1
Introduction
How did the apostles do biblical theology, and what can we learn from them? The goal of this book is to address these questions.
There has been a growing interest in the practice of biblical theology among evangelical Christians in the West, an interest seen in the very existence of this series of books. And even many laypeople are now familiar with the idea that the Bible is not only a collection of individual stories but also contains a larger story that stretches from the garden to the new creation.
From one perspective this is a new phenomenon in the church. The discipline of biblical theology was originally given a home in the academy through the work of post-Enlightenment historical critics who made a distinction between the theology of the Bible (biblical theology) and the theology of the church (dogmatic theology).1 This modern, dogged interest in the historical development of the theology of the Bible was then baptized by orthodox theologians who used the new method to analyse the history of redemptive revelation.2
From another perspective, however, recounting the theological teaching of the Bible as a story with historical development was certainly a part of pre-Enlightenment theologizing as well. Perhaps the second-century Christian bishop Irenaeus is most famous for taking this approach.3 And yet long before Irenaeus Jewish interpreters of the Bible summarized their understanding of holy writ in narrative historical form. Such summaries are found both within the OT (e.g. Neh. 9; Pss 105; 106; etc.) and outside it (e.g. Sir. 44â50). Our interest in this book, however, is not in these pre-Christian summaries, but rather in the summaries of Israelâs story composed after the coming of Jesus Christ in the apostolic witness of the NT.
Our idea: exploring the exposed iceberg
In the last century of biblical scholarship and especially in the last few decades the use of the OT in the NT has been explored at great length. For a time there was an intense interest in parallels between NT exegesis and the uses of the OT found at Qumran (pesher) or those found in the later rabbis (midrash).4 More recently there has been an interest in literary studies that consider factors behind the text such as the subtler echoes of the OT in the NT, ways that the OT story shapes the Gospels, or OT narratives that may lie underneath Paulâs arguments.5
If we use the metaphor of an iceberg, many of these studies have been deep-sea explorations attempting to shine a spotlight on things that are submersed in dark and frigid places, such as Paulâs Pharisaic training (midrash) or the philosophical echo chamber in which ancient texts find new resonations (intertextuality). We have all benefited from these studies but our project takes a more direct approach. Our goal is to explore those parts of the iceberg that are standing in plain sight under the light of the sun. Sometimes the most difficult thing to observe carefully is the thing that you see all the time, such as the famous âhall of faithâ in Hebrews 11. And yet Hebrews 11 is not only one of the most important examples of the use of the OT in the NT, but is also an inspired example of how to put the story of the Bible together.
The iceberg metaphor can also be usefully applied to our goal of understanding the biblical theology of the apostles by means of these passages. One difficulty in this discipline is that no one agrees about what exactly âbiblical theologyâ is. A recent volume entitled Understanding Biblical Theology finds no fewer than five different approaches represented by modern scholars (Klink and Lockett 2012). These approaches range from those who view the discipline as merely a descriptive, historical discipline, unearthing the religion of the human authors of the Bible,6 to those who argue that it should fully embrace the same categories and methods as systematic theology.7 This is why on a practical level the term âbiblical theologyâ may describe the exploration of one biblical author such as Paul (Schreiner 2001), of a larger corpus such as the OT (Dempster 2003), of the development of the OT in the NT (Beale 2011), of the central theme of the entire Bible (Hamilton 2010)8 or even of a view of God that accords with the Bible.9
Thus, an exploration of the âbiblical theologyâ of the apostles could in one sense be a study of everything the NT authors say and especially what they say about their Bible, the OT. Our goal in this project is not to explore the entire biblical theology of the apostles but to explore the exposed tip of the iceberg, their explicit summaries of Israelâs history. While there are many different approaches to the discipline of biblical theology, one characteristic of most of them is the attempt to come to terms with the post-Enlightenment focus on the Bible as a historical book. The passages in the NT that have the most bearing on this kind of study are those that narrate the history recounted in the OT from Abraham to the exile and beyond. These summaries are not everything the NT authors have to say about biblical theology, but are the clearest examples of apostolic reflection on the history or story of the Bible. Moreover, studying the exposed part of the iceberg will help us better understand what lies below the surface.
Our criteria: New Testament summaries of Israelâs story
Movement in this direction has already begun in the recent article of Hood and Emerson, who attempt to isolate âsummaries of Israelâs storyâ (SIS) as a compositional category. This article reviews modern research in this âgenre-transcending literary categoryâ,10 presents criteria to identify the category SIS and then gives a provisional list of about seventy to eighty such summaries in Jewish and Christian literature found both inside and outside the Bible.
