p.1
Part I
Equivocal Emotions
p.3
1 Cropped Vision
Photography and Complicity in Womenâs World War II Memoirs
Elisabeth Krimmer
Introduction
Many scholars have explored the valence of photography in the context of the Holocaust in order to elucidate the experiences of the victims, witnesses, and survivors of the National Socialist genocide. There are also a number of scholars who dealt with the perspective of perpetrator photography.1 However, there is as of yet not much that deals explicitly with the photographic legacy of the large number of women who worked for the German army in various functions and who can be categorized as complicit bystanders. In the following, I argue that this group, albeit not directly involved in frontline fighting or the execution of the Holocaust, was crucially important to the functioning of the regime. They made significant contributions to the war effort by providing logistical, administrative, communicative and medical support, and, in doing so, witnessed aspects of the Nazi genocide, such as public hangings, executions of so-called partisans, and rounding up for deportations, particularly if they were deployed to the Eastern front. Thus, like so many others, they were in a position to comprehend the full extent of the regimeâs cruelty, but chose to look the other way. It is this cropped vision evident in both narrative strategy and visual record that lies at the heart of their complicity with a murderous regime.
In order to elucidate how these female bystanders conceptualized their own role in the Third Reich, this article investigates the affective deployment of photography in two memoirs by army nurses: Ingeborg Ochsenknechtâs As if the Snow Covered Everything: A Nurse Remembers Her Deployment on the Eastern Front, and Erika Summâs Shepherdâs Daughter: The Story of the Frontline Nurse Erika Summ.2 As I will show, the emotional register evident in these texts is more subdued than one might expect. It would seem that both Summ and Ochsenknecht shielded themselves from the full force of the crimes they witnessed and the trauma they experienced by cultivating an emotional distance. While this âcoolnessâ helped them deal with the terrifying experience of the war and the Holocaust, it also implied a psychic splitting that facilitated their complicity in Nazi atrocities. But before I turn to an analysis of Summâs and Ochsenknechtâs memoirs, I would like to discuss the nature of these particular photographs, that is, photos taken by and/or included in memoirs of army auxiliaries and nurses, as well as the theoretical and ethical challenges posed by them.
The Civil Gaze
Anybody who peruses memoirs by women who served the German army in various functions will quickly notice that the photographs included in these texts follow a predictable iconography. Frequently, the memoirists begin with a number of images that depict their childhood and/or lives before the war. Taken as a whole, these images signify normalcy and innocence and are clearly designed to evoke sympathy with the author. Furthermore, in the context of the Holocaust, they serve an additional function that exceeds the traditional captatio benevolentiae. If we agree with Susan Sontagâs assumption that âsentiment is more likely to crystallize around a photograph than around a verbal slogan,â3 then these pictures have a significant power to widen the gap between what we see in the images, namely the quotidian nature of the authorâs pre-war existence, and what we know about National Socialist politics of extermination. In other words, these photos of childhood innocence effectively create an emotional distance between the memoirists and the Holocaust.
p.4
In addition to images that depict the authorâs pre-war life in often idyllic terms, memoirs of army nurses, as well as those of auxiliaries, also typically feature photographs from the various frontlines of the war. These wartime images tend to center on three groups of motifs: First, women who were deployed to the Western front, in particular to France and Italy, such as Ilse Schmidt, author of The Bystander: Memories of a Member of the German Army,4 include traditional tourist snapshots of scenery and landmarks.5 One of the perks of becoming an army auxiliary or a nurse consisted in the opportunity to escape the narrow confines of traditional domesticity and parental authority, and the photos provide ample evidence that these women were eager to travel and see the world.
Second, these memoirs tend to feature a significant number of group shots taken during various outings and vacations, including joyful gatherings on beaches and in cafes and restaurants. Frequently, the figures in these images smile at the camera in ways that are difficult to reconcile with both the memoiristâs textual emphasis on the harsh conditions of life on the Eastern front and the contemporary viewerâs historical knowledge of this era in general and of the persecution of Jews in particular. It would seem that the effect of these smiles is best captured by Roland Barthesâs notion of the punctum, a seemingly irrelevant photographic detail that pierces and attracts the viewer and that âparadoxically, while remaining a âdetail,â . . . fills the whole picture.â Barthes also credits the punctum with a certain liminal status when he claims that âit is what I add to the photograph and what is nonetheless there.â6 The notion that something is added that is already there perfectly captures this peculiar dynamic: it is not the smile or the photograph in and of itself that is troubling but their incongruity with our knowledge of mass murder on the Eastern front. In their liminality, the smiles of these auxiliaries and nurses and the quotidian nature of their photographs of everyday life evoke a different version of that which âremained unremembered yet cannot be forgottenâ7: not the crushing guilt of the perpetrator, not the traumatic suffering of the Holocaust survivor, but the complicity of the bystander who was present but failed to act.
In trying to define the nature of the complicity implied in these images, I found myself reminded of John Bergerâs analysis of the iconic photo of Che Guevaraâs dead body, which Berger endows with a moral dimension: âHis foreseen death âwill be the perfectly natural resultâ of all that he has lived through in his attempt to change the world, because the foreseeing of anything less would have meant that he found the âintolerableâ tolerable.â8 To be sure, Berger raises the moral bar so high that it will not only remain out of reach for most of us but would entail annihilation if heeded. And yet, his call for a total commitment to the fight against injustice sheds light on a sense of opprobrium that adheres to these images: in their focus on the mundane and the ordinary, these photos implicitly suggest that the memoirists found the intolerable nature of the Nazi regime quite tolerable. As Berger reminds us, all âphotographs bear witness to a human choice being exercised in a given situation . . . I have decided that seeing this is worth recording.â9 Thus, we cannot but wonder about the choice to highlight outings, social gatherings and vacations amidst a general environment of slaughter and genocide.
p.5
While the memoirs of nurses and army auxiliaries include images of the authorsâ social and professional lives, they contain no visual record of the Holocaust. This should not surprise us. After all, the Nazi regime had issued an order that forbade taking pictures of public executions and violence against civilians (albeit an order that was violated by many).10 The Nazi policy of censorship, however, does not explain the textual elision of mass murder in memoirs that were frequently written decades after the war. Moreover, it bears mention that, although the Holocaust is excluded from the visual record, German suffering is not. Tellingly, the third group of photos in these memoirs, and the only one that directly acknowledges the context of the war, tends to highlight German victimization. The authorsâ empathy for their male comrades in arms is evident in the numerous images of wounded German soldiers, soldierâs graves, and soldierâs funerals, thus creating a clear dichotomy between those whose life is grievable and those who are excluded from the community of mourning.
In Regarding the Pain of Others, Susan Sontag argues that
Sontagâs claim that images of manmade atrocities position the viewer as either activist or voyeur is convincing but it does not address the emotional responses set in motion by the pictures of complicit bystanders. Clearly, there is a wide range of possible reactions to these images. In some viewers, the oblivious enjoyment of these seeming wartime idylls may incite a sense of resigned melancholy (whatâs past ...