1
Introduction: farewell to âPlatoâs Caveâ
And here Neutrality, harps, art exhibitions, reviews, libels, back-chat, high-tea, cold, no petrol, no light, no coal, no trains; Irish language, partition, propaganda, propaganda, propaganda, rumour, counter-rumour, flat Georgian facades, Guinness, double Irish, single Scotch, sherry, Censors, morals, rain home to all.
John Betjeman, 10 January 1941
The military and economic expansion of the state
At 11 am, on 3 September 1939, British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain declared war on Germany. When the Irish government responded later that day, declaring the Emergency Powers Act, Irelandâs independence was just seventeen years old, its constitution two years old and its control of the strategic ports barely a year old. The Ireland that appeared in the letters of the poet John Betjeman, press attachĂ© to the British delegation in Dublin during the war, was a place of charm but hardship, anxiously asserting its neutrality as Britain and Europe burned. The political and economic crisis of the Second World War not only provided the acid test of this fledgling independence. Just as significantly, the war marked the high point of centralised state intervention in Ireland.1 The Emergency Powers Act â from which the Irish vernacular for the war originated â enabled the Fianna FĂĄil cabinet to pass orders without the need for specific legislation or detailed scrutiny in DĂĄil Ăireann. In these extraordinary conditions, the government hastily formed a cabinet emergency committee, composed of Taoiseach Ăamon de Valera and a handful of key ministers, streamlining decision-making and marking the transfer of power from local government to the executive.2
In taking these measures, the governmentâs immediate priority was security. In January 1939, the Irish Republican Army (IRA) declared itself at war with Britain and affirmed its non-recognition of the Irish state. On 19 January 1939, Neville Chamberlainâs son escaped a bomb attack in Tralee, County Kerry.3 Between then and March 1940, the IRA carried out a bombing campaign in Britain and just three months into the Emergency pulled off the audacious Magazine Fort arms raid.4 Moving quickly to neutralise the security threat, the government reintroduced internment and increased its surveillance of the IRA and suspected communist groups.5 The state also expanded its military capability. Under Frank Aiken, the new Minister for the Coordination of Defensive Measures, there was a massive growth in the armed forces. After the initial recruitment drive of September 1939, the number of men under arms in independent Ireland increased from 7,000 to 19,000.6 After the fall of France in June 1940, de Valera wrote in his diary: âGood to organise quickly. We try to avoid sacrificeâ.7 There followed a steep rise in recruitment with 41,000 men in the army by March 1941 and a total of 180,000 in the twin auxiliary bodies the Local Security Force (LSF) and Local Defence Force (LDF) by October 1941.8 Domestic surveillance was assumed by the armyâs intelligence wing âG2â, which cooperated closely with the GardaĂ. An omnipresent slogan â âStep Together!â â encouraged both recruitment to the Defence Forces and a wider unifying national Ă©lan.9
While the security of the Irish state during the Emergency has produced racy narratives complete with Nazi espionage,10 the economic and social history of the period sits rather timidly beside it. Yet the priority of economic survival was just as pressing for the nascent state as its security. The rushed exercise of state centralisation impacted hardest in the economic realm. The trade disruption that war threatened prompted the government to form a unique new arm of state: the Department of Supplies (1939â1945). Minister for Industry and Commerce SeĂĄn Lemass was appointed Minister for Supplies in September 1939, empowered to control the prices and import and export of all commodities, dictating the methods of âtreatment, keeping, storage, movement, distribution, sale, purchase, use and consumptionâ of all goods.11 The stateâs meticulous censorship network kept Supplies informed of profiteering and the evasion of ministerial orders12 as this new department gradually assumed dominance over economic life.
Other government departments also undertook wide-ranging interventionist projects. The Department of Agriculture introduced an unprecedented degree of state control to Irelandâs agricultural sector, evicting unproductive farmers from their land. A huge effort to produce domestic fuel through turf took place under the Department of Local Government and Public Health and later the Department of Supplies. The Customs Service dealt with the increase in volume of items smuggled across Irelandâs frontiers. Meanwhile, the Department of Justice and the GardaĂ, assisted by the LSF and LDF and a cohort of Department of Supplies Inspectors, addressed the upsurge in crime and black marketing that accompanied the introduction of rationing in Ireland.
