The nameless and the forgotten: maternal grief, sacred protection, and the archive of slavery
Sasha Turner
Death, particularly of enslaved infants and children, cast a long shadow over the experiences of enslaved mothers. Almost half of all enslaved infants died within the first two weeks of birth and another quarter died by age two. Although profitâloss calculations tabulate the frequent deaths of enslaved youngsters, these accounts reveal very little about cultural conventions on maternal grief or how enslaved mothers responded to their childrenâs deaths. In addition to using the rhetorical to draw attention to the loss women experienced and archival silences on maternal grief, this article challenges the claims that enslaved Africans welcomed and celebrated death because it freed loved ones from bondage and reunited captive Africans with their ancestors. Attention to expressions of grief and evolving grieving practices reveal the transformation of enslaved peopleâs culture and the invisible suffering of the enslaved, which are sometimes overshadowed by narratives of resistance and the resilience of African culture and black mothers.
What kinds of stories do we write about the ânameless and the forgottenâ? How do we compute loss, when the depth of the âloss cannot be knownâ?1
â18 December 1780 Last night Abba Miscarried of a boy.â âMary Ann was delivered of twins both died.â âRosettaâs child not named dead.â âChildren donât thrive well here, the reason is a mystery to me, but I am really sorry for they generally die of the jaw fall, or some other disorder when about a week or fortnight old.â2
Enslaved mothers and their children enter the archives in little more than fragments. Snippets of their lives, loves, and losses emerge from records imputed with the possibility of yielding profits. Miscarriages and deaths record financial loss. What of a motherâs grief? How did they grieve their childrenâs death? The calculus of partus sequitur ventrem â children follow their motherâs status â quantified and commodified but obfuscated and destroyed. Ideologies of motherhood. Mothersâ love and grief. Communal support and the dead remembered.
Absent from the archives are enslaved womenâs feelings about childbearing, and how the specter of death that hovered over the womb shaped womenâs maternal desires and practices. Understandably, historians speculate that childbearing brought anxiety and trepidation, a humming disquiet. Defining childbirth as ârooted in loss,â Jennifer Morgan, for instance, explains that mothering under enslavement was âmarked by an enormous degree of uncertainty that was manifested in the bodies of children whose future was out of [mothersâ] control.â Slaveryâs violent, vexing, and violating assaults meant that âthe birth of a child would have done nothing to alleviate sorrow; indeed it would only have made the load heavier.â3 Morganâs conclusion is the culmination of several decades of scholarship, which beginning in the 1940s contends that women controlled their fertility because bearing children endangered the emotional life of mothers and their community. Fertility control, Herbert Aptheker wrote in 1943, âshorten[ed womenâs] own misery and hurt their oppressors.â4 Women therefore kept sexual distance to prevent unwanted pregnancies, as well as turned the violence endemic to slavery inward toward their own bodies and that of their children by slitting the throats of their sons and daughters or using vaginal suppositories and emmenagogues to prevent conception and expel fetuses.5
âGynecological revolt.â âSelf-mutilation.â âSelf-sacrificing.â Saidiya Hartman is right. Slaveryâs âinvestment in violenceâ inundates not only the archives, but also the narratives scholars weave.6 Historians of slavery have rightly insisted on fertility control as an act of defiance against sexual exploitation and the capital claims slaveholders made on womenâs reproductive ability. Risking overstressing black womenâs extraordinary strength, scholars are equally right in spotlighting stories of ferocious mother-warriors âwho shouldered weapons while nursing babies.â7 These narratives elucidate how enslaved mothers performed the exceedingly difficult task of mothering under slavery but with the result of obfuscating failure, rejection, grief, fear, and loss.8 Where does womenâs disinterest in mothering fit? How did such young women as Harriet Jacobs reckon with the admonition of grandmothers to âstand by [their] own children, and suffer with them till death [because] nobody respects a mother who forsakes her children; and if you leave them, you will never be happy a moment ⌠and your suffering will be dreadful[?]â9 Did women need consoling after aborting their babies? Did women and community members celebrate infanticide as âheroic tragediesâ where, despite loss, death secured a passage to freedom?10
All too often, narratives of motherhood among enslaved women are frozen in a âheroic pose,â and the quest to capture the s/heroâs âunbending defianceâ sidelines the complexities and vulnerabilities of enslaved subjects.11 Stories of enslaved mothersâ negative emotional responses to sacrificing the self for the sake of children can destabilize the mother-worker-warrior image cultivated in the literature.12 Yet it is not necessary to dismantle the image of the devoted mother. Extricating the anguish and failures childbearing women felt, whether and how maternal grief was expressed in enslaved womenâs communities, for example, is necessary to understand how being enslaved shaped the experience, expression, and suppression of emotions. Delving into enslaved womenâs emotional lives not only peels away another layer in understanding slavery as more than just corporal exhibitions of violence. The cost of slavery to black humanity was also manifested in invisible scars.
