1 & 2 Samuel for Everyone

John Goldingay, JOHN GOLDINGAY

• Publisher: SPCK Publishing
• Year: 2019
• Print ISBN: 9780281061297
• eBook ISBN: 9780281082353
• Topic: Teologia e religione
• Subtopic: Commento della Bibbia

The books of 1 and 2 Samuel vividly describe the passing of the age of the judges and the founding of the Israelite monarchy. We read of the rise and rule of Samuel, the last and greatest of the judges, and his role in establishing Saul and, later, David as kings over Israel. The wars, deceptions, victories, friendship, intrigue, rivalry, jealousy, and (for David) adultery and family discord that marked the reigns of these two men ensure that 1 and 2 Samuel are among the most readable - and relevant - books of the Old Testament. Using personal anecdote, a witty and lively style, and drawing on his considerable theological knowledge, John Goldingay takes us deep into the unfolding story of the Old Testament.

1 SAMUEL 1:1–8

How Not to Display Accurate Empathy I

¹There was certain man from Ramathaim of the Zuphites from the mountains of Ephraim, named Elkanah, son of Tohu, son of Zuph, an Ephraimite. ²He had two wives. The name of one was Hannah; the name of the other was Peninnah. Peninnah had children, but Hannah had no children. ³This man used to go up from his city year by year to bow down and offer sacrifice to Yahweh Armies in Shiloh. The two sons of Eli, Hophni and Phinehas, were priests to Yahweh there. ⁴On the day when Elkanah sacrificed, he would give portions to his wife Peninnah and all her sons and daughters, ⁵and to Hannah he would give a double portion because he loved Hannah, whereas Yahweh had closed her womb. ⁶Her rival would provoke her greatly to make her fret because Yahweh had closed up her womb. ⁷So she would do, year after year. As often as she went up to Yahweh’s house, she would provoke [Hannah] thus, and she would weep and not eat. ⁸Her husband Elkanah said to her, “Hannah, why do you weep, why do you not eat, why is your spirit sad? Am I not better for you than ten sons?”

I don’t very often shout out loud when I read an e-mail, but I did so a few weeks ago when a message came from a friend of mine who had returned to a country in Asia two or three years ago. She and her husband had been longing to have children, but she had been unable to conceive, and it had begun to seem that she never would. It seemed a shame not least because she is one of the most loving and caring people I know; I could imagine what a great mother she would be. I know more than one lovely loving couple who for different reasons don’t want to have children but who (I suspect) will come to be loving parents if it happens, but they don’t feel incomplete without having a baby. This other couple was very keen to do so. They had got a dog, which can sometimes be a way of making up a little for the spouse or baby that it seems you are not going to have. Then the e-mail came saying she was two months pregnant! So I shouted out loud. She is now four or five months along, so it looks as if it will all work out fine.

Hannah was more like this couple than those other two couples who have no great desire to have children. Deeply longing to have children is often thought to be a cultural thing. In a traditional culture, a woman’s womanhood can seem to be tied to having children. If you don’t have children, you are not complete as a woman. Yet a woman in the West can also be deeply grieved at not being able to conceive; it does correspond to an aspect of the way womanhood was created and to female physiology (I say “womanhood” to avoid giving the impression that every woman ought to have children).

It was probably really important to Elkanah, too. At one level that would be because he and Hannah need to have children to join with Elkanah in running the farm. Further, to whom is he going to pass on the family land if they have no children? But it need not be a merely practical issue. I know men who have felt incomplete because they do not have children either because they were infertile or because their wives were.

Quite likely a need and desire for children is the logic behind Elkanah’s having two wives, as was the case when the infertile Sarah encouraged Abraham to take Hagar as a second wife (see Genesis 16). Elkanah will hope that Peninnah can bear children for Elkanah. Indeed she can. Actually she seems to drop them as easily as cooking lunch. Each year when the family goes to Shiloh for the festival, it seems that there is an extra baby to thank God for. Then what seemed to be a solution turns out also to be a problem. The situation again parallels the one that obtained with Abraham, Sarah, and Hagar. Encouraging Abraham to marry Hagar seemed a good idea in theory, but Sarah feels very different when Hagar is actually pregnant. Elkanah’s taking Peninnah as a second wife might have seemed a good idea in theory, but Hannah feels different when Peninnah gives birth to baby after baby. In effect Hagar became a provocation to Sarah, and Peninnah becomes a provocation to Hannah. Maybe Peninnah did very little deliberately to provoke Hannah. Neither Hagar nor Peninnah would have needed to do anything to be provocative except be pregnant.

So Elkanah finds himself living with permanent tension in the household and with deep depression in the soul of the woman he loved first and best. The poor man does his best to handle the situation, but we guys are clueless about understanding women. “Am I not better to you than ten sons?” Actually, Elkanah, no. Don’t apply a Band-Aid to the wound. Get her to talk about it some more.