The narrative of absence
Despite this, the social and economic history of the Emergency is the subject of a largely deficient historiography which provides little indication of the manner in which Irish people survived the shortages wrought by war. Much responsibility for this rests with one of Irelandâs great historians: F.S.L. Lyons. In his majestic Ireland Since the Famine (1973), Lyons used Platoâs allegory of the cave to claim that Emergency Ireland was âalmost totally isolated from the rest of mankindâ.13 Ireland as âPlatoâs Caveâ was born: Lyonsâs lapidarian, sweeping analogy supplanting the short edited collection on the Emergency published by Kevin B. Nowlan and T. Desmond Williams in 1969.14 Lyonsâs synopsis of the Irish Emergency echoed accounts of neutrality elsewhere. British diplomat Clifford Norton, stationed in Berne during the conflict, compared the Swiss people to âpassengers on an air-conditioned ocean linerâ: they âcould see through the portholes the storm and stress of the weather or the heat of the tropicsâ but failed to appreciate âthe conditions which the captain and crew were facing and by which they were hardened and influencedâ.15 Lyonsâs invocation of the archetypal cave was a slicker articulation of the neutral condition. The analogy heavily influenced the historiography which followed it.
A noticeable historiographical tendency subsequently took shape in works about the Emergency written in the 1970s and 1980s. These works focused on the diplomatic construction of neutrality, exploring the realpolitik that underlay de Valeraâs diplomacy. Considerations of everyday life and the stateâs increased domestic presence were placed to one side as the release of state papers illuminated the neutrality debate. Even the best general survey of the Emergency (published a decade after Lyons) extended âPlatoâs Caveâ backwards to the 1920s and 1930s, describing independent Ireland as suffering a âpostcolonial blackoutâ.16 In this study, Robert Fiskâs excellent In Time of War (1983), the focus remained almost unfalteringly on political elites. In other publications from this period, any thoroughgoing analysis of Irish economy and society was conspicuous by its absence.17
Outside the minutiae of the neutrality debate, Irish society was described in rather puritanical, isolationist terms. Invariably, the widespread popular support for neutrality was presented as indicative of a mute âbottom-upâ consensus in Irish society. The first perceptible charge out of âPlatoâs Caveâ was signalled by Bernard Share who, in his The Emergency: Neutral Ireland, 1939â45 (1978), argued that Lyons had exaggerated the stagnation of Irish society.18 Yet in this study, as in other early histories of the period, the mass of the Irish people appeared in a narrative that was, as Clair Wills puts it, âall about absence â of conflict, of supplies, of social dynamism, of contact with the outside worldâ.19 If Share displayed recognition of the poverty of âthe narrative of absenceâ, he offered little by way of alternative analysis.
By the late 1980s, the historiography of the Emergency was starting to edge away from the marble halls of high political accounts towards âbottom-upâ considerations of life in Ireland. But these early revisions of âPlatoâs Caveâ tended to dilute the economic impulses driving government action and its impacts by trivialising the narrative of absence. During the Emergency, the widely quoted Myles na gCopaleen contributed some of his most biting satire in the column âCruiskeen Lawnâ in the Irish Times, but his references to the âplain people of Irelandâ sat too long as a waggish substitute for an analysis of social and economic conditions at the time. Leaning heavily on the golden age of Dublin journalism, much of Tony Grayâs The Lost Years (1988) substituted diplomatic history with semi-whimsical reminiscence.20 By the late 1980s, the narrative of absence had gained acceptance at the popular level, offering a survey of social life akin in its depiction of boredom to Patrick Kavanaghâs Maguire, subject of his 1942 poem The Great Hunger, whose only antidote to the tedium of rural life was to occasionally âsinâ over the warm ashes of the cottage fire. The Irish people of the Emergency, when mentioned at all, resembled the inhabitants of Platoâs Cave: metaphorically, they were placed closer to Maguireâs cottage fire than âthe fire of lifeâ.
Deprivation and periodisation: the exceptionality of the Emergency
Terence Brownâs Ireland: A Social and Cultural History (1985) briefly considers whether Irish people were conscious of the cultural stagnation portrayed in much literature of the period. Instead of advancing the more abstract judgments of cultural history, Brown finds âthe economic depredations of the war years all too evidentâ.21 Even for those like John Betjeman, who moved in elite literary circles, Dublin may have been gossipy fun, but it was also painfully âcold, no petrol...