial loads are not present, then we refer to fatigue loading. If inertial forces are involved, then the action is dynamic, regardless of the number of load cycles.
Static actions are the sum of permanent and semi-permanent (slowly changing) actions. These actions are sometimes referred to as dead and live loads. The permanent actions result from the weight of the structural components to be anchored and any other constant loads that the attached components must carry, e.g. backÂfill, floor coverings, and plaster. Semi-permaÂnent actions include, for example, foot traffic, fixtures and fittings, non-load-bearing lightÂweight partitions, stored materials, wind and snow. Given values for the applicable permaÂnent and semi-permanent actions can be found in the relevant national and international standards (e. g. DIN 1055, Eurocode 1: EN 1990: 2002 (2002), ASCE 7 (American Society of Civil Engineers (2002)) .
Deformations can occur in anchored compoÂnents, e.g. due to temperature fluctuations or due to shrinkage and creep of the concrete comÂponents. Temperature fluctuations may be due to weather conditions, as with building facades, or may simply be a result of the component function, as in the case of chimneys, silos, boiler rooms and cold storage rooms. Restraint of these deformations gives rise to stresses in the fasteners, the magnitude of which depends on the geometry and position of the fastenings as well as the mechanical properties of the materials involved. These stresses may be releÂvant to the fatigue-resistance of the fastener, depending on the number of temperature-induced strain cycles. For example, in the case of facade support structures, assumptions of 104 to 2 · 104 load cycles are often used in design.
Frequently alternating actions (fatigue loads) are caused by, for example, traffic loads, crane rails, lift and machines. The magnitude of the changing action required for design is again to be found in the relevant national and internaÂtional standards. These standards also define whether a changing action should be viewed as a static action or as a fatigue load. For example, a wind load frequently changes in magnitude and direction but is often regarded as a static load for design purposes.
The essential difference between dynamic and static actions lies in the presence of inertial and attenuation forces. These forces arise from the induced accelerations and must be taken into account when determining the forces on the fasÂtening. Dynamic forces are brought about by earthquakes, sudden actions such as impacts and explosions, and by machines with high inertial acceleration, e.g. printing presses. Dynamic actions generated by machines are also regarded as relevant for fatigue.
Loads can occur as tension, shear or a combinaÂtion of tension and shear. In the case of shear, we distinguish between loading with or without bending of the fastener (Fig. 1.2).
2
Fastening systems
2.1 General
Fasteners transfer applied tension loads to the base material in various ways. Load-transfer mechanisms are typically identified as mechanical interlock, friction or bond (Fig. 2.1).
Mechanical interlock involves transfer of load by means of a bearing interlock between the fastener and the base material. Mechanical interlock is the load-transfer mechanism employed by headed anchors, anchor channels, screw anchors, and undercut anchors.
Friction is the load-transfer mechanism employed by expansion anchors. During the installation process, an expansion force is generated which gives rise to a friction force between the anchor and the sides of the drilled hole. This friction force is in equilibrium with the external tensile force.
In the case of chemical interlock, the tension load is transferred to the base material by means of bond, i.e. some combination of adhesion and micro-keying. Chemical interlock is the load-transfer mechanism employed by bonded anchors.
The majority of commercially available fasteners resist tension loads via one or more of the above described mechanisms.
Another way of differentiating anchor systems is by the way they are installed. A distinction is made between cast-in-place, drilled-in and direct installation. Cast-in-place components are secured in the formwork prior to casting. Drilled-in anchors are installed in holes drilled into the hardened base material. Direct installation refers to studs or nails driven into the base material with powder cartridges or pneumatic action.
The following sections describe anchors commonly used in plain and reinforced concrete.
2.2 Cast-in-place systems
A variety of inserts are used for cast-in-place installations. These include lifting inserts for the transportation of precast concrete components, anchor channels, embedded plates with headed studs, bent reinforcing bars equipped with internally threaded unions, as well as custom components for hanging heavy facade panels and for securing masonry. Sections 2.2.1 to 2.2.4 describe the more common cast-in-place systems listed above. Design procedures for cast-in-place headed anchors and anchor channels are outlined in section 14.
As previously discussed, cast-in-place systems transfer external tension loads into the base material by means of a mechanical interlock between the embedded component and the concrete. Their positions must be coordinated with the reinforcement layout. They can also be installed in heavily reinforced elements without difficulty. The advantage of cast-in-place systems lies in the fact that the location of the anticipated external loads is known and so can be accommodated in the design of the reinforced concrete member through appropriately placed reinforcement. The disadvantage lies in the extra layout and planning required for these systems, as well as in the potential for erroneous placement.
2.2.1 Lifting inserts
Lifting inserts used for the transport of plain and reinforced concrete precast elements must often conform to applicable local specifications regulating their design. Examples include the safety guidelines of Germanyâs Hauptverband der gewerblichen Berufsgenossenschaften (1992) and the U. S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) (1989) which specifies capacity requirements for inserts and lifting hardware.
In the case of cast-in cable loops, the crane hook or lifting tackle is simply attached to a loop of cable projecting from the concrete (Fig. 2.2).
A wide variety of commercially available lifting inserts are equipped with flush-set internally threaded sleeves to accommodate lifting tackle (Fig. 2.3). These are anchored in the concrete by various means including deformations, transverse dowels, and hairpins. Lifting inserts may also be constructed by swaging an internally threaded insert directly onto the end of a piece of reinforcing bar (Fig. 2.4).
A simple form of transport anchor is constructed from bar stock, one end of which has been sheared and bent to form a âswallow tailâ. A hole drilled into the opposite end serves to accommodate the lifting hardware attachment (Fig. 2.5).
Headed anchors with cold-formed heads (Fig. 2.6) at each end are designed to accommodate special lifting hardware that engages the larger head.
There are also systems available in which the lifting tackle can be remotely disconnected (Fig. 2.7).
The installation instructions of the manufacturer must be adhered to when using lifting inserts. These specify permissible load, minimum concrete strength, minimum component thickness, minimum spacing, and edge distance, as well as the necessary reinforcement. As a rule, specific additional reinforcement is required since lifting inserts are often positioned close to edges or in narrow components.