The order of the books in the Hebrew Bible is different from the order in the English Bible. In the Hebrew Bible, 1 Samuel follows directly on Judges (Ruth comes later). It’s then suggestive to be reading this story as the beginning of the next stage in Israel’s history following on Judges. When we finish reading Judges, we have a nasty taste in our mouths. The stories have become more and more troublesome as people are more and more doing “what is right in their own eyes,” which isn’t right in the eyes of any normal person. First Samuel starts by telling us about a particular family, as several of the stories in Judges do, and the family story it tells is one that begins with heartache and anguish, yet it will be a story with a happy ending and one that makes us want to read on rather than making us want to stop.

In particular, the sanctuary at Shiloh was the location of the last of the unsavory stories in Judges, whereas here Shiloh is the place where Hannah will get her prayers answered. Admittedly, it will transpire that Eli, Hophni, and Phinehas leave a lot to be desired as priests; but the birth of Hannah’s son will also mean that God is onto that. Shiloh is located in the south of the mountains of Ephraim and thus relatively central for the clans who live on the main mountain chain of Judah and Ephraim. We will learn in chapter 2 that the covenant chest was at Shiloh at this time—it seems to have moved around from one place to another from time to time, for reasons we do not know. Its presence there would make Shiloh the natural place for one of the pilgrimage festivals that Israel held each year.

The Torah speaks of all Israel appearing before God three times a year for such festivals, but for most families it wouldn’t be very practical to abandon the farm for two or three weeks and make the journey to the central sanctuary in that way. Elkanah’s habit involves something more practical. Ramathaim (Arimathea in the New Testament, where the man who provided a tomb for Jesus was from) is in the lowlands not so far from Shiloh; the chapter later calls the location of the family home “Ramah,” which rather suggests that this Ramathaim is another name for Ramah, even nearer Shiloh, only a day’s journey south. So Elkanah took the family there once a year. This would likely be the fall pilgrimage festival, the most practical time to leave the farm because the harvest was now over and the work of the new agricultural year had not yet begun. So people would be giving thanks for the past year (hopefully) and seeking God’s blessing for the new year. In addition, they would be reminding themselves of the way Yahweh Armies had brought them out of Egypt and brought them to their own land, and they would be living in bivouacs for the festival (there were no motels), reliving how things had been on that journey from Egypt to Canaan; hence the name of the festival, Sukkot (bivouacs or shelters or booths or “tabernacles”).

The sacrifices to which the story refers will be fellowship sacrifices, not burnt offerings (the whole of which were given to God) and not sacrifices designed to deal with offenses. When you offered a fellowship sacrifice, some went to God (that is, it got burnt up, as happened with the entirety of a burnt offering), but some was shared by the people who made the offering. So it was a barbecue in which God and the family shared. One of the priests would handle the technical side to the sacrifice, including the sprinkling of the animal’s blood on the altar and the burning of the parts that went to God. Elkanah as the head of the family that brought the offering would then share round the cuts with all the members of the family and make sure everyone got their fair share. Except that he gave a double share to Hannah as a mark of his love for her, to make up a bit for the fact that she has no children. Maybe that might work with a guy, who can’t get enough steak, but it doesn’t work with Hannah.

We’ll look at the idea of God’s closing the womb when we come to verses 20–28.

1 SAMUEL 1:9–11

Sour Hour of Prayer

⁹After they had eaten and drunk at Shiloh, Hannah got up. The priest Eli was sitting on the seat by the doorpost of Yahweh’s palace. ¹⁰[Hannah] was embittered in spirit. She made a plea to Yahweh and wept profusely, ¹¹but made a promise. She said, “Yahweh Armies, if you actually look at the affliction of your servant and are mindful of me, and do not put your servant out of mind but give your servant a male offspring, I will give him to Yahweh all the days of his life. No razor will come on his head.”

In his late seventies, my former colleague Lew Smedes wrote a memoir of his life called My God and I, which reaches way back into his childhood in Michigan in the 1920s and 1930s. The family had come from the Netherlands and Lew’s father died when he was very small, leaving his mother with four children. He was told that as the undertakers carried his father’s body out of the house, his mother moaned in her native Frisian, God is “zoo zuur [so sour]” Subsequently, he says, what a hymn calls “the sweet hour of prayer” was never sweet in their house. He found himself weeping whenever they met with God as a family for prayer. Meeting with God seemed to be a sadness for his mother, too, whether at home or in the church prayer meeting. He could not understand her prayers in the tongue she had brought from Europe, but he could recognize the sobs and tears and heaving. (Many years later, Lew asked her why she had never married again. She explained that though she was so tired and alone, she feared that another husband might not care for her children as she did. He comments that he then realized how profoundly he had found the love of his heavenly Father tucked into the love of his earthly mother.)

