When multi-storey buildings are investigated, two completely different approaches are available for the structural engineer. Choosing an analytical model is the preferred choice of those who rely on âconventionalâ methods of analysis. This approach often leads to simple, closed-form, albeit normally approximate solutions. Relying on discrete models offers the possibility of carrying out a more detailed but at the same time often fairly time-consuming analysis. Because of the complexity of discrete models, using a computer for the analysis is a must.
A couple of decades ago approximate methods played a very important and normally dominant role in the structural design of large and complex structures as often, because of the lack of computer power, it was not feasible, or practical, or sometimes possible, to carry out an âexactâ analysis. Then more and more powerful computers with more and more sophisticated programs started to become available to wider and wider structural engineering communities. Such programs made it possible to deal with very big and complex structures. These programs make life fairly easy for the structural engineer. However, using complex computer programs may also have disadvantages. The more and more sophisticated and user-friendly programs may create an atmosphere when the structural engineer relies on them too much and finds less incentive to acquire an in-depth knowledge of the behaviour of the structure. And the lack of in-depth knowledge might easily lead to uneconomic or unsafe structures.
It may become tempting to pass the responsibility of the structural analysis on to the computer and then to accept the results without doubt. This may especially be the case when the structure is large and its three-dimensional behaviour is complex. Even the question âDo we need hand calculations at all?â can emerge. The answer, however, for several reasons, is âYes, we need relatively simple hand calculationsâ. Simple hand calculations offer a useful way of making checks on the results given by the computer. Such checks are very important because when the structural engineer handles a great number of input and output data and evaluates the results, it is easy to overlook something or to make mistakes. Once a mistake is made, it may be difficult to find it. The term âComputer Aided Disasterâ, or CAD for short, may be used as an eye-catching phrase or a sensationalist session title at conferences but the warning is justifiably on the wall: one avoidable catastrophe would be one more than can be accepted. The significance of the independent verification of the computer-based results cannot be overemphasised (Brohn, 1996; Smart, 1997; MacLeod, 2005).
Experience shows that the old verdict âThis result must be correct as it was given by the computerâ can still be heard. Even when it is obvious to the knowledgeable that the result in question is incorrect. A quick check using a back-of-the-envelope calculation could often remedy the situation in minutes.
But there are other advantages of developing and applying simple hand calculations. When such methods are developed, structural elements of secondary importance (e.g. partitions and other non-load-bearing structural elements) are normally ignored and the investigation centres on dominant aspects and neglects phenomena of secondary importance. As a consequence, a simple method with fewer aspects to concentrate on can give a clearer picture of the behaviour emphasising the most important key characteristics of the structure. This is also helpful in developing structural engineering common sense. Understanding the contributions of key structural characteristics is especially important with large and complex structures.
Perhaps the best way to tackle the task of the structural analysis of multistorey buildings is to employ both approaches: at the preliminary design stage simple hand methods can quickly help to establish the main structural dimensions and to point to efficient bracing system arrangements. More detailed computer-based analysis can follow. Before the final decision is made, it is essential to check the results of the computer analysis and confirm the adequacy of the key elements of the bracing system. Here, again, suitable simple methods can be very useful.
This book is concerned with the structural analysis of multi-storey buildings whose bracing system consists of frames, coupled shear walls, shear walls and cores. Such structures are generally large, contain a great number of structural elements and behave in a three-dimensional manner. Using the analytical approach, relatively simple models can be created for the analysis.
The continuum method will be used which is based on an equivalent medium that replaces the whole building. The discrete load and stiffnesses of the building will be modelled by continuous load and stiffnesses. This approach makes it possible to use analytical tools to produce relatively simple, closed-form solutions to the resulting differential equations and eigenvalue problems.
The fact that the methods in the book are all based on continuous models has another advantage. When the results of a finite element analysis (based on discrete models) are checked, it is advantageous to use a technique that is based on a different approach, i.e., on continuous medium.
Structural analysis is normally carried out at two levels. The structural engineer has to ensure that (a) the individual elements (beams, columns, floor slabs, etc.) are of adequate size and material to carry their load and (b) the structure as a whole has adequate stiffness and the bracing system fulfils its main role to provide sufficient stability to the building.
The book does not deal with individual structural elements. Its aim is to present simple analytical methods for the complex global analysis of whole structural systems in the three main structural engineering areas. Assuming three-dimensional behaviour, closed-form solutions will be given for the maximum rotation and deflection, the fundamental frequency and the critical load of the building.
Whenever methods of analysis are developed, certain assumptions have to be made. These assumptions reflect a compromise: they help to create relatively simple methods but at the same time they ensure that the results are of adequate accuracy. Accordingly, it will generally be assumed that the structures are
â˘Â  at least four storeys high with identical storey heights
â˘Â  regular in the sense that their characteristics do not vary over the height
â˘Â  sway structures with built-in lower end at ground floor level and free upper end
and that
â˘Â  the floor slabs have great in-plane and small out-of-plane stiffness
â˘Â  the deformations are small and the material of the structures is linearly elastic
â˘Â  P-delta effects are negligible.