Scholarship on the nostalgia experienced by Middle Passage survivors, for example, has emphasized the link between the social and the psychic as necessary for fully apprehending the âaffective experienceâ of uprooting and displacement wrought by the transatlantic slave trade. The nostalgia, or âsad mood originating from a desire to return to oneâs native landâ captive Africans experienced, argued Ramesh Mallipeddi, was both an unconscious consequence of forced migration and a self-imposed condition brought on by enslaved people seeking to reclaim âsome measure of self-possession.â Nostalgia, which manifested in various forms as âdejection, sullenness, withdrawal, and a propensity to suicide,â empowered captive Africans to annihilate the body through the mind.13 Grief as examined in this discussion similarly emphasizes an in/voluntary suffering the death of children evoked; distinct from grievance as âspeaking out against that injuryâ or pressing a social claim based on such injury.14 By focusing on the varying ways grief manifested (versus grievance), this essay brings attention to the âintangibleâ suffering enslaved women experienced.
An archive that transformed people into marketable commodities restrains what is recoverable of the intimate lives of the commodified. Even when enslaved women had some opportunity to disclose their innermost pain, to abolitionists, for example, who were interested in exposing the viciousness of slavery, enslaved women appear to have âadhered to a cult of secrecy, a culture of dissemblance, to protect the sanctity of inner aspects of their lives.â15 Such enslaved women as Mary Prince who narrated her life to abolitionists gave the âappearance of disclosure, or openness about [herself] and [her] feelingsâ but she concealed the deepest parts of herself: pleasure, motherhood, sexuality remain an âenigma.â16 Yet it is âpossible to exceed ⌠the constitutive limits of the archive,â by exploiting what Hartman suggests are the capacities of the subjunctive and the rhetorical to tell stories through questioning, expressing âdoubts, wishes, and possibilities.â17 This article engages with archival fragments using a rhetorical strategy to tell a story of mothersâ fear, grief, and apprehension while calling attention to the challenges of such narration. Utilizing this âtwo fold attentionâ to use Lisa Loweâs framing, allows an affirmation of what is possible historically while apprehending what is lost and irrecoverable in the archives.18
Death, writes Vincent Brown âwas at the center of social experience for everyoneâ in Jamaica throughout the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries.19 Neither blacks nor whites sustained their populations by natural increase. While the mortality rates for whites were considerably higher than blacks, death was more visible among black inhabitants because of the preponderance of enslaved people. The high infant and child mortality rates not only entrenched the plantationsâ dependence on the slave trade. That more than one-half of enslaved newborns perished within days of their birth, and another one-quarter died before they reached aged two, also shaped the emotional quality of enslaved parentsâ lives. Disease, malnutrition, brutal punishment, unsanitary living and working conditions, and an excessive work regime pushed the enslaved beyond the limits of human endurance. While peculiar factors combined to shape the experience of death among enslaved Africans, mortal loss, particularly of children, was common for all inhabitants of the New World.20 Similarly high death rates among children of colonists in North America, for example, resulted in parents, with the encouragement of spiritual leaders, maintaining âdue distanceâ from their children. By limiting affection and attachment, parents could fortify their âminds against the worst that might happen.â21
Did enslaved mothers similarly insulate themselves; perhaps doubly so knowing that social if not physical death awaited their children?22 There is evidence to suggest that some enslaved mothers responded to their childrenâs injuries and needs with passivity. On Lord Penrhyn estate, one woman merely described as âone of the Congo Negroesâ reportedly caused the death of her child by her inattentiveness. The child died when it fell from its motherâs arms, after one too many episodes of the mother loosely holding it.23 Other mothers abandoned their children. On Golden Grove estate, the enslaved girl Mar was placed in the care of another woman after her mother ran away.24 Having only a notation in the slave inventories to go on, we do not know how long after Marâs birth her mother ran. At the very least, ignoring and abandoning children shielded mothers from the vulnerability of the almost inevitable death of their children.
Scholars writing of the Caribbean slavery experience offer the âdemoralized slaveâ as a trope for explaining apparent passivity among the enslaved. Writing of one enslaved woman named Sally, Trevor Burnard described Sally as âso traumatized by slavery that she gave up.â Sally had no children, and...