The nine chapters in this part each describe interventions and perspectives informed by their authorâs understanding and attention to systemic aspects of the units and facilities in which they work. Settings include open units, community-oriented units, closed and acute care units, and forensic closed units in a variety of mental health facilities in various countries.
The term âmultiple modes and levels of interventionsâ refers to the wide and flexible range of possible systemic interventions uniquely available to the clinical psychologist in mental health inpatient units, beyond the foundational clinical interventions of psychotherapy and assessment, the backbone of the profession.
A major challenge inherent to such systems-level interventions is the clinical psychologistâs ongoing task of successfully translating psychological understanding of the issues at hand into language that can be heard on the unit and put to constructive use. Through the process of articulating issues so that they can be addressed in a shared language with all those involved and impacted, the clinical psychologist enhances the quality of the unitâs therapeutic efforts, contributing to the evolution of a therapeutic approach more tailored and responsive to the specific needs and communications of the unitâs patients.
The ability to achieve this mission is contingent on a myriad of factors active in the setting, not least of which is the person of the psychologist: his/her professional disposition, abilities, as well as previous experience in such work.
The systems-level dimension of the clinical psychologistâs work is, therefore, to some extent, an open-ended venture. Beyond specific systems oriented interventions that might be structured into a given unitâs program (e.g., scheduled staff debriefing group meetings), it is up to the clinical psychologist to flexibly and creatively find ways and means to fulfill this dimension of the work within the particulars and circumstances operating in the setting.
This aspect of the clinical psychologistâs systems-level work is well represented in the nine chapters comprising this part of the book, in which authors describe their interventions in response to specific issues and challenges in their particular settings. The nine chapters fall into three thematic clusters and are grouped accordingly. Following is a brief description of these three clusters and the included chapters:
clinical psychologist(s) ⌠are perfectly placed and ideally trained to fulfill the range of roles outlined here, and through these have a significant influence on the good work of the ward that extends well beyond the walls of the clinical room.
In the next chapter (Chapter 2), Marilyn Charles describes her psychoanalytically oriented systems-level work within a renowned psychoanalytically and psychotherapeutically oriented private psychiatric inpatient facility in the United States. Through her examples, the author describes the clinical psychologistâs pivotal role in providing understanding and recognition of underlying dynamics at play around various treatment issues. Her description of the systemic model used in her facility highlights how multiple levels of dynamics play out in the hospital, allowing for more efficient and transformative therapeutic work to unfold between the staff and patients.
In Chapter 3, authors Peter Walker and Sophie Li describe the clinical psychologistâs placement and position within the Australian mental health inpatient system. Relying on their own experience as well as on input they collected through a survey conducted with fellow colleagues, the authors paint a rather grim picture of the limited degree of clinical psychologistsâ involvement and latitude in providing quality clinical psychology services on closed wards in the public mental health inpatient system. They convey a perspective suggesting that overemphasis on a biologically-based medical treatment model, together with limited resources available for patient care and rehabilitation within the broader public mental health inpatient system, creates conditions in which infringements of patientsâ human rights may occur. Stemming from this perspective, they endorse and summarize a human rights advocacy stance that clinical psychologists can take to safeguard patientsâ rights. The authors describe the implementation of cognitive behavioral therapy-based interventions and techniques on both systemic and individual levels and argue that by their very nature such interventions can remediate some of the more harmful aspects of inpatient mental health care.
In this clusterâs closing chapter (Chapter 4), Heidi Camerlengo discusses the ethical issues and challenges involved in clinical psychologistsâ work in mental health inpatient settings. The author describes a variety of ethical dilemmas and issues faced by psychologists; some derived from her own experiences and some from experiences recounted by colleagues in both public and private psychiatric hospitals in the United States. In her chapter, Camerlengo demonstrates how ethical dilemmas abound in clinical psychologistsâ work in these settings, and how their impact crosses over into several aspects of the psychologistâs clinical and administrative work, and sometimes into personal aspects of their work and lives as well. While the ethical dilemmas discussed in the chapter are not exhaustive, they represent some of the more common situations that psychologists encounter when providing inpatient mental health treatment. The author shows how addressing ethical dilemmas and conflicts is an ever-challenging part of the inpatient psychologistâs responsibilities.