Structural engineering research and practice often see researchers/structural designers who have specialized in one area with limited knowledge elsewhere. Designers are often reluctant to deal with theoretical matters; researchers often have little practical knowledge (or attitude); those dealing with stress analyses are sometimes ignorant of stability matters; people engaged in earthquake engineering may not be very good at the optimisation of bracing systems, etc.
This book offers a unified treatment for the different structures (frames, coupled shear walls, shear walls and cores, and their assemblies) and also for the different types of investigation (deflection, rotation, frequency, stability). The same terminology will be used throughout, and it will be shown that these seemingly independent areas (deformations, frequencies, critical loadsâor stress, dynamic and stability analyses) are in fact very closely related. In addition, the global critical load ratio links them to the performance of the bracing system in a rather spectacular manner.
Although real multi-storey buildings seldom develop planar deformation only, Chapter 2 (dealing with the planar analysis of individual bracing units) is probably the key chapter of the book in the sense that it introduces most of the characteristic stiffnesses that will be used for the three-dimensional investigations of whole systems later on. It is also shown here how the complex behaviour can be traced back to the local bending, global bending and shear deformations (and their torsional equivalents) of the bracing system. All the characteristic types of bracing units are covered here: sway- and infilled frames, frames with cross-bracing, coupled shear walls, shear walls and cores.
Three-dimensional behaviour is the subject of Chapters 3, 4, 5 and 6. The investigations in Chapter 3 centre on buildings subjected to lateral load and the main aim is to present simple, closed-form solutions for the maximum deflection and rotation of the building. It is spectacularly shown how the key contributors to the resistance of a multi-storey buildingâthe bending and shear stiffnesses, and their interactionâinfluence the performance of the bracing system. Chapter 4 deals with the frequency analysis of buildings. Closed-form formulae and tables make it possible to calculate the lateral and torsional frequencies of the building. The coupling of the lateral and torsional modes can be taken into account by a simple summation formula or, if a more accurate result is needed, by calculating the smallest root of a cubic equation. The often neglected but very important area of stability is covered in Chapter 5. In using critical load factors, simple (Euler-like) formulae are presented for the lateral and torsional critical loads. The combined sway-torsional critical load is obtained using a summation formula or calculating the smallest root of a cubic equation.
Chapter 6 introduces the global critical load ratio which is a useful tool for monitoring the âhealthâ of the bracing system. It can be used to show in minutes whether a bracing system is adequate or not, or a more rigorous (second-order) analysis is needed. The global critical load ratio can also be used to assess different bracing system arrangements in order to choose the most economic one. The results of three comprehensive worked examples demonstrate the practical use of the global critical load ratio.
To illustrate the practical use of the methods and formulae presented in the book, nineteen examples worked out to the smallest details are included. The examples range from the deflection or frequency or stability analysis of individual bracing units to the complex deflection and frequency and stability analyses of bracing systems, considering both planar and spatial behaviour. The examples are to be found at the end of the relevant chapter/section.
Numerous approximate methods have been published for the structural analysis of multi-storey structures. Most of them deal with individual bracing units. Some of them can even handle three-dimensional behaviour. However, it is surprising how few, if any, have been backed up with convincing accuracy analysis. Chapter 7 is devoted to the very important but often neglected question of accuracy and reliability. Using 32 individual bracing units at different storey heights, the accuracy of the relevant formulae is demonstrated by comparing the results of the closed-form solutions presented in the book with the results of the âexactâ (computer-based) analyses. Altogether 1631 checks are made in two groups. The first group contains 983 individual bracing units whose maximum deflection, fundamental frequency and critical load are determined. The second group contains the three-dimensional bracing systems of 648 multi-storey buildings. Here, too, the maximum deflection, the fundamental frequency and the critical load of these systems are determined. The results demonstrate the applicability and accuracy of the methods presented in the preceding chapters. Information regarding the accuracy of the procedures used in the nineteen worked examples concludes Chapter 7.
Although most of the formulae in the book are of the back-of-the-envelope type, due to the complexity of global three-dimensional analyses, some of the calculations may still seem to be rather cumbersome to carry out by hand. It is very rare, however, that a structural engineer today would wish to do actual hand-calculations, however simple they may be. Convenient spreadsheets and calculation worksheets make it possible to carry out the structural analysis and document its result at the same time in minutes. All the methods presented in the book are suitable for this type of application; in fact the worksheet version of all the nineteen worked examples has been prepared and made available for download. Each worksheet is prepared using both MathCad and Excel. These one-to eight-page long worksheets cover a very wide range of practical application and can also be used as templates for other similar structural engineering situations. Short summaries of the nineteen worksheets are given in the Appendix.