Hood and Emerson trace the beginning of their history of research to the publication of Ethelbert Staufferâs New Testament Theology in the mid-twentieth century that contained in an appendix âan apparently unprecedented listâ of 121 âtheological summaries of historyâ.11 Stauffer perceived in these summaries support for his own view of biblical theology, which is rooted in the sacred history:
The theology of the early church was a process of ordering. What went on was not the making of metaphysical concepts, nor yet the construction of a system, but an ordering of thought, that sought to discover the actual relationships between the different elements of the world of human experience. The answer that was found as a result of the search was like this: God ordered all reality in history . . . In this sense the theology of history is the primary and canonical form of Christian thinking . . .12
Hood and Emerson next survey several other scholars after Stauffer who have studied these summaries. They observe however that
none of these scholars address these summaries as a distinct compositional category as Stauffer did . . . Scholars usually focus on one or a handful of closely related forms [e.g. those that follow the âdeuteronomicâ sinâexileâreturn view of history] rather than giving attention to summaries as a form-transcendent phenomenon.13
They also survey scholars associated with the ânarrative turnâ in biblical scholarship (e.g. N. T. Wright) who have brought attention back to Israelâs story but do not cite Stauffer and his list of summaries.14
Joachim Jeska, influenced by Stauffer, has given âthe fullest review and the sole attempt in the extant literature to establish a technical term for this phenomenon, Summarien der Geschichte Israelsâ.15 He views these summaries not merely as âhistorical reporting, but attempts to actualize Israelâs history, bringing it to bear for present or future purposes, sometimes implicitly by the creation of patterns, sometimes by explicit commentâ.16 He comes up with a much shorter list than Stauffer (twenty-seven examples), partly because he does not use the shorter texts and partly because he restricts his investigation to ancient Jewish summaries that tell the story from Genesis to 2 Kings.17 Hood and Emerson observe that, although Jeska arranges his lists according to genre, he âfollows Stauffer in accumulating examples from a variety of forms and genresâ,18 treating these summaries as a compositional category that transcends genre and can be examined in their own right.
In the final section of their article Hood and Emerson suggest various criteria by which they delineate the compositional category of SIS. It should be observed that they purposely use the English word âstoryâ rather than âhistoryâ, not to deny the realis nature of Israelâs narrative, but to describe a narrative that moves beyond the past into the present and even the future.19 They first identify SIS as a âshorter version of the phenomenon known as rewritten Bibleâ (RB), for example, the retelling of Genesis and Exodus in Jubilees or Josephusâs longer history of the Jewish people (Jewish Antiquities).20 The difference between this genre of literature and the compositional category of SIS is that an SIS is âhighly condensedâ rather than being a lengthy summary and is always found âwithin a workâ rather than standing on its own.21
Next they suggest several criteria, which can be summarized with the following: an SIS recounts the âcharacters, events, and institutionsâ of Israelâs history in âchronological orderâ and at âsubstantial lengthâ.22 By âsubstantial lengthâ they are attempting to eliminate briefer references to Israelâs history such as Jesusâ statement that âmany will come from the east and the west, and will take their places at the feast with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob in the kingdom of heavenâ (Matt. 8:11). By âchronological orderâ, Hood and Emerson refer to a passage that âmoves in proper âhistoricalâ directionâ, allowing for âminor chronological digressionâ such as in Hebrews 11.23
With these criteria in place, Hood and Emerson write out their list of Jewish and Christian SIS. Since our concern is with the apostolic witness to Israelâs story, we will list only the seven summaries they find in the NT: Matthew 1:1â17; Mark 12:1â23//Matthew 21:33â46//Luke 20:9â18; Acts 7; Acts 13:16â41; Romans 9 â 11; Hebrews 11:1 â 12:2; and Revelation 12:1â12.
Our study of apostolic biblical theology follows Hood and Emersonâs criteria exactly, although our list of summaries is slightly different. We have selected the passages in the NT that recount the characters, events and institutions of Israelâs story in chronological order and at substantial length. Following these criteria we have excluded many texts that recount elements of Israelâs story but not in chronological order or at substantial length.24 One thinks of the brief recounting of certain episodes in the Gospels such as Jonah and the huge fish or Solomon and the Queen of the South (Matt. 12:39â42), Peterâs sermons in the early chapters in Acts (Acts 2:14â36; 3:12â26), or even the more substantial reflections of Paul on Abraham (Rom. 4) and Adam (Rom. 5:12â21; 1 Cor. 15) that do not show chronological or historical movement. In other words, while these recountings appeal to characters or events from the...