Heavy metal appeared suddenly in Argentina at the beginning of the 1980s, within a particular political and historical climate during which the nation found itself under the rule of a military dictatorship that had begun in 1976. Despite lacking the strength of its earlier years, the dictatorship continued to dominate the Argentinean political and social scene of the time.
The issue of class will not take a secondary position in this analysis. Taking this into account, and following Louis Althusserâs work and his analyses of society as a structure defined by class struggle, this chapter will consider the position this cultural movement occupies in Argentina as it pertains to said struggle. Althusser asserts that culture forms part of what he calls the ideological state apparatuses (ISAs). ISAs are intricately related to those classes that possess the means of production and which, consequently, control state institutions. However, precisely because they are marked by their connection to ideology, it is possible to understand
their capacity to not only be objects of the class struggle, but spaces where said class struggle takes place, often in highly contentious ways. The powerful upper classes (or class alliances) cannot enforce their laws on the ISAs as easily as they do when it comes to the (repressive) state apparatus.
Subculture and Identity
If we can think of heavy metal in Argentina as a subculture, it is because it originates as a subset of a âparent cultureâ4 defined by its class composition. A central argument of this chapter is that the social subject to whom heavy metal lyrics allude to, specifically in Argentina, and which enables us to consider this movement as a subculture that arises from the subordinate classes is characterized by one of two identities. Either this subject is a member of a working class that is suffering and resisting the onslaughts of neoliberal policies which were first enforced during the Military Dictatorship of 1976/83,5 or the subject belongs to a lower class that has already lost the âprivilegesâ of belonging to the working class as a consequence of the disintegration of the labor world, a disintegration precipitated by the imposition of neoliberalism in 1976: âPoor people clamor for a crust of bread/The rich have become their executionersâ (âLa Mano Malditaâ, Un Paso mĂĄs en la Batalla, V8 1985).
The lyrics of HermĂ©ticaâs song âGil Trabajadorâ, a song that offers a working-class critique against the vision of a society increasingly dominated by a neoliberal culture that undervalues hard work, will be taken as emblematic of this subcultureâs relationship with the working class: âWith my meager salary/I cannot avoid/the bitter taste of this bad moment/while the world, the police and a thief/dub me, in mockery, the simpleton6 workerâ (âGil Trabajadorâ, Ăcido Argentino, HermĂ©tica 1991). The lyrics enact, through their criticism of society, a reclaiming of the traditional values of the working class, which, in the specific context being analyzed, have been disputed by the dominant ideology the subculture is challenging.
It is worth mentioning the analysis made by Maristella Svampa (2000) who, in studying the identity of metal workers, introduces as a sample case the testimony of Roque, a worker from the metal industry who identifies himself as a metalhead. Svampa states that Roque âis excluded from the middle class by a position and a function in the social structure (âI get up at four in the morning to go to workâ) but also by the recreational spaces he frequents (âI donât visit nightclubs as they do, those that have a little more money than meâ) and the clothing he wears, among othersâ. On the other hand, Roque still voices the pride he feels at being a metal worker: âI always loved the sight of scrap and sheet metal bundlesâ7 (2000: 131). We would argue that the convergent identities of metalhead and lower-class laborer found in Roque can also be found to coexist in the heavy metal subculture of Argentina. The heavy metal subculture is formed around the subordinate classes; as a result, the subculture distinguishes itself from the rest of society through the position occupied by its members within the social structure as well as through the subjectivity or identification markers the movement acquires.
In order to closely analyze the identity that forms around the genre in Argentina, we will deploy Stuart Hallâs definition of identity. Hall affirms that
identities are born from difference, not at the margins of that difference. This implies the radically disturbing acknowledgment that the âpositiveâ meaning of any given term â and with it its âidentityâ â can only be discovered through its relationship with the Other, the relationship with that which it is not, with that which it precisely lacks, with that which it has denominated as its constitutive exterior.
(2010: 18)
From this perspective, we can think of the metalhead identity in Argentina as an opposition or as a limit to dominant culture, as that which the latter is not. Thus, we can account for a constitutive exterior that draws a line between what it is to be a metalhead and what it is not. And that exterior is not defined solely by the sound of the music those belonging to the subculture listen to or the common traits shared by those found within the subculture; the identity is also determined, in great measure, by the limit, the rejection, the resistance to the dominant culture. We can see this opposition to dominant culture in the work of a band like Riff, who voice their rejection of the modernity that was drawing near; âconsequently, Riffâs metal style â with its aggressively gothic and futurist horror components â proposes a subjectivity which implies a contrarian identity, an identity that rails against what it sees as an imposed system, the new modern cityâ (Blanco and Scaricaciottoli 2014: 105).
In its lyrics, Riff attacks modern values and trends that invade and modify the city. An opposition between modernity and the values that characterize the heavy metal subculture can be traced in different songs, as is the case in a song titled âMaquinaciĂłnâ: âToday we decide to reclaim/a trace of our identity/on the road lies/your uneventful modernityâ (âMaquinaciĂłnâ, Contenidos, Riff 1982). We can think of this opposition to modernity as functioning in two distinct manners: on the one hand, it offers itself as a resistance against the rise of a new way of producing and consuming promoted by neoliberal policies that invade, not just the cities, but society at large; on the other hand, it is an attack on modern groups and bands that appeared on the Argentinean rock and pop scene during the 1980s. Returning to the oppositions expressed during the identification processes, it can be argued that the values of modernity stand as an important antithetical element. In other words, and to be as clear as possible: it is not possible to be modern and belong to the heavy metal subculture at the same time.
Whereas the values of modernity represent a fundamental antagonist in the music of Riff, in the music of a band like V8, the position of the antagonist is taken up by the pacifism found in the figure of the hippie: âThose sick of withstanding/the weeping of the peacemongers/those fed up with seeing/the faces that recall yesteryears/join us, there is a place/in this metal brigade/deranged people who are not like/our inland hippiedomâ (âBrigadas MetĂĄlicasâ, Luchando por el Metal, V8 1983). The metal brigades, the metalheads, cannot be subjects who, recalling the repression suffered by the lower classes under the civicâmilitary dictatorship, willingly accept some form of complacent pacifism. Violent struggle surfaces as a response to a system and a political context that has historically attacked the subordinate classes. To allude to âour inland hippiedomâ is to draw âa line dividing what came to be known as national rock from the heavy metal output of bands like V8 who, tapping into the furor and the anger of the moment, reclaimed what had been abandoned in rock, that is, its imperative to protestâ (Blanco and Scaricaciottoli 2014: 111).
While an extended analysis of this aspect is beyond the purview of this chapter, it is important to mention that a fundamental aspect defining a subcultureâs identity is its style (clothing, hairstyle, etc.). This style functions, on the one hand, as an identifier that marks off boundaries of belonging, and which, at the same time, ties the subculture to prior subcultures. It also links them to the parent culture, given that it takes elements from both and resignifies them.