1
Changing Landscapes of Young Adulthood
This chapter presents the current research on young adulthood from the fields of psychology and sociology. This is done to in order to problematize current claims regarding the lack of religiosity among young adults. I will offer evidence to the contrary and argue for a more nuanced interpretation of general trendsāthat young adulthood is a time of spiritual discernment that is sometimes worked out through participation in the arts. This claim connects with the overarching thesis of this book by showing that the young adult years are a time of high spiritual interest and discernment regarding oneās religious identity. This claim also sets the stage for the following chapter, which elaborates on the role that the arts play in the faith lives of young adults: to foster connection, expression, and opening.
My empirical research study focused on the question, What role do the arts play in the faith lives of young adults? This chapter reviews contemporary research on young adults, highlighting the changing landscape of young adulthood. This review will provide foundational knowledge about young adults and expose some tensions in current research. This chapter will also expose the experiences of the current cohort that make them especially creative.
Since the publication in 2004 of Jeffrey Arnettās Emerging Adulthood: The Winding Road from the Late Teens through the Twenties there has been increased attention from researchers, churches, and the media given to the life stage of young adulthood. This age range has long been acknowledged as a time of transition and major life decisions. This is traditionally the period when individuals move away from home, consider and decide on a career and spouse, and become financially independent from their parents. Whether we call it āemerging adulthoodā (Arnett), ālater adulthoodā (Erik Erikson), or simply āyoung adulthood,ā there is general consensus among psychologists and sociologists that this period of life is changing in significant ways.
A Lively Conversation on Young Adulthood
In my review of psychological and sociological research on young adults I identified four themes of young adulthood. While some of these themes have been seen in previous generations, they seem to be more pronounced with younger generational cohorts. This is happening not only in the United States (although that will be the focus of this research) but internationally as well.
The first theme within the scope of the changing landscape of young adulthood is taking form in time. The years one spends in young adulthood are expanding, extending into the late twenties and early thirties. Sociologists and psychologists speculate on the reasons for these changes: longer life span, greater support from parents, or lazy young adults. Common to all is the claim that this stage of life is lengthening. A second theme is that young adulthood is the least religious period of a personās life. This is borne out in both national and denominational research through studies that focus on religious participation, including Bible reading, frequency of prayer, and congregational involvement. The third theme, especially interesting considering the second, is that this lack of church attendance and involvement does not completely correlate with a decrease in interest in matters of faith, religion, and spirituality. The fourth theme is that this generation of young adults is more aesthetically attuned and oriented than past generations, and this is often expressed in their faith lives. This final theme was identified in a preliminary way in the work of sociologist Robert Wuthnow and has been further explored and confirmed in my own research. Inquiry into this fourth theme is the focus of this study.
Igniting the Conversation: Life Cycle Theory
Before giving greater attention to these four thematic trends with young adults I will offer a critique of Arnettās life cycle theory. I start with Arnett because, as mentioned above, he has been one of the most prominent voices drawing attention to the changing landscape of young adulthood. Some developmental theories, such as life cycle theory, tend toward the straightforward clarity of categorizing life. Life stages, as Erik Erikson lays them out, are a prime example of this. While Eriksonās stages allow for overlap, flexibility, and a return to past stages if the need arises, the general focus is on steps, or stages, through which each human goes with little attention to global, economic, political, or social forces, trends, and events. Life stage theory focuses on the individual human, rather than the individual within society. This makes sense because Arnett and Erikson are in the field of psychology, which is more concerned with the psychic development of individuals, in contrast to sociology, which is more concerned with people groups. It is for this reason that I believe Arnettās contribution is limited and fails to account for the significant impact that the changing landscape of social institutions can have on a generation.
Take, for example, those who came of age during a military draft. Not only are the lives of drafted young men affected but also the...