The second thematic cluster of chapters in this part includes three chapters (Chapters 5, 6, and 7) that delineate specific, original, and innovative systems-level interventions, created and led by the clinical psychologists in response to situations and needs they identified within their units.
In the first of these, Jimmy Kim and Peter DâAmico (Chapter 5) describe their implementation of a positive behavioral support model within an acute care inpatient unit in a public psychiatric facility in New York. The authors describe how through the use of this model they develop patient-specific behavior plans that help the ward maximize clinical care, patient stabilization and reduction of aggressive behavior. The authors discuss how, as clinical psychologists cast in the role of behavioral consultants on the ward, they assist the multidisciplinary team, the patient, and family members to understand patientâs disturbing behaviors as a form of communication. This, in turn, opens the way to address underlying needs generating such behaviors and facilitates change.
In the next chapter (Chapter 6), Amit Fachler describes three of the more implicit roles that may be undertaken by a clinical psychologist in an acute closed inpatient unit. Using composite case examples taken from such work in a public psychiatric hospital in Israel, the author describes a psychodynamically minded clinical psychologist functioning as (a) an interpreter of patientsâ and family membersâ communications, (b) an informal organizational consultant, and (c) as âregulatorâ of the unitâs social climate. The author shows how functioning in these roles provides the psychologist opportunities to enhance the teamâs benign and thoughtful stance when confronted with difficult and challenging situations in their work on the acute closed ward.
In Chapter 7, Enav Or-Gordon describes her work with a recovery-oriented behavioral tool, developed and implemented in a closed psychiatric forensic ward in a state hospital in Prague, Czech Republic. The author demonstrates how work with this tool (a personalized notebook allocated to participating patients), promotes integration of the varied interventions on the ward into a unified structure and contributes to a cohesive course of therapy, enhancing patientâs self-agency and constructive involvement in shared hospitalization goals.
The last cluster of chapters in this part contains two chapters (Chapters 8 and 9) in which their authors address, through a more personal narrative, their first-hand experience of work within the mental health inpatient setting:
In Chapter 8, author Jim Geekie presents his personal, lived experience of work in a public mental health inpatient unit in the United Kingdom. The author explores some of the challenges encountered in attempting to reconcile personal and professional values while working in an institution dominated by medicalized approaches to understanding and relating to mental distress. Geekie considers from a personal perspective, if and how it may â or may not â be possible to work within such a system while remaining true to his values.
In this partâs closing chapter, Michael Siglag (Chapter 9) describes his many years of work within public and forensic state psychiatric hospitals in New Jersey, USA. Michael describes many influences and challenges encountered through his career path, starting as a unit based psychologist and moving ahead to management positions such as director of the APA-accredited internship in the hospital, followed by chairing the hospitalâs psychology department. The author presents this personal narrative of his long-term experience within the public psychiatric inpatient facilities, seeing it as representing experiences and challenges faced by many clinical psychologists working in similar public settings.
This collection of nine chapters, each describing psychologistsâ systemic-level perspectives and interventions, demonstrates the unique and valuable contribution such work holds for the mental health inpatient service, its units, patients, and staff. For the clinical psychologist committed to this level of work, experiencing his or her contribution to the unitâs ability to fulfill its patientsâ therapeutic needs is rewarding and satisfying. Continuously holding in mind the potential influence of systems-level interventions on the unit, the clinical psychologist can turn every excursion from the privacy of the consulting room to the unitâs public arena, into an opportunity to promote the systemâs psychological mindedness for the better care of its patients.