For Hannah, too, the hour of prayer was initially sour, though eventually sweet. Presumably she prayed when she was at home in the village, as other Israelites did, but the occasion when the family went to Shiloh would be a natural time for special prayers. We have already seen how the annual festival was designed to be an occasion of great joy and celebration as people rejoiced in the harvest that God had given them and also in the commemoration of God’s giving them their freedom and their place in the land, but for Hannah it had become consistently an occasion when her infertility was driven home to her. This fact would give extra drive to her pressing her agenda with God. Further, the sanctuary that is the focus of the festival is, after all, God’s this-worldly dwelling, an earthly equivalent of God’s dwelling in the heavens. It is God’s palace; Hebrew doesn’t have a word for “temple” but uses either the word for “house” or the word for “palace,” because the temple is the equivalent to a human being’s home and thus in particular the equivalent to a king’s palace. It is a portal; a place of contact, of interchange, and of movement between earth and heaven; a place from which prayers and praises can naturally reach the heavens and where messages from the heavens can reach the earth. It is thus the place where prayer is especially possible; and for Hannah the pain associated with this annual celebration makes it the place where prayer is necessary, too.

The festival is also an occasion for eating and drinking, and eating and drinking can get out of hand. Thus one reason why Eli would be sitting at the door of the sanctuary would be to guard against people approaching it when they are worse for wear. It was always part of the responsibility of a sanctuary’s staff to act as doorkeepers who made sure no one and nothing came into the sanctuary that would defile it. One can imagine that this duty became a bit wearisome, and I get the impression Eli will be glad when all these pilgrims go home and he can get back to a regular routine.

Hannah comes there to the sanctuary bitter in spirit. In other words, she is in a similar state to that of Naomi, just a few pages ago in the English Bible. God let Naomi go through a series of tough experiences that she describes as “bitter”; God has let Hannah’s lot be a tough one, and the storyteller knows that the bitterness has entered her own spirit. One might have thought that this would make her hesitant about praying. Maybe she would feel she had no wish to speak to the God who had closed her womb. Or maybe she would feel she needed to get her attitude together before she did so. Fortunately her desperation overcomes any such instincts. There is an old book titled Prayer by Ole Hallesby (Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1994; first published 1931) that talks about the way we can regard doubt or anger or bitterness as obstacles to prayer, when actually they are our way into prayer—they are the things we come to talk to God about. Hannah instinctively knew this was so.

She comes before God with a “plea.” Like the English word, the Hebrew word has a legal background. In everyday speech it could suggest entering a plea to a court when you have been improperly treated and you want the court to do something about it. That is the nature of praying for oneself (or for someone else). You are assuming the right to come into the heavenly court and urge (demand is almost the word) that it take action on your behalf. That is what Hannah is doing. She has ways of backing up her plea. She addresses Yahweh Armies, the God they come to worship at the festival; the title implies that the sovereignty and power they acknowledge on that occasion is significant not just in the context of big military and political events but in the context of an ordinary person’s needs. If God is Yahweh Armies, then this power ought to be applied to her life. She weeps profusely. It would be an expression of grief, but it would also be another way of getting God to take notice.

Hannah urges God to look at her. Color magazines at present are running a brave series of advertisements that portray children with cleft palates and such conditions; when you look at a lovely child with such an unfortunate ailment and you know you could meet its need by writing a check, how could you resist? If God looks at Hannah and at the dynamics of her family, how could God resist intervening in her life? She specifically urges God to be mindful of her and not to put her out of mind. The Hebrew words are usually translated remember and forget but they imply something more deliberate than those English words commonly suggest. In prayer people often ask God not only to look deliberately but to think deliberately, in the conviction that applying the mind to something leads to action, whereas putting something out of mind leads to continuing inaction.

Hannah appeals to her status as a servant. It may seem odd to refer to servanthood as a positive status, but this is the way the Old Testament sees it, especially in connection with prayer. The relationship between a servant and a human master is a mutual one. The servant is committed to the master, and the master, to the servant. I am your servant, Hannah says. Please will you behave in relation to me in the way a master should?

Furthermore she makes a promise. The rules in the Torah, the advice in Ecclesiastes, and some of the Old Testament’s stories draw people’s attention to the fact that making promises is a dangerous business, especially when God is the object of the promises. But Hannah takes the risk. In this case it is a particularly costly promise. In effect Han...

Table of contents

• Cover
• Title
• Copyright
• Contents
• Acknowledgments
• Introduction
• 1 Samuel 1:1–8 - How Not to Display Accurate Empathy I
• 2 Samuel 1:1–2:31 - How Are the Mighty Fallen 116
• Glossary