Chapter overview
This chapter focuses on âexploring learningâ and considers three main themes: first, how theory has provided a basis for understanding the processes of constructing learning; second, how during this process children develop learning strategies and build a learning identity, and third, to examine ways in which adults support learning through the use of learning and teaching strategies. Examining theories about how children learn will indicate how belief in the ways children learn has determined past and current educational practice. The aim is to encourage readers to consider their own beliefs and practices related to childrenâs learning and to recognise aspects of theory when observing children in learning situations, and so be able to make conscious decisions when selecting strategies that promote learning in general and for individual children, regardless of the curriculum content.
Why understanding childrenâs learning matters
The quest to determine how a child learns has occupied the minds of great thinkers, and theories about how children learn have influenced educational practice in ways that can be easily traced through history. The idea that children were âempty slatesâ or âempty vesselsâ as suggested by John Locke in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, where children were born waiting to be written on or filled up with knowledge, contributed to the teaching methods of the past where children were mostly silent and expected to listen to the adult and then regurgitate knowledge in a rote-learning scenario. This method of teaching children was slow to change, and in many ways was influenced by the behaviourist theories of Pavlov and Skinner, with the idea that behaviour (including learning) could be conditioned through a process of reinforcement. From the 1960s onward the influence of Piaget changed educational ideas, and The Plowden Report (HMSO, 1967) moved towards a more exploratory form of learning, with a more child-centred approach that encouraged children to discover knowledge for themselves through experimentation within their environment, with the adult being the facilitator of the learning experience rather than just the expert. Similarly, when the writings of Vygotsky became more widely discussed, the importance of learning together, socially and in groups with the learning scaffolded by a âmore knowledgeable otherâ, brought further changes to teaching methods. Theories, including Jerome Brunerâs âspiral curriculumâ, are so embedded in educational practice that the ideas are taken for granted and not always consciously explored (Gibbs, 2014, p. 42).
The traditional theories adopted by schools brought significant changes not only to the thinking about how children were learning, but also to the physical layout of classrooms, with rows of desks facing the teacher being replaced by tables arranged to accommodate group learning; walls with a few charts on display were replaced with brighter, changeable wall displays and resources that children could use independently from adults to aid their learning. Changes in the beliefs about childrenâs learning behaviours also saw the introduction into the classroom of more adults; no longer seen as sufficient, the one adult to 35+ children ratio has given way to smaller classes with several adults supporting learning, particularly for younger children.
Although, arguably, Piaget and Vygotsky may be considered as the âfathersâ of modern understanding of both development and learning, together with researchers such as Pavlov and Skinner (Skinner, 1953, 1971), who argue that learning is a change in behaviour brought about by reinforcement and conditioning, other key writers and researchers have continued to influence the way in which childrenâs learning is approached in educational situations. Words and terms abound that have resonance for the teacher and parent from such developments, including emotional literacy, behaviour for learning, thinking skills, modelling behaviours, teaching and learning strategies to name just a few. All reflect the notion that the child is unique, an active member of the community and that learning is more complex and holistic than perhaps previously considered. Understanding some of the complexity surrounding learning allows us to understand the child and so meet their needs in an increasingly complex world.
Teaching versus learning
Before continuing the exploration of learning in this chapter, the distinction between âlearningâ and what constitutes âteachingâ deserves consideration. Within education, it is perhaps impossible to separate one from another as teachers and practitioners are as involved in what should be taught as in what should be learned. Issues of adult and school accountability examine planning and intent as well as how much children know, especially in the core curriculum subjects of literacy and numeracy. Emphasis on knowledge-based assessment adds pressure to adults to âteachâ children facts to a set timetable, although teachers and practitioners who understand childrenâs ways of learning will plan creative activities to engage children in learning. Research seems to indicate that national curriculum testing does inhibit some forms of teaching that may support children in their learning; for example, Jones (2010) found that the teaching of thinking skills in primary schools has suffered as a result of an education system that is dominated by tests and league tables. Encouraging children to think and question is often seen as a fundamental part of learning, so any teaching that prevents children from learning to think for themselves indicates some of the challenges facing educationalists as they ponder the balance between teaching and learning.
Teaching methods are founded on the drive to acquire knowledge and conform to patterns of behaviour that are generally based on behaviourist theories. Such theories are based on assumptions of conditioning and a cycle of reinforcement for certain accepted behaviours that followed the work of Burrhus Frederic Skinner, and others, known as âoperant conditioningâ. This theory is based on the study of actions and their consequences, and is often used in schools as part of a system of rewards and punishments. Through reinforcement of certain behaviours, children can be manipulated or programmed into working in ways that support learning in predetermined directions. This is an effective way to manage a class and feedback on learner performance (e.g. encouragement, approval, praise, affirmation) providing reward and also reinforcement to ensure repeat performances.
Learning could perhaps be considered as something that brings its own rewards and reinforcement, but it comes from within the individual rather than being imposed from outside. Perhaps this is the distinction between learning and teaching; one comes from within and the other is controlled and determined by others.
Some traditional views of learning
What is learning? A pause for reflection
Before you read this chapter, pause and consider what you think learning is. How do children learn? What do they learn? How do we know that children are learning?
And then, consider how âteachingâ fits into the picture of learning âŚ
The processes involved in understanding how children learn are complex, and there are differing views that try to satisfactorily answer the fundamental question, âWhat is learning?â. Many academic papers and books on learning seem to hesitate to explicitly define the meaning or agree on a definition (De Houwer et al., 2013; Wirth and Perkins, 2008). However, any attempt at a definition usually encompasses the idea that learning involves the acquisition of new knowledge and a change in behaviour, often as a result of experience being internally assimilated in the mind by the individual, either by solitary activity or through interaction with another person or the environment. Dewey (1998) famously links learning to experience, but not to all experiences; he equated learning from experience as the ability to reflect upon the experience in a personal way, thus enabling learning to take place. This idea that experience precedes learning is extended in the notion that âlearning is a consequence of thinkingâ (Perkins, 1992, p 31; Ritchhart and Perkins, 2008), which stresses the importance of not only educators presenting children with opportunities to experience but to then talk/think/reflect in order to bring about learning.
Our understanding of the role of learning within child development made significant strides with the influential work of Jean Piaget and his interest in cognitive development. His work outlining stages of development related to a childâs age showed how children were able to build upon existing knowledge to assimilate and accommodate new learning. In this way, his contribution demonstrates the cumulative and constructive nature of learning; that is, that as new experiences and ideas are explored and assimilated into new mental pictures, the childâs view of the world changes and a new layer of knowledge and understanding is established.
Piaget essentially saw learning as a solitary, cognitive activity, with the role of the adult being a facilitator of learning, giving the child experiences and opportunities to explore the world and build knowledge and understanding for themselves. Vygotsky brought a new dimension to such constructivist theories, by stressing the importance of the adult or âmore knowledgeable otherâ in the learning process. Vygotskyâs ideas were based around the way in which a more learned partner can encourage and anticipate the next step in learning and so enhance the learning experience. This led to an appreciation that a difference can be made to the learning process through social interaction. Vygotsky succinctly voiced the idea that âwhat the child is able to do in collaboration today he will be able to do independently tomorrowâ (Vygotsky, 1987, p. 211; 1998, p. 202) giving value to social learning and talking a...