Many infants in the United States have incarcerated parents (Pattillo, Weiman, & Western, 2004; Rebecca Project, 2010; Villanueva, 2009) and are at risk for poor social outcomes, partially as a result of disrupted attachment relationships (Cassidy, Poehlmann, & Shaver, 2010; Kjellstrand & Eddy, 2011; Lange, 2008; Myerson, Otteson, & Ryba, 2010). Although rigorous studies are few, parentāchild relationship-focused interventions conducted in jails, as part of prison-based residential parenting programs, and during community-based alternative sentencing programs appear to positively affect parenting, attachments and infant and child behavior (Baradon, Fonagy, Bland, Lenard, & Sleed, 2008; Byrne, Goshin, & Joestl, 2010; Cassidy et al., 2010, 2010; Condon, Carver, Crawley, Freeman, & Van Cleave, 2010; Eddy et al., 2008; Fearn & Parker, 2004; Goshin & Byrne, 2009; Sleed, Baradon, & Fonagy, 2013). As more such programs are developed and tested, a body of research is accruing that provides insight into life stressors and felt experiences of incarcerated parents that can be used to help shape content and process, at least in regard to parents (Berry & Eigenberg, 2003; Borelli, Goshin, Joestl, Clark, & Byrne, 2010; Borja, Nurius, & Eddy, 2015; Fritz & Whitecare, 2016; Harris, 2014; Kjellstrand & Eddy, 2011; Whaley, Moe, Eddy, & Dougherty, 2008). Little is known about the experiences and inner worlds of infants and young children of incarcerated parents (Condon Weisenburg, 2011).
What can infants communicate to us about their experiences? Quite a bit, it turns out. Attachment theory is the frame of reference for this study. Researchers working within that frame have pioneered the use of techniques to help in understanding infantsā experiences. In the 1940s, John Bowlby and Esther Bick developed a clinical technique called infant observation. It has long been used to hone cliniciansā understanding of the situated meanings of infant behaviors, infantsā inner worlds, and the psychodynamics of infantāparent relationships (Bick, 1964/1987; Waddell, 2013). Work by scholars, practitioners, and researchers that is particularly relevant to the work conducted in this study include descriptions of attachment behavior (Ainsworth, Blehar, Waters, & Wall, 1978; Cassidy, 1999; Powell, Cooper, Hoffman, & Marvin, 2013; Spieker, Nelson, & Condon, 2011), how attachment relationships develop (Brazelton & Cramer, 1990; Cassidy, 1999; Crittenden, 2008; Karen, 1994; Stern, 1985, 1990, 1995, 2002), parentsā states of mind (Crittenden & Landini, 2011; Powell, Cooper, Hoffman, & Marvin, 2007; Shlafer & Poehlman, 2010; Shlafer, Raby, Laler, Hesemeyer, & Roisman, 2015; Stern, 1995), factors that influence relationship development (Belsky, 1999; Berlin, Ziv, Amaya-Jackson, & Greenberg, 2005; Crittenden & Claussen, 2000; Fraiberg, Adelson, & Shapiro, 1975; Howes, 1999; McHale, 2007; Sameroff, McDonough, & Rosenblum, 2004; Shlafer, Raby, Laler, Hesemeyer, & Roisman, 2015), the inner worlds of infants (Lieberman, 1993), infantsā attachment models (Johnson, Dweck, & Chen, 2007), infant mental health (Zeanah, 2009), and infant mental health interventions (Cicchetti, Rogosch, & Toth, 2006; Katz, Lederman, & Osofsky, 2011; Lieberman & Amaya-Jackson, 2005; Lombardi & Bogle, 2004; Makariev & Shaver, 2010; Osofsky, 2004). Collectively, this body of work influences policy as well as practice (Jones Harden, 2007) and the development of new research paradigms and tools. A relational health paradigm that has proved useful in describing trends in infantāparent interactions over time (Condon, Willis, & Eddy, 2016) also proved useful in understanding the relationship experiences of infants in the RPP.
Early relational health is a function of overarching emotional tone and mutual competencies that can be observed during interactions between an infant or toddler and a parent or caregiver. The fundamental concept is mutuality, meaning relational health is not the sum of individualsā skill sets. Relational health is a categorical description of a relationship between a young child and adult. When relational health is robust the following mutual capacities develop during the first 1000 days of life: engagement; enjoyment; responsiveness; attention; pacing; initiation; imitation; cooperation; mutual ability to recognize the other personās affect, develop a shared goal, and respond to challenges; and mutual engagement in pretend play, complex communication and language, and mutual ability to build bridges between ideas (Condon et al., 2016). In relationships with positive overarching emotional tone, the parent and child develop and practice mutual capacities that sustain and strengthen their connection with one another almost effortlessly. Positive overarching emotion does not mean there are never missteps, ruptures, and upsets, only that a sense of warm connection predominates, and that ruptures can be readily repaired. Over time, these dyads develop and sustain secure, mutually heartening relationships. When overarching emotion in interactions is less than positive or negative, efforts to connect are constricted or stymied. Negative overarching emotion does not mean there is never laughter, only that missteps, ruptures, and upsets occur frequently, and are not easily repaired. In relationships with less than positive or negative overarching emotional tone, one or the other person may demonstrate skills but mutual capacities are weak or absent. These dyads are at risk for sustained relationship difficulties.
This study focuses on the early experiences, inner worlds, and relational health of seventeen infants living with their incarcerated mothers in a womenās correctional facility. The term āinner worldā pertains to the desires, ideas, expectations, and preferences that infants conveyed through emotional expressions, shifts in attention, and a wide range of behaviors during interactions with their mothers and environment. The infants and mothers lived together in a special unit known as the Residential Parenting Program (RPP). Monday through Friday, infants also participated in an on-site Early Head Start (EHS) intervention program. Through observations and interviews that occurred over a period of 2 years, thick descriptions of infantsā experiences and interactions in different contexts with their mothers and other people provided glimpses into infantsā relationship experiences and inner worlds. A researcher (and the author of this report) who is a social welfare scholar, early childhood special educator, and infant mental health practitioner conducted all observations and interviews. This report focuses on two key issues: variability in early relational health for mothers and infants living in the RPP and factors that impacted infantsā experiences and the development of infantāmother relationships.