1 Therapy Beyond Walls
The Clinical Psychologistâs Multi-Level Work in the Psychiatric Ward
Mark Andrew McFetridge
Twenty-five years earlier, Michaelâs key nurse Dawn met me at the entrance of the Acute Psychiatric unit known as âDerwent wardâ. The river Derwent in the north of England is unusual in that it flows upstream (rather than Natureâs design of downstream) into the tidal river Ouse; a Roman shortcut to York.
I noticed that Dawn seemed reluctant to facilitate my use of the wardâs consulting room to meet with Michael for our seventh therapy session. âHow has Michael been since our therapy appointment last week?â I asked. âHeâs cut his face again; it was the day after your sessionâ. I thought privately that my nursing colleague just did not understand the importance of this crucial therapeutic work on Michaelâs experiences of childhood sexual abuse. Dawn privately thought this young clinical psychologist was misguided, causing Michael to become more disturbed and unnecessarily extending his admission to Derwent ward.
Having had a quarter of a century to consider this view (it is important to take a little time to reflect) I now consider Dawn to have been correct. There were key things I had yet to learn, including that any individual therapy on inpatient units needs to be fully integrated with the service and not undertaken by clinicians having little communication and shared formulation with the core inpatient team. I had yet to learn that clients who have histories of childhood abuse who self-harm must develop alternative ways of safely managing distress before addressing their traumatic memories in therapy. If not, the flow of the intrinsic emotional distress is inevitably against the self in a direction congruent with the invasion of their childhood.
Later in my career, I had the opportunity to work with, and learn from, a number of group analyst colleagues. I already had experience facilitating therapeutic groups for clients and training groups for staff; however, I was not aware of the therapeutic potential of the group within the inpatient setting for developing the sense of community, belonging, involvement and agency (Kennard & Haigh, 2009; Pearce & Haigh, 2017).
Over the next two decades, I had the privilege of being a staff member of the Acorn program, a DBT-informed Therapeutic Community at the Retreat York, UK. Opening in 1796, the Retreat âmental health projectâ and its founders rejected the inhumane treatments of the day (purging, burning, bleeding) and applied their Quaker values and practice to a new institution for the treatment of the insane that was to prove remarkably effective (Tuke, 1813). Samuel Tuke wrote of the importance of âexciting the capability of the patientâ, implicitly acknowledging that the ward environment could have a powerfully enabling effect. The relevance of the Quakers original approach to contemporary mental healthcare is still apparent (Borthwick et al., 2001).
Too often, we presume that the problem is solely located within the patient, and the correct therapy will remedy this pathology. Comprehensive formulation of our patientsâ clinical presentations might still usefully take account of social, environmental, occupational, and spiritual factors, as did the Quakers. There was a reason this pioneering institution was built on an eminence, with beautiful grounds of sufficient size for animal husbandry (Tuke, 1813).
The importance (if not primacy) of attachment experiences and learning has been acknowledged as important for us all (Bowlby, 2005). Perhaps the nature of the anticipated interaction and the actual relationships between the patient and others might exceed the effect of any simple intervention. Wampold (2013) found 87% of outcome variance was due to client-related factors and other factors outside therapy. Only 13% could be attributed to the treatment itself, and of this the therapeutic alliance had by far the greatest contribution to the outcome, far greater than the therapeutic model (Green & Latchford, 2012). If this is correct, our therapeutic interventions need to extend beyond the walls of our therapy office in order to maximize effectiveness.
While the complexity of client presentation may be particularly challenging, the clinical psychologist is perfectly placed to make a valuable contribution to the care and treatment received during their psychiatric admission. The integration of theory, research, and practice is what differentiates the clinical psychologist from other professions. Skillful, collaborative formulation of the individualâs mental health difficulties and strengths, in the context of their past/present relationships and life experiences, will effectively inform the inpatient teamâs considered interventions and care plans.
Lucy was a 50-year-old teacher. She was admitted to the ward following a life-...